From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 20 23:32:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA00042
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:32:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA18081;
	Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:25:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA29075 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:06:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA29070 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990621030507.IJDW1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:05:07 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: <mnhopkins@juno.com>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Regen Fix of '46.
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:05:35 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bebb92$eeebc240$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <19990620.200323.-657.1.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Michael Hopkins wrote:

>    Noise?  Sure, he says, so he puts a 15K in series with the wiper, "as
> insurance against a noisy potentiometer."  He claims a 0.1UF cap to
> ground across the 15K reisistor gives a time constant  "sufficient to
> iron out the small discontinuities of voltage encountered in noisy
> wirewound potentiometers."
>
>   So how about it? Did Goodman let slip a blooper secret back before he
> changed his call?

Secret? Builders were using big bypasses across the wipers of their regens
to kill wiper noise in the 1930s, if not earlier; check the ARRL handboo
This is why I don't grok the complaints about regen-pot noise; you put 0.22
to 1 uF from the wiper to ground in addition to the RF bypass. A series
resistor between both bypasses helps both. If you really want to gild the
lily nowadays, power the oscillator anode from an adjustable three-terminal
regulator.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 20 23:55:55 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA00065
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:55:54 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA19559;
	Sun, 20 Jun 1999 23:49:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA29566 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from peach.iaxs.net (root@peach.iaxs.net [209.134.128.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA29561 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from citrus.iaxs.net (bill@citrus.iaxs.net [209.134.136.217])
	by peach.iaxs.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA04445
	for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:39:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from bill@localhost)
	by citrus.iaxs.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA27431
	for Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:39:33 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 22:39:33 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bill Hawkins <bill@iaxs.net>
Message-Id: <199906210339.WAA27431@citrus.iaxs.net>
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Contact at WWV Fort Collins?
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Group,

Have a chance to visit Fort Collins on Tuesday afternoon the 22nd.
Would like a phone number to call to try and arrange a talk with
one of the engineers there, if that's possible. Tried the BA list
on Friday, no help.

Bill Hawkins   bill@iaxs.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 00:30:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00093
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:30:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA21563;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 00:23:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA29938 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA29933; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:14:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 21:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: John <johnmb@mindspring.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Viking Valiant II...
In-Reply-To: <199906202351.TAA29924@smtp5.mindspring.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990620211250.29922A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, John wrote:

> 
> Ken: Methinks you have a Viking II, not a Valiant II?

John:

You're right! Sorry. I didn't read the front panel carefully enough. No
VFO, so it is a Viking II.

Thanks, 

Ken W7EKB

> 
> 
> At 04:14 PM 6/20/99 -0700, you wrote:
> >1) I was just given one of these things. Appears complete but dirty, and I
> >don't yet have a manual. No VFO, although I have several VF-1s, one of
> >which should work with it.
> >
> >I don't yet know if I will be allowed to KEEP it, but, if weight is any
> >indication, it must be pretty good quality.
> >
> >Anyone happen to have any hints about this thing?

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 09:34:14 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA00476
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:34:13 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA16529;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA05135 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m14.boston.juno.com (m14.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.193]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA05128 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m14.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDMX4HHQ; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:09:17 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 07:35:27 -0500
Subject: GB> A Robert Mitchum Regen.
Message-ID: <19990621.080618.-70123.1.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,3-6,10-11,15-16,19-20,22-23,26-27,31-32,37-43
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

	
In  "Thunder Road," the Feds chase down Mitchum's fire breathing '49 Ford
business coupe and find a 200 gal tank in the back -- but no booze.  His
answer?

"I bought it for the 'mill."

   Is that us about regenerative receivers?  Does this fascination
reflect an infatuation with Armstrong's alchemy or do we simply seek a
blooper ride up the bumpy road to a yesterday when, we now belive, things
were simpler and in control?

  If it is just a nostalgic impulse, we might as well bid SW-3s on up to
$750 or $1K , as we will never get one built that satisfies us.  But if
we seek to rejoin the hands-on radio of the late '20s in the form of, at
least,  the Eisenhower Era, lets ask:

1.  Why do we even consider working an oscillator into the wire of the
aerial? If you want a one-tuber you should hide a 6dB FET in the plug-in
coil.

2.  Why must we try for same-tube local oscillators?  They are going to
pull, pals.

3.  Why deplete the collector's stashes of Brandes 'phones?  There are
lots of modern ways to off load an audio signal without even saying "op
amp."

  Incidentally, I see great hope that we are really  interested in
circuitry instead of Sophistry this time.  A Dave Newkirk post included
this line; "That's why I don't grock the complaints about regen-pot
noise..."

  The term 'grock" came to us from Robert Heinlein's "Stranger in a
Strange Land."  The work appeared in 1961 and is credited by many as the
beginning of the Hippy movement.  The reference puts us in the '60s, so
now let's review, "Stabilized Regenerative Detector," Smith, W. (W2BRQ),
CQ, Nov, 1964, p 80.


de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
"Better a Blooper than a store-bought 'super."

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 09:22:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA00413
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:22:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA14620;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA04996 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:03:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.inetport.com (inetport.com [204.96.100.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA04991 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (as01-45.inetport.com [204.181.88.125])
	by admin.inetport.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA24433;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:02:56 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199906211302.IAA24433@admin.inetport.com>
Reply-To: <talen@inetport.com>
From: "talen" <talen@inetport.com>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>, <hbr@qth.net>
Subject: GB> capacitor question
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 07:55:07 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

	
What is the reason some older tube designs call specifically for "Paper 
Tubular" caps, largely in low frequency areas ? I understand when to use 
Ceramic disk caps (some not too stable, excellent for RF coupling and 
bypass) or Mica (very stable,even more so for SM, very low loss, accurate,  
expensive) or Temperature compensating caps like N750s (to correct for 
the effects of temperature rise on other components) or Mylar (like the 
old paper caps but more stable and low loss). I would readily use the 
Mylars in place of Paper Tubulars but can't answer the question "why not
a Ceramic disk ?"

Also the paper caps used as bypass caps are all connected outside foil 
(stripe) to ground so the outside is at a lower potential (safety ?) and 
maybe for the shielding effect ?? 

73s  Kees K5BCQ

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 10:00:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA00539
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:00:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA20230;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:53:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA05549 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp5.jps.net (smtp5.jps.net [209.63.224.55]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA05544 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compaq (209-239-210-152.oak.jps.net [209.239.210.152])
	by smtp5.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA24499;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <005601bebbec$8882c4e0$98d2efd1@compaq>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: <talen@inetport.com>, <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>, <hbr@qth.net>
Subject: Re: GB> capacitor question
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:46:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I think they didn't call for ceramic discs simply because they weren't
available at the time.  Disc caps were a post-WW2 development (anybody have
a more precise time frame?), and before them the paper tubular cap was the
only style (or at least the cheapest) that could provide the capacitance and
voltage range in question (e.g. .01 at 400 V).

>What is the reason some older tube designs call specifically for "Paper
>Tubular" caps, largely in low frequency areas ? I understand when to use
>Ceramic disk caps (some not too stable, excellent for RF coupling and
>bypass) or Mica (very stable,even more so for SM, very low loss, accurate,
>expensive) or Temperature compensating caps like N750s (to correct for
>the effects of temperature rise on other components) or Mylar (like the
>old paper caps but more stable and low loss). I would readily use the
>Mylars in place of Paper Tubulars but can't answer the question "why not
>a Ceramic disk ?"

It was for the shielding effect.  The grid side of the cap is usually at a
higher impedance than the input side, and more prone to hum pickup, so
placing the outer foil side on the input (or ground) side of the circuit
provided a shield for the inch or so of metal (the inner foil) that would
otherwise have picked up hum.
>
>Also the paper caps used as bypass caps are all connected outside foil
>(stripe) to ground so the outside is at a lower potential (safety ?) and
>maybe for the shielding effect ??
>
>73s  Kees K5BCQ


73,
Mike, KK6GM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 10:15:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA00608
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:15:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22240;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:08:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA05776 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from orford.valley.net (orford.valley.net [198.115.160.32]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA05770 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyme.VALLEY.NET (lyme.valley.net [198.115.160.11])
          by orford.valley.net (2.5 Build 2639 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id JAA06029; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:58:06 -0400
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:58:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199906211358.JAA06029@orford.valley.net>
Received: by lyme.VALLEY.NET (blitz.valley.net) via SMTP from plainfield-175.valley.net  id <8675883> 21 Jun 99 10:01:13 EDT
X-Sender: Brad_Thompson@pop.valley.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: talen@inetport.com
From: Brad Thompson <Brad.Thompson@valley.net>
Subject: Re: GB> capacitor question
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, hbr@qth.net
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

At 07:55 AM 6/21/99 -0500, you wrote:
>	
>What is the reason some older tube designs call specifically for "Paper 
>Tubular" caps, largely in low frequency areas ?... I would readily use the 
>Mylars in place of Paper Tubulars but can't answer the question "why not
>a Ceramic disk ?"
>
>Also the paper caps used as bypass caps are all connected outside foil 
>(stripe) to ground so the outside is at a lower potential (safety ?) and 
>maybe for the shielding effect ?? 

Hello--

IIRC, the dielectric material needed to construct high-capacity (and
relatively high-working-voltage) ceramic capacitors didn't get perfected
until World War II.

High-capacity disk caps typically use a "high k" (or high-valued
dielectric constant) ceramic that's temperature-UNstable. For example,
the common Z5U temperature characteristic peaks at approx +25 C
and is +20 to -50 percent over temperature (+10C to +85 C).

If you plot capacitance versus temperature, the curve looks somewhat
parabolic, with a peak around +25 C and capacitance falling off on either
side. Initial capacitance tolerance is +80 to -20 percent of nominal value.

The X7R characteristic is more stable in both capacitance and temperature
coefficient, but you may not find the voltage rating you need.

So, if you want to use an older-vintage disk ceramic as a bypass cap,
make sure that it stil provides enough capacitance at temperature extremes.
Assume that any older, 600-V disk ceramic cap of
value over approx. 1000 pf is of high-K construction and use accordingly.

One other item: the high-K ceramics can act as acoustic transducers
and will emit a ticking noise if subjected to high pulsed currents.

Virtues? Well, these  disk caps didn't cost much and do offer lower series
inductance than most old-style wound paper caps.

Re: outside foil-- when grounded, it acts as a shield.

73,
Brad  AA1IP

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 10:47:23 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA00668
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:47:23 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26726;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 10:40:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA06154 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 07:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.inetport.com (inetport.com [204.96.100.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA06149 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 07:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (as02-31.inetport.com [204.181.88.159])
	by admin.inetport.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29715;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:27:17 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199906211427.JAA29715@admin.inetport.com>
Reply-To: <talen@inetport.com>
From: "talen" <talen@inetport.com>
To: <mjsilva@jps.net>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>, <hbr@qth.net>
Subject: Fw: GB> capacitor question
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:19:29 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Thanks for the info Mike. This circuit (Ted Crosby's HBR-11 receiver) is from 
the early 60s and specifies Ceramic caps everywhere and Mica caps where
needed  *except*  the Product Detector screen bypass, both audio coupling 
caps, audio cathode bypass, and AGC circuit caps where it specifically calls 
for "Paper Tubulars". The ones that are grounded are probably, as you point
out, for shielding...but what's the story on the Paper Tubular coupling caps ?

73s  Kees K5BCQ


----------
From: Mike Silva <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: talen@inetport.com; glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; 	
Subject: Re: GB> capacitor question
Date: Monday, June 21, 1999 8:46 AM

I think they didn't call for ceramic discs simply because they weren't
available at the time.  Disc caps were a post-WW2 development (anybody have
a more precise time frame?), and before them the paper tubular cap was the
only style (or at least the cheapest) that could provide the capacitance and
voltage range in question (e.g. .01 at 400 V).

>What is the reason some older tube designs call specifically for "Paper
>Tubular" caps, largely in low frequency areas ? I understand when to use
>Ceramic disk caps (some not too stable, excellent for RF coupling and
>bypass) or Mica (very stable,even more so for SM, very low loss, accurate,
>expensive) or Temperature compensating caps like N750s (to correct for
>the effects of temperature rise on other components) or Mylar (like the
>old paper caps but more stable and low loss). I would readily use the
>Mylars in place of Paper Tubulars but can't answer the question "why not
>a Ceramic disk ?"

It was for the shielding effect.  The grid side of the cap is usually at a
higher impedance than the input side, and more prone to hum pickup, so
placing the outer foil side on the input (or ground) side of the circuit
provided a shield for the inch or so of metal (the inner foil) that would
otherwise have picked up hum.
>
>Also the paper caps used as bypass caps are all connected outside foil
>(stripe) to ground so the outside is at a lower potential (safety ?) and
>maybe for the shielding effect ??
>
>73s  Kees K5BCQ


73,
Mike, KK6GM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 11:45:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA00784
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:45:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02736;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:38:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA06798 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA06793 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28082;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:23:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906211523.LAA28082@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: BC-186 (Was: Re: GB> what did I actually buy?
In-Reply-To: <199906201824.OAA00876@saltmine.radix.net> from Gary Chatters at "Jun 20, 99 02:24:55 pm"
To: gc@Radix.Net (Gary Chatters)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:23:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> >If you run into another BC-186, keep me in mind.   I'd be glad to have 
> >one of those things, which I have not seen in ?? years.   Don't even 
> >recall the operational characteristics, but it'd be nice to have and 
> >operate as a piece of "working memorabilia."
> 
> If anyone on this list is interested in looking at a couple of
> pictures of the BC-186 there is one up on eBay.  It is item 120083933.
> 
> Seller says it covers 2400 - 3700kc.  There is a regeneration control
> on the front which gives an idea of the circuit.  There is also
> what looks like an "ANT." on-off switch.  Any idea what that is for?

The BC-186 is a very hot regen receiver.  It uses 4 tubes, an RF stage,
a detector, and two audio stages.  I don't offhand remember the tubes
but something like a pair of 34's and a pair of 30's rings a bell.

My OM had the fortune to be in on the testing of that ``mule radio set''
back in 1932 at the Signal School, Ft. Monmonuth.   He had fond memories
of it, and thought it was not too bad.  The companion TX uses a 40something
oscillator and an unobtainum 865 tube.  It is not that bad as a TX.
You can sub an 801 for the 865, by switching one wire on the tube base.

I had the fortune to own one of these sets and use it on FD back in 1982.
It was not very competitve on 80M CW, and sitting on the ground crouched
on a set of 15 inch wooden legs was not conducive to speedy operating.
A 15 foot whip antenna on  80, was not conducive either.   But, it was
fun to knock off a few QSO's, OT style.  Not in the middle of FD, it
was a fun set to run.

If only the receiver is available (it had a companion battery box the
same size as the receiver), you will have a dickens of a time trying
to find a proper plug for it......

Neat RX though, and very neat OT Mule Radio Set, combined with its TX,
hand crank generator, wooden mule pack,..... and several grunts.....

ZUT DE NA4G/Bob UP

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 11:50:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA00810
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:50:51 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03563;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:44:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA06829 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA06824 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28096;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:26:02 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906211526.LAA28096@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> what did I actually buy?  MIssing several things
In-Reply-To: <5144c698.249da815@aol.com> from "CTrautfiel@aol.com" at "Jun 19, 99 10:12:37 pm"
To: CTrautfiel@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:26:01 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Hi Folks
> 
> I just purchased two pieces of  WWII military gear at a very reasonable 
> price. I have never purchased this kind of equiptment before as it never 
> occurred to me to seek out this gear. I sort of stumbled onto it. So with no 
> real knowledge of what I was getting I bought the stuff. 
> 
> So here it is 
> 
> 	BC-188A modulator
> 	BC-186 receiver cover up to 3.700 mhz

The RX is missing its battery box, unless you are a lucky feller.

The modulator was used to drive the mopa TX for audio.  It is mostly
useless, without its TX, but keep it together for someone else, maybe.

> Have I bought something that is completely unworkable? Were these two devices 
> intended to work together? OR would they both have to say BC-188 or BC-186?

Nope... neat little mule radio pack set  (designed to fit on a mule pack
harness in two wooden cases).

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 11:52:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA00818
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:52:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA03756;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:45:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA06897 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA06886 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 08:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28109;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:29:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906211529.LAA28109@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> KH6O's 500 kHz shore station
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906191503210.6549-100000@uhunix4> from "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" at "Jun 19, 99 03:20:19 pm"
To: jeffreyh@hawaii.edu (Jeffrey Herman, KH6O)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boatanchors@listserv.tempe.gov, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu,
        ham-radio-history@egroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> use by some broadcast station, then I'll request KHK, a former Hawaii
> shore station which went QRT some 22 years ago: Kahuku Radio.

Kahuku was a famous station back all the way to the early days.
See Elmer Bucher's Practical Wireless Telegraphy, for a complete
description of the station, and it setup...... back about WWI,
when it used to run the circuit between Fusanabe(?), Japan and
San Francisco or San Diego.  The antenna was several miles long.
Biggie station, then.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 13:18:00 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA00931
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:17:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14809;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA07948 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA07941; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: Gary Chatters <gc@Radix.Net>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: BC-186 ... and 865.
In-Reply-To: <199906211523.LAA28082@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990621094815.7878C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> of it, and thought it was not too bad.  The companion TX uses a 40something
> oscillator and an unobtainum 865 tube.  It is not that bad as a TX.
> You can sub an 801 for the 865, by switching one wire on the tube base.

865s are no longer un-obtanium: I bought one from AES for $18 for my 1929
QSO Party rig.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 13:17:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA00926
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:17:46 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14676;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:10:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA07973 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA07963; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Roy Morgan <roy.morgan@nist.gov>
cc: John <johnmb@mindspring.com>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Viking Valiant II...
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990621121034.00a40ac0@sdct-sunsrv1.ncsl.nist.gov>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990621094957.7878D-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> >You're right! Sorry. I didn't read the front panel carefully enough. No
> >VFO, so it is a Viking II. 
> 
> The Viking I had a single final tube (type 4C32 or some such..)
> 
> The Viking II  had two 6146's.  Some I's were modified with the 6146's
> which if done well was a good idea.  
> 
> I have a modified Viking II..  It is for sale.

What mods? Better audio? THAT I would be interested in. First, though, I
have to get a manual. Either Hi-Manuals or W7FG, I guess. What was the
difference between the Viking II and the Viking II CDC?

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 13:18:27 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA00941
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:18:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14863;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 13:11:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA07984 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA07975 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA13729;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:51:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA19266;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:53:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 11:53:03 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: talen <talen@inetport.com>
cc: mjsilva@jps.net, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, hbr@qth.net
Subject: Re: Fw: GB> capacitor question
In-Reply-To: <199906211427.JAA29715@admin.inetport.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906211148080.15539-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   The "trick dielectric" ceramic-disc condensers also exhibit changes in
capacitance with applied DC across 'em, AC current through 'em, and so on
and so forth.  In some audio applications, they can introduce distortion;
and in a filter, they're quite unpredictable.  The smaller size (than a
tubular paper condenser) can also complicate layout, especially in a
homebrew project that's a bit "fiddly" about what wires run where.  Any of
those considerations could have led to the parts-spec for the HBR
receiver.  Subbing good tubular mylars will dodge most of 'em, and a
little thought applied to the schematic & pix will get you around the
rest.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 21 23:40:11 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA01569
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:40:11 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14662;
	Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:33:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA13893 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from enterprise.powerup.com.au (qmailr@enterprise.powerup.com.au [203.32.8.37]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA13888 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 20:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14730 invoked from network); 22 Jun 1999 03:14:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mkelly) (202.139.237.230)
  by enterprise.powerup.com.au with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 03:14:25 -0000
Message-ID: <376EF64B.1579@powerup.com.au>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:34:51 +1000
From: Murray Kelly <mkelly@powerup.com.au>
Reply-To: mkelly@powerup.com.au
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Hawkins <bill@iaxs.net>
CC: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Contact at WWV Fort Collins?
References: <199906210339.WAA27431@citrus.iaxs.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I was staying in Ft Collins 2 years ago and went to see the
station - all I could find was a huge paddock with some nice
towers.

I understand the actual studio is elsewhere (?Boulder?).


Bill Hawkins wrote:
> 
> Group,
> 
> Have a chance to visit Fort Collins on Tuesday afternoon the 22nd.
> Would like a phone number to call to try and arrange a talk with
> one of the engineers there, if that's possible. Tried the BA list
> on Friday, no help.
> 
> Bill Hawkins   bill@iaxs.net

-- 
******************************************************************
*        Murray Kelly vk4aok      mkelly@powerup.com.au          *
*      29 Molonga Ter. / Graceville/ QLD. 4075/ Australia        *
*                   ph/fax Intl+ 61 7 3379 3307                  *
******************************************************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 12:20:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02421
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:20:03 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA08059;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA20585 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 08:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA20579 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 08:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA01762;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:41:15 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906221541.LAA01762@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
In-Reply-To: <199906212121.JAA27875@smtp1.ihug.co.nz> from barry kirkwood at "Jun 22, 99 09:21:37 am"
To: bjk@ihug.co.nz (barry kirkwood)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:41:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Hello Bob, again.
> I am new to the web. Can you advise how to work eBay, or how to get info to
> work it?
> thanks
> Baz>
> end
> Barry (Baz) Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD ex ZL1BN, ZL4OK etc
> Signal Hill
> 66 Cory Road
> Palm Beach
> Waiheke Island 1240
> NEW ZEALAND
> Ph/Fax 64-9-372-5161

Can someone bounce Barry, or the list how to use EBAY?  I never have,
and probably never will, but others might be interested in howto.
(I hate auctions.  Much better to deal one on one, IMHO, settin' back
on da' veranda, or nose to the piece in the shop.  I never have enuf
spare guildern for auctions.....(:+\\.....).

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 12:28:34 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02432
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:28:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09755;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:21:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA20869 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA20864 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990621165941.12416B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Have been working for the past two weeks on getting gear ready for FD next
weekend.

I am adjusting the screen resistor in the 2E26 output stage of my
AN/GRC-109 so that it will provide me with 5 watts output, and connecting
a VFO made out of a 3 - 4 mHz Command transmitter.

Lessee now: a 6AG7 VFO, driving the 6AC7 crystal osc stage, driving the
2E26 output stage. With all the filaments, this will be a new low in
efficiency.  And all this, plus the receiver, being powered by a GN-58
driven by a modified exercise bicycle instead of hand-cranks. Should be
interesting. I certainly hope we make more than two contacts! :-)

W7UFQ, Sam Scripter, will provide the motive power. He is a bicycle nut,
in addition to being an avid ham and a bagpipe player. He wants to see how
long he can pedal (!)

I managed to procure (neat word, "procure") all the necessary parts for
the Cycle-Gen Mark 58-1 from various places like the city dump, a bike
repair company with a trailer full of parts, etc.

So far, total cash outlay for the cycle conversion, including the Sears
Ergonomic Exercycle with its 40 lb flywheel, has been $0.00.

Heck, one of the bikes I picked up at the city dump, an old Raleigh road
bike, was in such good shape, that instead of cutting it up, I hauled it
down to the local bike repair depot to be tuned up for my wife.

We've got the tent, and two extension ladders for antenna supports, about
a dozen heavy-duty 12 volt marine lead-acid storage batteries in case the
power-source poops out (Hee hee!), and enough other gear to choke a horse.

Now all we need is to get organized by next weekend.

Ken W7EKB


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 12:38:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02449
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:38:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10514;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:31:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA21154 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA21139; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: barry kirkwood <bjk@ihug.co.nz>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
In-Reply-To: <199906221541.LAA01762@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990622091116.12416D-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Can someone bounce Barry, or the list how to use EBAY?  I never have,
> and probably never will, but others might be interested in howto.
> (I hate auctions.  Much better to deal one on one, IMHO, settin' back
> on da' veranda, or nose to the piece in the shop.  I never have enuf
> spare guildern for auctions.....(:+\\.....).

Barry:

The best way to learn about eBay, is to go to their web site and download
the New User info. It will tell you everything you need to know to get
started.

Fine tuning can be learned by observation.

Also, be advised that all else being equal, eBay's prices on ham gear are
18% above average market value and WAY above hamfest prices.

It is a nice place to SELL ham gear if you are looking for that, but if
you are BUYING from eBay, you will very rarely find a bargain in equipment 
there.

Components are a different matter, and I have had pretty good luck
on tubes of certain types: i.e. 6CL6s, 12BY7s, 5763s, etc., at times.

Good luck.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 12:48:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02464
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:48:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12204;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:41:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA21423 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net (sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net [206.81.192.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA21416 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19699 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 1999 16:27:52 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 19671 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 1999 16:27:52 -0000
Received: from ndsl43.sttl.uswest.net (HELO dslserver) (216.160.64.43)
  by sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 16:27:52 -0000
Message-ID: <001901bebccc$080d6b40$2b40a0d8@sttl.uswest.net>
Reply-To: "Dave" <zommbee@ix.netcom.com>
From: "Dave" <zommbee@ix.netcom.com>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990622091116.12416D-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> How to Ebay
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:26:49 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hello all,

Best way to learn about Ebay and at the same time reduce
the discussion time here on the topic is simply to go to:

http://www.ebay.com

And 'read all about it'.  It's very clear how it all works from 
their site, and quite easy to get set up.

Hope this helps.

Dave WB7AWK
http://www.boatanchors.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 13:54:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA02589
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:54:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20857;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:47:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA22231 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA22226 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA13493;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:28:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA16153;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:29:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:29:54 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: barry kirkwood <bjk@ihug.co.nz>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
In-Reply-To: <199906221541.LAA01762@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906221224240.14634-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Anent eBay, you go through a simple sign-up procedure which their
web-pages will lead you through, and get a supersecret id which you then
enter when bidding on things.  It is very straightforward once you've
found the "front page" for eBay.  (Can't remember the URL but *any* search
engine should get you there, just hunt for "ebay.")
   Once the deal is closed, you get together via e-mail with the seller or
buyer and work out payment & shipping--eBay isn't involved in that part of
it as near as I can tell.  Darned if I know how they make any money off
the transactions!

   ...I never have actually managed to buy anything there; the bidding is
always too rich for my blood and you can just imagine how poorly my chatty
little e-mails go over with the sellers....

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 15:08:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA02744
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:08:08 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00491;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:01:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA23360 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f307.hotmail.com [207.82.251.220]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA23354 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 63376 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 1999 18:38:12 -0000
Message-ID: <19990622183812.63375.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 207.214.219.43 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:38:11 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [207.214.219.43]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> A 2BP1 Scope Unit
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:38:11 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I just received a nice mil surplus 2BP1 scope unit which was very kindly 
provided by Neil at Almost All Digital Electronics (I guess this was part of 
the non-digital electronics section :-). This unit appears to be constructed 
of black anodized aluminum with shield, 5 adjustment pots, a 12AX7 tube and 
a 1Z2 rectifier. It seems to be meant to screw down onto some other piece of 
gear (has two thumb screws in front and one in back and has wierd "keyway" 
knobs that probably mesh with some panel intended for the front). There is a 
single odd junction plug on the bottom of the unit through which all inputs 
lead. The unit bears the following identification on the front:

Monitor
F16-M-46251-1019

Does anyone know the origin or intended use of this unit?

I worked through the circuit details by hand. Only one section of the triode 
is used and appears to serve as an amplifier for the vertical plates. The 
horizontal plates seem to have no means to apply a sweep unless this is 
somehow provided also by the hi voltage supply (one side is connected 
through a 20 M resistance to the filament/cathode of the rectifier). The 
adjustment pots seem to include the usual vert and horiz and focus and 
brightness plus a fifth which seems to be an attenuator for the input to the 
vert plates.

Any info on this would be helpful.

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 15:20:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA02762
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:20:16 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA02308;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA23647 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA23641 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02032;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:56:57 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906221856.OAA02032@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> FD...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990621165941.12416B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu> from Ken Gordon at "Jun 22, 99 09:06:59 am"
To: keng@uidaho.edu (Ken Gordon)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Lessee now: a 6AG7 VFO, driving the 6AC7 crystal osc stage, driving the
> 2E26 output stage. With all the filaments, this will be a new low in
> efficiency.  And all this, plus the receiver, being powered by a GN-58
> driven by a modified exercise bicycle instead of hand-cranks. Should be
> interesting. I certainly hope we make more than two contacts! :-)

I Luv it.... pur sang efficiency!  That would be 10 kilowattes in and
5 watteys out....  GB for sure!

> W7UFQ, Sam Scripter, will provide the motive power. He is a bicycle nut,
> in addition to being an avid ham and a bagpipe player. He wants to see how
> long he can pedal (!)

Feed him well, feed him well, feed him well, or keep BIG batteries
bye the bye......

.....

> We've got the tent, and two extension ladders for antenna supports, about
> a dozen heavy-duty 12 volt marine lead-acid storage batteries in case the
> power-source poops out (Hee hee!), and enough other gear to choke a horse.

Think MULE,  MULE,  MULE,  GRUNTS,  GRUNTS, GRUNTS..... you need at least
a squad worth of shavenheaded grunts..... half a dozen mules....

We modern folks with our batteries and grills and ice chests will have
it easy.....

> Now all we need is to get organized by next weekend.

Nah, it will never happen.... I guarantee...

(Lessee, where did I put that antenna bag?....(:+{{.....Oh, oh.....)

> Ken W7EKB

Sounds Great, Ken....   I will have Grandma Hartley and Twinnie Triode
in tow, although odds are slim we would make much of a transcon.
I will be running the electric dynamoteur, plus a 12V battery.
Alas, it will only be up Friday night (the funzies Olden Pfartes evening).
The big guns will be out for the actual FD fracas.

Hope to QSO some of you fine GB FD rats, as long as the thunderboomers
stay away from the ethereal adornments.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 15:48:55 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA02815
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:48:55 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07774;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA24056 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mrelay.bellglobal.com (mrelay.bellglobal.com [198.235.216.100]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA24049 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns by mrelay.bellglobal.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #26722)
 with SMTP id <0FDQ0009KTMT4E@mrelay.bellglobal.com> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:18:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:17:06 -0400
From: Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca (Bill Henderson)
Subject: Re: GB> Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
To: rbarmore@indy.net
Cc: na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu, bjk@ihug.co.nz,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <msg276539.thr-a9fcb301.77359403@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
Organization: Ottawa Carleton District School Board
Content-id: <msg276539.thr-a9fcb301.77359403.part0@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-Gateway: NASTA Gate 2.0 for FirstClass(R)
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906221224240.14634-100000@indy2>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

e-bay gets a sum from the seller of the goods... usually about $10.00,
I think. I've never sold anything through them, but I too was curious
as to how they made any money and read "the fine print". I believe
sellers set up an account, usually with a credit card number so your
card gets billed once a month with any fees you've accumulated from
recorded sales. That's one of the reasons many sellers specify a
reserve bid (covers their expenses) . If the reserve is not met, the
seller can decline the sale and I think they are then "off the hook"
for fees related to that sale. 
So... how do you know how much a certain item usually brings (whether
you are selling or buying)?
Just do a search for sales of similar items in the past. Again... as
others have said (posted)... checkout e-bay's Info pages (ALL of them)
.  - Bill H.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 16:48:49 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA02913
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:48:49 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA14610;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:41:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA24748 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:15:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA24743; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 13:15:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> A 2BP1 Scope Unit
In-Reply-To: <19990622183812.63375.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990622131313.24665B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> I just received a nice mil surplus 2BP1 scope unit which was very kindly 
> provided by Neil at Almost All Digital Electronics (I guess this was part of 
> the non-digital electronics section :-). This unit appears to be constructed 

I don't know about your scope, but I sure DO know about Neil!

He is a REALLY super person, and possibly one of the nicest people I have
ever had dealings with.

He sent me, FREE, the necessary parts to fix my HP 8640B. I needed two
gears, and he sent me, at his cost, the whole oscillator assembly.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 18:07:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA03109
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:07:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23781;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:00:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA25588 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA25583 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 14:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373676(1)>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:41:16 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135673(7)>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:40:41 -1000
Date: 	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 11:40:36 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: boatanchors@listserv.tempe.gov, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu,
        ham-radio-history@egroups.com
Subject: Re: GB> KH6O's 500 kHz shore station
In-Reply-To: <199906211529.LAA28109@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906221129180.2045-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Thank-you to everyone for your supporting emails regarding my little
500 kc shore station proposal.

I just did a search of the FCC's database, and here are the only US sta-
tions still maintaining a 500 kc maritime CW watch (power output in kW):

KFS CA (40)
KLB WA (5)
KLC TX (40)
KPH CA (20)
WCC MD (20)
WLO AL (40)
WNU LA (17.6)
WPD FL (2.7)
WSC NJ (1)

Applications pending: AL (40)
                      NJ (1)

The pending apps show owner as Mobile Marine Radio, Inc. (owner of KLB,
WLO, AND WSC). It's interesting to see that applications are still being
submitted to the FCC for newly proposed 500 kc stations!

73, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 18:49:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA03133
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:49:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA27362;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:42:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA26065 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m14.boston.juno.com (m14.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.193]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA26060 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m14.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDRH5HD4; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:22:07 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:19:03 -0500
Subject: GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Message-ID: <19990622.171906.-3186535.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,5-6,11-12,15-16,29-30,34-39
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Old Timers did not speak of a "VFO."  When they quit crystal they went to
an "ECO" or "Electron Coupled Oscillator."  By happenstance they did not
call it a "Lamb," or a "Dow," but these funnly looking oscillators became
known as Tri-Tets when they used a crystal instead of a variable cap
across the grid and cathode.

  It's a Triode oscillator with a Tetrode amp in the same tube.  It was
valuable because it could operate on a multiple of the crystal and just
about any old crystal would work with the dose of current these things
delivered  Some authorities would tell the builder to  put a panel lamp
in series with the crystal and tune for minimum light, not maximum smoke.

  It all began with the Navy and a fellow named Lt.  J.B. Dow who wrote
in the Feb., 1926 QST.  Jim Lamb of QST saw the circuit as a low Mu
triode coupled by its grid to a high Mu screen-grid amp -- a Tri-Tet.

  Such circuits are out of favor now, but you can build one iwth an 807. 
Put a 400 Ohm, 2W resistor in the cathode and bypass it with a 0.01 cap
to a grounded, parallel tuned circuit.  Put a 7 mc FT-243 crystal across
an RFC and from the grid to the top of the 400 Ohm resistor.  If it is a
7 mc crystal, tune the cathode circuit to about 10 mc -- the rule of
thumb in 1.5X the crystal frequency.  In the plate circuit make another
parallel tuned circuit at twice the frequency of the crystal.  Key an 807
in the screen grid from the junction of a  5K 20W and a 10K 20W to
ground.  Feed the plate and the voltage divider with 350 VDC, put a
parasitic supressoor in the plate lead close to the 807 cap, and bypass
the screen with a .005 cap.  Don' risk a favored HC-6.  Stick to the
rugged old FT-243 crystals even if you lower the voltage and use an ugly
old 6V6.

  This material is from "The Variable Frequency Oscillator," Orr, W.
(W6SAI), Ham Radio Horizons Magazine, May, 1977, p 26 - 31.  A dollar and
an SASE will bring a copy to the address in the end sig, but Tri-Tets are
covered in most old handbooks. 

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
"One man's chirp is another man's music."

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 19:02:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA03145
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:02:32 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA27837;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 18:55:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA26259 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp.amotusa.com ([206.169.137.4]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA26254 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM davidb-200.amotusa.com BY smtp.amotusa.com ; Tue Jun 22 15:38:33 1999
Message-ID: <018501bebcff$ecbc5340$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: <mnhopkins@juno.com>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:38:18 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


>  It's a Triode oscillator with a Tetrode amp in the same tube...

Well slap me silly -- so *that's* what tri-tet means!  I never knew!  Thanks
for the posting, Michael.

73,
Mike, KK6GM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 22 21:41:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA03229
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:41:18 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04430;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 21:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA27290 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA27285 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990623001224.DHUF1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Tue, 22 Jun 1999 17:12:24 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: <mnhopkins@juno.com>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 20:12:53 -0400
Message-ID: <000301bebd0d$231bc6c0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
In-Reply-To: <19990622.171906.-3186535.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Michael Hopkins wrote:

>   It all began with the Navy and a fellow named Lt.  J.B. Dow who wrote
> in the Feb., 1926 QST.  Jim Lamb of QST saw the circuit as a low Mu
> triode coupled by its grid to a high Mu screen-grid amp -- a Tri-Tet.

That's how official culture puts it. But I can't cleanly credit Lamb with
the invention of the crystal triode-tetrode after having seen William P.
Durkin, W2DHM, "Combined Oscillator and Doubler," for the Experimenter, QST,
Dec 1932, p 40, which suggests the use of a 46 or 47 used as an osc, with an
"80-m" tank keeping the screen (or "outer grid" in the 46) above RF ground,
and a "40-m" tank tuning the plate. This is essentially the Tri-Tet with
tank repositioned--about a half year before Lamb's publication of his
version in James J. Lamb, "A More Stable Crystal Oscillator of High Harmonic
Output," QST, June 1933, pages 30-32. [introduces the word tritet, no
hyphen; later ARRL usage put the hyphen in]. In all, I find it hard to
excuse Lamb's failure to footnote Durkin in June 1933.  (BTW, the Durkin
piece is notable for another reason: The rare usage of the 46 "dual grid"
tube, which was intended for use only as a low-mu triode [plate and outer
grid tied together] or high-mu triode [grids tied together.])

>   Such circuits are out of favor now, but you can build one iwth an 807.
> Put a 400 Ohm, 2W resistor in the cathode and bypass it with a 0.01 cap
> to a grounded, parallel tuned circuit.  Put a 7 mc FT-243 crystal across
> an RFC and from the grid to the top of the 400 Ohm resistor.  If it is a
> 7 mc crystal, tune the cathode circuit to about 10 mc -- the rule of
> thumb in 1.5X the crystal frequency.  In the plate circuit make another
> parallel tuned circuit at twice the frequency of the crystal.  Key an 807
> in the screen grid from the junction of a  5K 20W and a 10K 20W to
> ground.  Feed the plate and the voltage divider with 350 VDC, put a
> parasitic supressoor in the plate lead close to the 807 cap, and bypass
> the screen with a .005 cap.  Don' risk a favored HC-6.  Stick to the
> rugged old FT-243 crystals even if you lower the voltage and use an ugly
> old 6V6.

I dis-recommend using in the tri-tet hookup any tube with its suppressor
grid or beam-forming plates internally connected to its cathode (as is so in
most audio pentodes and beam tubes, including the 6F6, 6V6, and 6L6, and in
many RF tubes, such as 807. The presence of the cathode-connected suppressor
or beam plates adds direct capacitive coupling between the tube's plate and
cathode, which in a tri-tet is above RF ground, and therefore compromises
the isolation between the oscillator and amplifier portions of the tube;
this can lead to increased crystal current and greater than necessary
sensitivity of the oscillation frequency to the tuning of the plate. Even
Lamb failed to note the effect of the beam-forming plates in his wonderful
overview, James J. Lamb, "A Practical Survey of Pentode and Beam Tube
Crystal Oscillators for Fundamental and Second Harmonic Output," QST, April
1937, pages 31-38, 106, 108.

Another strike against the use of beam tubes as triode-tetrode oscillators
(LC or crystal) is that the electron shielding of the screen by the grid (in
a beam tube, they're aligned so the screen is in the electron shadow of the
grid as far as the cathode is concerned) tends to make the screen less
capable of drawing sufficient current in its job as oscillator anode. As
it's put concerning the modified Pierce oscillator in the 11th edition of
the Radio Handbook (p. 95), "A pentode tube with very high transconductance
and a screen configuration which permits a fair amount of screen current
will give optimum operation on harmonics. The screen acts as the anode of a
triode oscillator . . . and some of the 'beam' tetrodes draw too little
screen current to do the job." Video amp pentodes of the 6AC7, 6AG7, 6CL6,
6AH6, 12BY7 and similar class make fine tubes for any oscillator
configuration in which the oscillator consists of the triode formed by the
screen, grid and cathode, including the tri-tet. BTW, The first 6AG7 tri-tet
I've seen in print is in Byron Goodman, W1JPE, and Hal Bubb, W1JTD, "A
56-Mc. Transmitter for Mobile Work," QST, November 1941, pp. 50-52.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 02:08:26 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA03409
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:08:26 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA26508;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA29772 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.36]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA29767 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.238.58]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990623053606.QUCS8212@SandyBlaize>;
          Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:36:06 +0000
Message-ID: <003401bebd39$f99aa640$3aee490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        <mnhopkins@juno.com>
Subject: Re: GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:27:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

    Ah!  The "tri-tet"!  First one I remember was the one on wood
slats from an old apple crate with the candy striped , wax coated
"bell wire" we used to buy small rolls of in the
hardware store for 25 cents as kids.  One had to get seven round
"sucker sticks"
or scrounge some from whoever made candied apples so that you
could wind the tank coils.  Lacking this, seven nails would do
with the heads cut off afterwards and filed
smooth.  Think it was in the 1949 ARRL Handbook.
    The "Tri-tet" was hell on crystals though!  The oscillator
would work great with a 6F6
but when you tried for more power with a 6L6, and mistuned it at
the wrong time, it
loved to fracture crystals!
    Afetr busting three precious FT-243 crystals for 3700 and
3735, I went to the
1936 Jones 6A6 push-pull oscillator and didn't have any trouble
with crystals
again.  Made my first out-of-town QSO back in '51 with the Jones
oscillator!
Big DX: New Orleans to Baton Rouge, LA!
73,
Sandy W5TVW (ex-WN5TVW then)

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 02:08:22 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA03404
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:08:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA26036;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:01:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA29940 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from usagi.cts.com (usagi.cts.com [209.68.192.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA29934 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from king.cts.com (root@king.cts.com [198.68.168.21])
	by usagi.cts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12179;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sd.cts.com (root@sd.cts.com [192.188.72.28])
	by king.cts.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA14669;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sd.cts.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #5)
	id m10wfsB-00008CC; Tue, 22 Jun 99 22:46 PDT
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Kolb <jlkolb@cts.com>
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
cc: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        barry kirkwood <bjk@ihug.co.nz>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906221224240.14634-100000@indy2>
Message-ID: <Pine.SCO.4.05.9906222243360.4557-100000@sd.cts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Roberta J. Barmore wrote:

>    ...I never have actually managed to buy anything there; the bidding is
> always too rich for my blood and you can just imagine how poorly my chatty
> little e-mails go over with the sellers....

No, but it's fun to go look at the prices sometimes :)

Although the two Mechanical filter plug-in adapters I've
sold on the radio e-lists or newsgroups, I got more for
than the same items went for on eBay - Do I owe someone
a refund :)

John

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 02:10:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA03422
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:10:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA26717;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 02:03:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA00150 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from usagi.cts.com (usagi.cts.com [209.68.192.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA00136 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from king.cts.com (root@king.cts.com [198.68.168.21])
	by usagi.cts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA13134;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sd.cts.com (root@sd.cts.com [192.188.72.28])
	by king.cts.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA15404;
	Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sd.cts.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #5)
	id m10wfwY-0000ofC; Tue, 22 Jun 99 22:51 PDT
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Kolb <jlkolb@cts.com>
To: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> A 2BP1 Scope Unit
In-Reply-To: <19990622183812.63375.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SCO.4.05.9906222248480.4557-100000@sd.cts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Brad Hernlem wrote:

> I just received a nice mil surplus 2BP1 scope unit which was very kindly 
> provided by Neil at Almost All Digital Electronics (I guess this was part of 
> the non-digital electronics section :-). This unit appears to be constructed 
> of black anodized aluminum with shield, 5 adjustment pots, a 12AX7 tube and 
> a 1Z2 rectifier. It seems to be meant to screw down onto some other piece of 
> gear (has two thumb screws in front and one in back and has wierd "keyway" 
> 
> Does anyone know the origin or intended use of this unit?
> 
This sounds like part of an item that passed through my hands a
few years ago. It was a relay rack sized box, about 4.75" high,
which had 8 scope tubes across the front. Don't know the item number.
John


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 07:12:27 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA03603
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:12:26 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA09079;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:05:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id DAA03761 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 03:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (mail1.bna.bellsouth.net [205.152.80.13]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA03756 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 03:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from randomlettering (host-209-214-120-176.bna.bellsouth.net [209.214.120.176])
	by mail1.bna.bellsouth.net (8.8.8-spamdog/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA27481;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990623050310.007f7180@mail1.telalink.net>
X-Sender: badger@mail1.telalink.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:03:10 -0500
To: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
From: Tom Norris <badger@telalink.net>
Subject: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Cc: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
In-Reply-To: <018501bebcff$ecbc5340$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Gee, and all htis time I had thought you were talking about
solvents!! heehee.

But seriously, I have not built one. I need to start up a GB project
or two. If the new job turns out OK and we move to a house with
shop room, will have lots of project room, and maybe even time to 
do them this fall. :-)

Will most tubes with the suppressors not tied to the cathode work
pretty well?

73

Tom KA4RKT

At 03:38 PM 06/22/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>
>>  It's a Triode oscillator with a Tetrode amp in the same tube...
>
>Well slap me silly -- so *that's* what tri-tet means!  I never knew!  Thanks
>for the posting, Michael.
>
>73,
>Mike, KK6GM
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 09:06:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA03757
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:06:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18741;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:59:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA04752 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA04747 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA06370;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:48:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA13932;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:50:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:50:29 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Tom Norris <badger@telalink.net>
cc: Mike Silva <mjsilva@jps.net>, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990623050310.007f7180@mail1.telalink.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906230736220.12707-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   I have yet to hear the standard warning for Tri-Tets: 

   The greatest crystal current generally occurs when you're trying for
*fundamental* output from the crystal.  Many published & commercially-made
circuits include some means for shorting out the cathode tank when running
the osc on the fundamantal.  One common ham method was to bend over the
corner of one plate of the condenser, so at "full mesh" it was shorted out
(this is best done with condenser that limits rotation to 180 degrees,
shorting happening right as you approach the full-mesh stop).  Millen's
90800 exciter takes a less-kludgey approach, a simple toggle switch on the
panel.  Taking the cathode tank out turns the thing back into a straight
tuned-plate tetrode osc.
   ...I see this done mostly where a beam-power tube is used, bringing us
right back to the points made by Dave Newkirk and others about not using
poorly-screened tubes such as the 6L6 for tri-tets--hams in the '30s
didn't have 6AG7s (etc.) to use instead but we do.

   Hanging a pilot lamp in series with the xtal is cheap insurance for any
power oscillator and well worth the extra 50 cents.  A crystal no longer
costs half a week's pay but they're not *that* cheap and most of the
crystal houses are pretty slow!

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 11:54:13 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA04385
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:54:13 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11584;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:46:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA05994 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f144.hotmail.com [207.82.251.23]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA05989 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16303 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jun 1999 15:26:51 -0000
Message-ID: <19990623152651.16302.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:26:51 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: jlkolb@cts.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- Re: BC-186 (Ebay howto???)
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:26:51 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I think in general that E-Bay is better for the sellers than the buyers but 
I have picked up a few goodies for fair prices. For example, I bought a 
brand spanking new Tektronix 7A18A dual vertical amp plug-in unit with 
manual for $50.

For some strange reason, some things go for reasonable prices (if not 
downright cheap) while others sell for astronomical prices that defy all 
logic. For example, I shopped around for a long time for some scope probes 
on E-Bay but could never touch the prices. I had a good idea of the open 
market value of what I wanted based on contacts with the Tektronix gurus 
(like Deane Kidd) and posted prices on the web. One item that I was 
following began to soar above that level so I alerted the high bidder of his 
cheaper direct purchase options via e-mail. He had already bid +50% by the 
time he read my e-mail!

There are certainly many worse example, too.

Brad

>On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Roberta J. Barmore wrote:
>
> >    ...I never have actually managed to buy anything there; the bidding 
>is
> > always too rich for my blood and you can just imagine how poorly my 
>chatty
> > little e-mails go over with the sellers....
>
>No, but it's fun to go look at the prices sometimes :)
>
>Although the two Mechanical filter plug-in adapters I've
>sold on the radio e-lists or newsgroups, I got more for
>than the same items went for on eBay - Do I owe someone
>a refund :)
>
>John
>


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 12:42:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA04501
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:42:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18145;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:34:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA06601 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA06596 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD/99
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990623091334.6564A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Been examining the T-784 (TX part of the AN/GRC-109), and checking
power-output using an MFJ cross-needle tuner with the 30/300 watt scale.

According to the MFJ, my T-784 is over 100% efficient on 40 meters,
providing me with 47 watts output for 42 watts input (420 volts @ 100 mA).

Gee...now if only I could patent it.

On 20 and 15, its output is 15 watts and 10 watts respectively.

All these with a 3500 kHz rock.

Interesting.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 17:44:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA05310
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:44:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25275;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:37:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA09396 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mx.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA09391 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seanet.com (o24.dialup.seanet.com [207.12.129.152]) by mx.seanet.com (8.9.3/Seanet-8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA08491 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <37714B77.E5D661BA@seanet.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:02:47 -0700
From: Jim Bowman <jimbowman@seanet.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: GLOWBUGS LIST <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re:GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------94B67B2F22A99150C9D43A59"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------94B67B2F22A99150C9D43A59
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I built the same little rig in 1954 - my first novice xmtr at age 14 as
WN5GQP in Houston. It appeared in the ARRL "How to Become a Radio
Amateur" handbook about that time. My cousin and I started in the ham
game together and both built one. We thought we were real cool when we
changed the tank coil to a B&W 80JEL (80 meter junior end link,
remember?) plug-in tank coil instead of the lollipop stick wound job.
Thinking back, the home brew coil with insulated wire was safer because
this little rig uses a series tank, so the coil is hot with B+.

We ran the poor little 6V6 to the gills. In the circuit, the screen is
run at the same potential as the plate, which was about 350V. It really
cooked. I soon got a crystal for 40 meters, but didn't bother with
doubling - ran it straight thru. Sure enough, the crystals (I still have
them) ran hot, but I don't remember ever blowing one. I remember
straining to the static of my old (at THAT time) Hallicrafters Sky Buddy
(my first "commercial" rig after my homebrew regen using a single 3S4,
described in the same "How to Become" handbook) into the wee hours and
working a station in NY State, on my end fed Zepp. Not bad from Houston!
I was so excited I felt sick to my stomach! Almost threw up! When was
the last time you felt that kind of thrill with radio? The little 6V6
was cooking along, the plates would start a cherry glow if you keyed
down for a time. I had gone to water cooling via one of my socks dipped
in water and pulled over the tube!! I don't remember ever blowing the
tube either! We later plugged in a 6L6 and thought it was WAY cool!

I recently had a fit of nostalgia (allowed, for us OF's) and wanted to
recreate that old rig. I picked up an identical Sky Buddy at the
Puyallup flea market here in Wa., and tracked down a copy of the ARRL
HTBARA booklet describing the 6V6 rig and the regen. I want to recreate
the little 3S4 regen, also, even if it is a cantankerous little booger.
The soft music of the tube microphonics when bumped were magic!

Hey gang, I had thought about offering a little kit of parts to get
started building one of these little tri-tets. Maybe like the tube and
socket, a nice variable cap (I have some new ones, about 150 pf, ceramic
insul, teflon shaft, panel mount), maybe a pvc coil form (better than
lollipop stick?), some fahnstock clips (think old timey), and some good
mil-spec hookup wire to do the job, and a copy of the article from the
book. The only other parts are one resistor, three fixed caps, and the
crystal. After all the bad press on the tri-tet, though, I'm not sure
there would be any interest. Or would there?

I am going to throw one together  breadboard style with a front panel -
I like that old look. I'll see how it goes.

How many others built that little 6V6 rig in the past to provide fond
memories?

73,
Jim W7HPK
jimbowman@seanet.com

Sandy W5TVW wrote:

>     Ah!  The "tri-tet"!  First one I remember was the one on wood
> slats from an old apple crate with the candy striped , wax coated
> "bell wire" we used to buy small rolls of in the
> hardware store for 25 cents as kids.  One had to get seven round
> "sucker sticks"
> or scrounge some from whoever made candied apples so that you
> could wind the tank coils.  Lacking this, seven nails would do
> with the heads cut off afterwards and filed
> smooth.  Think it was in the 1949 ARRL Handbook.
>     The "Tri-tet" was hell on crystals though!  The oscillator
> would work great with a 6F6
> but when you tried for more power with a 6L6, and mistuned it at
> the wrong time, it
> loved to fracture crystals!
>     Afetr busting three precious FT-243 crystals for 3700 and
> 3735, I went to the
> 1936 Jones 6A6 push-pull oscillator and didn't have any trouble
> with crystals
> again.  Made my first out-of-town QSO back in '51 with the Jones
> oscillator!
> Big DX: New Orleans to Baton Rouge, LA!
> 73,
> Sandy W5TVW (ex-WN5TVW then)



--------------94B67B2F22A99150C9D43A59
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252]) by krim.seanet.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4)
	 with ESMTP id XAA07632 for <jimbowman@seanet.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA29772 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.36]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA29767 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.238.58]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990623053606.QUCS8212@SandyBlaize>;
          Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:36:06 +0000
Message-ID: <003401bebd39$f99aa640$3aee490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        <mnhopkins@juno.com>
Subject: Re: GB> Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:27:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk

    Ah!  The "tri-tet"!  First one I remember was the one on wood
slats from an old apple crate with the candy striped , wax coated
"bell wire" we used to buy small rolls of in the
hardware store for 25 cents as kids.  One had to get seven round
"sucker sticks"
or scrounge some from whoever made candied apples so that you
could wind the tank coils.  Lacking this, seven nails would do
with the heads cut off afterwards and filed
smooth.  Think it was in the 1949 ARRL Handbook.
    The "Tri-tet" was hell on crystals though!  The oscillator
would work great with a 6F6
but when you tried for more power with a 6L6, and mistuned it at
the wrong time, it
loved to fracture crystals!
    Afetr busting three precious FT-243 crystals for 3700 and
3735, I went to the
1936 Jones 6A6 push-pull oscillator and didn't have any trouble
with crystals
again.  Made my first out-of-town QSO back in '51 with the Jones
oscillator!
Big DX: New Orleans to Baton Rouge, LA!
73,
Sandy W5TVW (ex-WN5TVW then)



--------------94B67B2F22A99150C9D43A59--

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 22:34:05 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA05763
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:34:05 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16642;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:26:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA12268 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m1.boston.juno.com (m1.boston.juno.com [205.231.100.199]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA12263 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from ne1s@juno.com)
 by m1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDUG89QF; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:04:25 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 21:59:16 -0400
Subject: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Message-ID: <19990623.220515.3278.4.NE1S@juno.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906230736220.12707-100000@indy1>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 9-14
From: Larry M Szendrei <ne1s@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I built one of these a coupla years ago. Built it up on a breadboard with
a black plexiglass panel to look sorta period. Uses a 59 tube with
supressor tied to the screen (as in one classic application of the
circuit), but since the socket and pinouts are compatible, it will also
accept a 1625 tube with a jumper from the plate cap to the socket
(cautions concerning beam-power tubes with the beam-forming plates
connected internally to the cathode duly noted). I short out the cathode
coil when I tune the plate tank to the cystal's fundamental freq., as
Bobbi has mentioned. I have a pilot light in series with the crystal -
I've lost a 60 mA bulb with a 1625 in the socket, but never a crystal!

Used it on 40M in the February AWA contest.

73,
Larry/NE1S

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 23 23:38:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA05798
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:38:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA21471;
	Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:31:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA13204 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:17:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA13199 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990624031641.RCCH1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Wed, 23 Jun 1999 20:16:41 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>,
        "Tom Norris" <badger@telalink.net>
Cc: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 23:16:43 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bebdef$fc1f5da0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906230736220.12707-100000@indy1>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Gang,

Bobbi wrote:>

>    I have yet to hear the standard warning for Tri-Tets:
>
>    The greatest crystal current generally occurs when you're trying for
> *fundamental* output from the crystal.  Many published & commercially-made
> circuits include some means for shorting out the cathode tank when running
> the osc on the fundamantal.  One common ham method was to bend over the
> corner of one plate of the condenser, so at "full mesh" it was shorted out
> (this is best done with condenser that limits rotation to 180 degrees,
> shorting happening right as you approach the full-mesh stop).  Millen's
> 90800 exciter takes a less-kludgey approach, a simple toggle switch on the
> panel.  Taking the cathode tank out turns the thing back into a straight
> tuned-plate tetrode osc.
>
>    ...I see this done mostly where a beam-power tube is used, bringing us
> right back to the points made by Dave Newkirk and others about not using
> poorly-screened tubes such as the 6L6 for tri-tets--hams in the '30s
> didn't have 6AG7s (etc.) to use instead but we do.

The main reason why tuning a tri-tet's cathode tank too close to the crystal
frequency is dangerous is that the triode oscillator section of the tube, as
is true of any screen-grid-tube oscillator that uses the screen-grid-cathode
triode as the oscillator, runs with essentially no output load. With this
being the case, tuning a tri-tet's cathode tank too close to the crystal
frequency results in excessive feedback, heating that, if carried to
extreme, can fracture the crystal.

Keeping this from happening is simple: *Don't make the cathode tank
tunable.* If you're so inclined, you can spend considerable time at the
bench fiddling with the LC ratio of the tank, and the frequency to which
it's tuned, to optimize the oscillator's output on whatever frequency while
minimizing crystal current. I'm not interested in such hairsplitting, so
what I do is tune the tank to 5.9 MHz for 80-meter rocks and about 10.5 MHz
for 40s. A fixed cap; a toroidal, powdered-rion-core inductor wound per the
formula in the ARRL Handbook. No variable capacitor in the thing; it's
sure-fire, and presents no more danger to the crystal than other circuits if
used properly. (Keeping the screen voltage below the point at which yoopy
keying occurs is another must. Back when these circuits were developed,
keyed LC oscillators were the "rotten signals" to beat, and even a badly
overloaded crystal sounded much more stable than an LC set. Nowadays,
frequency stability can come before power output--it does in my station!)

And no bent tank-tuning-cap plate or "short out the tank" switch, either.
Why? Because, I find, the directive not to use the tri-tet for fundamental
output is *misguided*. Using the tri-tet circuit, or some other
configuration that uses the screen-grid-cathode triode of a screen-grid tube
as the oscillator, does an important thing: It (largely) isolates the
oscillator from the effect of load shifts at the tube plate. This is not
only important for frequency stability. Using a standard "pentode" or
"tetrode" oscillator (which Lamb aptly termed "tuned plate crystal grid")
endangers the crystal in the sense that load shifts at the plate greatly
vary the power fed back to the crystal. In the worst case sudden loss of
plate load--such as the antenna connection failing in an instance where such
an oscillator drives an antenna directly--makes the circuit's full feedback
available to the crystal, at the crystal's peril. Circuits in which there is
little or no feedback from the tube plate to the crystal, of which the
tri-tet is one, are much more protective of the crystal in this sense.

In practice, I've invariably found that, with a given tube (I've used the
59, the 6L6, the 12A7 [yes, *7*],) using the tri-tet configuration for
fundamental output gives better keying (no yooping) and more freedom from
frequency shift with plate tuning. Again, for 80 m crystals I shoot for a
tri-tet tank resonance of 5.9 MHz; for 40-m crystals, 10.5 MHz. Because 40-m
crystals are considerably thinner than 3.5-MHz ones, avoiding yoop with 40-m
rocks usually means running the tube at a lower screen voltage than with
80-m rocks. (For best keying at 40 m, I use an 80-m rock and double. Hint:
When doing this right into an antenna, don't use a pi-net at the
output--it's a low-pass network that will barely attenuate the subharmonic
at all!)

Psst: Yes, the 12A7 suppressor is tied to its cathode. But it still made a
nice QRP tri-tet.

>    Hanging a pilot lamp in series with the xtal is cheap insurance for any
> power oscillator and well worth the extra 50 cents.  A crystal no longer
> costs half a week's pay but they're not *that* cheap and most of the
> crystal houses are pretty slow!

Use a 60-mA 2-V lamp (#49?). But keep in mind that the lamp is a variable
resistance, and may therefore introduce chirp or yoop if it lights much.
(Idea: I believe it should be possible to roughly determine the crystal
current by comparing the brilliance of an RF-light lamp with lamp lit to
equal brilliance with metered dc--perhaps with photocells or
phototransistors would do it--but haven't gotten around to trying this yet.)

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 08:01:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA06113
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 08:01:06 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13550;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id EAA18289 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 04:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA18284 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990624114002.TUXK1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Thu, 24 Jun 1999 04:40:02 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> VFO Drive for Your Tri-Tet
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:40:03 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bebe36$4c938400$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Gang,

In the 11th edition *Radio Handbook*'s "Simple Operating-Table V-F-O Unit"
writeup (pp. 293-297) comes a useful "drive your crystal oscillator with a
VFO" hint that some of us may not have considered: "The center conductor of
the coaxial cable [from the VFO buffer output] may be coupled directly into
the grid circuit of a 6L6, 6V6, 6AG7, or 7C6 tube. . . . A better
arrangement affording a much improved impedance match from the coaxial cable
to the first tube is to operate this tube as a grounded-grid amplifier. With
this circuit arrangement the inner conductor of the coaxial cable is [ac
coupled to the cathode of the first tube, with the first tube's usual
cathode bias resistor to ground]. With this grounded-grid arrangement . . .
no tendency toward oscillation will be experienced and improved output from
the tube can be obtained either operating the stage as an amplifier or a
frequency multiplier."

I tried this in connecting a 12SJ7-12A6 VFO to a 6JC6-12HG7-6JB5 transmitter
I'm developing and found such an embarrassment of drive that I can run the
12A6 screen at a quite low voltage and still get sufficient drive with the
12A6 plate far detuned.

This hint is a particularly useful in retrofitting VFOs to oscillator tubes
configured to run with the cathode above ground. Oscillator tubes without
the suppressor or beam-forming plates internally tied to the cathode will
give the best isolation. (Hint: This is why unaltered 6L6s, 807s, 1625s and
other such tubes are poor choices for grounded-grid power amps: The grid
can't act as a screen if it's bypassed by plate-to-beam-forming-plates
capacitance.)

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 11:10:00 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA06316
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:09:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04655;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:02:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA19832 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA19827 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA25606;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:44:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA17179;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:43:20 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:43:17 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
cc: Tom Norris <badger@telalink.net>, Mike Silva <mjsilva@jps.net>,
        Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: RE: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
In-Reply-To: <000001bebdef$fc1f5da0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906240845100.12479-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi, David!

   ...With an old transmitter a person may have little choice, if they
wish to keep it intact, but to use the original configuration; and if the
rig ran a Tri-Tet, that will likely mean it's got a tuneable cathode tank.
Millen was not the only outfit to do so!  In such cases, the user is
better off running the osc as a TPXG if they're after fundamental output.
   New construction is another thing, and builders will do well to
heed your ideas.  The toroid coil/condenser for each band would fit neatly
in an old tube base.
   Another version on the general theme is the Jones "regenerative
oscillator," which uses an RFC in the cathode circuit bypassed by a few
hundred pF.  Haven't really analyzed it in depth but it looks to be doing
similar phase-shifting tricks to the classic Tri-Tet.  I built a
single-6L6 version of this (on a breadboard, with an unfortunately
high-pass output coupling scheme and other Crimes Against Something) and
it works well on 40 and 80m, doubling or fundamental--mildly cooked a
*very* tiny colorburst xtal with it once but larger ones and FT-243s
survive happily, even with no load on the plate at all!  A word to the
wise, high-Q plate tanks and link coupling (or couple the tank to a pi-net
as used to be done) are a *really* good idea for the Jones ckt; it's a
good producer of harmonics.  (Trust me--I used a low-C tank and bid fair
to qualify for a "Worked All TV Sets" award).

   In re pilot lamps as current indicators, congratulations!  You've
re-invented Fred Sutter's "What, No Meters?" method *and* the grease-spot
photometer.  The latter item uses a pair of lamps, one fed with RF and the
other from a variable voltage source with meters for current and voltage.
The lamps are put in light-tight boxes with a common dividing wall, and a
small hole (1/2" or so but I am working from memory) is drilled in an
outside wall of the box assembly, centered on the divider and covered by a
translucent substance.  The original ham versions used a sheet of paper
with a grease spot on it, hence the name. Anyhow, one applies RF power to
the test bulb, then varies the voltage on the reference bulb until the
brightness of each half of the grease spot is equal.  Then you read the
voltage and current and you've got power. Accuracy is said to be very
good--human perception of "compared to what" is quite keen when the things
compared are side-by-side. 
   Fred Sutter's pilot-lamps-as-milliammeters notion isn't so precise, but
he did publish (in "Hints and Kinks") a nice chart of perceived
brilliance/color vs. percentage of rated current that will give the user
reasonable "ballpark" numbers.
   An RF power-mesauring method akin to both of the above (and from the
same time period) used a light-bulb test load and a photographer's light
meter, working up a little calibration chart by running the lamp from line
voltage through a variable autotransformer, measuring voltage & current as
above.  Disconnect the variac et al, apply RF and hey, presto, a
terminating RF wattmeter.  (A light-tight box is a good idea here, too,
for obvious reasons).
   ...The "gotcha" with the RF power mesaurement schemes described above
is, of course, that modern Mazda lamps have an ugly resistance vs. applied
power variation, so load Z varies proportionately; if the only question is
"power?" they'll answer it but if you want to know "power into a certain
load Z," you're out of luck.  (There are some tricks that can be played
with combinations of tungsten- and carbon-filament lamps to flatten the
delta-R/delta-P slope but carbon-filament lamps are scarce these days).
   Fred Sutter's meterless wallet-savers, however, don't suffer so much
from the way light bulbs behave; since we don't really give a hang about
the actual power (and the resistance of the lamp & delta thereof as
current changes is negligable in most but not all cases--readers should
have a look at Dave's very valid points about hangin' 'em in the xtl/grid
circuit and why one should not choose for maximum glow there), they'll do
a fine job. Not as precise as a fine old Weston 301 (might give a Readrite
a run for the money!) but quite adequate for tune-up and answering the
eternal question, "Am I gonna fry this tube?"  :)

   ...A closing thought: Dave's new-old ideas* about light bulbs as
measuring devices and the known limitations of light bulbs as loads makes
me wonder if a clever person might be able to use a small lamp and a
voltage-dividing pure resistive load to measure power.  You'll still
suffer from delta-R/delta-P effects but they could be minimized by
swapping lamps to keep brightness in the upper range and using correction
factors worked out from the known hot resistance of the lamps; load
resistance of the device would stay reasonably constant, with the lamp's
effect attenuated by the amount of voltage division used.  Grease-spot
photometry could still be used--throw a little Ohm's Law/Power Law math at
the results and you're there!

   73,
   --Bobbi
________________________________
* Lest someone consider that comment unduly critical, I'll say right here
in print that it is a very fine conceptual leap; Fred Sutter was no slouch
and a fellow who independantly comes up with the same notion starting from
the same place (lamps as xtal-protecting fuses) is no slouch either!

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 14:50:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA06913
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:50:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03441;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA21831 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA21826 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> CW-Crystals...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990624111109.21568C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Does anyone know whether or not John Morris is still active? I have not
been able to reach him for a couple of months now.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 18:07:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA07259
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:07:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA30341;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 18:00:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA23714 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from home.gis.net (home.gis.net [208.218.130.20]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA23703 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 14:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blah (ppp48-185.gis.net [216.41.48.185]) by home.gis.net (8.8.8/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA19676 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000e01bebe88$e99469c0$b93029d8@blah>
Reply-To: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
From: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Tri-tet Oscillator
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:30:42 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Lately I have been working (time permitting) on a Harvey UHX-10 transmitter
circa 1937 which has a 6L6 Tri-tet oscillator, grid-neutralized 6L6
amplifier, and 6N7 plate modulator.  It was advertised as being usable from
1.6 through 60 Mcs, crystal or eco frequency control, eco only on 6 Meters.
The cathode coil plugs into a five pin socket which is arranged so one can
use eco, Tri-tet, tuned plate, and perhaps other oscillators.  The tank
tuning capacitors are only 50 µµfd, so it is only usable on 6, 10, and maybe
20 Meters without padding capacitors.   Operation on the lower bands
requires significantly larger padders, and I suspect that they let the Q
fall where it may!  I have what appear to be original 160 M coils, and they
have a large air padder in the middle, but it cannot possibly be large
enough.  Thus far I have it working, but output is low.  (I haven't checked
the bypass and coupling capacitors yet.)  Roberta's suggestion to make the
cathode tank fixed-tuned is a good one; tuning the cathode tank does not
have a gross effect on output, but it does on the crystal current!  The
lower you tune the higher the crystal current goes.  By eyeball I think I am
seeing about 100 Ma in the series lamp.  This is OK for FT-243 types, but
don't try the smaller ones!

For a nearly correct schematic see QST, June 1937, pages 48-49, 80, Willard
S. Wilson, "A 28 Mc Mobile Installation."  The actual schematic also has
some cathode bias, and only the screen voltage is variable.

For a similar oscillator see Hints & Kinks, Volume 3, page 26, Dunning &
Lindquist, "Composite Oscillator."

73
Richard Brunner, AA1P, rbrunner@gis.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 20:26:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA07350
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:26:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA09861;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:18:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA24977 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA24971 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990625000115.PZT1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:01:15 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
Cc: "Tom Norris" <badger@telalink.net>, "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>,
        <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: A forgotten vet.
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:01:16 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bebe9d$d8ae5840$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906240845100.12479-100000@indy1>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bobbi wrote:

>    Another version on the general theme is the Jones "regenerative
> oscillator," which uses an RFC in the cathode circuit bypassed by a few
> hundred pF.  Haven't really analyzed it in depth but it looks to be doing
> similar phase-shifting tricks to the classic Tri-Tet.

Lamb explains that topology, which had pretty much become standard by the
1960s, in his 1937 survey article. It's essentially a triode-tetrode circuit
in which the oscillator is a grounded-plate Pierce. (I'm a fan of the
"modified Pierce" myself, the essentials of which I've traced, in QST, to
the mid-1930s.)

>    In re pilot lamps as current indicators, congratulations!  You've
> re-invented Fred Sutter's "What, No Meters?" method *and* the grease-spot
> photometer.

Being familiar with both ideas (and a great fan of Sutter, who I hope is
smiling down at us as we converse) I don't rate as their re-inventor. :-D
(The only place I'm sure I've seen a reference to grease-spot photometry is
in my WWII RSGB Handbook.) What I'm after is the indication and measurement
of crystal currents too small to appreciably light a bulb, and what I
suspect is that a suitable lamp will be giving off detectable,
invisible-to-the-eye IR at current levels well below that which results in a
glow detectable to the eye. I'm hoping that an IR phototransistor might be a
useful responder to such an emitter.

>    ...The "gotcha" with the RF power mesaurement schemes described above
> is, of course, that modern Mazda lamps have an ugly resistance vs. applied
> power variation, so load Z varies proportionately; if the only question is
> "power?" they'll answer it but if you want to know "power into a certain
> load Z," you're out of luck.  (There are some tricks that can be played
> with combinations of tungsten- and carbon-filament lamps to flatten the
> delta-R/delta-P slope but carbon-filament lamps are scarce these days).

How about this? I suspect that most of a lamp's resistance change with
current occurs from cold to, say, 1/2 rated current. That being the case,
how about feeding the load lamp with dc (or low-frequency ac) via a suitable
RF choke, *and* (via a capacitor) RF? The dc would be a sort of bias--light
the lamp to half its rated current to bring the R shift under more or less
under control--and the RF would take the lamp the rest of the way to full
brilliance. The control lamp would be fed only by low-frequency ac or dc, as
before. We'd subtract the known load lamp bias power from the known control
lamp power; the difference would be the RF power. And then we'd call CQ into
the bulb to see who answers. (My record at 100 W out or so is 3 miles on a
light bulb and 1 mile on a Heath Cantenna. :-D)

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 21:17:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA07378
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:17:23 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13519;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 21:09:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA25420 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25415 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 17:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11870;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:53:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02173;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:55:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:55:06 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Richard Brunner <rbrunner@gis.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Tri-tet Oscillator
In-Reply-To: <000e01bebe88$e99469c0$b93029d8@blah>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906241950220.1845-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   I'm glad to see the UHX-10 is coming along; IMO, the more old
transmitters are made to work again, the better!
   But I have to make a correction: the fixed-tuned cathode tank is David
Newkirk's idea, not mine; all I did was cheer the notion from the
sidelines.

   BTW, those fixed padders *allow* maintaining a high-C tank of good Q.
Harvey knew what they were about.
   So did Jones but he didn't have TVI to contend with; my breadboard rig
uses *only* a 50pF variable.  Marginal (at best) on 40 and lousy on 80m.
It was an okay dodge in its day--you can QSY pretty far and not have to
retune--but not very spectrally clean unless the little rig is followed by
an amp stage or two.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jun 24 23:38:49 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA07521
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:38:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24716;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 23:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA26880 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA26875 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 20:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD-99...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990624201025.26795A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, the cycle-gen is operating: looks kind of neat. I will try to get
some digital pictures of it and our set up and post some of them here if
anyone might be interested.

We have two AN/GRC-109 sets and a complete AN/GRC-9 set to use Saturday
and Sunday. When (!) the cycle power poops out, we intend to use DY-88
vibrator/dynamotor units.

We intend to keep our output power down to 5 watts or less (more points).

We also will have a Novice station set up, and will probably use a
HW-16/HG-10 combo and an inverter. (We have LOTS of deep-cycle marine 12
volt batteries).

Gee...I hope we can work a few of you guys. We will check 7147 now and
then, and 3579.

How about 20? Can you suggest a frequency? How about 14.050?

Our call will be W7UQ for the main setup and KB7QEU for the Novice
station.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 15:54:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA08432
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:54:03 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13989;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA03267 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA03261 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDYS8B7A; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:15:38 EDT
To: dpnewkirk@home.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Light bulb DX
Message-ID: <19990625.142321.9255.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
References: <000001bebe9d$d8ae5840$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-4,6-10,12,14-21
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:15:38 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hey, Dave: 

Gotcha beat.

>> . And then we'd call CQ into
the bulb to see who answers. (My record at 100 W out or so is 3 miles on
a
light bulb and 1 mile on a Heath Cantenna. :-D)  <<

<snip>

I made a 5-7-9 cw contact into the next town about 8 miles away  from a
60 watt
bulb on the test bench while loading up an EICO-60 xmtr back in the '70s.
Output was abt 40w on 40 mtrs.

He may have answered me on his Cantenna.  < insert chuckle here >
( just kidding )


vry 73
gary wd4nka

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 15:54:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA08437
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:54:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14250;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA03272 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA03266 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDYS8CDJ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:15:38 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> tube qrp
Message-ID: <19990625.142321.9255.1.wd4nka@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-11,13,15-17,19,21-28
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:15:38 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi, Gang:

I was reading about Loren G. Windom's 1925 qrp station, a 199 at
abt 75v. B+ at a few mills.  ( Ham Radio Horizons , Oct 1978 ) 

His receiver was very unique, as well.

Says he did 30,000 miles per watt.  A record in 1925, at a quarter watt!

Got me to thinking about tube QRP.  Are there any events other than 
the AWA thing that are tube specific ?

It would be nice if there were an event like a qrp event utilising
tube-only
rigs of ANY flavour or era. ( i find the 1929 barrier to be a bit
arbitrary, though
i understand some demarcation must be in place ).

Maybe even issue a Loren G. Windom certificate in honour of his
achievements
as a radio pioneer to the stations reporting the highest mile-per-watt
index.

Just a thought.

( It's a dead day at the Clinic )  ;-)

vry 73
gary,  wd4nka

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 19:17:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08668
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:17:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00951;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:09:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA04248 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m4.boston.juno.com (m4.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.198]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA04241 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from aleisen@juno.com)
 by m4.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EDY3UVGE; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:46:40 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> For Sale
Message-ID: <19990625.112127.11591.21.aleisen@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 1-4,6-11,13-14,16,18,20-25,27,29,31-33,35,37,39-41
From: ALLAN V EISENHAUR <aleisen@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 16:46:40 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have the following items For Sale or Trade, shipping or postage  extra.


Thanks & 73's AL N1PIC

Large List of NOS Tubes appox 750 & used pulls for TV,Radio &
Communications email me for a list.

Western Electric/Hickok  KS15750 L1 tube tester manual + BSP’s 
		 Excellent Photo 	Copy's	all for	$20

ARRL   The Radio Operators Manual	1966		$5
Cowan Publ The New Mobile Handbook	By William J Orr W6SAI
1956	$15

Weston	#506	2 1/2” panel
meter	0-1KVDC		1m	ext res.
Weston	#506	2 1/2” panel meter	0-2. 5KVDC	
50K 	ext res.
Weston	#506	2 1/2” panel meter	0-2. 5KVDC
	50k	ext res.
						Meters  $15 ea
Hallicrafters S85  OP/Serv Man Photo copy		$6
Gonset GR212 reciever Manual Photo Copy 		$5

MILLEN
90902/90942 Cathode Ray Oscope Service
Manual	1969	COPY	$6
90932 	Modulation Mon Oscope Service Manual
	1960	COPY	$6
90651	Grid Dip Meter	Service
Manual		1965	COPY      $10

RCA
WO-79B	Oscilloscope		OP & Instruction Serv Man      
Copy $6
WV-97A	Senior Voltohmyst	OP & Instruction Serv Man		
Copy $6
WV-98C	Senior Voltohmyst	OP & Instruction Serv Man 1972	
 Copy $6

Back Issue of NUTS & VOLTS Magazine  Dec 1991 thru Jun 1998	$75

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 19:33:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08680
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:33:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01697;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:25:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA04356 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA04345 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:09:48 -0700
Message-ID: <3773F08D.DA67C4AA@littonengr.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 14:14:32 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
CC: dpnewkirk@home.com, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX
References: <000001bebe9d$d8ae5840$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com> <19990625.142321.9255.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
-- Conrad

Gary G Johanson wrote:

> Hey, Dave:
>
> Gotcha beat.
>
> >> . And then we'd call CQ into
> the bulb to see who answers. (My record at 100 W out or so is 3 miles on
> a
> light bulb and 1 mile on a Heath Cantenna. :-D)  <<
>
> <snip>
>
> I made a 5-7-9 cw contact into the next town about 8 miles away  from a
> 60 watt
> bulb on the test bench while loading up an EICO-60 xmtr back in the '70s.
> Output was abt 40w on 40 mtrs.
>
> He may have answered me on his Cantenna.  < insert chuckle here >
> ( just kidding )
>
> vry 73
> gary wd4nka
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 19:51:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08694
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:51:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02848;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:43:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA04811 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from www.durham.net (root@WWW.Durham.Net [198.73.212.119]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA04800 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Docusystems.durham.net (tserver1-0.durham.net [198.73.213.64])
	by www.durham.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA08329;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199906252235.SAA08329@www.durham.net>
From: "Edward Swynar VE3 CUI" <gswynar@durham.net>
To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>, "Gary G Johanson" <wd4nka@juno.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:32:10 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I recall testing my Johnson Ranger transmitter on 10-meters AM back in
1974, or so, with a basement dipole which had an effective height of some
*minus* 6 feet above ground---I was answered by a guy in the next town
about 5-miles or so away, with a "5x9" signal both ways!

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

  

----------
> From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
> To: dpnewkirk@home.com
> Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
> Subject: GB> Light bulb DX
> Date: June 25, 1999 2:15 PM
> 
> Hey, Dave: 
> 
> Gotcha beat.
> 
> >> . And then we'd call CQ into
> the bulb to see who answers. (My record at 100 W out or so is 3 miles on
> a
> light bulb and 1 mile on a Heath Cantenna. :-D)  <<
> 
> <snip>
> 
> I made a 5-7-9 cw contact into the next town about 8 miles away  from a
> 60 watt
> bulb on the test bench while loading up an EICO-60 xmtr back in the '70s.
> Output was abt 40w on 40 mtrs.
> 
> He may have answered me on his Cantenna.  < insert chuckle here >
> ( just kidding )
> 
> 
> vry 73
> gary wd4nka
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 21:37:27 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA08783
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:37:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08598;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:29:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA05708 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA05699 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:28:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.25]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990626002723.DTYH22412@SandyBlaize>;
          Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:27:23 +0000
Message-ID: <000301bebf6a$60f8a8a0$19ef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Heath Reflector" <heath@listserv.tempe.gov>,
        "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "CW Reflector" <cw@qth.net>, "BA Swaplist" <baswaplist@foothill.net>,
        "BA Reflector" <boatanchors@theporch.com>,
        "BA Reflector 2" <boatanchors@listserv.temp.gov>,
        "Bob Stohlman, WB5QVN" <rstohlman@centuryinter.net>
Subject: GB> Looking For:
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:24:42 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Still looking for a quantity of 7059 (five to a dozen), and 12DK6
(two) for my Hallicrafters SR-400.  Also several 6D6 (five to
ten).  "NOS" tubes only.

Will trade other tubes or parts.  What do you need?

73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jun 25 22:35:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA08831
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:35:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11760;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:27:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA06045 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA06030 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 18:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373780(4)>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:23:46 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135678(2)>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:23:17 -1000
Date: 	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 15:23:11 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Boatanchors II <boatanchors@listserv.tempe.gov>,
        Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        ham-radio-history@egroups.com
Subject: GB> FCC Form 503 arrived
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906251515390.16609-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Here we go, Gang. Application For Land Radio Station Authorization
In The Maritime Services, Form 503, arrived in today's mail. What's
missing is FCC Form 1070C, Notice Of Fee Due For FCC 503 (I shutter
to think of the [non-refundable] fee that needs to accompany 503). =:o

I'm going to fill this out very slowly and carefully...

Have a great weekend,
Jeff KH6O

P.S. Still looking for a Heath DX-60 transmitter...


Fingerprint Classification Services: A personal copy of your inked
finger impressions utilizing the Henry Classification Formula.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 00:44:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA08895
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:44:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19657;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA07056 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA07049 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990626033326.NDEX1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Fri, 25 Jun 1999 20:33:26 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Gary G Johanson" <wd4nka@juno.com>, <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> tube qrp
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 23:33:31 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bebf84$a9f5d040$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <19990625.142321.9255.1.wd4nka@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Gary Johanson wrote:

> It would be nice if there were an event like a qrp event utilising
> tube-only
> rigs of ANY flavour or era. ( i find the 1929 barrier to be a bit
> arbitrary, though
> i understand some demarcation must be in place ).

The 1929 barrier isn't as arbitrary as it sounds. January 1, 1929, was when
the new radio regulations adopted at the 1927 Washington Conference went
into effect. On that date, hams suddenly had considerably narrower bands, in
all: 40 meters changed from 7 to 8 MHz to 7 to 7.3 MHz; 20 meters went from
14 to 16 MHz to 14.0 to 14.4 MHz. Spectrum-gobbling signals that might have
been tolerable in the older, wider bands had to go--so by order of the ARRL
Board of Directors, Ross Hull undertook a Technical Development Program, the
results of which appeared in QSTs of 1928, to develop better transmitter and
receiver circuits capable of producing "1929 signals" and receiving those
signals under "1929 conditions." Although I'd have to reread my old QSTs to
confirm the details, I believe that part of the new regs also called for
adequately filtered dc to be applied to the transmitter plates -- or at
least the plates of the tube(s) supplying power to the antenna. So what AWA
has done in setting the 1929 "barrier" is bias participants toward using
hardware capable of producing a reasonably good transmitted signal today.
Hull's work was pivotal in hams' continued enjoyment of their narrowed bands
back then; his transmitter articles, in particular, were blueprints to
success under the tougher regulations of "1929 amateur radio."

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 10:21:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA09215
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:21:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09678;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:13:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA12236 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 05:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA12230 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED2S6D8Y; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:53:04 EDT
To: Boatanchors@theporch.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 07:50:04 -0500
Subject: GB> FMLA: Talking Trash
Message-ID: <19990626.075007.-181959.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


All the QRPers don't drive SUVs and go backpacking on weekends. 
I learned that when I went down to Austin to a dinner for QRP Guru
George Dobbs, G3RJV, and sat across from an OT.

     Frank, my pal who wants to take back 56-60mc with a Five Meter
Liberation Army refused to go, saying QRPers were "transferring the
receiving problem to the other guy."  But I wanted to get him a
memento and the OT needed part of a Command Set TX for something. 
I had one in the car and traded it for a little solid state TX.

"Is that a snuff can?" Frank asked as he examined the offhanded
style of the builder.

     I explained it was a cat food tin standing in as the chassis
for a "Tuna Tin Two."  An entire series of Doug DeMaw revivals from
the '70s is underway, I told him, and mentioned the Herring Aid
Five RX and the CB (chipped beef can) Slider VFO.

     I was able to trade for this piece only because the builder
succumbed to the widespread QRP obsession for circuit board clone
projects -- the fellow tossed his homebrew for a ".38 ACP," or some
such will-of-the-whisp West Coast board kit.

     Frank sneered at that, but he was engaged by the "ugly" style
of building evidenced on the Tuna Tin TX.  I soon forgot about the
trinket, but not Frank.

     Three days later I happened down to the basement to find Frank
resplendent in rubbish.  He explained his new VFO would never
settle down on a solid tin base so he ended up putting a 12A6 Tri-
Tet on the metal end of a paper Magnesium Citrate carton he termed
his "Epsom Salts ECO."

     Then he saluted Native Americans with the visage of a warrior
on the base of his interstage "Calumet Coupler" which used a baking
powder can to hold a 6AQ5 set up as a buffer.

     Next came a mildly pear shaped platform with tapped coils and
a dual variable.  He called it a "Deviled Ham Doubler," and he must
have rushed it into service as Charlie, the demonic white ferret,
was clawing at its lower edge despite the considerable potential
danger from the microwave oven chassis Frank was using to power
all this stuff.

     The output was single ended, which is strange for Frank, but
he said he was working out the kinks on 10M before he took it up
to 5.

     His receiver, termed a String Bean Super-Gainer, used 303 cans
for shields over the coils he wound on paper product tubes and
someone's old cabinet door supplied the base.  Frank always prefers
to build on wood, and it is a good thing since he won't use a
transformer unless he needs big voltage. 

     He rigged two mayonnaise jar tops on threaded shafts for a
neutralizing cap.  He had a Hellmann's and a Kraft and said he was
careful to put the Kraft on the low side because, he felt,
Hellmann's caps took HV better.  I just ignored that.  These old
timers have all kinds of superstitions.

     He fired up the rig and dipped the 813, which he mounted on
a big can that once contained "Polish" sausage, altho that is not
what it said.  Frank won't say "German."  It is something left over
from the war, I guess, but when he sees a Rin-Tin-Tin looking dog
he calls it an "Alsatian."

     In short order he was working some of his pals at a CW clip
I cannot follow, but on tune up the final plate cap, cut from tuna
cans, arched over.  The ferret took off and Frank said, "must have
been some dolphin in that one."  I could not see if he was joking
and was afraid to ask.

     The whole set up was impressive, like some adult's electric
train, and it took up about as much space, but Frank is not into
miniaturization.  It covered our 6-foot bench and at the end he
stacked up some milk cartons to hold the final, which was partially
obscured by a grocery sack to keep the ferret out of the high
tension leads.

"What kind of output are you using on your Polish Sausage PA ?" I
asked. (I decided to go along with the WWII convention.)

     "Link, of course," he said.

     I still could not see his face.


de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222     Copyright FMLA XLII

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 11:00:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA09244
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:00:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11309;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:52:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA12474 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 06:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA12468 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 06:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED2WF27C; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:50:46 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:47:27 -0500
Subject: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
Message-ID: <19990626.084744.-181959.8.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,4-5,9-10,13-14,16-22
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


I read with interest Dave Newkirk's quite plausable account of why the
AWA sets 1929 as the cut off for its primative TX contest.  I saved it,
in fact, but there is a consequence, unintended or not, to setting 1929
as the cut off.

  The dual triode won't appear 'till 1934.  The Type 19 that so
influenced 5M practice was first, but others were half a year behind it. 
With these early ICs (the first?) it became possible to build quite good
one tube RXs and, also, the Frank Jones type push pull one-tube TXs.

  I have some 19s but could not afford to buy more at the present asked
price.  But if I could use a  6SN7 I could field a two valve station or,
by copying C.F. Rockey and others, even a one-tube station.

  Perhaps we need a Tandem Triode 'Test for those more interested in
circuitry than historic accuracy.

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
"Better a Blooper than a store-bought 'Super."

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 12:16:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA09304
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:16:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15005;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:08:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA13118 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA13112 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JCUOZMCMJS8WX4FQ@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:06:25 CDT
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:05:31 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: GB> GB on-the-air contest
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <006901bebfe5$5585ca40$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I am all in favor of a GB on-the-air rally/contest/show and tell session. Let's put on a contest for homebrew
valve-based gear for sometime in the early fall and then again in the winter. You get max points for a complete
firebottle homebrew station and somewhat less points for store-bought stuff. We need to include incentives for homebrew
SS and commercial stuff too to lure those guys into our web. I think the objective should be to put out the best signal
quality-wise as the design you are using will allow. Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.
I bet they would have been wouff-honged in 1928.
Anything to get more firebottles on the air.
Now if the *(^((_%$ rain would just lift a few minutes so I could make a run to the FD site...
ZUT!
Conard




From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 13:05:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA09342
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:05:07 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17144;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:56:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA13400 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA13394 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 08:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA04970;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:57:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA18464;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:58:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:58:37 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: mnhopkins@juno.com
cc: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
In-Reply-To: <19990626.084744.-181959.8.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906261030070.17005-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Michael and others:

   We need to hear from somebody more plugged-in to the AWA (et al)  
contest circuit than am I; but I am pretty sure there is more than one
event, with differing rules.  CX calls for "1929-type" rigs, with later
tubes barred but per Bob Dennison [1], there's a winter "Old Time CW"
contest with a 1942 cut-off, and surely that's not all there is...!

   What we need to work up is an "OT Contest/Event Calendar," for posting
on the GB and various BA lists & newsgroups and perhaps publication in
Electric Radio [2].  ...You can toss in the "Before Breakfast SW Club"
award if you like, a certificate (borrowed from a 1930s radio mag) I award
to anyone I work during my occasional early-morning activity. ;)  (We need
more BA-specific wallpaper--two-way all-tube awards, "green radio" awards,
etc., hint, hint).

   And there's nothing barring folks from running such gear any time they
feel the urge; the tube-fan gathering-places of 3.58, 7.147, 7.05 and
sometimes 14.05 mc/s (CW) and 3.885 mc/s (phone) are good prospects for
encountering similarly-minded individuals, and the QRP (n.040) and FISTS
(n.058) freqs are a fair bet as well.  I have worked a couple of retired
landline telegraphers (vy fb!) on 14.030 and 7.030, too--don't know if
they hang out there or if it was happenstance but it certainly makes for
a good chat [3].

    Anyhow, the very best way to make the world safe for tubes, CW and AM
is to get out there and *use* 'em.  Letter-writing, pfui--vote with your
shack!

   73,
   --Bobbi
______________________________________
1. Dennison, Bob (W2HBE), "A '1937' Transmitter," Electric Radio, number
74, June, 1995; pp 14-16, 38.
2. A sharp computer-type could probably make short work of this from
QST/ARRL online contest listings, AWA pubs &c.
3. Even at slow speed, Morse is a conversational mode for these fellows;
so it's a real treat to work 'em!

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 13:37:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA09361
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:37:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17613;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 13:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA13667 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m1.boston.juno.com (m1.boston.juno.com [205.231.100.199]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA13661 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 09:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from w7dra@juno.com)
 by m1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED27EV9J; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:27:25 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> what about the CX contest?
Message-ID: <19990626.082222.5031.0.w7dra@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 5-6,9-14
From: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:27:25 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

seems there is a contest set up years ago doing with our equipment, the
CX exchange. not strictly hb valve oriented but close enough for my
taste. you have awa and er with old stuff contests (still haven't figured
out the rules to those contests, though), and some qrp clubs have hb
sprints. and our time honored fd? we have "stations" at many setups that
are at least "classic"

we should pick a contest (already in operation) publicize it on the gb
reflector and then ALL TURN UP! we would drown a  small contest, to the
delight of the organizers

just some thoughts

mike
w7dra@juno.com

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 14:39:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA09411
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:39:18 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21683;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:31:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA14190 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA14182 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:29:44 -0700
Message-ID: <37750E79.E076CE8E@littonengr.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:35:06 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
CC: mnhopkins@juno.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906261030070.17005-100000@indy1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I'LL SECOND THATY, BOBBI!  But, also need some folks to work
some 160 Meters.  Shouldn't be scared off by the antenna requirements.
I can load up my 40 Meter half wave end fed antenna just fine on 160
and it sounds OK to the few folks that I can work up there, using my
Jones 832 push/pull crystal controlled power oscillator.  160 Meters
is an interesting band - even in the summer time.  Often very quite
and low noise (here in Northern California, anyway.)  It's an empty
park to play in, yet, nobody there.  I wonder why that is?  --  Conrad

"Roberta J. Barmore" wrote:

> Michael and others:
>
>    We need to hear from somebody more plugged-in to the AWA (et al)
> contest circuit than am I; but I am pretty sure there is more than one
> event, with differing rules.  CX calls for "1929-type" rigs, with later
> tubes barred but per Bob Dennison [1], there's a winter "Old Time CW"
> contest with a 1942 cut-off, and surely that's not all there is...!
>
>    What we need to work up is an "OT Contest/Event Calendar," for posting
> on the GB and various BA lists & newsgroups and perhaps publication in
> Electric Radio [2].  ...You can toss in the "Before Breakfast SW Club"
> award if you like, a certificate (borrowed from a 1930s radio mag) I award
> to anyone I work during my occasional early-morning activity. ;)  (We need
> more BA-specific wallpaper--two-way all-tube awards, "green radio" awards,
> etc., hint, hint).
>
>    And there's nothing barring folks from running such gear any time they
> feel the urge; the tube-fan gathering-places of 3.58, 7.147, 7.05 and
> sometimes 14.05 mc/s (CW) and 3.885 mc/s (phone) are good prospects for
> encountering similarly-minded individuals, and the QRP (n.040) and FISTS
> (n.058) freqs are a fair bet as well.  I have worked a couple of retired
> landline telegraphers (vy fb!) on 14.030 and 7.030, too--don't know if
> they hang out there or if it was happenstance but it certainly makes for
> a good chat [3].
>
>     Anyhow, the very best way to make the world safe for tubes, CW and AM
> is to get out there and *use* 'em.  Letter-writing, pfui--vote with your
> shack!
>
>    73,
>    --Bobbi
> ______________________________________
> 1. Dennison, Bob (W2HBE), "A '1937' Transmitter," Electric Radio, number
> 74, June, 1995; pp 14-16, 38.
> 2. A sharp computer-type could probably make short work of this from
> QST/ARRL online contest listings, AWA pubs &c.
> 3. Even at slow speed, Morse is a conversational mode for these fellows;
> so it's a real treat to work 'em!
>
> KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
>       FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA
>    Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 15:16:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA09463
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:16:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23509;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA14507 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA14501 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:08:00 -0700
Message-ID: <37751771.156AA9E3@littonengr.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:13:23 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> R-122A/ARN-12, 75 Mhz Airborne Marker Beacon Receiver
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Does anyone hanve any information, a manual or a schematic for
the R-122A/ARN-12, 75 Mhz Airborne Marker Beacon Receiver.
I scored one off the Ebay, which arrived yesterday.  Seems like it
would make a good IF and foundation receiver for use with VHF
UHF converters to reach the higher bands, like 2300, etc., with
a lighthouse tube based converter.  Would also work as an IF for
2 & 6 meter work.

I'd like to use it without tearing it up, since
it is so nicely designed and built.  Also need information on the
JAN6AJ5 and JAN28D7 tubes, which it uses.  I found a diagram
for the 6AJ5, which seems to be a pentode, but that's all the info
that I have.  The JAN 28D7 (if it is similar to the 7D7, appears to
be an triode/pentode, with the grid of the triode connected to a
grid in the pentode.

The receiver has a long strip of what looks
like audio transformers - some of which may be audio filters,
used to separate out the three signals commonly used to control
three lamps on the pilots instrument panel - the outer marker lamp,
the middle marker lamp and the inner marker lamp.  This seems
to agree with the seven of pins in the front panel connector,
which  should include: ground, +28 Volts, DC, some form of
B+ (based on the voltage ratings of the capacitors, inside), a
remote audio output lead and the three lamp driver leads.

I am building an adequate power supply for it (as well as for use
with some ARC-5 receivers) and can probably reverse engineering
it sufficiently to get it working.  But, it would be nice to have the
military maintenance manual for reference, since often there are
sublties that one might overlook.  I would appreciate any data
that anyone might have leading to the acquisition of such a manual.

TNX, Conrad, W7WLM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 15:34:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA09475
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:34:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22980;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:26:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA14681 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m1.boston.juno.com (m1.boston.juno.com [205.231.100.199]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA14675 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 11:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from w7dra@juno.com)
 by m1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED3D8CHP; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:26:10 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> fd activity
Message-ID: <19990626.102107.5031.2.w7dra@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2
From: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 14:26:10 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

what i am going to do now is use cx rules (work 3 stations with a set
up), and see how many distinct rigs i can put on the air for these next
two days

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 22:26:27 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA09795
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:26:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA08026;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:17:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA17501 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA17495 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 18:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id VAA00767
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:15:23 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <37753261.4DD9@atl.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:04:49 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> free peecee hp 486-33 canoe anchor (pay shipping) and compactron 5th wheel
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

or would that be free compactron and peecee 5th wheel :-)
no RAM, no HDD, runs linux OK
will have to pay shipping if you can't pick up in Atlanta
http://debris.org/canoe.html
for details
-bob

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 19:53:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA09665
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:53:47 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02581;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:45:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA16349 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA16343 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373841(4)>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:31:50 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135667(9)>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:31:19 -1000
Date: 	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:31:15 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
In-Reply-To: <006901bebfe5$5585ca40$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906261132530.17655-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.

I guess radiomen can be classified according to whether they desire to
hear only pure DC T-9 signals, or whether they search out and work those
rough AC, somewhat modulated, rowdy-sounding, multitoned signals. I fall
in the latter category! Hearing a "rough" signal on the ham bands immedi-
ately takes me back to those joyous evenings sitting the Central Pacific
USCG 500 kc watch "looking after" dozens and dozens of ships plying the
shipping routes in all directions of the compass. Some slop-buckets must
have been running AC on their plates, others (like myself at NMO) pur-
posely kept our transmitters in A2 (with a tone modulating our CW signal)
which gave our signals an orchestra-like sound, complete with dozens of AF
harmonics filling the guard band (495-505). Listening to the cacophony of
discordant tones, growls, buzzsaws, banshees, foghorns, bells, buzzers,
and whistles on 600m made me feel like the luckiest radioman in the world,
and to think I was getting *paid* to hear this beautiful-sounding symphony
every night made it even sweeter! (Some signals had tones which varied
in freq'y with the roll of the ship.)

BTW, I have a home-made "chopper": It's a motor-driven toothed wheel
in series with my hand-key, providing a make-break circuit - probably
provides a square-wave of a couple hundred CPS super-imposed on my signal.
Now, I've never used it on the air (but have into a dummy load), but I
smile at the thought that I do have ICW capability, just in case...

Post script: By design, 500 kc Auto Alarm receivers *only* responded to
A2 tone-modulated signals; part of the ITU-dictated distress procedure
was to send the distress message send in A2. That's why you'll find all
ship xmtrs with A2 capability. (To hear a ship sending an Auto Alarm
on 500 in A2 is a sound that will haunt you for a life-time, for at that
moment you know men are parishing, their shipboard home being transformed
into a watery coffin, in a short time to forever be asleep on the ocean's 
bottom...)

Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jun 26 19:55:50 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA09683
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:55:49 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02539;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 19:47:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA16377 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA16370 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 15:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373865(7)>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:37:00 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135667(9)>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:36:29 -1000
Date: 	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 12:36:25 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
cc: mnhopkins@juno.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906261030070.17005-100000@indy1>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906261232010.17655-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Why not team up with the army of QRP operators on the QRP e-list? They
have contests almost weakly (literally!). Shouldn't matter what folks are
using to pump out their signal -- the more the merrier, right?

73, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 00:21:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA09864
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:21:51 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA11891;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:13:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA18340 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA18334 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:10:42 -0700
Message-ID: <377596A3.EB48B77A@littonengr.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:16:22 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
CC: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906261132530.17655-100000@uhunix5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Amen.  When, I was a kid and working rare DX, the rarer the DX the
stranger the signal. It was easy to pull them out of the QRM because they
sounded unique, something signals seem to lack, today.  And, I would
wonder what the guy's rig looked like.   Was it built on a board?  Did it
look like the wall full of panels and meters as many  of DX stations,
pictured in the ham magazines of the day, looked like?

In those days, one had to have a terrible signal before anyone complained.
Nobody ever told me my crystal controlled rig drifted objectionably until
about a year ago, or was it two.  Chirp?  Just about everybody had a little
chirp.  But, today, chirp is not to be tolerated.  I even had  a guy break
into
a QSO, just to tell me that I had a little chirp.  I've been told that
anything
less than a pure DC smooth signal does not belong on the air and is not good
practice - as if I never knew that.  But, it's true, though, what can I say?

The Future is always kinda strange in that it brings things of beauty  and
then
sweeps them away.  They linger like the fragrance of a flower as if only for
those
who can sense them.  And, then they are gone.  Maybe it's enough to have
heard a "cacophony of discordant tones," on a late night watch, in a world
which lives in caos yet worships order.   The game has changed.

Maybe, all the guys (like me) that miss signals with a little character
should
exodus to 160 Meters, where there are few purists to bother.  We could hold
a "Chirp and Buzz In,"  and nobody else would know anything about it.....

 Conrad, W7WLM

"Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" wrote:

> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.
>
> I guess radiomen can be classified according to whether they desire to
> hear only pure DC T-9 signals, or whether they search out and work those
> rough AC, somewhat modulated, rowdy-sounding, multitoned signals. I fall
> in the latter category! Hearing a "rough" signal on the ham bands immedi-
> ately takes me back to those joyous evenings sitting the Central Pacific
> USCG 500 kc watch "looking after" dozens and dozens of ships plying the
> shipping routes in all directions of the compass. Some slop-buckets must
> have been running AC on their plates, others (like myself at NMO) pur-
> posely kept our transmitters in A2 (with a tone modulating our CW signal)
> which gave our signals an orchestra-like sound, complete with dozens of AF
> harmonics filling the guard band (495-505). Listening to the cacophony of
> discordant tones, growls, buzzsaws, banshees, foghorns, bells, buzzers,
> and whistles on 600m made me feel like the luckiest radioman in the world,
> and to think I was getting *paid* to hear this beautiful-sounding symphony
> every night made it even sweeter! (Some signals had tones which varied
> in freq'y with the roll of the ship.)
>
> BTW, I have a home-made "chopper": It's a motor-driven toothed wheel
> in series with my hand-key, providing a make-break circuit - probably
> provides a square-wave of a couple hundred CPS super-imposed on my signal.
> Now, I've never used it on the air (but have into a dummy load), but I
> smile at the thought that I do have ICW capability, just in case...
>
> Post script: By design, 500 kc Auto Alarm receivers *only* responded to
> A2 tone-modulated signals; part of the ITU-dictated distress procedure
> was to send the distress message send in A2. That's why you'll find all
> ship xmtrs with A2 capability. (To hear a ship sending an Auto Alarm
> on 500 in A2 is a sound that will haunt you for a life-time, for at that
> moment you know men are parishing, their shipboard home being transformed
> into a watery coffin, in a short time to forever be asleep on the ocean's
> bottom...)
>
> Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 00:33:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA09874
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:33:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13615;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:25:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA18421 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA18415 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990627032422.VTJD1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:24:22 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Conard Murray" <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> RE: Romance and Prehistoric Sigs (Was GB on-the-air contest)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:24:30 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bec04c$917a2020$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906261132530.17655-100000@uhunix5>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Gang,

Conrad Warren wrote:

> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.

to which Jeff Herman replied:

> I guess radiomen can be classified according to whether they desire to
> hear only pure DC T-9 signals, or whether they search out and work those
> rough AC, somewhat modulated, rowdy-sounding, multitoned signals. I fall
> in the latter category!

I'm there, too, with the qualification that those signals are okay during
special 'tests, but less okay at other times. (A bit of yoop or chirp is
okay with me anytime, but I confess that I work hard to keep *my* signal
from sounding that way! :-D)

And to put it into perspective, in the late 1980s and into the early 1990s,
when I was working at ARRL, every Friday I had the privilege of sitting in
on a special lunch in the office of QST Managing Editor Laird Campbell,
W1CUT, attended by a number of key retired ARRL staffers. (On a typical day,
it'd be Laird; John Huntoon, W1RW; By Goodman, W1DX; Joe Moskey, W1JMY;
George Hart, W1NJM; me, and several others; with luck, Perry Williams,
W1UED, would sit in, as would Dick Baldwin, W1RU, if he was in town for an
IARU function. One Friday in 1989 I had the privilege of reintroducing my
dad to the group; he'd worked with them in the 1950s when ARRL was based in
West Hartford.) Talk about a group with a handle on history! One Friday I
brought in a cassette tape of a bandscan during a just-concluded AWA Old
Time Transmitter party in which Goodman and I had participated. Everyone
leaned in and listened, almost holding their breaths. Finally, listening to
a particularly wonderfully chirpy VE3, Huntoon leaned back in his chair,
shook his head and said, "That's just beautiful--*beautiful*!" It brings
tears to my eyes."

I think Jeff conveyed the romance well. Those of us who haven't lived
through the times when daily use of radio routinely involved such signals
can only approach an understanding of how evocative their sounds can be. At
base, what's going on has to do with what Alastair Cooke, who I never miss
in his "Letter from America" talk each week, said at the beginning of a
particular Letter: What we mean when we say "Back in the good old days" is
really "When I was young." In this case of radio old-timers, it means "When
radio and I were young."

This is as good a time as any for me to announce that I hope to meet more of
you on the air sooner rather than later now that we just closed on a house
here in Montclair. There are plenty of tall, 70+-year-old trees on the
property, and I'll be getting some wires up in time for considerable fun in
the fall and winter. 160, 80, 40, and 30 will be my mainstays, although I
find myself greatly attracted to 80 (especially 3650 to 3725) these days.
I'll be getting back to work on my special SKN rig, for which I expect to
work up keying circuitry capable of giving my signal a lovely bong--*that's*
the signal sound that gets *me* misty, and I've been licensed "only" since
1969!

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 01:05:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA09895
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:05:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA14861;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:57:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA18662 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA18654 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD-99...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990626205107.18561B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, my cycle-gen, which had so much promise, was a complete bust...in
more ways than one.

The shaft used to drive the GN-58 was too short and broke the boss where
the hand cranks fit.

As long as there was no load, it worked fine, but when I fired up the
GRC-109, the boss shattered.

So far, our Novice station has made more contacts than I have.

Oh, well. Better luck next time I guess.

Conditions seem to be pretty hot.  The SSB station is making contacts, and
contacts on CW are easy, and this is all at 5 watts with so-so antennas.

Good luck to all.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 01:06:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA09900
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:06:07 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA14802;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 00:57:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA18693 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA18679; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 20:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: baswaplist@foothill.net
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> WTB...GN-58...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990626205635.18561C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Subject says it all. Anyone have an extra one?

Would also like to find a PE-162 or PE-162A, or UPG-12.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 01:44:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA09922
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:44:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA16361;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 01:36:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA19102 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA19096 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 21:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.220]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990627043205.CZYJ22412@SandyBlaize>;
          Sun, 27 Jun 1999 04:32:05 +0000
Message-ID: <001201bec055$a8acc280$7ef0490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:25:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>
>In those days, one had to have a terrible signal before anyone
complained.
>Nobody ever told me my crystal controlled rig drifted
objectionably until
>about a year ago, or was it two.  Chirp?  Just about everybody
had a little
>chirp.  But, today, chirp is not to be tolerated.  I even had  a
guy break
>into
>a QSO, just to tell me that I had a little chirp.  I've been
told that
>anything
>less than a pure DC smooth signal does not belong on the air and
is not good
>practice - as if I never knew that.  But, it's true, though,
what can I say?
>
    Today, people seem to have a tendency to "split hairs" no
matter how "fine"
the hairs are!  Another thing I've noticed in the "Newbie
sand-state" crowd
is that they will not answer you if you are not within 100 Hz of
them!  No matter how
strong you might be.  Also operating practices are abominal in
that they
"tail end" you.  (i.e.: just send their callsign on the initial
call)  How the hell do
I know if someone is calling me unless he send my call at least
once?
After the usual customary "RST/QTH/NAME and maybe RIG" exchange
(most of them run KNWD TS-XXX) they hurry off or call CQ again if
you answered
their call.  Does every ham contact have to end this abruptly?
(That's one BIG
reason I don't "DX" as they are anxious to vacate and catch
someone else!)

I like to find out more.  Do you like old gear?  Do you like
airplanes?
Do you like ships?  Do you like QRP gear, do you like sex?
Whatever
to start a conversation.  You may get "WX HR IS RAINY" or
whatever.
At least that's a start.

That may be why I like the CX type contests so much orr the Old
Timer
events, there is a bit more than the usual contest exchange.  If
my signal
is a bit chirpy or "yoopie", then the other op. wants to know
what I'm
using for sure.  I have had some real old timers grin over the
air
when they hear my old '10 Hartley!

I get bored sick with the "RST/QTH/NAME" Qso's emitting the
Japanese
rig "sterile signals" that all sound exactly the same.

My nickle's worth!
73,
Sandy W5TVW
>The Future is always kinda strange in that it brings things of
beauty  and
>then
>sweeps them away.  They linger like the fragrance of a flower as
if only for
>those
>who can sense them.  And, then they are gone.  Maybe it's enough
to have
>heard a "cacophony of discordant tones," on a late night watch,
in a world
>which lives in caos yet worships order.   The game has changed.
>
>Maybe, all the guys (like me) that miss signals with a little
character
>should
>exodus to 160 Meters, where there are few purists to bother.  We
could hold
>a "Chirp and Buzz In,"  and nobody else would know anything
about it.....
>
> Conrad, W7WLM
>
>"Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" wrote:
>
>> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is
disgraceful.
>>
>> I guess radiomen can be classified according to whether they
desire to
>> hear only pure DC T-9 signals, or whether they search out and
work those
>> rough AC, somewhat modulated, rowdy-sounding, multitoned
signals. I fall
>> in the latter category! Hearing a "rough" signal on the ham
bands immedi-
>> ately takes me back to those joyous evenings sitting the
Central Pacific
>> USCG 500 kc watch "looking after" dozens and dozens of ships
plying the
>> shipping routes in all directions of the compass. Some
slop-buckets must
>> have been running AC on their plates, others (like myself at
NMO) pur-
>> posely kept our transmitters in A2 (with a tone modulating our
CW signal)
>> which gave our signals an orchestra-like sound, complete with
dozens of AF
>> harmonics filling the guard band (495-505). Listening to the
cacophony of
>> discordant tones, growls, buzzsaws, banshees, foghorns, bells,
buzzers,
>> and whistles on 600m made me feel like the luckiest radioman
in the world,
>> and to think I was getting *paid* to hear this
beautiful-sounding symphony
>> every night made it even sweeter! (Some signals had tones
which varied
>> in freq'y with the roll of the ship.)
>>
>> BTW, I have a home-made "chopper": It's a motor-driven toothed
wheel
>> in series with my hand-key, providing a make-break circuit -
probably
>> provides a square-wave of a couple hundred CPS super-imposed
on my signal.
>> Now, I've never used it on the air (but have into a dummy
load), but I
>> smile at the thought that I do have ICW capability, just in
case...
>>
>> Post script: By design, 500 kc Auto Alarm receivers *only*
responded to
>> A2 tone-modulated signals; part of the ITU-dictated distress
procedure
>> was to send the distress message send in A2. That's why you'll
find all
>> ship xmtrs with A2 capability. (To hear a ship sending an Auto
Alarm
>> on 500 in A2 is a sound that will haunt you for a life-time,
for at that
>> moment you know men are parishing, their shipboard home being
transformed
>> into a watery coffin, in a short time to forever be asleep on
the ocean's
>> bottom...)
>>
>> Jeff KH6O
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 02:37:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09976
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:37:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA18227;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA19720 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hdo1.hdo.net (+aVPfnvJDJtZsjBP/xBEhbNqD8kstmwM@hdo1.hdo.net [209.76.66.193]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id WAA19715 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from k6qq (pm-4-21.hdo.net [209.76.66.22])
	by hdo1.hdo.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id WAA04691;
	Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:22:00 -0700
Message-ID: <01f601bec05d$327b8580$16424cd1@k6qq>
From: "John Moriarity" <k6qq@hdo.net>
To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>, "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Conard Murray" <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
References: <000001bec04c$917a2020$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Subject: Re: GB> RE: Romance and Prehistoric Sigs (Was GB on-the-air contest)
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:23:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Yes, I remember the "interesting" signals in the 1950's
and 1960's.  South Americans on 50 Hz mains that sounded
like they had no filter capacitors in their power supplies.
"Chow...pee Chow pit   Chow...chow pee Chow", as they
chirped
through your passband.  You had to turn off your crystal
filter (if you had one) to copy them, and follow them as
they drifted up (or down) the band.  I think some operating
skill has been lost by those who demand for T9X signals
from everyone.

73,

John. K6QQ
Alturas, CA

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 11:48:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA10302
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:48:36 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA00971;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 11:40:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA25262 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA25256 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 08:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA14003;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:28:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA13432;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:30:03 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 10:30:02 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> RE: Romance and Prehistoric Sigs (Was GB on-the-air contest)
In-Reply-To: <000001bec04c$917a2020$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906271000330.11540-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Now, I have never minded a bit of chirp or yoop, and not so very long
ago worked a fellow who had put an ol HB xmtr back on the air that
drifteted 10kc or more during a transmission [1]; my rule's always been
that if it was clear enough to copy, the sigs were okay (though really
funky ones deserved to be told).  There's an AF-67 on the BA air with
*amazing* chirp...and it's armchair copy, so who minds other than a little
kidding?
   But the recent thread reminds me of the SS British kit I built a couple
of years ago.  I was running it with a power supply I *knew* was
inadequate; just wanted to see if the smaller-than-a-postcard xcvr [2]
really did work.  First station I worked kept tellin' me over and over
that it chirped; I acknowledged and explained why, but the poor fellow
just couldn't hardly stand it.  (Maybe he thought an OO would go after
*him?*[3])  Seemed a bit odd at the time; now I'm starting to
understand--he'd probably never even *heard* a less-than-perfect note!

   All the more reson to get on the air with old gear and let the folks
hear 'em.  Nothing too egregious--raw AC is right out and most modern
xcvrs aren't so good for following major drift unless the op's got a good
handle on split operation--but sheesh, a little "character" just makes the
sigs easier to pick out of the clutter!  (As does hand-sent Morse, or
maybe I'm just getting old--some of those "perfect" keyers are as rough to
swot as a 15-wpm bug with 40-wpm dits, especially when handled by a nit
who doesn't understand word spacing otta be longer than character
spacing!)

   ...Would love to work a little 160; sadly, around here, there's *heaps*
of crud down there, so I need to look into the various noise-cancelling
schemes before making any serious efforts.

   73,
   --Bobbi
_____________________________
1. I've always tended to set the receiver where it can be tuned
left-handed.  Just from habit--*that* QSO explained why the OTs
recommended the practice! Good ol' Drake receiver, it was easy to track
right along after the drift. 
2. A Walford Electronics "Wedmore," very fine with a good supply; if a
person's going to mess with sand, it's worth finding out what Tim
Walford's got available--very nice stuff, from QSL-sized rigs worthy of
Fred Sutter through some nicely sophisticated gear and none of it very
expensive.  Easy to build but not paint-by-numbers; he assumes the
builder's got a clue.
3. Have we done *too* good a job of making newcomers fear rotten sigs?
Poor guy seemed to fear he'd get a late-night knock on the dorr from FCC,
FBI and CIA for working a chirpy station!

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 15:22:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA10412
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:22:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11023;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA26982 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA26977 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COMPUTER (ip94.winterpark.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.233.94])
	by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA21694;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199906271906.MAA21694@swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <af4k@mail.earthlink.net>
From: "Brian Carling" <af4k@earthlink.net>
Organization: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~af4k
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:06:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: GB> GB Plate Transformer available
Reply-to: af4k@earthlink.net
CC: BOATANCHORS@LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Priority: normal
References: <000001bec04c$917a2020$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906271000330.11540-100000@indy2>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

For sale:

Power transformer 120V primary 
Excellent condition.  Secondaries: 660V AC at 85 mA, 6.3V CT 3A, 5V/2A    
$16.00 plus shipping

Reply via e-mail if you would like it.

AF4K

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 15:27:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA10420
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:27:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09252;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA27075 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA27066 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COMPUTER (ip71.winterpark.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.233.71])
	by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA25453;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199906271911.MAA25453@swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <af4k@mail.earthlink.net>
From: "Brian Carling" <af4k@earthlink.net>
Organization: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~af4k
To: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:11:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: GB> CW-Crystals...
Reply-to: af4k@earthlink.net
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990624111109.21568C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Ken - did we find out anything about John???

I hope that he is OK! We really should support and encourage his work 
there!

Bry

On 24 Jun 99 at 11:13, Ken wrote: 

> Does anyone know whether or not John Morris is still active? I have not
> been able to reach him for a couple of months now.
> 
> Ken W7EKB
 

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 15:36:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA10429
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:36:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08697;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:28:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA27343 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m1.boston.juno.com (m1.boston.juno.com [205.231.100.199]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA27337 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 12:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from w7dra@juno.com)
 by m1.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED53RVDD; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:21:14 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD 99
Message-ID: <19990627.111615.5031.0.w7dra@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 6-7,13-17
From: mike l dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:21:14 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

talk about working a contest, i put together 7 complete stations, and
worked 3 qsos on each. my biggest gripe was that i have only a rock bound
rig on 160 (6AG7/6L6/pp211s), and had to kludge a 160m modified arc5 into
the grid of the 6AG7 to get the frequency agility to work the 160m
stations. i guess since i have no experience with the transceivers i
would not know how difficult it would be to listen anywhere except where
i was transmitting, can they scan the band to see who is on?

i remember a made for tv movie where some troops were guarding the
alaskan pipeline, they were being attacked by the enemy, and they put
themselves into a bunch of loose pipes, so they would only shoot who was
in front of their particular pipe. this to save ammo and not two people
shooting the same person. kind of like the modern transceiver,  i guess
if you are going to work 100 an hour you need a tunnel vision set.....

mike, the guy with lots of chirps and humm and dirfting signals

you know i have a lot of 809/811 types maybe time to build a hartley?

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 18:35:15 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10533
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:35:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18169;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA28788 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA28783; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Brian Carling <af4k@earthlink.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> CW-Crystals...
In-Reply-To: <199906271911.MAA25453@swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990627151209.28651B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Hi Ken - did we find out anything about John???
> 
> I hope that he is OK! We really should support and encourage his work 
> there!

I have e-mailed him twice, and called him via telephone at least 3 times.
The e-mail I sent did NOT bounce, but I received no answer from him,
and could not raise him via telephone either.

I have no idea what is going on with him, but would really like to know.

That is John Morris of C-W Crystals, who lives in Nevada, Missouri, for
those of you who are wondering who we are talking about.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 18:48:45 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10543
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:48:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA20335;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:40:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA29040 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA29031 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD-99...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990627152425.28975A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

is now over with. The GRC-109 did a good job on 40 meters last night,
although it had to be driven by a friend's GN-58. Nearly wore two guys out
who were taking turns hand-cranking it. I absolutely could not get a
coupling between the cycle power source and the generator to hold. Will
have something proper machined on Monday so as to be ready for "next
time".

Overall, FD was fun. There were only three of us, plus my two sons who
manned the Novice station. Lots of people stopped by and asked questions,
including two policemen about midnight. They were just curious, since we
had notified the station early in the week.

Conditions were pretty good, and the bands were really filled. I just wish
there were more activity outside of contests.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jun 27 21:27:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA10633
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:27:05 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA26327;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:18:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA00423 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA00417 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374090(3)>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:06:45 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135672(7)>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:06:15 -1000
Date: 	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 15:06:11 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Wanted: 2-tube circuit using a 6146
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906271502490.25961-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Anyone have a 2-tube circuit using a 6146 in the final? Until I
find a Heath DX-60 transmitter, I'll have to build an xmtr myself.
Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 00:54:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA10769
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:54:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05897;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:45:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA01993 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from shell14.ba.best.com (vintage@shell14.ba.best.com [206.184.139.145]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA01988 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vintage@localhost)
	by shell14.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id VAA10386;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Robert P. Okas" <vintage@best.com>
To: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
cc: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
In-Reply-To: <377596A3.EB48B77A@littonengr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906272116460.9351-100000@shell14.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Folks,

    I've had similar experiences. I once had a QSO with a fellow on 80m
who didn't live all that far away. After I told him I was running a
DX-100, he gave me his phone number and asked me to call him (my nickel,
of course). When I did, he reamed me out about my chirp! His rig? A
TS-950SDX! Must be rig snobbery... As far as I'm concerned, if I can copy
the fist, I'll work the station. Don't even get me starred on bug fists...

73,
Bob - W3CD

On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Conrad Warren wrote:

> 
> In those days, one had to have a terrible signal before anyone complained.
> Nobody ever told me my crystal controlled rig drifted objectionably until
> about a year ago, or was it two.  Chirp?  Just about everybody had a little
> chirp.  But, today, chirp is not to be tolerated.  I even had  a guy break
> into a QSO, just to tell me that I had a little chirp. ...

  == SNIP ==



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 01:14:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10784
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:14:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05480;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:05:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA02403 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp6.jps.net (smtp6.jps.net [209.63.224.103]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA02397 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compaq (209-239-204-233.oak.jps.net [209.239.204.233])
	by smtp6.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA24425;
	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <003201bec122$9c9657e0$e9ccefd1@compaq>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Wanted: 2-tube circuit using a 6146
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:55:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I just grabbed two ARRL Handbooks ('66 and '73) and both had such a circuit
(different ones).  If you don't have any handbooks from that era I'll see if
I can find the articles on the QST CDROM and send them to you.

73,
Mike, KK6GM


>Anyone have a 2-tube circuit using a 6146 in the final? Until I
>find a Heath DX-60 transmitter, I'll have to build an xmtr myself.
>Jeff KH6O
>
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 02:29:23 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA10824
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:29:23 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA08579;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 02:20:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA04050 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA04044 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 23:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374012(10)>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:10:31 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135667(1)>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:09:54 -1000
Date: 	Sun, 27 Jun 1999 20:09:51 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Mike Silva <mjsilva@jps.net>
cc: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Wanted: 2-tube circuit using a 6146
In-Reply-To: <003201bec122$9c9657e0$e9ccefd1@compaq>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906272008220.19663-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I'll place an ad in the various NGs for a DX-60 manual -- maybe
making up my own "kit" is the way to go about this!

Thank-you to everyone for your offers of schematics; I'm saving 
your emails just in case I can't acquire the manual.

Jeff

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 05:25:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA10924
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 05:25:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA15209;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 05:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id BAA05443 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA05438 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 01:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED7JF4JL; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 04:57:16 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 03:53:39 -0500
Subject: GB> Digital Dementia, a paradox too
Message-ID: <19990628.035422.-94171.1.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,3-4,10-11,19-23,25
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Some years ago (1985) I decided to get on 30M.  I padded down the 11M
section of a Heathkit VF-1 VFO to 5 mc and doubled thru one of Leo
Meyerson's 680's ample 20M sections -- it feeds a choke.

  I listened on a Yaesu general coverage RX I later sold for $300.  It
sounded OK so I began to click them off one afternoon.  But the third guy
I worked was obsessive about my signal -- especially after I recited the
TX.  I listened again -- no change.  I was keying only the PA.  Turns out
his compliant was that the THIRD little red number right of his digital
readout was not steady.

  Another Obsessive-Compulsive ham, of course, but the experience set me
thinking , again, of one of the great paradoxes of radio.  One would
suppose the signals would become less stable as one went up in the
spectrum.  But in fact, I hardly ever hear a really bad 6M CW sig and the
home of chirp and such is 80M, where dwell also the lids with the cursed
Vibroplexes that send dits at 80 WPM and dahs at 18.  I wish all those
things would go to collectors, but why are all the unstable sigs down on
80?

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
Made $50 on the Yaesu RX 'cause no one ever took off the plastic face
cover.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 10:11:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA11244
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:11:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA05250;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:02:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA07674 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mrelay.bellglobal.com (mrelay.bellglobal.com [198.235.216.100]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA07669 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 06:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns by mrelay.bellglobal.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #26722)
 with SMTP id <0FE100IZHIHAWJ@mrelay.bellglobal.com> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:49:33 -0400
From: Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca (Bill Henderson)
Subject: GB> Searching tube data
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <msg284367.thr-8dbeaf.4c4fef@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
Organization: Ottawa Carleton District School Board
Content-id: <msg284367.thr-8dbeaf.4c4fef.part0@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-Gateway: NASTA Gate 2.0 for FirstClass(R)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have picked up two type 6LW6 octal based sweep tubes from older
Admiral brand color tv sets.
Been looking around, but can't seem to find any specs, a basing diagram
or even equivalent types for reference. I would like to try one of
these as RF power amp in a simple two tube xmtr. 
I've checked a lot of the usual sources on the web and some back issues
of ARRL Handbooks that I have as well as my GE receiving tube manual...
NOTHING.
So... anybody got any data on 6LW6, specs as originally used or has
anybody tried this at say 600 vdc or thereabouts? Any data
appreciated... thanx  - Bill H.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 10:48:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA11324
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:48:51 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08787;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:40:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA08122 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from stput.stp.guidant.com (stput.guidant.com [132.189.76.30]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA08117 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpmsx01.stp.guidant.com (stpmsx01.stp.guidant.com [132.189.8.30])
	by stput.stp.guidant.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA26193
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:36:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by stpmsx01.stp.guidant.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <NMCSDYSY>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:30:53 -0500
Message-ID: <21B46CBD022AD1118F0500805F15A068018666E2@stpmsx05.stp.guidant.com>
From: "Freeberg, Scott (STP)" <scott.freeberg@guidant.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: RE: GB> RE: Romance and Prehistoric Sigs (Was GB on-the-air conte
	st)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:30:49 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi All,

I spent alot of radio time last summer running an Ameco AC-1 (with a 75A4,
Talk about extremes in technology) running 5 watts output, and a Conar 400
running 15 watts out.  Hung around the 40 meter qrp freq and lower.

Those little peanut whistles have extreme chirp for sure!  It gets even
worse if you don't tune it right.   It was funny in that all the newbie's
were quick to point out my chirp, while all the OT's commented on how nice
it sounded.  Interesting huh?  Of all my BA radios, I get the most radio
excitement from using that Ameco AC-1 and Conar 400 because while the
contacts are far and few between, they are sweet contacts.

Can you get in trouble with the FCC for transmitter chirp?

73,

Scott WA9WFA in Saint Paul Minn


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 11:08:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11378
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:08:53 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13156;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:00:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA08355 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ale.atd.ucar.edu (ale.atd.ucar.edu [128.117.80.15]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA08349 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 07:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atd.ucar.edu (adam.atd.ucar.edu [128.117.78.128])
	by ale.atd.ucar.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA26571
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:45:44 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <37778B12.F794B340@atd.ucar.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:47:46 -0600
From: Chip Owens <owens@atd.ucar.edu>
Organization: NCAR
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Romance & Pre-historic signals
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

When I was in the US Navy and assigned to the Naval Communications
Station, Japan I operated the Navy MARS station in my off-duty time. The
U.S. Air Force acted as the regulating body for all (military)
communications in Japan as the FCC had no jurisdiction in a foreign
country. They also regulated use of amateur radio frequencies & power
levels by US forces operating from the military bases.

One of the restrictions imposed at that time was that hams operating
from US military bases could not communicate with local Japanese
nationals. Imagine calling CQ and not being able to reply to the
amateurs calling in your own backyard! Curiously, there was no
restriction made on contacts with hams in the Soviet Union. So when
propagation was poor I ended up working bushel baskets full of UA0
stations on 40M CW. The time period was 1970 and the years following,
i.e. part of the Cold War era. For a newly licensed ham this was great
fun and a real eye-opener. Those UA0 stations had some really awful
sounding signals!, but there was no mistaking them even as they drifted
and chirped across the salt-water path from Russia to Japan. Actually I
found it easy to copy them despite their somewhat raspy and drifty
signals. Power supply regulation was an obvious problem for many of
them, but it didn't stop them from plying the ether. It didn't
discourage me from working them either!

'73, Chip, NW0O,  Boulder, Colorado




-- 
Chip Owens   (owens@atd.ucar.edu)

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 11:36:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11441
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:36:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17267;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA08680 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA08675 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12496;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:13:00 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281513.LAA12496@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest (Sine Me UP!).
In-Reply-To: <006901bebfe5$5585ca40$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu> from Conard Murray at "Jun 26, 99 10:05:31 am"
To: cmurray@tntech.edu (Conard Murray)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> I am all in favor of a GB on-the-air rally/contest/show and tell session.

Great Idea!

I second the motion..... (lots of others will, too.....(:+}}...)

> Let's put on a contest for homebrew
> valve-based gear for sometime in the early fall and then again in the winter.
> You get max points for a complete
> firebottle homebrew station and somewhat less points for store-bought stuff.
> We need to include incentives for homebrew
> SS and commercial stuff too to lure those guys into our web.

Lets say anything valve based, for starters, with classes[points] for

(Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1])
power (5W[3]/50W[2]/500W[1])
mode (CW[3]/AM[2]/SSB[1]).

Allow only valve type gear with HB/GB[2] or commercial/military gear[1].
HB stuff can be modern reproductions or really olden antique stuff too.

No modern transistor stuff allowed.

Report period x power x mode x type for qso points.

It is only a funzies thing, and fer heaven's sake, set a whiles an' chaw
on that thar ol' ham rag a bit.....

> I think the objective should be to put out the best signal
> quality-wise as the design you are using will allow.

True, but a period set can put out a period signal and still be entirely
acceptable, for the state of the art at the time of the period.

> Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.
> I bet they would have been wouff-honged in 1928.

Always, but, a good Hartley can sound as good as a Ten-Tec, or as
sweet as a 25 cycle Cuban, or one of Jeff's ACW/ICW/A2 sets.
All it takes is a little o' the right fiddlin'.

> Anything to get more firebottles on the air.

Basically true, within reason.  But I tend to tolerate significant
character in a fist or a signal, and have only found maybe one or two
that were unreadable.  After all, it is ``get the communications through'',
right?  A good op can read the bilgewater muck with even a slipping contact
or carborundum detector, and still pass the traffic.  Still, it takes some
operator training to run the really rotten olden tyme gear, or they can
sound like they are the ``banshees from hades''.  But, that is what our
GB group is about, too..... learning how to make it work!

> Now if the *(^((_%$ rain would just lift a few minutes so I could
> make a run to the FD site...

WS4S DE W4D 1A NC
FB QSO U FD OM FM NC
GL CONARD
DE NA4G/Bob UP

Alas, I was only able to hit WS4S, on 40M(?), late Sat.  I didn't check the
logs yet to see if anyone else was hit by the others of the crewe.  I like
ta fell outta da op's chair when it hit me that it was ol' Conard there.
I dunno if he recognized me with that silly W4D call, but I batted back
at him on the bug for a second to let him know he was heard in Raleigh.
If the dupes did not eat us up, we ran 1003 QSO's 1A NC with five deaden
olden CW pfartes well stinking by the end of the watch.....(:+{{.....
Alas, Grandma Hartley and Twinnie Triode did not do squat Friday night.
But, it was, indeed, a fun and rowdy FD 1999.  It sounds like several
GB folks had fun, although sorry about Ken's shafting problems (next
time try rubber drive belts?).

> ZUT!
> Conard

ZUT!

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 11:43:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11503
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:43:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18644;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA08937 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ciao.intergraph.com (ciao.intergraph.com [205.139.151.254]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA08932 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b11.b11.ingr.com by ciao.intergraph.com
          via smtpd (for piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252]) with SMTP; 28 Jun 1999 15:23:51 UT
Received: from ro.com (lilliput.ics.ingr.com) by b11.b11.ingr.com (5.65c/1.921207)
	id AA16207; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:23:48 -0500
Message-Id: <37779382.8319E9C2@ro.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:23:46 -0500
From: Dan Kerl <dlkerl@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> R-122A/ARN-12, 75 Mhz Airborne Marker Beacon Receiver
References: <37751771.156AA9E3@littonengr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Conrad Warren wrote:
> 
> The receiver has a long strip of what looks
> like audio transformers - some of which may be audio filters,
> used to separate out the three signals commonly used to control
> three lamps on the pilots instrument panel - the outer marker lamp,
> the middle marker lamp and the inner marker lamp.  This seems
> to agree with the seven of pins in the front panel connector,
> which  should include: ground, +28 Volts, DC, some form of
> B+ (based on the voltage ratings of the capacitors, inside), a
> remote audio output lead and the three lamp driver leads.

Ohboy, airplane stuff!

The frequencies of the resonators in this receiver can be found from
this bit, found at
http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/~ladkin/Reports/navigation.html#ILS
----------------------
ILS marker beacons have a rated power output of 3 watts or less and
an antenna array designed to produce an elliptical pattern with 
dimensions, at 1,000 feet above the antenna, of approximately 2,400
feet in width and 4,200 feet in length.

Ordinarily, there are two marker beacons associated with an ILS,
the OM and MM. Locations with a Category II and III ILS also have
an Inner Marker (IM). When an aircraft passes over a marker, the
pilot will receive the following indications:

OM - blue lamp, 400 Hz tone
MM - amber lamp, 1300 Hz tone
IM (also labeled FM/Z, BC or airways) - white lamp, 3000 Hz tone

The outer marker (OM) normally indicates a position at which an
aircraft at the appropriate altitude on the localizer course will
intercept the ILS glide path. 

The middle marker (MM) indicates a position approximately 3,500
feet from the landing threshold. This is also the position where an
aircraft on the glide path will be at an altitude of approximately
200 feet above the elevation of the touchdown zone. 

The inner marker (IM) wll indicate a point at which an aircraft is at
a designated decision height (DH) on the glide path between the MM
and landing threshold.
-------------------------
Some of the uses of markers went away with the demise of the old
radio range systems, such marking the 'cone of silence'. I know of no
fan markers (FM) currently active in this area (north Alabama).

A description of some of the obsolete uses can be found in Terman's
Radion Engineers' Handbook (1943), pp 897.

-- 
Dan Kerl
dlkerl@ro.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 11:53:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11535
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:51 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20614;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA09158 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA09153 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:33:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12550;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:31:59 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281531.LAA12550@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <3773F08D.DA67C4AA@littonengr.com> from Conrad Warren at "Jun 25, 99 02:14:32 pm"
To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
> -- Conrad

Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
sets and applications.  My expectations are that it would net about
10 mw output, and be good for about 5 miles or so, although the
fence wire ought to be like a long coax or line against ground
in the above application.  What would the impedance of the fence
be at RF?????.....(:+}}.....

Anyone know if experimentation with buzzer sets is covered by any
of the classic Part 15 regs?  That could form the basis of some
interesting QRPP experiments with loose coupling and proper
decrement to the waves.  After all, in the early days, buzzers
were used to excite antennae for tuning and calibration purposes
both in spark sets and in receiving sets.

Hmmmm, do they still make vibrating reed buzzers anymore?

Maybe a SPDT reed relay or sensitve adjustable plate relay could
be pressed into service as a buzzer......Hmmmmm......  You would
have to very carefully adjust the thing so that the arm would
vibrate at around 200-300 cycles to get a decent note.

Hmmmmm..... Where did my buzzer go?????  (:+}}.....

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 11:53:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11530
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:43 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA20852;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA09229 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.aurora.edu (admin.aurora.edu [192.203.224.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA09221 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (broehrig@localhost)
	by admin.aurora.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA14563;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:34:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:34:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest (Sine Me UP!).
In-Reply-To: <199906281513.LAA12496@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990628103332.21742B-100000@admin.aurora.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:

> > I am all in favor of a GB on-the-air rally/contest/show and tell session.
> Great Idea!
> I second the motion..... (lots of others will, too.....(:+}}...)
> Lets say anything valve based, for starters, with classes[points] for
> 
> (Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1])
> power (5W[3]/50W[2]/500W[1])
> mode (CW[3]/AM[2]/SSB[1]).
> 
> Allow only valve type gear with HB/GB[2] or commercial/military gear[1].
> HB stuff can be modern reproductions or really olden antique stuff too.

Are we just talkin' transmitting gear here or does the reiver have to be
in the saem category?

                    "Nostalgia is a thing of the past"
    E-mail: broehrig@admin.aurora.edu or k9eui@arrl.net   73 de Bob, K9EUI
            CIS: Data / Telecom   Aurora University, Aurora, IL
                      630-844-4898  Fax 630-844-4222

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 12:05:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11568
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:05:01 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22492;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:56:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA09487 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA09480 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 08:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA12614;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:43:03 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281543.LAA12614@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Tri-Tet: RE: Smilin' Fred Sutter.....
In-Reply-To: <000001bebe9d$d8ae5840$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com> from David Newkirk at "Jun 24, 99 08:01:16 pm"
To: dpnewkirk@home.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

....a truism was thusly spake....

> (and a great fan of Sutter, who I hope is smiling down at us as we converse)

Ol' Fred be plenty smilin' at us as long as we keep ``tuffy 6L6'' and
company a'glowin'......

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 12:28:13 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11656
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:28:13 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25601;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10067 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10062 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12659;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:03:20 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281603.MAA12659@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
In-Reply-To: <19990626.084744.-181959.8.MNHopkins@juno.com> from "mnhopkins@juno.com" at "Jun 26, 99 08:47:27 am"
To: mnhopkins@juno.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:03:19 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> I read with interest Dave Newkirk's quite plausable account of why the
> AWA sets 1929 as the cut off for its primative TX contest.  I saved it,
> in fact, but there is a consequence, unintended or not, to setting 1929
> as the cut off.

Well said by Dave.  I might suggest also, that due to power supply
filtering constraints of the early 20's, running AC power was musical,
at best, with things like slop jar rectifiers and 1ufd filter caps.
But, even the early sets can put out very respectable signals with
battery power and reasonable coupling.   For example, the earliest
reference to a ``Hartley'' sending  set that I can find, touted as
the worlds simplest sending set, dates from about 1921 in Gernsback's
Radio News, in one of the newcomers columns.  I have built many sets
using that exact design, running on batteries, and loosely coupled,
and they work rather well for 1w or less output.  Almost any tube
that you have can be dropped in, and still work.

Only two things are well to keep in mind about the early sets.

1) never direct couple them.

2) never overload them.

Other than that, if it will run stably on battery power, without an
antenna, or with just a small dummy load, it will usually do fine
hooked up to the antenna.

>   The dual triode won't appear 'till 1934.  The Type 19 that so
> influenced 5M practice was first, but others were half a year behind it. 
> With these early ICs (the first?) it became possible to build quite good
> one tube RXs and, also, the Frank Jones type push pull one-tube TXs.

There were some combined tubes back in the early 20's, but they were
very expensive, and mostly experimental.  The name of Scott (Brit?)
seems to be associated with that, and there was a Brit or German firm
that made BC sets with such combined tubes, because taxes were less
on them with only one valve in the set as opposed to several.  Any
Brits on the list that can confirm that?

>   I have some 19s but could not afford to buy more at the present asked
> price.  But if I could use a  6SN7 I could field a two valve station or,
> by copying C.F. Rockey and others, even a one-tube station.

Folks, there is Nothing, repeat Nothing wrong with subbing a later tube
in an early circuit, and still calling the thing an early repro set.
If you are not running the AWA thing, where the real tube counts, then
put anything there that will work and allow you the fun of GB'ing the
beastie.  I swear by the 6SN7ish sort of thing, because they are still
relatively common for play tubes and they can be wired up double to
make one triode with a little adapter to fit an '01A socket (plus the
right voltages), or run separately as independent triodes.

>   Perhaps we need a Tandem Triode 'Test for those more interested in
> circuitry than historic accuracy.

That is the joy of a triode.... singly or doubly or triply they are
still a triode.  Remember, one of our early GB folks (now sadly not
on the list) ran 833's in his regennie detector.  A triode is a triode
is a triode..... (well that one was a little hotter than the rest.....)

Pick a design from an article, and use that as the period.   Sub whatever
device you have available to work, and get it working!  Use precious
devices, like '00's or '01's sparingly, these days, but do play with
the circuits, new and old.  That is how you get the hang of them.

> "Better a Blooper than a store-bought 'Super."

Well said..... (:+}}.... but good ones don't bloop.....

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 12:33:58 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11671
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:33:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26605;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10194 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10189 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12684;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:12:34 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281612.MAA12684@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
In-Reply-To: <37750E79.E076CE8E@littonengr.com> from Conrad Warren at "Jun 26, 99 10:35:06 am"
To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:12:33 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> I'LL SECOND THATY, BOBBI!  But, also need some folks to work
> some 160 Meters.  Shouldn't be scared off by the antenna requirements.

160 is the funnest bande about.  EVERYTHING is staaaaaable at 200M an' down.
Hartleys love it down on those ``short useless waves''.

I was running the 40M vertical loaded up on 160.  It works, fair, but it
works.  Anything from 45 feet of end fed whatever, worked against any
kind of 45 foot or longer counterpoise wiiiiilllll load up on 160.
Even a 15 foot fishpole whip loads on 160, but won't do transcons, very
well.  You will have to have a series antenna tuner of maybe 300pf-500pf
cap and a coil of roughly 4 inches diameter, and 50 turns of no. 14
copper household wire.  Tune for max out with a  FS  meter and run with it!
My favorite antenna for 160,  still, is an end fed roll of 100 feet of
storeboughten wire with a similar counterpoise laid out on the ground.
I can work everything out to 1000-1500 miles, easily, in winter and
out to 300 miles or so in summer with only 25 watts or so.  Cranking up
Big Bertha Radiomarine to 250 watts, gets me transcons in winter on 160.

There is a fellow, Gene, up in VA, that is on 160 CW yearround.
You can always count on him on 1807 in the evenings.

>  160 Meters
> is an interesting band - even in the summer time.  Often very quite
> and low noise (here in Northern California, anyway.)  It's an empty
> park to play in, yet, nobody there.  I wonder why that is?  --  Conrad

Folks just dunno what they be missing, methinks.....

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 12:40:45 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11683
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26838;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:31:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10328 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10322 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12708;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281616.MAA12708@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> GB Chirp an' Buzz-in..... Yeah!
In-Reply-To: <377596A3.EB48B77A@littonengr.com> from Conrad Warren at "Jun 26, 99 08:16:22 pm"
To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:16:52 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Maybe, all the guys (like me) that miss signals with a little character
> should exodus to 160 Meters, where there are few purists to bother.
> We could hold a "Chirp and Buzz In,"  and nobody else would know anything
> about it.....
> 
>  Conrad, W7WLM

I love the name..... We should find some way to use it!

Probably good for mostly fall/winter/spring, in reality.

But, a monthly ``Chirp and Buzz In'' would  be a neat idea.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 12:56:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA11713
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:56:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28732;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10636 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10631 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12746;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:33:50 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281633.MAA12746@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Wanted: 2-tube circuit using a 6146
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906271502490.25961-100000@uhunix5> from "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" at "Jun 27, 99 03:06:11 pm"
To: jeffreyh@hawaii.edu (Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Anyone have a 2-tube circuit using a 6146 in the final? Until I
> find a Heath DX-60 transmitter, I'll have to build an xmtr myself.
> Jeff KH6O

A 6AG7 and a 6146 would have been typical of the novice sets of the
mid 50's/60's ARRL handbooks.  My guess would be anything from about
1955-1965 should have one design for a 50-75 watt or 90 watt set
using maybe a 6AG7/6CL6 oscillator and the 6146 buffer.  Before that
time (1946-1954) I would expect a 6L6/6AG7 oscillator and an 807
final as typical.  There was even a mid 60's single 6146 set that
had about 35 watts output using the 6146 as the xtal oscillator
(1964?).

I dunno how well they worked, but the Johnson Viking Adventurer,
or the Globe Scout or Heath DX-60 circuits would have been very
typical of what to expect.  If you can find one of those schematics,
it should serve as a good starter, or find one of those handbooks.
My novice Adventurer was always marginal.  The Globe Scout was fair.
But the DX-60 always was rock solid.   I would say that to copy it
would be a fairly good strategy.

(Dave Newkirk, are there any particular HBK years you can recommend
from your experiences?)

(Jeff, send me your snailmail and I will copy you off a couple of
schematics.)

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 13:07:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11724
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:07:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA30881;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:58:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10771 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sparticus.bright.net (sparticus.bright.net [205.212.123.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10765 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bright.net (circ-ras3-2-cs-11.dial.bright.net [209.143.14.241])
	by sparticus.bright.net (8.9.3/8.9.3 ComNet Build) with SMTP id MAA21203;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002601bec185$55e90be0$f10e8fd1@Bright.net>
From: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
To: "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:43:20 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

As a kid during WW2, a friend and I experimented with this kind of
thing over a 1 block distance here in town, if you can call our feeble
attempts "experiments".  Got some verbal "QSLs", ("pink ticket" type),
from by grandmother about the interferrence with her "The Guiding
Light" radio soap opera programs, and from my grandfather when he was
trying to listen to the war news from H.B. Kaltenborne, (Blue Network,
I think).  I guess this was what might be called "damped waves", as it
covered a wide spectrum then, and I suppose, would also today.  I
don't know if even Part 15 would cover that kind of emissions.
73 de
Dick, WB8MHE
wb8mhe@bright.net

-----Original Message-----
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
To: cwarren@littonengr.com <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
<glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Monday, June 28, 1999 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)


>> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
>> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
>> -- Conrad
>
>Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
>Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
>sets and applications.  My expectations are that it would net about
>10 mw output, and be good for about 5 miles or so, although the
>fence wire ought to be like a long coax or line against ground
>in the above application.  What would the impedance of the fence
>be at RF?????.....(:+}}.....
>
>Anyone know if experimentation with buzzer sets is covered by any
>of the classic Part 15 regs?  That could form the basis of some
>interesting QRPP experiments with loose coupling and proper
>decrement to the waves.  After all, in the early days, buzzers
>were used to excite antennae for tuning and calibration purposes
>both in spark sets and in receiving sets.
>
>Hmmmm, do they still make vibrating reed buzzers anymore?
>
>Maybe a SPDT reed relay or sensitve adjustable plate relay could
>be pressed into service as a buzzer......Hmmmmm......  You would
>have to very carefully adjust the thing so that the arm would
>vibrate at around 200-300 cycles to get a decent note.
>
>Hmmmmm..... Where did my buzzer go?????  (:+}}.....
>
>Bob/NA4G
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 13:16:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11776
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:16:06 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA32206;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:07:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA10982 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA10976 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA12829;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:51:35 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281651.MAA12829@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest (Sine Me UP!).
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990628103332.21742B-100000@admin.aurora.edu> from Bob Roehrig at "Jun 28, 99 10:34:46 am"
To: broehrig@admin.aurora.edu (Bob Roehrig)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: cmurray@tntech.edu, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:
> 
> > > I am all in favor of a GB on-the-air rally/contest/show and tell session.
> > Great Idea!
> > I second the motion..... (lots of others will, too.....(:+}}...)
> > Lets say anything valve based, for starters, with classes[points] for
> > 
> > (Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1])
> > power (5W[3]/50W[2]/500W[1])
> > mode (CW[3]/AM[2]/SSB[1]).
> > 
> > Allow only valve type gear with HB/GB[2] or commercial/military gear[1].
> > HB stuff can be modern reproductions or really olden antique stuff too.
> 
> Are we just talkin' transmitting gear here or does the reiver have to be
> in the saem category?

Good Point, Bob.... I was thinking receiver and transmitter would be
of the same period, in the above, but it would be good to break it out
to where the regennie folks or such had a receiver advantage.

Maybe something like:

(Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1]) TX
power (5W[3]/50W[2]/500W[1])
mode (CW[3]/AM[2]/SSB[1])
type (HB[2]/commercial-military[1])

(Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1]) RX
type (HB[2]/commercial-military[1])

For equalizing distance effects, 0-1000 miles = 1
                                 1000-2000 miles = 2
                                 >2000 miles = 3

Points for a qso would be:

TX(vintage x power x mode x type) x RX(vintage x type) x DISTANCE.

All of this is based upon info you are going to want to minimally
log, anyway.

Most of us would make maybe 50 QSO's so that would entail a little
calculating, but might not be too unduly reasonable.

Folks with peanut whistles would get the advantage over big guns.

Maybe adjust points to favor the lesser stations, even more?

Would something like that make more sense?

As a prize, the top 5 points stations get a certificate to throw darts at?

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 13:18:15 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11787
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:18:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA31769;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:09:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA11074 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from alice.pdq.net (alice.pdq.net [204.145.251.236]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA11069 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AirNote: 1
Received: from 56K-076.MaxTNT6.pdq.net [209.144.25.76-6] by meg.pdq.net; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:57:05 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.19990628114103.01193f10@pop.pdq.net>
X-Sender: bratcher@pop.pdq.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:01 -0500
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
From: "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." <bratcher@pdq.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <199906281531.LAA12550@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
References: <3773F08D.DA67C4AA@littonengr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

At 11:31 AM 6/28/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
>> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
>> -- Conrad
>
>Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
>Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
>sets and applications.  My expectations are that it would net about
>10 mw output, and be good for about 5 miles or so, although the
>fence wire ought to be like a long coax or line against ground
>in the above application.  What would the impedance of the fence
>be at RF?????.....(:+}}.....
>
>Anyone know if experimentation with buzzer sets is covered by any
>of the classic Part 15 regs?  That could form the basis of some
>interesting QRPP experiments with loose coupling and proper
>decrement to the waves.  After all, in the early days, buzzers
>were used to excite antennae for tuning and calibration purposes
>both in spark sets and in receiving sets.
>
>Hmmmm, do they still make vibrating reed buzzers anymore?
>
>Maybe a SPDT reed relay or sensitve adjustable plate relay could
>be pressed into service as a buzzer......Hmmmmm......  You would
>have to very carefully adjust the thing so that the arm would
>vibrate at around 200-300 cycles to get a decent note.
>
>Hmmmmm..... Where did my buzzer go?????  (:+}}.....
>
>Bob/NA4G

Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
in the middle of a summer afternoon...

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 13:35:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11824
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:35:08 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02403;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:26:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA11365 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11359 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA12869;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281705.NAA12869@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <002601bec185$55e90be0$f10e8fd1@Bright.net> from Dick Blaney at "Jun 28, 99 12:43:20 pm"
To: wb8mhe@bright.net (Dick Blaney)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> As a kid during WW2, a friend and I experimented with this kind of
> thing over a 1 block distance here in town, if you can call our feeble
> attempts "experiments".  Got some verbal "QSLs", ("pink ticket" type),
> from by grandmother about the interferrence with her "The Guiding
> Light" radio soap opera programs, and from my grandfather when he was
> trying to listen to the war news from H.B. Kaltenborne, (Blue Network,
> I think).  I guess this was what might be called "damped waves", as it
> covered a wide spectrum then, and I suppose, would also today.  I
> don't know if even Part 15 would cover that kind of emissions.
> 73 de
> Dick, WB8MHE
> wb8mhe@bright.net

Neat.

I tried a few of these kinds of things in the early 50's, but surely
did not know what the hades I was doing then.....

I have always wondered about setting up a spark set with some proper
coupling and proper tuning (the real spark sets were not well tuned but
had only one ``tank'' circuit).  I would think that a 3 stage tuned
circuit of tanks, link coupled at critical coupling or less would
sharpen up the historically poo-pooed spark wave, until it actually
would meet modern requirements as to harmonics and out of band
operation, etc.  It would still be as wide as a broad AM wave,
modulated with 100% modulation and a complex audio wave form.
It might be fun to try that with a buzzer setup, and run it
into a spectrum analyzer and actually do the response curves
for frequency and harmonics.  The type of spark discharger
(plain gap, rotary gap, quenched gap) also has an effect on
the purity of wave and sharpness of wave.

If you actually look at the frequency response of a real spark set
(see Elmer Bucher, again, for a plot of the actual wave of a marine
spark set), the wave is not as ``broad'' as misconceptions lead us
to believe.   Also, with reduced coupling, it could be improved.

Although the spark set would never match up to a good tube set
for purity of wave, it might still be an interesting pre-GB
thing to play with, for fun, assuming it could be tamed a little.
It is one of those interesting oddities from way back in time.....

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 13:59:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA11854
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:59:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05843;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA11787 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11781 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA12899;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:27:10 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281727.NAA12899@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990628114103.01193f10@pop.pdq.net> from "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." at "Jun 28, 99 11:53:01 am"
To: bratcher@pdq.net (Robert M. Bratcher Jr.)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> >> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
> >> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
> >
> >Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
> >Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
> >sets and applications.
> >
> Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
> out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
> transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
> with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
> away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
> in the middle of a summer afternoon...

Interesting, that would be an untuned plain gap circuit, and the most
prone to harmonics, etc.

Now, what if that were well shielded and filtered on the power supply
leads, DC was used as the power source, the ``gap'' was adjusted carefully
to give a good note, and several tuning tanks were used to keep the
wave sharp?   Hmmmmm.....

Neato.....

I tried it once with an auto vibrator, 12V, if memory is correct, pulled
from a car radio.  Mine also had no tuned circuit,  and I could hear it
in the sw rx about 500 feet away, with several feet of wire antenna as
the radiator.  With no antenna attached, it could only be picked up
around 100 feet away.  That was when I was a GI, and the folks in the
barracks thought I had totally gone goonie lugging a car battery and
funky board all over the grounds.  I proved to myself that it did
work...... sort of.....(:+\\.....  I did not know Morse then, so
I couldn't try sending anything but an odd pattern of dits by connecting
the battery on/off.

There is a friend in town with a couple of real spark sets.  One a plain
gap ham set from the early 20's, one a rotary gap set from some school
that used to teach radio up in Philly, and the third I don't remember
offhand what it is.  It is fun to take them to local ham classes and
set out the regens and key a few dits.....  sans antennae, of course.
They can be real hash, ahh, err, signal generators, untuned.

But, that still begs the question of whether or not a buzzer set could
be cleaned up enough to try some QRPP part something-or-other demos
or experiments.

Any one else got any odd spark set experiments to report?
This is getting interesting.....

Bob/NA4G



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 14:00:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA11862
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:00:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05434;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:51:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA11898 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11891 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JCXMNR93P08WXD3L@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:31:58 CDT
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:29:42 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KH6O" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <019101bec18b$cee6ce00$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906261132530.17655-100000@uhunix5>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Jeff,
> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.

I was in a bit of a hurry when I wrote that. Maybe I should explain what I meant before everyone thinks wrong thoughts
about me.
I am all for rigs sounding like they should. If a rig is expected to chirp, let it chirp and let others enjoy it. RAC
and A2 sounds great to me too. What I am objecting to are rigs that are set up to exaggerate the chirp or note. I have
heard a few Hartleys on the air that sounded perfect and I know that with even the smallest amount of care one can be
made that only chirps maybe three or four hundred cycles or so. What I am objecting to are some rigs I heard that were
chirping four or five kc/s with clicks going out past that or A2 that sounded like a bad AM rig modulated with a kazoo
with a wet reed. Stuff like that isn't making any friends, especially with other ops that are trying to operate close
by.
I think one of the 'missions' of the GB list is to educate other hams in the way of the firebottle. One excellent way of
doing this is by working them with old-style gear. If they hear a clean, stable (within the limits of the technology, of
course) signal then they will be impressed and hopefully be inspired to make their own firebottle rig.  If what they
hear is a mess then they will not want to waste time and money on something that they would be embarrassed to sign their
call with.
I am sure a lot of really foul signals were put on the air back in the old days. Parts were scarce and expensive and I
am sure the desire to get on the air forced many into making do with what they had. I bet the guy running RAC would have
been glad to use a filter if he had one and I bet he made one as soon as he could. If there was one thing I wish I could
transplant from the ham radio era our grandparents knew to the ham radio of today it would be the ham's spirit of
continual improvisation and improvement. The ham of the 20's and 30's strove for the best signal possible and I think we
do them a disservice if we represent their efforts with anything less.
I enjoy a nice clean A2 signal and a bit of RAC is good too from time to time just to show the newbies what it sounds
like if nothing else. Go wherever your heart leads and do it well. Build it, get it on the air and tell us about it.

73 and ZUT!
Conard, WS4S

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 14:39:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA12003
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:39:47 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA11194;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:30:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12498 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA12493 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED8H3M82; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:09:43 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> carbon arc wireless
Message-ID: <19990628.141726.11263.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
References: <199906281531.LAA12550@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,2,4,6-9,11,13-19,21-30
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:09:43 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

One of my first jobs had me working for a lady who used to be driven to
school as a young lass by Mina Edison, in her electric car down in Ft.
Myers.
She was fun to talk to.  But when i found out her husband Archie plied
the ether
for the Miami Fruit Co. abt 1918 or there abouts, i badgered him
mercilessly
for his recollections.  He graciously obliged.  

One of the things Archie would always go back to was how easy it was
to identify the Company, the Nationality and often the individual you
worked,
by the " swing " of the fist.  Miami fruit ops developed what he called
the
" banana-boat swing " , Cunard ( Marconi ) ops had what he called a
" Limey swing ", and etc.  Germans with Telefunken had theirs.

He described a transmitter i have never heard anybody ever talk about
neither have i found literature on:  the Carbon Arc.

Archie said it was basically a carbon arc such as is used to burn litho
plates
with, and the arc was pulled by a magnetic field and coupled through
some coil arrangement to the aerial.  He said that over the headsets
it sounded like a beautiful violin.  The tone or pitch was determined by
the pull of the magnetic field on the arc.  Has anybody ever come across
one of these things?     ( i'dve loved to see one in operation )


vry 73
gary wd4nka

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 14:49:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA12032
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:49:12 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA13763;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12669 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA12664 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> News!!!
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990628112139.12313E-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I am forwarding this message which came to me from Conrad Warren. I am
sure he meant it for the whole group. We can help!

Ken W7EKB

>When I get my 304TL Hartley done, I supposer someone will complain about
its "lousy" signal...

Well, I won't.  When you get it done give me a buzz.  Maybe, by then
my 833 oscillator will be done.  It will double as the weinie cooker at our
first Annual Amateur Radio Heritage Field Day,  to be held the third
Saturday of August every year.  I will personally kick off the first one
myself, removing my radio apparatus, out into the pucker brush, to fill
the ether with Teslian Waves and otherwise hob nob with all those of a
similar inclination.

Mark your calendars.  From hence forth, The third Saturday of August is
National Amatuer Radio Heritage Day, and is to be celebrated by two way
communications, with wireless apparatus, no later in vintage than or vintage
design than 1960. Both portable, in the field and at home QTH operations
are encouraged. On this one day out of the year, no one will criticize
anyone else's signal except for readability and strength!

No contests will be run on this day.

I will be working with my Representative (Herger) to have a bill drafted and
sent to Congress to make the National Amateur Radio Heritage Day, and its
associated Field Day, a legal day of recognition, rememberance and
celebration.
 
Conrad W7WLM

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:02:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12090
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:02:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15436;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12835 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp.amotusa.com ([206.169.137.4]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA12827 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM davidb-200.amotusa.com BY smtp.amotusa.com ; Mon Jun 28 11:34:41 1999
Message-ID: <020901bec194$d86d12a0$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>, "Gary G Johanson" <wd4nka@juno.com>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:34:23 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Don't have my musty old books here at work (alas) but here's what I remember
reading about arc transmitters:  they had a very clean signal (I think there
was some pre-audion AM done with them), they had to run continuously to keep
the arc going, so keying either switched the frequency or dumped the output
into a dummy load, and the arc worked much better in a hydrogen-rich
atmosphere, so they continuously injected alchohol (and perhaps other
similar substances?) into the arc chamber.

Additions, corrections?

Arc transmitters are certainly discussed in the old books.

73,
Mike, KK6GM

>...
>He described a transmitter i have never heard anybody ever talk about
>neither have i found literature on:  the Carbon Arc.
>
>Archie said it was basically a carbon arc such as is used to burn litho
>plates
>with, and the arc was pulled by a magnetic field and coupled through
>some coil arrangement to the aerial.  He said that over the headsets
>it sounded like a beautiful violin.  The tone or pitch was determined by
>the pull of the magnetic field on the arc.  Has anybody ever come across
>one of these things?     ( i'dve loved to see one in operation )
>
>
>vry 73
>gary wd4nka
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>Get the Internet just the way you want it.
>Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
>Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:14:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12155
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:14:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17313;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:05:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13189 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA13180 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA13080;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:49:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281849.OAA13080@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest
In-Reply-To: <019101bec18b$cee6ce00$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu> from Conard Murray at "Jun 28, 99 12:29:42 pm"
To: cmurray@tntech.edu (Conard Murray)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:49:11 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jeffreyh@hawaii.edu, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> 
>Hi Jeff,

> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.

>I was in a bit of a hurry when I wrote that. Maybe I should explain
>what I meant before everyone thinks wrong thoughts about me.

No problem.   Everyone knows your fine dedication to the GB tradition.
Anyone who thinks wrongly of Conard, be gettin' a touch o' da rettysnitch,
and a dozen passes o' da wouf hong....(:+}}......

A friend of mine, who is also AWA, calls it ``scary'' rather
than disgraceful.  He is now known to old hands by his ``scary''
note, after a report from a fellow down Atlanty way.   Also, ol'
Bruce Kelly, now hobknobbin' with Fred Sutter, about the virtues
of Miss ``Tuffy'' 6L6, regularly had one of the finest sounding
primary keying sets you have ever heard (that set is sorely missed
these days with that slow and steady fist).  It's note rang like
a fine crystal bell, of goodly note.  Both of these AWA folks,
could/can/do/did run with the best on their sets.  It be kindof
``interesting'' to compare notes, then go back and fiddle some more
with Grandma Hartley.  They know/knew how to get the period signal,
and they were old enough to have lived in those days.   Sadly, many
of them are now going SK, and we will miss those ``interesting''
sigs, down the road aways.

>I am all for rigs sounding like they should. If a rig is expected
>to chirp, let it chirp and let others enjoy it. RAC and A2 sounds
>great to me too. What I am objecting to are rigs that are set up
>to exaggerate the chirp or note. I have heard a few Hartleys on
>the air that sounded perfect and I know that with even the smallest
>amount of care one can be made that only chirps maybe three or four
>hundred cycles or so. What I am objecting to are some rigs I heard
>that were chirping four or five kc/s with clicks going out past
>that or A2 that sounded like a bad AM rig modulated with a kazoo
>with a wet reed. Stuff like that isn't making any friends, especially
>with other ops that are trying to operate close by.

I like that kazoo with the wet reed bit..... like a scary kazoo, on 80M....

Folks, Conard has it exactly right..... a period set should sound like
its period.  Hartleys can be as good as most late model sets, so period
sets can be pretty fine with a little care and TLC on the things.
Most folks don't realize just how fine the period sets can really be.
A good period Hartley can run with the big dawgs, just like a Ten-Tec.
Yer Hartley ain't had a good wringin' out till it be hustled along QSK
at 35wpm or better.   If it can handle that, well, it be well adjusted.
If it can't, it still needs some fiddlin'.  Once properly fiddled, then
it be pure musick, sans bloops, whoops, klicks, swishes, an' buzzes.

I would agree that there were some AWA sets that were more than
scary.  Any set that traverses more than 5khz up and down at one
keydown is probably overloaded/overcoupled, and could use some revising.
I have noted that not everyone on the AWA fracas seems to have all
the bits together, as one might expect.  Mebbie that is the AWA crewe
in training.....  We, Glowbuggites, of course, being better of the
training and technical artes, can do better, right?  Rah, Rah, Rah!
Actually, we share a lot in common with the AWA folks, in history,
traditions, knowledge, and fun.  We just get on the air, all the time,
with our olden sending sets!

>I think one of the 'missions' of the GB list is to educate other
>hams in the way of the firebottle. One excellent way of doing this
>is by working them with old-style gear. If they hear a clean, stable
>(within the limits of the technology, of course) signal then they
>will be impressed and hopefully be inspired to make their own
>firebottle rig.  If what they hear is a mess then they will not
>want to waste time and money on something that they would be
>embarrassed to sign their call with.

Yes, we must carefully educate others in ``the way of the firebottle''.
Mebbie paraphrase that to ``the way of the glowbottle''.

That includes not only the QSO's but also hands-on GB'ing and getting
them to mix up their own sending sets.  I sense many do not have a
yardstick of comparison as to what is expected out of good ancient
sets, vs really rotten QRM, as T.O.M. was wont to say.  That also,
should be part of our mission, i.e., to help all hands understand
what a real period set can do,  and what it sounds like when purring
along like a kitten, rather than a feisty, touchy ol' alleykat.

>I am sure a lot of really foul signals were put on the air back in
>the old days. Parts were scarce and expensive and I am sure the
>desire to get on the air forced many into making do with what they
>had. I bet the guy running RAC would have been glad to use a filter
>if he had one and I bet he made one as soon as he could. If there
>was one thing I wish I could transplant from the ham radio era our
>grandparents knew to the ham radio of today it would be the ham's
>spirit of continual improvisation and improvement. The ham of the
>20's and 30's strove for the best signal possible and I think we
>do them a disservice if we represent their efforts with anything
>less.  I enjoy a nice clean A2 signal and a bit of RAC is good too
>from time to time just to show the newbies what it sounds like if
>nothing else. Go wherever your heart leads and do it well. Build
>it, get it on the air and tell us about it.

Hey, even I have to do a lot of making do with flotsam and jetsam
in the parts dept.  But, usually, with some knowledge and fiddlin'
many of the old parts can be made to work well, still, and we will
make/sub as necessary to get the beastie going, with as good a note
as reasonable, for the period.

Too bad about the ACW/ICW/A2 bit... I like the sound of that, too,
and, it can be read on a tuner with a xtal detector!  IF AM is
allowed, still, why not A2.... just thinking out loud.....(:+}}...

We are a scant bit off from that scarce parts bit of old, in that
it is like we are on the far other side, where getting parts of old
is a problem.  But, even with hand made parts, we can and should try
to put out the best signal that our period set can rightly be said
and shown to do.  They can usually do much better than most folks think.

For sure, let us all do it and report it, and also MAKE it work, and
work WELL.  Even old early 20's sets can be made to sound like yer
sandysolidstate thing, with a touch of care, and the right knowledge.
It behooves us GB folks to share that ``right'' knowledge, so all can
learn and enjoy..... Then we can one-up even them thar AWA folks
(although they can run some right fine '29 style MOPA sets that are
easily comparable to a Ten-Tec....., but we GB folks can put up easily
as good a run on Hartleys.....(:+}}.....).

We GB folks can do and will do to make it work and work well, right?

Yup.....

>73 and ZUT!
>Conard, WS4S

ZUT/GB DE NA4G/Bob UP

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:15:22 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12164
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:15:22 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17418;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13217 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA13208; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Mike Silva <mjsilva@jps.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
In-Reply-To: <020901bec194$d86d12a0$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990628115120.13012C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Don't have my musty old books here at work (alas) but here's what I remember
> reading about arc transmitters:  they had a very clean signal (I think there
> was some pre-audion AM done with them), they had to run continuously to keep
> the arc going, so keying either switched the frequency or dumped the output
> into a dummy load, and the arc worked much better in a hydrogen-rich
> atmosphere, so they continuously injected alchohol (and perhaps other
> similar substances?) into the arc chamber.
> 
> Additions, corrections?
> 
> Arc transmitters are certainly discussed in the old books.

I also know, from talking with Vern Peters who was a Sparks, that you had
to have the BFO on to copy an arc transmitter, unlike the spark
transmitter.

Ken W7EKB


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:24:45 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12185
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:24:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17316;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:15:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13257 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA13248 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:54:13 -0700
Message-ID: <3777C546.C7D0F57C@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 11:56:45 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
CC: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> 6146 Rig,Dx-60 and its Manual - Ebay - Frustration or Future
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906271502490.25961-100000@uhunix5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


"Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" wrote:

> I'd rather pay a fixed price than to have to keep out-bidding others
> day after day -- and I'm not always around at the close of an auction
> -- that's whey everyone hangs around and tries to get in their final
> bid.
>

Conrad wrote:

Well, that is a consideration that you may soon be rid of when you
discover how the ebay auction really works...

If you follow the things that you are interested in, on the Ebay
Auction,
for a while, you'll get a feel for what the prices on things generally
are. Track the things that you are interested in, but, don't bid on them

until minutes before the auction on the particular item is about ready
to close.  By then, the competition has "shaken out" and the price
is closely established, although one can be surprised, occasionally.
If the price is already above what you are willing to pay, don't
bid.  Some manuals go for practically nothing.

But, there is another factor.

Things keep coming along - the same kind of item continues
to show up as often as two or three being offered for sale,
within a few days.  It's like things show up in jags, with
folks bidding the most on the first to show up and then as
more of the item continue to show uip, the price declines.
That is usually a good time to bid on something.

More often then not, it seems like, the items that I am interested
apparently do not appeal to a wide following of people.  As
a result it is possible to separate the bidders into different
groups, which narrows the field of folks who will bid on
any one thing. So, far, I have isolated the following groups:

   1.  The Audiophiles - bid on a narrow selection of parts,
        mostly tubes like 211's, 300's and other hyped audio
        tubes, which have had intense media exposre in audio.

   2.  The what I call "Heritage ham builders," who go after
         tubes like 45's UV-201's, those tubes which have
         had the most media exposre in early wireless circles.

   3.  The none builder, boat anchor user/collector - likes to buy
        high end stuff like Collins, National, etc. wants pristine
        stuff in working order - only....no scratches, no dents,
        no  modifications, all the right knobs, must  be guaranteed
        to work.

    4.  The collector - usually also a dealer- buys to fill holes
        in his collection but pays for what is in his collection
        by dealing in the same line of stuff.  Will buy a whole
        box of tubes in order to score the one he wants and then
        will sell the rest, usually for more than he paid for them.
        Knows that a tube sold by itself or in pairs will bring a
        great deal more than sold as one tube in a large box of
        tubes (as an example) and knows what folks are paying
        for tubes, because he tracks tubes and tube prices.  What
        is said here, applies to any item that has collectable value.

     5.  The restorer/collector - likes to tackle projects which have
        a high degree of potential successful restoration.  Likes to
        buy shabby looking, but complete and usually workable
        equipment to basically cleanup, touch up and to make
        simple repairs to.  May buy things which "light up,"
        but don't work, but are otherwise clean and complete.

     6.  The solid state user - likes to buy later models of useable
        solid state gear and is willing to pay higher prices to get it.
        Equipment must be in working order and in good shape.

     7.  The boat anchor user.  Equipment must be in working
        order and in good shape and will pay high prices to
        acquire good equipment.

     8.  The homebrew builder/rebuilder - buys parts and hulks
        of gear.  May buy several to get enough parts to build one
        that works and looks good.  Also, buys parts and tubes
        for use in home brew projects.  Usually seeks the most
        popular tubes, like 6146's, 807's, 6AG7's and 45's.

     9. The military collector/user - prefers to buy pristine old
        military gear, as opposed to 'butchered' military surplus.

    10. The explorer/experimenter - usually doesn't have a lot
         of money to spend, but will buy odd things to mess
         around with.

    11. The buff - indiscriminately buys random things that
         seem interesting, but usually doesn't have a lot of money.

  It is possible to run any item seen on the ebay auction through
a mental filter and "psyche out" who the most probable buyer
will be. This usually has great bearing on the price the item will
inevitably rise to - usually in the last  several hours of the auction
on that item.  With even casual observance of the kind of items
that one might have interest in, one quickly learns which items
will almost automatically bring a high price and which ones will
bring a moderate price and which one will run through the auction
bringing a low price if in fact rthey actually sell.

The principle factors which determine the saleability and price of
an item seem to be applicability, useability, physical condition,
historic significance and relative scarcity.  Relative scarcity seems
to modulate the price more than anything else, followed by useability,
and historic significance and it's a toss up which is the most
important.

   Speaking soley for myself, I have found that most of the things of
most interest to me are usually passed over and sell for rather low
prices.  This is especially true of tubes.  Most people go after the
tubes
which have been hyped the most, ignoring many tubes which in fact
are more useful than the ones which have been greatly hyped.  Also,
I have noticed - where tubes are concerned - that many very rare and
at the same time very good and useful tubes - slide through the auction
virtually un-noticed and can be purchased for a song.

There are basically only two tube buyers: the collectors and the users.

The users are looking for tubes which mostly fit commercial gear, be
it old or new.  The collectors are looking to fill holes in collections
and for resale, but even they are more interested in "collecting" the
most marketable tubes and seem to let other not so well known tubes
pass by.  So, there is a whole spectrum of tubes - including later
television tubes which apparently few people want or are interested.
Ironically, amond these - not so interesting tubes - there are some real

jems, when it comes to homebrewing useable equipment and gear
which is oriented toward the construction of 1930's to 1940's kinds
of gear.

It is also wise to carefully select search words and combinations of
search words, since many items actually can only be found with
certain search words and often seem mis-listed because of other
descriptive uses of that particular search word.  For instance, the
search word, "receiver," will dredge up radio receivers, hair receivers
weapon receivers, and little silver boxes with glass sides used to
store trinkets and jewelery.  However, it will recover any radio
receiver
listed as a 'receiver.'  "Transmitter," will recover anything listed as
a transmitter.  But, "radio reciver," will recover only those items
described by the seller as radio receivers.  So, it pays to play with
different search words and see what it is that they recover from the
search engine.

Once one gets into the "spirit" of the auction, it becomse a wonderful
place to find what one needs, and to study things that one might not be
able to study (in pictures) otherwise.  I have seen many strange and
rare tubes, as an example, that prior to that, resided exclusively as a
number in my mind - something known of, but never actually seen.
This is also especially true in the case of earlier model airplane
engines,
which I also track - but rarely buy.

One can 'knock' the Ebay auction, but in full honesty, I feel that it
will have a profound impact on every hobby endeavor, including
Amateur Radio, and will inevitably severely compete with all other
forms of marketing of used and even new things.  It would not
surprise me at all, to see it replace classified ads, flea markets,
swap meets and the tradional ham swap-nets, as the preferred way
to sell anything, which lends itself to cost-effective transportation
from the seller to the buyer. (not a good place to sell old army tanks?)

There is one rather somber note to the Ebay Auction, where ham
radio is concerned.  Right now and for the next few years there
is going to be a surge of older ham gear and military surplus,
dating from WWII.  Then, this surge may go to a trickle, until
the next generations of hams gets ready to go silent keys.  Right
now is a good time to pick up those old military rigs and many
rare tubes.  The next "round" of stuff may not be so plentiful
and as useable.

I am truly amzed at the quantities of things, which I thought would
be rather rare that are showing up on the Ebay Auction.  Especially
older antique radios, parts and tubes.  It's simply amazing to watch.
Things which I have not seen since I was a young kid are suddenly
showing up in fluxes that boggle the mind.  And, the quantities of
such items on the Ebay exceeds my expectations a thousand times
over.  In fact, many items touted as being "rare" are not rare at all,
based on the numbers which are showing up in the auction.  Now
again, for the first times in almost a century these items are actually
becoming so plentiful, that anyone who might have wanted one,
could have  one - at a price that is becoming more reasonable every
day.  --  Conrad, W7WLM





From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:30:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12217
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:30:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA19630;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:21:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA13623 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA13613 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:05:15 -0700
Message-ID: <3777C7DA.2003FB8C@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:07:45 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." <bratcher@pdq.net>
CC: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
References: <3773F08D.DA67C4AA@littonengr.com> <4.1.19990628114103.01193f10@pop.pdq.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Now, there's a neat ham kid story for you! -- Conrad, W7WLM

"Robert M. Bratcher Jr." wrote:

> At 11:31 AM 6/28/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
> >> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
> >> -- Conrad
> >
> >Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
> >Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
> >sets and applications.  My expectations are that it would net about
> >10 mw output, and be good for about 5 miles or so, although the
> >fence wire ought to be like a long coax or line against ground
> >in the above application.  What would the impedance of the fence
> >be at RF?????.....(:+}}.....
> >
> >Anyone know if experimentation with buzzer sets is covered by any
> >of the classic Part 15 regs?  That could form the basis of some
> >interesting QRPP experiments with loose coupling and proper
> >decrement to the waves.  After all, in the early days, buzzers
> >were used to excite antennae for tuning and calibration purposes
> >both in spark sets and in receiving sets.
> >
> >Hmmmm, do they still make vibrating reed buzzers anymore?
> >
> >Maybe a SPDT reed relay or sensitve adjustable plate relay could
> >be pressed into service as a buzzer......Hmmmmm......  You would
> >have to very carefully adjust the thing so that the arm would
> >vibrate at around 200-300 cycles to get a decent note.
> >
> >Hmmmmm..... Where did my buzzer go?????  (:+}}.....
> >
> >Bob/NA4G
>
> Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
> out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
> transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
> with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
> away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
> in the middle of a summer afternoon...

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:39:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12239
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:39:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21244;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:30:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA13790 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA13784 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:12:39 -0700
Message-ID: <3777C998.848D0DE5@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:15:11 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
CC: "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." <bratcher@pdq.net>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
References: <199906281727.NAA12899@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:

> > >> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
> > >> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
> > >
> > >Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
> > >Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
> > >sets and applications.
> > >
> > Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
> > out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
> > transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
> > with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
> > away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
> > in the middle of a summer afternoon...
>
> Interesting, that would be an untuned plain gap circuit, and the most
> prone to harmonics, etc.
>
> Now, what if that were well shielded and filtered on the power supply
> leads, DC was used as the power source, the ``gap'' was adjusted carefully
> to give a good note, and several tuning tanks were used to keep the
> wave sharp?   Hmmmmm.....
>
> Neato.....
>
> I tried it once with an auto vibrator, 12V, if memory is correct, pulled
> from a car radio.  Mine also had no tuned circuit,  and I could hear it
> in the sw rx about 500 feet away, with several feet of wire antenna as
> the radiator.  With no antenna attached, it could only be picked up
> around 100 feet away.  That was when I was a GI, and the folks in the
> barracks thought I had totally gone goonie lugging a car battery and
> funky board all over the grounds.  I proved to myself that it did
> work...... sort of.....(:+\\.....  I did not know Morse then, so
> I couldn't try sending anything but an odd pattern of dits by connecting
> the battery on/off.
>
> There is a friend in town with a couple of real spark sets.  One a plain
> gap ham set from the early 20's, one a rotary gap set from some school
> that used to teach radio up in Philly, and the third I don't remember
> offhand what it is.  It is fun to take them to local ham classes and
> set out the regens and key a few dits.....  sans antennae, of course.
> They can be real hash, ahh, err, signal generators, untuned.
>
> But, that still begs the question of whether or not a buzzer set could
> be cleaned up enough to try some QRPP part something-or-other demos
> or experiments.
>
> Any one else got any odd spark set experiments to report?
> This is getting interesting.....
>
> Bob/NA4G

It seems like a series of inductively coupled, Faraday shielded, tuned circuits

between the first shock excited tuned circuit and the one coupling it to an
antenna, could greatly reeduce the bandwidth of the signal down to as little
as a couple of kilo-hertz.  This sounds like another week end project coming
over the horizon at the speed of light.  And, yes, one can still buy door
buzzers
at the hardware store.  Also available at the second hand store, flea markets,
antique stores and down the line.  There is no shortage of door buzzers in the
world - well, up to now, at any rate!  -- Conrad W7WLM

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:47:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12257
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:47:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22308;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:38:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14085 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14080 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA10114;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA20613;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:20:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:20:36 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
In-Reply-To: <19990628.141726.11263.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281408190.16704-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi, Gary!

   That sounds very much indeed like the old sealed-arc transmitters, that
ran an arc (and yes, carbon electrodes, I think) in a magnetic filed in
some of the dee-darnedest environments; one version used an alcohol drip,
I think, and I believe there were some that ran in hydrogen.  Can't let
*air* get to 'em, of course!  Dunno why they used such stuff, maybe
cooling--hydrogen has pretty good thermal conductivity, maybe better than
air and an alcohol drip probably carries heat away as it evaporates, but
that's just a guess. Excluding oxygen also prevents the electrodes burning
away (and hydrogen is one of the gases it is *easy* to get in pretty pure
form). Exotic stuff and not to be idly trifled with--and I think the big
UHF TV rigs are spooky!  Not hardly.  (I'm hoping BA Bob Keys will chime
in with some hands-on stories).
   ...They were reputed to have a very fine note.  I have a couple of old
references (Sterling's "Radio Manual" from 1930 and Bucher's "Wireless
Telegraphy" from 1918 or so) and will see what details they provide.
   Most any *decent* spark or arc rig fed the antenna through an
"Oscillation Transformer" with varying arrangements of condensers in the
ckt--exactly the sort of thing you or I would call an "output tank."
Tends to improve the decrement (...some...) and give better power transfer
to the luminiferous aether.  If you have a nice, relatively clean source
like an arc and decent Q in the O. T., you can do pretty well, at least by
pre-1929 standards. (Most of the suggestions for O.T. construction read
suspiciously like modern discussions on making high-Q transmitting
inductances, btw).

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:51:39 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12268
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:51:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18618;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:42:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14155 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14147 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13143;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281920.PAA13143@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Poulsen's ARC converters
In-Reply-To: <19990628.141726.11263.0.wd4nka@juno.com> from Gary G Johanson at "Jun 28, 99 02:09:43 pm"
To: wd4nka@juno.com (Gary G Johanson)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:42 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> One of the things Archie would always go back to was how easy it was
> to identify the Company, the Nationality and often the individual you
> worked,
> by the " swing " of the fist.  Miami fruit ops developed what he called
> the
> " banana-boat swing " , Cunard ( Marconi ) ops had what he called a
> " Limey swing ", and etc.  Germans with Telefunken had theirs.

More of that fine character bit....   It distinguishes operators and
signals.   Too bad, so little of it is left to actually hear.

> He described a transmitter i have never heard anybody ever talk about
> neither have i found literature on:  the Carbon Arc.

That is Dr. Valdemar Poulsen's arc converter.

He was a Danish engineer(?) that took Duddell's ``singing arc''
used as an external heterodye radio frequency source, and made
it into a viable low/medium frequency transmitter.   That was around
1907-1912.   They were commercially made until vacuum tubes took
over around 1920.

> Archie said it was basically a carbon arc such as is used to burn litho
> plates
> with, and the arc was pulled by a magnetic field and coupled through
> some coil arrangement to the aerial.  He said that over the headsets
> it sounded like a beautiful violin.  The tone or pitch was determined by
> the pull of the magnetic field on the arc.  Has anybody ever come across
> one of these things?     ( i'dve loved to see one in operation )

The arc has two electrodes, one carbon, that is adjustable, and one
platinum(?) or platinized copper (and water cooled).  It is burned in
a strong magnetic field in a hydrogen atmosphere in a strong metal
chamber.   The hydrogen atmosphere was made with water dripped into
the chamber.  The arc, thus burned, is connected between antenna and
ground and emits radio frequent energy at the natural period of the
antenna, of continuous waves (thus its ``musical''  note when used
with a beat or heterodyne or autodyne oscillating valve detector).
I am not exactly sure of how the magnet works, but it is a DC field
in a strong magnet that possibly holds the arc plasma together.
Someone check Bucher or Sterling or other works to confirm that.
Typically, they were used at waves shorter than Alexanderson alternators
but below 200 meters.  Most use was in the 300/450/600M marine waves.

To key the arc converter, you use a dummy load or an inductor to
detune the antenna to another wave (at a keying rate).  The arc,
once struck, stays on during operation.

My OM, was also a shipboard op in those days, and recalled the ``musical
note'' of those arc converters.  He also recalled having to strike the
arc, with care, else the electrode holder blew out into your hands,
not a nice happenstance.

Arc converters came in standard sizes, typically 2kw at the low end,
up to 100kw (which magnet therefrom became the first Berkeley cyclotron
and still sits on the campus somewhere).  The 2kw sets were standard
size marine sets of the period, and used until the WWII era, in remote
places.

Most arc converters in this country were made by the Federal Telegraph
Company (later absorbed by Mackay and ITT [here in Raleigh] and now
sold to some British company.

One of the AWA members had a home brew arc converter that was supposed
to run on 160M, at a meeting about 10 years back, but I missed its
demo.  I heard one of the members say that it was not supposed to work
on waves that short.  I dunno for sure.  IFF it could work on 160M,
it might make for an interesting CW rig.....(:+}}.....

If magnets could be obtained and wound, and suitable electrodes and
chamber fabricated, it is not that hard to assemble the needed parts.
I would be real careful of striking off the hydrogen atmosphere.
It is probably not all that dangerous, but might be unsettling.

That is all I can remember, offhand, but it is coverd in Bucher or
Sterling's or other 20's radio manuals.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:05:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12312
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:05:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25336;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:56:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14210 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14200 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13158;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:22:41 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281922.PAA13158@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> News!!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990628112139.12313E-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu> from Ken Gordon at "Jun 28, 99 11:24:48 am"
To: keng@uidaho.edu (Ken Gordon)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:22:40 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I LOVE IT!

Mark the 3rd Saturday in August.....  (starting this year?).

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:59:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12291
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:59:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23866;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:50:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14344 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14337 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13180;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:25:44 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281925.PAA13180@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990628115120.13012C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu> from Ken Gordon at "Jun 28, 99 11:52:15 am"
To: keng@uidaho.edu (Ken Gordon)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> > Don't have my musty old books here at work (alas) but here's what I remember
> > reading about arc transmitters:  they had a very clean signal (I think there
> > was some pre-audion AM done with them), they had to run continuously to keep
> > the arc going, so keying either switched the frequency or dumped the output
> > into a dummy load, and the arc worked much better in a hydrogen-rich
> > atmosphere, so they continuously injected alchohol (and perhaps other
> > similar substances?) into the arc chamber.

                                              ALCOHOL  drip

That is what I was thinking of, not water drip, into the chamber.
Water was circulated for cooling.....

> > Additions, corrections?
> > 
> > Arc transmitters are certainly discussed in the old books.
> 
> I also know, from talking with Vern Peters who was a Sparks, that you had
> to have the BFO on to copy an arc transmitter, unlike the spark
> transmitter.

Yes, it is continuous waves, so we could still use one, now, IFF it
could be made to work that high up on those useless short waves
(200M and down).

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 15:59:39 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA12296
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:59:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24279;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14423 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14410 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13196;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:28:32 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281928.PAA13196@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Poulsen's ARC converters
In-Reply-To: <199906281920.PAA13143@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from User Na4g Boatanchor Bob at "Jun 28, 99 03:20:42 pm"
To: na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User Na4g Boatanchor Bob)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> The hydrogen atmosphere was made with water dripped into
> the chamber.

Nil... alcohol was dripped into the chamber, not water.
Water was the coolant of the electrode (non-carbon one, I think).
There may have been water coolant also circulated in the carbon
electrode holder.   The bloody thing must have really cooked!

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:12:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12335
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:12:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26140;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:03:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14702 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14691 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13222;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281938.PAA13222@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281408190.16704-100000@indy2> from "Roberta J. Barmore" at "Jun 28, 99 02:20:36 pm"
To: rbarmore@indy.net (Roberta J. Barmore)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:38:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>    That sounds very much indeed like the old sealed-arc transmitters, that
> ran an arc (and yes, carbon electrodes, I think) in a magnetic filed in
> some of the dee-darnedest environments; one version used an alcohol drip,
> I think, and I believe there were some that ran in hydrogen.

The alcohol drip, when oxidized gave a h2 atmosphere, which stabilized
the burning of the flame.

>    ...They were reputed to have a very fine note.  I have a couple of old
> references (Sterling's "Radio Manual" from 1930 and Bucher's "Wireless
> Telegraphy" from 1918 or so) and will see what details they provide.

Bucher covers it well, and Sterling's should up through the 2nd edition.

>    Most any *decent* spark or arc rig fed the antenna through an
> "Oscillation Transformer" with varying arrangements of condensers in the
> ckt--exactly the sort of thing you or I would call an "output tank."
> Tends to improve the decrement (...some...) and give better power transfer
> to the luminiferous aether.  If you have a nice, relatively clean source
> like an arc and decent Q in the O. T., you can do pretty well, at least by
> pre-1929 standards. (Most of the suggestions for O.T. construction read
> suspiciously like modern discussions on making high-Q transmitting
> inductances, btw).

Typical spark sets would have one tank oscillation circuit in the
spark discharger circuit.   Then the antenna would be inductively
coupled with or without added series capacitance.  By modern standards
that would be rather crude, and could be much improved with several
tuned circuits, perhaps.

We all need a decremeter for our shacks, right?  (hint... today we
probably call it a wavemeter).  In practice, it was a very precisely
calibrated wavemeter with a field strength meter, and you measured
the bandwidth or decrement of the spark wave by plotting the frequency
and the meter output across the wave.  See the end sections or
possibly the appendix of Bucher around page 250 or so, and there is
a neat plot of a spark wave and its decrement.

As I remember Bucher's arc diagrams, they were directly coupled or
maybe coupled with a 1 turn link.  I need to consult Bucher, tonight.

There was a good 1932 radio manual by Duncan and Drew, that has some
diagrams and descriptions of the marine arc sets.   Sterlings  has
some, but Loomis or Bucher seem  to be the heavy hitters in details.

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:11:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12329
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:11:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25879;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:02:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14717 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14705 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA15215;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:39:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA22262;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:24 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:22 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: Dick Blaney <wb8mhe@bright.net>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <199906281705.NAA12869@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281426570.16704-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Well, let's see; you can coarse-tune a spark rig by the size, shape and
distance of the electrodes, and probably by picking the RF freq at a
harmonic of the applied AC or interrupted DC; that's step one.
   Step two, loose coupling into a tank at Fo.  Come otta there into a
wavetrap at 3Fo (especially with interrupted DC, odd harmonics wil
predominate and for reasons that are intuitively obvious but take a few
pages of math to explain, the first odd harmonic will be the
biggest--there is one major-league squarewave at work here and if you
take apart a squarewave you get a poetical succession of odd harmonics);
another double-tuned, loose & variably-coupled transformer at Fo (or some
other flexible topology, this one just happens to be both historically
correct and low parts-count), and sniff it with a spectrum analyzer.
Retweak the gap & interrupter for the cleanest sigs.
   At *that* point, either 5Fo or 7Fo will predominate, and probably take
another trap.  With a lot of luck, you might have an airable signal at
that point; and likely to be greatly attenuated.  It's not going to be
frequency-agile.  (The next term level-wise *should* be 5Fo but real-world
parallels--the glonking sync pulse power-draw of a TV rig,
f'rinstance--lean to 7x so I'm hazarding a guess).
   The whole lash-up calls for very careful and complete shielding,
isolating each section from the others, or the RF will sneak right around.
It will not look a lot like a spark rig, though you might sneak by with
hardware cloth (so you could, at least, see the sparks).  
   It would be great fun! 

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:20:26 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12359
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:20:25 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA27112;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14926 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA14917 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374300(2)>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:46:20 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135667(6)>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:45:38 -1000
Date: 	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 09:45:36 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
cc: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> 6146 Rig,Dx-60 and its Manual - Ebay - Frustration or Future
In-Reply-To: <3777C546.C7D0F57C@littonengr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906280942350.23983-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Conrad Warren wrote:
> "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" wrote:
 
> > I'd rather pay a fixed price than to have to keep out-bidding others
> > day after day -- and I'm not always around at the close of an auction
> > -- that's whey everyone hangs around and tries to get in their final
> > bid.

 
> Conrad wrote:
> for a while, you'll get a feel for what the prices on things generally
> are. Track the things that you are interested in, but, don't bid on them
> until minutes before the auction on the particular item is about ready
> to close.  

But that usually means getting up at 3am (Hawaiian Standard Time) to place
a bid... That's why I wrote: "...I'm not always around at the close of an
auction..."

73, Jeff

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:18:36 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12349
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:18:35 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26116;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA15222 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA15215 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 12:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13293;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:53:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906281953.PAA13293@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281426570.16704-100000@indy2> from "Roberta J. Barmore" at "Jun 28, 99 02:41:22 pm"
To: rbarmore@indy.net (Roberta J. Barmore)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:53:04 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Hi!
> 
> Well, let's see; you can coarse-tune a spark rig by the size, shape and
> distance of the electrodes, and probably by picking the RF freq at a
> harmonic of the applied AC or interrupted DC; that's step one.

Well, we are looking at 160M, for example, on the quiet times......
Could we sneak one in next to 1AW after skeds.....(:+}}.....

Restrict us to plain buzzer excitation, for simplicity.

> With a lot of luck, you might have an airable signal at
> that point; and likely to be greatly attenuated.
> It's not going to be frequency-agile.

Well, for GB use, pick a fixed frequency of little use and the least
possible harmonic interference, and mebbie, something could be done.

>    The whole lash-up calls for very careful and complete shielding,
> isolating each section from the others, or the RF will sneak right around.
> It will not look a lot like a spark rig, though you might sneak by with
> hardware cloth (so you could, at least, see the sparks).  

Well, we enclose it in a nice wooden case to look like a Rhumkorpf(sp?)
coil, and well.......

A pair of them across a parking lot, for display demos, ......

>    It would be great fun! 

Indeedy!

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:36:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12400
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:36:08 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA28602;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:27:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA15750 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA15742 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA21125;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:05:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA24315;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:07:03 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:07:00 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
In-Reply-To: <199906281938.PAA13222@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281454130.16704-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   FWIW, I seem to remember Sterling has some decent photos of a big arc
job, both closed and open.  It looks like the offsping of a romance
between a water-heater and an early microwave oven, with a little Buck
Rogers ancestry on both sides!  Pretty massive gadget and all business--if
King Kong owned a pressure-cooker, it'd look just like one of these.

   ...While they were safe in trained hands, I would caution anyone who
wants to mess with an arc in hydrogen to go look at the Hindenburg film
(soundtrack courtesy of a WCFL Radio ["The Voice Of Labor!"]
transcription, fwiw). I would not test a HB arc rig inside the house.  
Carbon arcs themselves are about as hot a thing as can be made this side
of nuclear weapons--not that I would ever have taken a modified pencil and
90-odd Volts of Bell Telephone surplus batteries and played with one, oh
no, I'm *innocent* of any such thing.... (Gee, it's been nearly 30 years
and I think I've still got a retinal spot; those critters are *bright*--it
was probably the battery-carbon version that caused the burn).

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 16:40:47 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA12412
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:40:46 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29407;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:31:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA15962 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA15957 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13404;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:12:41 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906282012.QAA13404@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Arc converters
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906281454130.16704-100000@indy2> from "Roberta J. Barmore" at "Jun 28, 99 03:07:00 pm"
To: rbarmore@indy.net (Roberta J. Barmore)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:12:40 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>    FWIW, I seem to remember Sterling has some decent photos of a big arc
> job, both closed and open.  It looks like the offsping of a romance
> between a water-heater and an early microwave oven, with a little Buck
> Rogers ancestry on both sides!  Pretty massive gadget and all business--if
> King Kong owned a pressure-cooker, it'd look just like one of these.

If it is the big one with a curving top magnet,  that is possibly the
100kw arc converter from Federal......(the Berkeley cyclotron version).
I think those were made for several point to point stations (like maybe
Hawaii (Jeff?)), the Philippines, Canal Zone, etc., in govt circuits.
One of them became that Berserkeley toy.   Anyone have any more info
on that?

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 17:00:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA12448
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:00:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA32207;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:50:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA16340 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA16334 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 13:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id ED8RY6N6; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:28:10 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Boatanchors@theporch.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:14:00 -0500
Subject: GB> Crypto QSLs
Message-ID: <19990628.152501.-3184927.3.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,4-5,11-12,14-19
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


When I reviewed Frank Jones' received QSL cards for 1956-58, many of the
authors used an active device style of notation for the TXs:  "Rig HR
12AT7, 5763, pair 2E26 in PP" is fairly clear save the ambiguity of
whether the "PP" denotes "push-pull," or "push-push."

I have been at in long enough (since '78) to read that form of notation,
but when it goes on to the RXs, I get confused.  If someone back in the
'30s says "RX 1-1-2," I want to think it is a regnerative with an RF
stage, tuned or untuned; a detector, and a pair of audio tubes.  But some
of the notation does not seem to fit that notation.  Don't know how they
would deal with a Type 19 dual triode, for instance.

  What did the OTs understand about a number notation system for
receivers?

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
My kid's Yaesu: 2-28-3

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 18:13:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA12550
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:13:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA07388;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA17446 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f261.hotmail.com [207.82.251.152]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA17441 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 47970 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jun 1999 21:48:18 -0000
Message-ID: <19990628214818.47969.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:48:18 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- 6146 Rig,Dx-60 and its Manual - Ebay - Frustration or Future
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:48:18 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


>"Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" wrote:
>
> > I'd rather pay a fixed price than to have to keep out-bidding others
> > day after day -- and I'm not always around at the close of an auction
> > -- that's whey everyone hangs around and tries to get in their final
> > bid.
> >

Actually, if you e-mail the sellers you might find that they have other 
stuff of interest that they will sell to you outright; picked up an extra 
Velvet Vernier that way.

>Conrad wrote:
>
>Well, that is a consideration that you may soon be rid of when you
>discover how the ebay auction really works...
>
>If you follow the things that you are interested in, on the Ebay
>Auction,
>for a while, you'll get a feel for what the prices on things generally
>are. Track the things that you are interested in, but, don't bid on them
>
>until minutes before the auction on the particular item is about ready
>to close.

Hehe. :-) I took that to extreme on one of my purchases by coordinating my 
bid to the ticks on WWV which was tuned on the receiver while I was waiting 
for the auction to end. By the time my bid went off there wasn't a hope in 
---- that anyone else could get the last bid.

Another advantage of radio.

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 18:20:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA12561
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:20:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA08084;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA17565 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA17550 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:55:48 -0700
Message-ID: <3777EFD5.A70D3E84@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:58:23 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
CC: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB on-the-air contest (Sine Me UP!).
References: <199906281513.LAA12496@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

A truly GREAT IDEA!  WHere do I sign up?  Conrad, W7WLM

User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:

> > I am all in favor of a GB on-the-air rally/contest/show and tell session.
>
> Great Idea!
>
> I second the motion..... (lots of others will, too.....(:+}}...)
>
> > Let's put on a contest for homebrew
> > valve-based gear for sometime in the early fall and then again in the winter.
> > You get max points for a complete
> > firebottle homebrew station and somewhat less points for store-bought stuff.
> > We need to include incentives for homebrew
> > SS and commercial stuff too to lure those guys into our web.
>
> Lets say anything valve based, for starters, with classes[points] for
>
> (Pre-1930[4]/1930-1942[3]/WWII[2]/Postwar[1])
> power (5W[3]/50W[2]/500W[1])
> mode (CW[3]/AM[2]/SSB[1]).
>
> Allow only valve type gear with HB/GB[2] or commercial/military gear[1].
> HB stuff can be modern reproductions or really olden antique stuff too.
>
> No modern transistor stuff allowed.
>
> Report period x power x mode x type for qso points.
>
> It is only a funzies thing, and fer heaven's sake, set a whiles an' chaw
> on that thar ol' ham rag a bit.....
>
> > I think the objective should be to put out the best signal
> > quality-wise as the design you are using will allow.
>
> True, but a period set can put out a period signal and still be entirely
> acceptable, for the state of the art at the time of the period.
>
> > Some of the stuff I have heard the AWA guys running is disgraceful.
> > I bet they would have been wouff-honged in 1928.
>
> Always, but, a good Hartley can sound as good as a Ten-Tec, or as
> sweet as a 25 cycle Cuban, or one of Jeff's ACW/ICW/A2 sets.
> All it takes is a little o' the right fiddlin'.
>
> > Anything to get more firebottles on the air.
>
> Basically true, within reason.  But I tend to tolerate significant
> character in a fist or a signal, and have only found maybe one or two
> that were unreadable.  After all, it is ``get the communications through'',
> right?  A good op can read the bilgewater muck with even a slipping contact
> or carborundum detector, and still pass the traffic.  Still, it takes some
> operator training to run the really rotten olden tyme gear, or they can
> sound like they are the ``banshees from hades''.  But, that is what our
> GB group is about, too..... learning how to make it work!
>
> > Now if the *(^((_%$ rain would just lift a few minutes so I could
> > make a run to the FD site...
>
> WS4S DE W4D 1A NC
> FB QSO U FD OM FM NC
> GL CONARD
> DE NA4G/Bob UP
>
> Alas, I was only able to hit WS4S, on 40M(?), late Sat.  I didn't check the
> logs yet to see if anyone else was hit by the others of the crewe.  I like
> ta fell outta da op's chair when it hit me that it was ol' Conard there.
> I dunno if he recognized me with that silly W4D call, but I batted back
> at him on the bug for a second to let him know he was heard in Raleigh.
> If the dupes did not eat us up, we ran 1003 QSO's 1A NC with five deaden
> olden CW pfartes well stinking by the end of the watch.....(:+{{.....
> Alas, Grandma Hartley and Twinnie Triode did not do squat Friday night.
> But, it was, indeed, a fun and rowdy FD 1999.  It sounds like several
> GB folks had fun, although sorry about Ken's shafting problems (next
> time try rubber drive belts?).
>
> > ZUT!
> > Conard
>
> ZUT!

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 18:45:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA12586
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:45:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10159;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA17960 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from alice.pdq.net (alice.pdq.net [204.145.251.236]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA17955 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-AirNote: 1
Received: from 56K-061.MaxTNT13.pdq.net [216.118.13.61-3] by pocahontas.pdq.net; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:17:43 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.19990628170430.011a2f10@pop.pdq.net>
X-Sender: bratcher@pop.pdq.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:13:29 -0500
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
From: "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." <bratcher@pdq.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <199906281727.NAA12899@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
References: <4.1.19990628114103.01193f10@pop.pdq.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

At 01:27 PM 6/28/99 -0400, you wrote:
>> >> How about five miles on a barb wire fence with a door bell buzzer,
>> >> into the cook's old BC radio, back at the cook shack, on the ranch?
>> >
>> >Ahhh, that is a primitive spark set!  Neato.  See Elmer Bucher's
>> >Practical Wireless Telegraphy (1917) for some interesting buzzer
>> >sets and applications.
>> >
>> Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
>> out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
>> transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
>> with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
>> away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
>> in the middle of a summer afternoon...
>
>Interesting, that would be an untuned plain gap circuit, and the most
>prone to harmonics, etc.
>
>Now, what if that were well shielded and filtered on the power supply
>leads, DC was used as the power source, the ``gap'' was adjusted carefully
>to give a good note, and several tuning tanks were used to keep the
>wave sharp?   Hmmmmm.....

I didn't think about that back then. Just playing with radio & that simple
spark gap. It sure tore up the AM band! How far I don't remember.
Found out roughly where my random length longwire antenna was resonant
though. Thats where reception of my noisemaker was furtherest heard. It was
just an afternoon experiment in Pasadena Texas...

>Neato.....

Yes it was fun all right!

>I tried it once with an auto vibrator, 12V, if memory is correct, pulled
>from a car radio.  Mine also had no tuned circuit,  and I could hear it
>in the sw rx about 500 feet away, with several feet of wire antenna as
>the radiator.  With no antenna attached, it could only be picked up
>around 100 feet away.  That was when I was a GI, and the folks in the
>barracks thought I had totally gone goonie lugging a car battery and
>funky board all over the grounds.  I proved to myself that it did
>work...... sort of.....(:+\\.....  I did not know Morse then, so
>I couldn't try sending anything but an odd pattern of dits by connecting
>the battery on/off.

So we both did the same experiment at different times.

>There is a friend in town with a couple of real spark sets.  One a plain
>gap ham set from the early 20's, one a rotary gap set from some school
>that used to teach radio up in Philly, and the third I don't remember
>offhand what it is.  It is fun to take them to local ham classes and
>set out the regens and key a few dits.....  sans antennae, of course.
>They can be real hash, ahh, err, signal generators, untuned.

Last year one of the members of the local antique radio club brought a 250w
spark gap transmitter to the show.
No antenna connected of course. Wonder how far that signal went? I never
tried to find out although I did send some morse over it.

>But, that still begs the question of whether or not a buzzer set could
>be cleaned up enough to try some QRPP part something-or-other demos
>or experiments.

It would take a lot of filtering...

>Any one else got any odd spark set experiments to report?
>This is getting interesting.....
>
>Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 18:47:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA12606
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:47:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10605;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA18124 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from meg.pdq.net (pop.pdq.net [204.145.251.79]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA18119 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-AirNote: 1
Received: from 56K-061.MaxTNT13.pdq.net [216.118.13.61-17] by pocahontas.pdq.net; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:23:05 -0500
Message-Id: <4.1.19990628171713.01154e00@pop.pdq.net>
X-Sender: bratcher@pop.pdq.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:18:58 -0500
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
From: "Robert M. Bratcher Jr." <bratcher@pdq.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <3777C7DA.2003FB8C@littonengr.com>
References: <3773F08D.DA67C4AA@littonengr.com>
 <4.1.19990628114103.01193f10@pop.pdq.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

It was about a year before I got my first ham license...

At 12:07 PM 6/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Now, there's a neat ham kid story for you! -- Conrad, W7WLM
>
>"Robert M. Bratcher Jr." wrote:

>> Back in my middle teens (about 1976) I made a crude spark gap transmitter
>> out of a relay wired as a buzzer fed by 20 volts AC from a toy trian
>> transformer. Connected my longwire directly to the relay then walked away
>> with a portable shortwave radio listening to the noise wondering how far
>> away I could hear it. Faded out around 1.5 miles away near 6 mhz. That was
>> in the middle of a summer afternoon...




From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 18:46:00 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA12596
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:45:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10430;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:37:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA18079 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from shell14.ba.best.com (vintage@shell14.ba.best.com [206.184.139.145]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA18074 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vintage@localhost)
	by shell14.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id PAA13554;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Robert P. Okas" <vintage@best.com>
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Arc converters
In-Reply-To: <199906282012.QAA13404@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906281452200.7335-100000@shell14.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:

> >    FWIW, I seem to remember Sterling has some decent photos of a big arc
> > job, both closed and open.  It looks like the offsping of a romance
> > between a water-heater and an early microwave oven, with a little Buck
> > Rogers ancestry on both sides!  Pretty massive gadget and all business--if
> > King Kong owned a pressure-cooker, it'd look just like one of these.
> 
> If it is the big one with a curving top magnet,  that is possibly the
> 100kw arc converter from Federal......(the Berkeley cyclotron version).
> I think those were made for several point to point stations (like maybe
> Hawaii (Jeff?)), the Philippines, Canal Zone, etc., in govt circuits.
> One of them became that Berserkeley toy.   Anyone have any more info
> on that?
> 
> Bob/NA4G
> 
    Dang my failing memory, but I seem to remember an article in Comm
Quarterly last year, dealing with Poulson Arc TX's. Federal was a San
Francisco based company, with roots in Stanford. I believe there was a
Federal installation in the North Bay area, possibly at Bolinas or Pt.
Reyes. Historians can correct me on this. Either way, when the transmitter
was decomissioned, Berkeley got the magnet, which, if I'm correct, Ernest 
Lawrence of Berkeley helped design. The magnet can be seen on the U.C.
Berkeley campus where it sits as a monument.

73,
Bob - W3CD

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 19:16:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA12648
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:16:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12635;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:08:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA18590 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp.amotusa.com ([206.169.137.4]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA18585 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM davidb-200.amotusa.com BY smtp.amotusa.com ; Mon Jun 28 15:42:40 1999
Message-ID: <02f201bec1b7$7461e060$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Arc converters
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 15:42:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

That's right -- I'd forgotten about that.  I seem to remember that the arc
transmitter was destined for some place exotic (China?) but it ended up in
storage.  I'll look into my Lawrence bio ("An American Genius") tonight.

BTW, I also remember reading that Lawrence would keep a SW radio tuned to
the cyclotron frequency when he was at home.  Whenever the noise stopped
he'd call up the lab and demand to know what had gone wrong.

73,
Mike, KK6GM

>If it is the big one with a curving top magnet,  that is possibly the
>100kw arc converter from Federal......(the Berkeley cyclotron version).
>I think those were made for several point to point stations (like maybe
>Hawaii (Jeff?)), the Philippines, Canal Zone, etc., in govt circuits.
>One of them became that Berserkeley toy.   Anyone have any more info
>on that?
>
>Bob/NA4G
>
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 19:51:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA12674
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:51:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15358;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:42:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA19113 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA19108 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990628232601.OJVS1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:26:01 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:26:13 -0400
Message-ID: <000201bec1bd$9cecd8e0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <199906281531.LAA12550@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bob, NA4G, wrote:

> Anyone know if experimentation with buzzer sets is covered by any
> of the classic Part 15 regs?  That could form the basis of some
> interesting QRPP experiments with loose coupling and proper
> decrement to the waves.  After all, in the early days, buzzers
> were used to excite antennae for tuning and calibration purposes
> both in spark sets and in receiving sets.

Class B emission, damped waves, are expressed prohibited by international
and our national radio regs for *any* purpose, including the usages covered
in Part 15.

73,

Dave, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 19:55:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA12684
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:55:53 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15221;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:46:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA19123 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA19118 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:28:15 -0700
Message-ID: <37780580.EEC69AD2@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:30:52 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
CC: mnhopkins@juno.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
References: <199906281603.MAA12659@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO




> Somebody said:
>
> >   The dual triode won't appear 'till 1934.  The Type 19 that so
> > influenced 5M practice was first, but others were half a year behind it.
> > With these early ICs (the first?) it became possible to build quite good
> > one tube RXs and, also, the Frank Jones type push pull one-tube TXs.
>
> There were some combined tubes back in the early 20's, but they were
> very expensive, and mostly experimental.  The name of Scott (Brit?)
> seems to be associated with that, and there was a Brit or German firm
> that made BC sets with such combined tubes, because taxes were less
> on them with only one valve in the set as opposed to several.  Any
> Brits on the list that can confirm that?
>
> >   I have some 19s but could not afford to buy more at the present asked
> > price.  But if I could use a  6SN7 I could field a two valve station or,
> > by copying C.F. Rockey and others, even a one-tube station.
>
> Folks, there is Nothing, repeat Nothing wrong with subbing a later tube
> in an early circuit, and still calling the thing an early repro set.
> If you are not running the AWA thing, where the real tube counts, then
> put anything there that will work and allow you the fun of GB'ing the
> beastie.  I swear by the 6SN7ish sort of thing, because they are still
> relatively common for play tubes and they can be wired up double to
> make one triode with a little adapter to fit an '01A socket (plus the
> right voltages), or run separately as independent triodes.
>
> >   Perhaps we need a Tandem Triode 'Test for those more interested in
> > circuitry than historic accuracy.
>
> That is the joy of a triode.... singly or doubly or triply they are
> still a triode.  Remember, one of our early GB folks (now sadly not
> on the list) ran 833's in his regennie detector.  A triode is a triode
> is a triode..... (well that one was a little hotter than the rest.....)
>
> Pick a design from an article, and use that as the period.   Sub whatever
> device you have available to work, and get it working!  Use precious
> devices, like '00's or '01's sparingly, these days, but do play with
> the circuits, new and old.  That is how you get the hang of them.
>
> > "Better a Blooper than a store-bought 'Super."
>
> Well said..... (:+}}.... but good ones don't bloop.....
>
> Bob/NA4G

Hey, Folks!

Don't forget the MIGHTY RK-34, also called the 2C34, a twin
triode with seven pin base and the plates coming out the top to plate
caps.  These tubes are floating around and have shown up a couple
of times on the Ebay auction - once as RK-34's and once as 2C34's.

They are also available from Vacuum Tubes, Inc., on the internet
(jim@vacuumtubesinc.com), phone/fax (513) 385-3855, for $6.50
new!

I have built a lot of transmitters with these tubes, which will
run an easy 25 watts push/pull - push/push service, and make keen
Jones push/pull oscillators, both crystal controlled and otherwise.
You can drive one with a 6SN7 jones push/pull crystal oscillator,
if you want to take it easy on the crystals.  Jones used them for
VHF self-excited oscillators up to a couple hundred megs or so.
They are rugged, stable and friendly tubes.

Remember in push/push amplifier service, the output is at twice
the frequency of the input and NEUTRALIZATION IS NOT
REQUIRED.  And, these tubes shine in that kind of service.
They are definitely a 30's period tube, which seems to have fallen
through the cracks of Amateur radio consciousness.

They require 6.3 volts of filament voltage at 800 mils, and up to
300 volts of plate power at80 milliamperes.  They are listed under
V27, in the older ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook and the base
diagram is Figure 70.  Physically, they are about the same size as
a 6Y6 ( same envelop) and run reasonably cool at rated power.

I have also used them for push/pull tripler service, where they
make efficient power triplers, feeding an antenna  on 21 Mhz,
using a 7 Mhz crystal in a 6SN7 Jones push/pull crystal oscillator.
Cathode keying works very well and no key clicks were observed
on the other end, even with the simplest cathode keying circuit
(The key lead bypassed with a 0.01 ufd, at the fron panel jack and
another .01 ufd disc across the cathode socket pin to chassis ground.)

A truly neat but largely forgotten tube from yester year that really
performs!  -- Conrad, W7WLM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 20:00:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA12700
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:00:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA15678;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA19350 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA19342 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990628233746.OMJO1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:37:46 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Freeberg, Scott (STP)" <scott.freeberg@guidant.com>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> RE: Romance and Prehistoric Sigs (Was GB on-the-air contest)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:37:58 -0400
Message-ID: <000301bec1bf$40da1160$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <21B46CBD022AD1118F0500805F15A068018666E2@stpmsx05.stp.guidant.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Scott Freeberg wrote:

> Those little peanut whistles have extreme chirp for sure!  It gets even
> worse if you don't tune it right.   It was funny in that all the newbie's
> were quick to point out my chirp, while all the OT's commented on how nice
> it sounded.  Interesting huh?  Of all my BA radios, I get the most radio
> excitement from using that Ameco AC-1 and Conar 400 because while the
> contacts are far and few between, they are sweet contacts.

You might want to try powering the Ameco with regulated plate and screen
supplies (or at least regulation on the screen) to see if it still chirps.
If it does, you're probably overheating, and therefore endangering, your
crystals. If the chirp goes away, voltage regulation is the cause. It's
probably a combination of the two, especially at 40 meters, where crystals
are considerably thinner than at 80.

> Can you get in trouble with the FCC for transmitter chirp?

It's possible. You're more likely to get mail from ARRL Official
Observers -- a situation we will have to keep an eye on should OOs become
any more official than they are now. The personality cult building around
FCC's Riley what's-his-name may presage such an ominous shift. (I'm glad to
have scofflaws caught; I just don't like the Warm Fuzzy Personal Cop
approach, and wish FCC could just do its job without turning any aspect of
its operations into a personality-dependent sideshow.)

I had a particularly funny (to me) report back in the mid-1980s: I'd
configured my keying to have a nice hard make and a long tail to get that
oh-so-sweet W2AN-style bong. An OO heard it and, sure something was wrong
but unable to classify it, I guess, cited me for chirp.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 20:12:15 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA12715
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:12:14 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA16811;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:03:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA19639 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA19633 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:52:06 -0700
Message-ID: <37780B16.C3C10E6@littonengr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:54:43 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
CC: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
References: <199906281531.LAA12550@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu> <19990628.141726.11263.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Yes, I have heard of them and think that I have a book somewhere that
talks about them.  The magnetic stablized arc is not a difficult device
to build - as long as one does not expect the mechanism to advance
the arc rods as they burn off.  Then, the design gets a little dicey.
There are many carbon rods still available that would serve nicely in
this application.  The best of those available are used in motion
picture projectors and short pieces can be obtained from just about
any theater projectionist, if one simply asks for them.  Generally,
they are burrned down to about three inches in length but, that's
long enough.  Actually, one can build an arc transmitters whose
rods can be adjusted from the front panel by turning an insulated
knob, which advances a carbon rod afixed to a threaded screw.

A neon sign transformer of about 12 - 15 kilo-volts will yield
a 300 - 500 watt transmitter.  These are readily available, too,
from neon sign servie companies, who are always removing
old signs and tossing the transformers, which are generally good.
Also, can find them at flea markets and second hand stores.  The
small transformers, used in Bar liquor signs are of an ideal size
and are easy to come by both used and new.  The plate capacitor
needs to have a plate spacing of at least 3/8 of an inch, but 1/2" is
better for 15 KV.  The tank coil can be wound out of solid #16 wire
or one can use copper tubing which can be made self supporting, or
nearly so.  Keying is usually done by keying a relay in the primary
of the high voltage transformer.

The navy seemed to prefer the quenched arc, made from a stack
of discs or plates - especially in their emergency transmitters and
their smaller simpler transmitters.  But, the carbon arc is easier top
make and works very well.  I built one as a kid and sneaked it on
the air one night after I had contacted somebody with my AT-1,
just to see if he could hear me.  He did, alright!  But, I never used
it again, although I was sorely tempted on numerous occasions.

Conrad, W7WLM

Gary G Johanson wrote:

> One of my first jobs had me working for a lady who used to be driven to
> school as a young lass by Mina Edison, in her electric car down in Ft.
> Myers.
> She was fun to talk to.  But when i found out her husband Archie plied
> the ether
> for the Miami Fruit Co. abt 1918 or there abouts, i badgered him
> mercilessly
> for his recollections.  He graciously obliged.
>
> One of the things Archie would always go back to was how easy it was
> to identify the Company, the Nationality and often the individual you
> worked,
> by the " swing " of the fist.  Miami fruit ops developed what he called
> the
> " banana-boat swing " , Cunard ( Marconi ) ops had what he called a
> " Limey swing ", and etc.  Germans with Telefunken had theirs.
>
> He described a transmitter i have never heard anybody ever talk about
> neither have i found literature on:  the Carbon Arc.
>
> Archie said it was basically a carbon arc such as is used to burn litho
> plates
> with, and the arc was pulled by a magnetic field and coupled through
> some coil arrangement to the aerial.  He said that over the headsets
> it sounded like a beautiful violin.  The tone or pitch was determined by
> the pull of the magnetic field on the arc.  Has anybody ever come across
> one of these things?     ( i'dve loved to see one in operation )
>
> vry 73
> gary wd4nka
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 20:21:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA12729
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:21:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA17216;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA19886 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.37]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA19881 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.191]) by mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990629000249.FJVI1709@SandyBlaize>;
          Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:02:49 +0000
Message-ID: <009501bec1c2$62210560$bfef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:58:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have a multipage description and "construction" article in
Bucher's
"Wireless Experimenter's Manual".  It describes a large buzzer
powered by 110 VDC that will do 25 miles into a crystal detector.
Said to be good for "local" in-town communications, but has been
heard for
200 miles under favorable conditions!  (200 meters of course!)
Maybe I can copy the pages and scan them for anyone wanting
details?
(I have a sheet scanner not a flatbed one, so it's difficult
doing book pages!)

73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 20:37:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA12746
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:37:53 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA19514;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:28:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA20163 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.37]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA20158 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.240.239]) by mtiwmhc02.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990629001536.FQSD1709@SandyBlaize>;
          Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:15:36 +0000
Message-ID: <00a701bec1c4$2a7034e0$bfef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 19:12:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



>The navy seemed to prefer the quenched arc, made from a stack
>of discs or plates - especially in their emergency transmitters
and
>their smaller simpler transmitters.  But, the carbon arc is
easier top
>make and works very well.

WHOA!!!  The quenched gap stuff is "spark".  The Pousen
carbon/copper
electrode CW stuff is "arc".  Don't get the two confused or use
the terms
interchangably!  There is an enormous difference in the two.
The "other" CW stuff before Vacuum tube oscillators was the
Alexandersen
Alternator.  I think one of the biggest installations here in the
US was on
Long Island in a place RCA called "Radio Central".  I have some
photos of the
antenna farm and it is awesome!
73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 21:03:58 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12773
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:03:57 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21118;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:55:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA20522 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA20515 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373756(9)>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:56 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135676(1)>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:18 -1000
Date: 	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 14:41:14 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
cc: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        cwarren@littonengr.com, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: RE: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <000201bec1bd$9cecd8e0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906281439220.14571-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, David Newkirk wrote:
> Class B emission, damped waves, are expressed prohibited by international
> and our national radio regs for *any* purpose, 

Pop quiz: What was the date Class B emissions were finally prohibited?

Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 21:16:20 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12785
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:16:19 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA21789;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:07:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA20773 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA20767 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990629005527.PERV1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 17:55:27 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Wanted: 2-tube circuit using a 6146
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:55:40 -0400
Message-ID: <000401bec1ca$1bd43840$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <199906281633.MAA12746@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bob, NA4G, wrote:

> A 6AG7 and a 6146 would have been typical of the novice sets of the
> mid 50's/60's ARRL handbooks.  My guess would be anything from about
> 1955-1965 should have one design for a 50-75 watt or 90 watt set
> using maybe a 6AG7/6CL6 oscillator and the 6146 buffer.  Before that
> time (1946-1954) I would expect a 6L6/6AG7 oscillator and an 807
> final as typical.  There was even a mid 60's single 6146 set that
> had about 35 watts output using the 6146 as the xtal oscillator
> (1964?).

Actually, 6146s were relatively uncommon as finals in published "beginner"
transmitter articles. I'm guessing that this was so because the 6146 was a
current tube for the Novice power level (and two will do 100 W out), and
therefore about as pricy in dollars per watt as you could go. So even into
the late 1960s we see TV sweep tubes and 1625s in 75-W (input) rigs.

> (Dave Newkirk, are there any particular HBK years you can recommend
> from your experiences?)

I'm flattered that you consider me a source. :-D I think Jeff has his hands
full of offers of suitable schematics already. There was one in the mid
1960s (the 1966 Handbook has it on pp. 185-189; 6AG7-6146B) and another in
the early 1970s (6GK6-6146B).

Psst: There's no reason to confine yourself to a two-tube transmitter if you
want the best in keying. A three-tube rig, with the first tube acting as an
unkeyed oscillator (you can key it if you like, of course), will let you
achieve no-compromise key waveshaping with chirps and yoops and no backwave.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 21:28:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12795
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:28:46 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA22536;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:19:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA20918 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA20913 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990629010514.PGZQ1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:05:14 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        <mnhopkins@juno.com>
Cc: <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> AWA and the 1929 rule, TTT?
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:05:27 -0400
Message-ID: <000501bec1cb$79690480$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <199906281603.MAA12659@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bob, NA4G, wrote:

> Folks, there is Nothing, repeat Nothing wrong with subbing a later tube
> in an early circuit, and still calling the thing an early repro set.
> If you are not running the AWA thing, where the real tube counts, then
> put anything there that will work and allow you the fun of GB'ing the
> beastie.  I swear by the 6SN7ish sort of thing, because they are still
> relatively common for play tubes and they can be wired up double to
> make one triode with a little adapter to fit an '01A socket (plus the
> right voltages), or run separately as independent triodes.

and

> That is the joy of a triode.... singly or doubly or triply they are
> still a triode.  Remember, one of our early GB folks (now sadly not
> on the list) ran 833's in his regennie detector.  A triode is a triode
> is a triode..... (well that one was a little hotter than the rest.....)

The first announcements of metal tubes included the 6D5, a sort of
indirectly heated 45 equivalent. It didn't stay in the lineup for long. But
the issue of the 6D5 reminds me to inject here that if you want a really
nice low-mu power triode with first-rate shielding, you can use a metal 6F6,
6L6, or 6V6 with its plate and screen connected. Likewise, you needn't feel
locked into using a solenoidal coil that's grossly oversized for the job (as
was traditional); a good toroidal inductor of suitable design will be far
less prone to microphonics and the effects of nearby objects.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jun 28 21:55:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12813
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:55:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA24604;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:46:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA21836 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from orford.valley.net (orford.valley.net [198.115.160.32]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA21830 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 18:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lyme.VALLEY.NET (lyme.valley.net [198.115.160.11])
          by orford.valley.net (2.5 Build 2639 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id VAA07737; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:33:55 -0400
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:33:55 -0400
Message-Id: <199906290133.VAA07737@orford.valley.net>
Received: by lyme.VALLEY.NET (blitz.valley.net) via SMTP from plainfield-175.valley.net  id <8785510> 28 Jun 99 21:36:30 EDT
X-Sender: Brad_Thompson@pop.valley.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
From: Brad Thompson <Brad.Thompson@valley.net>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

At 02:20 PM 6/28/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Hi, Gary!
>
>   That sounds very much indeed like the old sealed-arc transmitters, that
>ran an arc (and yes, carbon electrodes, I think) in a magnetic filed in
>some of the dee-darnedest environments; one version used an alcohol drip,
>I think, and I believe there were some that ran in hydrogen.  Can't let
>*air* get to 'em, of course!  Dunno why they used such stuff, maybe
>cooling--hydrogen has pretty good thermal conductivity, maybe better than
>air and an alcohol drip probably carries heat away as it evaporates, but
>that's just a guess.....

Hello--

I dimly recall that certain rotary apparatus (alternators?) operated
in a pure-hydrogen atmosphere because it presented a lower "wind
resistance" than did the denser mix of gases we breathe.

My references aren't handy, either, but did the sealed-arc devices
also include rotating parts?

73,
Brad  AA1IP

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 00:34:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12906
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:34:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04574;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:25:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24038 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24033 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990629041425.RBOO1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:14:25 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Carbon Arc Wireless
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:14:38 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bec1e5$e7b31f60$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Gang,

You can read about, and see photos of, a working arc oscillator built by
experimenter Dave Quinlan at the Longwave Club of America page

http://www.lwca.org/library/articles/poulsen/poulsen1.htm

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 00:34:01 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12901
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:34:01 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04130;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:25:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24062 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24053 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990629041554.RBVF1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:15:54 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>,
        "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:16:08 -0400
Message-ID: <000101bec1e6$1d17f220$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <000201bec1bd$9cecd8e0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

When I wrote

> Class B emission, damped waves, are expressed prohibited by international

I meant "expressly" prohibited--of course! :-D

73, Dave, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 00:39:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12913
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:39:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA00960;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:31:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24310 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24305 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990629042334.RDEX1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:23:34 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: <mnhopkins@juno.com>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        <Boatanchors@theporch.com>
Subject: RE: GB> Crypto QSLs
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:23:48 -0400
Message-ID: <000201bec1e7$2f359740$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <19990628.152501.-3184927.3.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Michael Hopkins wrote:

> I have been at in long enough (since '78) to read that form of notation,
> but when it goes on to the RXs, I get confused.  If someone back in the
> '30s says "RX 1-1-2," I want to think it is a regnerative with an RF
> stage, tuned or untuned; a detector, and a pair of audio tubes.  But some
> of the notation does not seem to fit that notation.  Don't know how they
> would deal with a Type 19 dual triode, for instance.

The system I know of is x-V-y, where x stands for the number of RF stages
before the detector, V stands for the detector, and y stands for the number
of AF stages after the detector. I would guess that a usage like 1-1-2 would
be a variant. (It's possible to use more than one tube in the detector, but
that wasn't so common in heyday of this loose code.) Almost surely, the
numbers stood for *stages*, not envelopes; a 6F7 used as a pentode detector
and triode audio, for instance, would surely have been referred to as a
0-V-1.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 00:40:14 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12920
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:40:14 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04714;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:31:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24244 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24235 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA12506;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:23:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02656;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:24:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:24:44 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: Brad Thompson <Brad.Thompson@valley.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless, keying, key clicks
In-Reply-To: <199906290133.VAA07737@orford.valley.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906282206560.26795-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Somebody asked if there were any rotating parts (as in fast,
motor-driven) to an arc, and the answer is 'no."
   ...However, please note that an arc rig emits an *undamped* wave!
That's right folks, a good arc rig is legal as church on Sunday (or pick
your own day and institution, we got lots of both).  But tricker to do.

   Darned if I cannot find any photos; know I've seen 'em.  Turns out my
"Bucher" is really Rupert Stanley, "Text Book on Wireless Telegraphy,"
1914.  He covers arcana like the Goldschmidt alternator under "undamped
waves," and just a smidgen on the arc.  Both Stanley and 
Sterling make it plain that the arc is excited by *DC.*  Yup, direct
current, same kind of stuff Tom Edison sold Manhattan (a sweeter deal than
$24 in beads, if you happened to be him--not so good if you lived there
many years later).
   Yep, you lay DC on the arc and strike it up just like anything making
pictures in the projection booth down at the Pantages (or the Rialto or
whatever the movie show in Yourtown called itself; we had the much-missed
and creepy "Egyptian," and just up the street from me, the "Vogue" and a
zillion more).  The electromagnet is in the form of a pot-core inductor
(shaped like a hatbox for doughnuts), with the gap on the inside; top
pole, we drip alcohol down the center, and the arc runs right across a
diameter intersecting the poles; alcohol (you could use kerosene
[paraffin, outside the US] but it smokes up the chamber more rapidly--some
land stations used city gas!). Front electrode is carbon, the back is
copper; cooling water is circulated above and below the arc chamber, which
has a nifty little regulator arrangement to keep the gas pressure ever so
slightly above atmospheric.  Thus we now have a DC arc running in a
hydrogen (more-or-less; it's really a hydrocarbon vapor, as Sterling
points out) atmosphere.  Just to make life interesting, the electromagnet
is in *series* between the DC source and the carbon electrode, where it
acts as a current-limiting choke and an RFC; the copper electrode is
grounded. (Unless you speak the Queen's English, in which case you must
earth it instead).
   You may wonder, "what the heck good is all that?" and the answer is,
not much!  Nope, it takes a resonant circuit to make it produce useable
RF.  Hook a seres LC between the carbon terminal and ground, and we'll go
from there (we'll get our real "series C" in an interesting way, see
below, so don't get a condenser out).
   Paraphrasing Sterling, as the arc starts, there is a considerable
current-flow; and some of the current is diverted to the antenna-ground
system (which he models, rightly enough, as a condenser) via a series RF
inductor.  The aerial charges up, arc current goes down proportionately,
and the arc voltage *rises.* (I'm gonna be lazy here and invoke the
conservation of energy to account for that).  As the voltage goes up, the
antenna robs more current until it gets "fully" charged (umm, there's a
liitle Zeno's Paradox lurking here; turnover point is where current into
the condenser has dropped so that Z gets substantially higher than the
arc's impedance).  Now the arc gets most of the current, it's impedance
drops, and the antenna capacitance discharges back through the arc; this
makes the whole LC circuit ring and as it crosses zero headed into
negative voltages, that current opposes the normal flow through the arc
and pfft, it goes *out!*  And immediately starts up again (the LC is still
ringing, you see, and heads back across zero in the other direction,
where it aids flow across the gap).
   All the magnet-and-hydrogen does is make the arc *easy* to put out;
hydrogen has a *high* rate of diffusion and the magnetic field acts on the
arc (see "Singing Flame," I think a websearch might turn up some good/odd
stuff) to increase path-length; something counterintuitive here but I
*think* the weaker arc is more easily pulled away from the ionized
atmostphere it exists in.
   Adjustment is likely critical--you can model this in a manner akin to
that of a tube in Class C; the tube only conducts over a very small
portion of half of each cycle but it's a great *big* slug of current, and
as its period is conincident with that of the plate tank, the tank rings
like a bell and we get simon-pure sinewaves (assuming we picked
reasonably-high Q for that tank and took care to avoid unexpected modes).
   ..But in an arc, we get some work out of the "bottom" half-cycle of the
ringing: it puts the arc out, and, unloaded, zings back the other way and
helps to start it up again; and once the arc starts up, it dumps in
another nice jolt of energy and thus the whole thing is self-sustaining.

   Sterling shows a number of ways to key it; the classic example of
frequency-shift keying (with a chopper, no less!) by a loop coupled to the
antenna inductor, but he calls that an "emergency method."  He details a
"dummy load" method, keying the RF back and forth with a contactor *ahead* 
of the inductor/aerial (another tuned circuit in the dummy load), and an
absolutely Goldbergian stunt that uses one *more* electrode as an
"ignitor" with a keyed solenoid to wriggle it--this one actually *does*
turn the arc off and on as you key.  All of 'em have a FSK chopper so the
fellow with a damped-wave detector can copy 'em.

   Some of the older info in Stanley (op. cit.) shows the arc with RF
chokes to feed in the DC and a series LC ckt across the arc (which it is
in Sterling's too, but not obviously, as part or all of the series C is
the antenna-ground capacitance*). He stresses that the arc must be short
and thick (thus arc resistance is low), and if the arc's good, then F
equals 1/(2*PI*SQR[L*C]), an equation that should be verrrry familiar.

   So in short, how an arc works is, it shock-excites a tuned circuit; and
the tuned circuit quenches the arc at Fo thanks to some very clever
shading of the odds.  Small wonder you can't key the input power--it's a
metastable system and takes a push-start to get going!

   Could you make it work on 160 meters?  I don't know; it's probably
pushing things, as the physical process of making the arc go out takes
finite time.  Somebody with a background in Real Fizzicks can probably
make a better guess.

   73,
   --Bobbi
_______________________
* And--aha!--here's where flat-top antennas and multi-wire counterpoises
are handy: we need enough C to keep L reasonable, and how better to do so?
Small wonder the configuration hung on well into the tube era!  You don't
wanna shunt more C across the antenna, not if you're a good 1914 RF
boffin; you want all that RF current to be *working* for you.


KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 00:53:56 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA12949
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:53:55 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04798;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24675 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sparticus.bright.net (sparticus.bright.net [205.212.123.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24669 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bright.net (circ-ras1-1-cs-15.dial.bright.net [209.143.14.18])
	by sparticus.bright.net (8.9.3/8.9.3 ComNet Build) with SMTP id AAA14570;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:34:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000801bec1e8$b13a1620$120e8fd1@Bright.net>
From: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>, "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Cc: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Carbon Arc Wireless
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:34:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

There used to be an interesting web page on a very comprehensive
scientific analysis of the spark transmitter using modern components
in a controlled atmosphere at the URL below, but when I checked it
this evening, I couldn't open it.  Anyone know what happened to it?
http://newton.otago.ac.nz:808/ursi/belrose/spark.html
73 de
Dick, WB8MHE
wb8mhe@bright.net

-----Original Message-----
From: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Tuesday, June 29, 1999 12:26 AM
Subject: GB> Carbon Arc Wireless


>Gang,
>
>You can read about, and see photos of, a working arc oscillator built
by
>experimenter Dave Quinlan at the Longwave Club of America page
>
>http://www.lwca.org/library/articles/poulsen/poulsen1.htm
>
>73,
>
>Dave Newkirk, W9VES
>dpnewkirk@home.com
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 01:00:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA12960
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:00:12 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05893;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 00:50:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA24740 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA24732 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 21:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA15028
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:36:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03494
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:37:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:37:57 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Oh, yes, key clicks...
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906282325170.29860-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Knew I had forgot something, in the process of digging a very deep hole
in res ipso "arc" and falling into it headlong.

   Key clicks and the 1929 (though, what, 1979?) transmitter: Ya don't
need 'em.  They add no character and the big guy next door--you know, the
one with a bad temper and unlimited free legal help?--will not like it
when you click all over his AM radio talk & call-in shows.

   Couple of RFCs and/or a small inductor, a condenser or two and
resistor, and key clicks will go right away.  If nothing more, stuff a
0.01mF condenser across the key; it'll knock out about 60% of 'em,
minimum.  For more fixes, see *any* radio handbook worthy of the name from
oh, 1935 though '70.  Basic idea is series L, shunt C, and maybe a little
series RC network right across the key.

   Rocket science it is *not.*  Chirp, yoop and drift are confined to the
ham bands (er, hey, YOU--don't fall over the band edge with that '29
Hartley, it'll make a mess); okay, *mostly* so confined.  But clicks are
pretty much that ol' damped wave and with a lousy decrement; they're
*everywhere* and the BCL's will hear them.  ...And see them.  This is not
good.  You want clicks in your shack, buy a sounder; they have charm.
(Clicks also mean you're sputtering up your key contacts--and they don't
make replacements for J-38 contacts any more, if they ever did).

   Oops, gotta go--Bud just tossed an empty beer bottle at my shack window
again!  H'mm, where were those good condensers....

   73,
   --Bobbi 

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 13:04:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13922
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:04:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01158;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:55:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA03294 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA03288 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id MAA05061;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3778AE0F.1EBF@atl.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:29:19 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
CC: Brad Thompson <Brad.Thompson@valley.net>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- h2 gas use
References: <199906291416.KAA14745@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bob-

If I am getting this arc TX thing, the arc is tied to a resonant
circuit and is actually a plasma arc. The current flow meets
resistance as the circulation in the tuned circuit changes direction and
full cutoff is achieved by 'blowing out' the plasma with a steady state
magnetic field resulting in one arc per cycle. To operate on higher
frequencies than the maximum that the arc can be created and 'blown out'
the only option is to pick a harmonic and filter the $h!t out of iit.

Right so far?????

Intrigued by the concept of blowing out the arc every cycle and the
negative resistance attribute that makes the puppy work, one
wonders if, rather than using a DC to make the field that blows out
the arc and the plasma/tank circuit 'spring' to bounce the arc,
one might use the same tank circuit to make the field that blows out the
arc. 
This would save the energy used for the magnetic bias ala resonant 
TV flyback scheme, and rather than blow out the arc, perhaps one
could 'train' it by having the two resonant circuits coupled a bit
differently. 

My physics is very rusty but the idea is that, just maybe, 
we could operate at a higher frequency because now
the field made by the tank is actually pusing the electrons in 
the opposite direction (stiffer spring) rather than just increasing
the resistance. It might even train the arc into a 'string of beads'
which would be kinda pretty to look at :-)

Let's say the electron flow in the arc 
is from left to right on the page producing a toroidal magnetic field
as shown (o's out of page, x's into page)


             o o o o o
             =>=>=>=>=>
             x x x x x

now this mass flow of electrons is in a springy plasma/gas so we know 
the mass from the current and the springiness from the plasma/gas
properties.

We build a contradictory field by feeding this same current through
a toroidal winding surrounding the electron current.

dots and #'s represent the field built from the current in the
toroid which is shown my dashes and arrows
           
            ->->->->->->
           ^ o#o#o#o#o# |      slice of toroid 
           | #o#o#o#o#o v
            <-<-<-<-<-<-

             =>=>=>=>=>		arc
             
            <-<-<-<-<-<-
           | x.x.x.x.x. ^
           v .x.x.x.x.x |
            ->->->->->->

           _____________
          |             |
          |    _____    |                 
          |   |     |   |
          |   |  X  |   |
          |   |_____|   |
          |             |
          |_____________|


end view of toroid with X representing arc electron flow
into page, I did not draw toroid wire but consider the 
double box as the 'form' (don't really use a form)
that the toroid would be wound on, i.e. wire 

If anyone has the physice background to model this, please let
me know how high a freq we might expect this thing to work
at. Or maybe someone will build one and see...

-bob



User Na4g Boatanchor Bob wrote:

> 
> ``In maintaining oscillations in the antenna circuit it is necessary
> for the arc flame in the arc converter to be extinguished once every
> cycle and the magnetic field acting as a magnetic blow-out is employed
> to assist in accomplishing this result.  Hydrogen, being the lightest
> and having the highest rate of diffusion of all known gases is used as
> the  atmosphere in which the arc burns.  This atmosphere is obtained
> by the use  of some hydrocarbon such as alcohol, kerosene, or city
> gas.   On board ship it is generally  found that the alcohol is the
> more satisfactory than kerosene on account of requiring less cleaning
> of the chamber.   The cathode or negative electrode is rotated to
> insure uniform wear and maintain steady arc operation.''
> 
> Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 09:13:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA13285
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:13:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00137;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:03:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA00157 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mrelay.bellglobal.com (mrelay.bellglobal.com [198.235.216.100]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA00151 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns by mrelay.bellglobal.com (PMDF V5.1-12 #26722)
 with SMTP id <0FE300MH5A8554@mrelay.bellglobal.com> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:48:06 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:45:58 -0400
From: Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca (Bill Henderson)
Subject: Re: RE: GB> Searching tube data
To: salfter@delphi.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <msg285572.thr-67f2fa94.77359403@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
Organization: Ottawa Carleton District School Board
Content-id: <msg285572.thr-67f2fa94.77359403.part0@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-Gateway: NASTA Gate 2.0 for FirstClass(R)
References: <NCBBKEMBADLHBJFHAAKIIEFGCHAA.salfter@delphi.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

A BIG THANK YOU !!! 
This is exactly the type of information that I was looking for.
Guess I'll have to check which edition of the G.E. Essential
Characteristics manual that I have.
Thanks again.  - Bill H.
***************************************************
>From the 14th edition of GE's _Essential_Characteristics_:

6LW6--beam power amplifier for horizontal amplifier applications
Base: 8NC
Heater Supply: 6.3V, 2.65A
Design Maximum Plate Watts: 40W
Design Maximum Plate Voltage: 990V
Input Capacitance: 40pF (all capacitance figures without external
shield)
Output Capacitance: 14.5pF
Grid-Plate Capacitance: 1.0pF
Rp=6700 ohms
Gm=12000
Max. Positive Pulse Plate Voltage=7.5kV; Max. DC Cathode Current=400mA

(Base 8NC puts the heater on pins 7 and 8, cathode on pin 2
(beam-forming
plates connected internally to cathode), control grid on pin 5, screen
grid
on pin 3, and the plate on the top cap.)

Scott Alfter
salfter@delphi.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 09:44:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA13321
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:44:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04789;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA00576 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 06:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from basfzgw.basf-corp.com ([144.29.126.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id GAA00570 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 06:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from basfigw.basf-corp.com (actually host basfigw) by basfzgw with SMTP (MMTA) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:20:13 -0400
Received: from intmailb.basf-corp.com  by basfigw.basf-corp.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP	id JAA07279 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:20:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com (actually host basf-corp-gw01.parsippa.basf-corp.com) 
          by intmailb; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:20:23 -0400
Received: by basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999))  
          id 8525679F.0048F8F7 ; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:17:03 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: BASF-CORP
From: Stanley A Mcintosh <mcintos@basf-corp.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-ID: <8525679F.0048F7F8.00@basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:19:35 -0400
Subject: GB> 2C39
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

A friend gave me a pair of these cool looking tubes, but I do not know what use
they might have.  Any knowledge available from the list?

Thanks,
sam


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 10:33:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA13464
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:33:46 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11579;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:24:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA01104 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [209.48.224.31]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA01099 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [209.48.224.40])
	by mail1.radix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00992;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:04:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from gc@localhost)
	by saltmine.radix.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA05645;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gary Chatters <gc@Radix.Net>
Message-Id: <199906291404.KAA05645@saltmine.radix.net>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, mcintos@basf-corp.com
Subject: Re: GB> 2C39
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>
>A friend gave me a pair of these cool looking tubes, but I do not know what use
>they might have.  Any knowledge available from the list?
>

The 2C39 is a triode that provides a few tens of watts output at UHF.
IIRC they were called "lighthouse" tubes for obvious reasons.

Back in the 50's Motorola used them as power amplifiers tubes
in their 450 Mc FM mobile radios.  The 1981 ARRL handbook describes
the conversion of the transmitter strip from one of these radios
to use as a transmitting convertor for 432.

A look through VHF handbooks from a couple of decades ago will likely
yield a few construction projects for power amps at 432 or 1296.

I think these were the tube used in the APX-6 military surplus IFF sets
that hams converted to 1215 Mc.

Gary

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 10:44:50 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA13537
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:44:49 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13874;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA01259 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA01254 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14745;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:16:02 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906291416.KAA14745@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- h2 gas use
In-Reply-To: <199906290133.VAA07737@orford.valley.net> from Brad Thompson at "Jun 28, 99 09:33:55 pm"
To: Brad.Thompson@valley.net (Brad Thompson)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:16:01 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> I dimly recall that certain rotary apparatus (alternators?) operated
> in a pure-hydrogen atmosphere because it presented a lower "wind
> resistance" than did the denser mix of gases we breathe.

>From Sterling's Radio Manual, 1st ed., p. 396:

``In maintaining oscillations in the antenna circuit it is necessary
for the arc flame in the arc converter to be extinguished once every
cycle and the magnetic field acting as a magnetic blow-out is employed
to assist in accomplishing this result.  Hydrogen, being the lightest
and having the highest rate of diffusion of all known gases is used as
the  atmosphere in which the arc burns.  This atmosphere is obtained
by the use  of some hydrocarbon such as alcohol, kerosene, or city
gas.   On board ship it is generally  found that the alcohol is the
more satisfactory than kerosene on account of requiring less cleaning
of the chamber.   The cathode or negative electrode is rotated to
insure uniform wear and maintain steady arc operation.''

> My references aren't handy, either, but did the sealed-arc devices
> also include rotating parts?

Not really.  The electrodes were adjustable, but there were no particular
rotating  parts.   A motor generator was used to generate the magnet
power voltage of several hundred volts dc.

Caution --- When the arc is in operation the upper end of the
            loading inductor may be as much as 20,000 volts
            above ground and the operators should not approach
            to within six inches of the coil.

Antenna current was rated at 7 amperes at 2400 meter waves on the
2kw Federal sets, but it would be much higher on the 100kw sets.

The arc draws 8 amperes at starting on Federal 2kw rigs.

Arcs were used on wavelengths from 300m to 18,000M, according to Bucher.

The wave could be modulated by a coupled compensation loop attached
to a key and a chopper, or keyed by a backshunt (dumping to dummy load)
or frequency jump ``compensation'' (pulling the frequency several kc),
or by an ignition key electrode that short circuited the arc from the
antenna to a dummy load.

The positive electrode (anode) connected to the antenna circuit and
was a water-cooled copper tip electrode on a porcelain sleeve insulator.
The negative electrode (cathode) connected to the ground and was also
water cooled.  So, a true carbon arc, was not used in commercial gear.
Apparently, the copper electrode design was a Federal innovation.
That would make it relatively easy to whip up electrodes, perhaps,
for some experimental gear.  Theoretical voltages can be 200-1200vdc
(even storage batteries), but currents seem to be up to 10 amperes
for 2kw sized sets.  Maybe that could be toned down to where a small
set of maybe 10 watts or so could be run from a 400vdc dynamotor
typical of those found in Korean war surplus FM transmitters.
I can find no info on the magnet windings.

Mean machine!

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 10:56:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA13586
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:56:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15073;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:47:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA01580 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA01573 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 07:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14814;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:30:29 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906291430.KAA14814@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Light bulb DX (What about Buzzer DX???)
In-Reply-To: <000101bec1e6$1d17f220$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com> from David Newkirk at "Jun 29, 99 00:16:08 am"
To: dpnewkirk@home.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> When I wrote
> 
> > Class B emission, damped waves, are expressed prohibited by international
> 
> I meant "expressly" prohibited--of course! :-D
> 
> 73, Dave, W9VES
> dpnewkirk@home.com

Drat... I was hoping there would be some sort of experimental clause.

I guess it is arc and alternator time...... for play....

I do like the idea of a potential arc rig on 160M.  That would be a
class act, for sure.....  and worth some PR points.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 12:10:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13782
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:10:10 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26691;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:01:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA02414 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA02409 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA20469;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:42:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03447;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:44:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:44:15 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: Brad Thompson <Brad.Thompson@valley.net>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- h2 gas use
In-Reply-To: <199906291416.KAA14745@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906290939340.17205-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Anyone who has read BA Bob's account of the arc and mine will note a
discrepancy.  Bob *is* correct, I am *not*--the *carbon* electrode goes to
earth, the *copper* electrode to the antenna inductor; and it's the copper
one that gets connected through the electromagnet to the positive side of
the DC source.
   My apologies: it was late, I was fallin' asleep and the connection to
my provider conked out once during the writing (here, Windows wins--with
simple DOS-based access, you can't write offline!); but I should have made
sure the facts were factual.  ...Trying to learn and teach simultaneously,
perhaps not so good a plan! ;)

   The "ignition key" method, which both Bob and I got from Sterling, is
very interesting; I think I'd have to touch the hardware, or at least have
a look at a set of very clear drawings, to really understand it.  The best
part is that the rig acts in a familar manner, only working when the key
is down; but it's a complex assembly.
   The "backshunt" method, using an SPDT RF relay ahead of the antenna
inductor, is probably the most promising for practical (???)
experimentation, as there's no backwave (the folks a few kc away
appreciate this!) and any arc, spark and Tesla-coil fan can slap together
such a relay from junkbox parts in a trice.  May need some fiddling to get
really good isolation, however; you don't want the fellow three blocks
over with a SuperInhaler 3000 to hear level-shift keying!  (The other
reason for wanting gooood isolation?  Well, it'd be awkward to have to
restrike the arc every handover!  Wonder if that's one reason for
full-duplex working in maritime MF CW comms?)

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 17:41:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA14684
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:41:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08009;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA06472 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA06467 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id RAA05490;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:10:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3778ED80.13AD@atl.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:00:00 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
CC: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- h2 gas use
References: <199906291931.PAA00546@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bob-

Thank you for writing.

In the meantime I found some reference material and
in Nilson and Hornung, "The arc flame must be subjected
to a powerful transverse magnetic field to clear the ionized path
as soon as possible." 
They have a diagram of the current and potential in various parts 
of the circuit and explain the starting and continous operation of
the arc and explain that the inductance of the choke (if I'm
reading this right) causes the emf from the antenna coil to
discharge through the arc and restart it.
So, my first thoughts appear to have been rather hairbrained,
because the opposing magnetic field will not kill the ionization.

You are probably right and I bet it's the chokes that limit the upper
freq more than anything.

Your smaller version might well work on 160.

-bob

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 12:43:21 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA13881
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:43:20 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA31182;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:34:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA02916 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ny.us.ibm.com. (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.104]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA02911 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: dbrady@us.ibm.com
Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.132.205])
	by ny.us.ibm.com. (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAB25710
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:14:48 -0400
Received: from d53mta04h.boulder.ibm.com (d53mta04h.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.142.4])
	by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.8.8m2/NCO v2.03) with SMTP id KAA33332
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:14:56 -0600
Received: by d53mta04h.boulder.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.4  (830.2 3-23-1999))  id 8725679F.00593F33 ; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:14:48 -0600
X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-ID: <8725679F.00593D42.00@d53mta04h.boulder.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 10:14:40 -0600
Subject: GB> TCS keying (grid blocked)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



Last night during QSO with Conard, WS4S, on 7147, he asked
how I put grid blocked keying on my TCS-13. Thought I'd share it
with everyone else.

DISCLAIMER: The following information describes what works on MY
TCS and in not intended to suggest this method/circuit arrangement is
superior to any other!

Connect one end of a 2.5MH RF choke to the 1625 grids where the two
22K grid biasing resistors intersect and remove grounding jumper.
Connect a 1N4007 diode to pin 5 (grid) of the buffer 12A6 with the 'arrow'
pointing away from the pin. Connect other end of diode to the just added
RF choke at the end NOT connected to the 1625 grid circuit. At this
intersection apply -150v to 'block' the buffer and finals with key up.
When the key is down this point drops to -60v. My bias supply starts
at -500v and through a simple network of high value resistors gets
reduced to -150. These resistor values need to be calculated to match
your available voltage supplies, ( a chance to exercise Ohm's law ).
There is no 'power' involved in supplying bias voltage, so calculate
for 1MA or less current flow in the circuit.

You need to 'shape' the keyed waveform, so add a capacitor at the
intersection of the diode and RFC. ( .01 works for my circuit values).

This little mod allows the "Master" oscillator to run all the time. My
TCS has a good external ground connected to the panel and I can
just barely hear the oscillator on my own receiver. In other words,
'backwave' isn't a problem.

73 de W5FRS
Dennis


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 13:05:59 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13930
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:05:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA01939;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA03265 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA03259 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA00338;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906291636.MAA00338@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- ignition key method
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9906290939340.17205-100000@indy1> from "Roberta J. Barmore" at "Jun 29, 99 10:44:15 am"
To: rbarmore@indy.net (Roberta J. Barmore)
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:36:37 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>    The "ignition key" method, which both Bob and I got from Sterling, is
> very interesting; I think I'd have to touch the hardware, or at least have
> a look at a set of very clear drawings, to really understand it.  The best
> part is that the rig acts in a familar manner, only working when the key
> is down; but it's a complex assembly.

As I understand it, the ignition key is an internal electrode with a power
absorbing resistor that basically dumps the generator power to ground
by short-circuiting the arc electrodes.  Keying physically moves the
ignition key electrode short, like a relay armature away from ground
allowing the arc to strike.  I would think that the positioning of the
three electrodes would be important,  since when that keying short is
removed the arc must restrike itself.

Rather than dumping the RF to load, the ignition key dumps the generator
power to load.

>    The "backshunt" method, using an SPDT RF relay ahead of the antenna
> inductor, is probably the most promising for practical (???)
> experimentation, as there's no backwave (the folks a few kc away
> appreciate this!) and any arc, spark and Tesla-coil fan can slap together
> such a relay from junkbox parts in a trice.  May need some fiddling to get
> really good isolation, however; you don't want the fellow three blocks
> over with a SuperInhaler 3000 to hear level-shift keying!  (The other
> reason for wanting gooood isolation?)

I would expect the isolation was good enough for early radio receivers,
although some backwave would have been present.  In a modern version,
it would require good shielding to prevent backwave.

>  Well, it'd be awkward to have to
> restrike the arc every handover!  Wonder if that's one reason for
> full-duplex working in maritime MF CW comms?)

Dunno, although I would expect that could be an issue.

The arc was continuous, unless ignition keying was used, so probably
it was struck when ready to send, and left running until traffic
was passed.  I doubt it would be left running for a full watch.
That would consume a lot of power and electrodes.   With Federal's
use of copper for both electrodes, it would seem that one might
be able to use something like ordinary welding rod or even bolts
turned to a round end, as electrodes.  I wonder how strong the
case needs to be?    Maybe something like large diameter iron pipe
would work?

The arc chamber is a water cooled bronze casting, on Federal models,
and has a lid that will raise slightly in the event of an explosion
to allow the seal to give a little and vent.

The seals are sealed with grease.   The chamber is vented to outside
with a hose, through a one-way vent seal.

A 15 gallon recirculating tank of water was used for cooling, with
a small motor driven pump.

On the Federal sets, the arc/magnet generator supplied 250-400vdc at
2kw (around 8 amperes --- wowser, a biggie current mg set).

I don't exactly get how the magnet is positioned.  It looks like
coils are wound around the case of the chamber, but that seems to
be mostly magnet.  The actual chamber seems to be rather small,
maybe the size of a coffee cup.    The rest is all magnet and
water cooling.  Apparently, the ends of the magnet N/S poles
were positioned on either side of the arc juncture.  Sterling
indicates that the anode tip should always be positioned midway
between the magnet poles.

On the carbons used on the cathode, they were 1/2 inch in
diameter and 7 inches long, which seems like a standard
lighting carbon?  The copper holder positioned the carbon
via a guage and special wrench.

Although, I don't see how we could easily reconstruct a 2kw
arc converter, I think there is enough there to run it down
to maybe a 10 watt sized monster, and not melt the house down.

Gee, what a winter's project it could be.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 16:01:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA14447
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:01:20 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28714;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:52:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA05157 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mailcity.com (fes-qout.whowhere.com [209.1.236.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA05152 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Tue Jun 29 12:21:54 1999
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:21:54 -0700
From: "andy eliason" <andye8@mailcity.com>
Message-ID: <KBIJPPOOEEOBDAAA@mailcity.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sent-Mail: off
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: GB> Poldhu and Beyond
X-Sender-Ip: 38.27.54.56
Organization: MailCity  (http://www.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hey,

If you "get off on" arcs and sparks, take a look at www.poldhu.com,  
particularly "Beyond Poldhu".  Lots of fascinating pictures of the
Alexanderson and Poulson and Marconi Rotary spark gap transmission
equipment.  I got a particular kick out of the warehouse sized tuning
condenser filled with dangling steel plates.  

There are also numerous discussions from different engineers
that worked the various sites giving several perspectives on the same
installation in some cases.  

Andy 
KA9DOL Milwaukee


Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 16:07:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA14463
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:07:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29869;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA05293 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA05288 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA00546;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906291931.PAA00546@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> carbon arc wireless --- h2 gas use
In-Reply-To: <3778AE0F.1EBF@atl.org> from BOB DUCKWORTH at "Jun 29, 99 12:29:19 pm"
To: bob@atl.org
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 15:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Bob-
> 
> If I am getting this arc TX thing, the arc is tied to a resonant
> circuit and is actually a plasma arc.

The resonant circuit is the antenna and ground/counterpoise.
There is no tuned tank, although apparently one was used originally,
but dropped in favor of just putting the arc across antenna and ground.

Bucher (1917, Fig 278) shows a fundamental diagram which looks like
a spark set with the spark capacitor and spark tank condenser physically
swapped and then  the arc from the generator to ground, thus.....


     + generator -------choke--+--capacitor--+   +----- ANTENNA 
                               |             |   |
                              ARC          coil coil
                               |             |   |
     - generator -------choke--+-------------+   +----- GND


Later, in Fig 279, he shows a ``modern'' arc transmitter, thus.....


     + generator -------choke--+----- ANTENNA 
                               |
                              ARC
                               |
     - generator -------choke--+----- GND





Then, (p 266), he suggests ``In the latest naval installations, the
arc gap is connected directly in series with the antenna circuit as
shown in Fig. 279, which is a duplicate of the connections of the
U.S. Naval Station at Radio, Va., and other naval stations.''
And, ``It is claimed that connecting the arc in this way has
increased the range of such transmitters to a remarkable degree,
and that the operation of the whole system has been simplified.''

It emulates the Alexanderson alternator hookup, in that regard.

The ship sets seem to have the same connections.



> The current flow meets
> resistance as the circulation in the tuned circuit changes direction and
> full cutoff is achieved by 'blowing out' the plasma with a steady state
> magnetic field resulting in one arc per cycle. To operate on higher
> frequencies than the maximum that the arc can be created and 'blown out'
> the only option is to pick a harmonic and filter the $h!t out of iit.

That seems correct.  But, the arc may not be totally blown out between
oscillations, but only the plasma ion stream halted.  Mention is made of
blowing out the arc, and having to resstrike the arc when that happens.
I am assuming that the plasma is affected but the burn is continuous.
Sterling, (1st ed., p 397) seems to be saying that the RF inertia in
the antenna circuit (inductive/capacitive reactance) allows the
current to build up and decrease cyclically.   The DC power supplied
to it may be biasing it in some way, sort of like grid bias.   The
thump of starting the arc, probably is acting like the impulse of
a spark hit.  But, rather than generating discontinuous waves or
damped waves, the arc ion stream allows the cycle to go continuously.
It does seem to be an LC ringing phenomenon that generates the 
continuous wave after the arc is struck.

I am expecting that the maximum frequency would be dependent upon
the stray capacity of the arc converter, perhaps?  Sterling suggests
that sets could go to 450M on Independent Wireless Telegraph Company
arc sets with no problems.

> Right so far?????

So far...

.....interesting diagrams....

I don't think it is physically blown out, but the plasma is biased
to cutoff or something like that, perhaps.

> If anyone has the physice background to model this, please let
> me know how high a freq we might expect this thing to work
> at. Or maybe someone will build one and see...

I think the oscillation frequency probably has more to do with
the natural LC constants of the shipboard antennae and the actual
apparatus.

Bob/NA4G



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jun 29 21:34:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA14835
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:34:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA28087;
	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 21:25:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA09057 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from home.gis.net (home.gis.net [208.218.130.20]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA09050 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 17:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blah (ppp47-145.gis.net [216.41.47.145]) by home.gis.net (8.8.8/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA22119 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <005201bec292$790a8960$912f29d8@blah>
Reply-To: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
From: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Poulsen Arc Converters
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 20:48:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well gang, you have it mostly right!  The negative resistance effect depends
upon having hydrogen in the arc chamber.  Kerosene and alcohol are
disassociated by the arc, giving hydrogen, and maximum frequency is limited
by the gaseous conductor recombination time, which is fastest for hydrogen.
I have seen (somewhere) a graph of conversion efficiency versus frequency,
and it varied from maybe 45% at low frequencies to 15% at 600 Meters.  These
are actually quite good numbers, and compare favorably with tube and
solid-state equipment.  Arc converters were also noted for harmonic
production, which is no surprise considering they were using only one tuned
circuit.  There is probably little chance of successful operation on 160M,
but maybe a  harmonic could be used - an interesting prospect!  Also, they
will work very well at 160-190 kc which may become a ham band within our
lifetimes.  We could theoretically do it now (at 160-190 kc) under Part 15
rules, but it would be hard to hold it down to 1 Watt.  At LF, realizable
antennas are a very small fraction of a wavelength and radiation resistance
is very low, but what little power is radiated propagates VERY well.

The Navy loved the arc transmitters; a 30 kW arc transmitter readily
outperformed a 100 kW spark transmitter in field tests.

Richard Brunner, AA1P, rbrunner@gis.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 02:20:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA14985
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:20:51 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14033;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA12246 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA12239 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Arc TX...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990629224454.11984D-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I am finding this discussion to be VERY interesting! I have always
wondered how CW was generated before the days of tubes. Although I did
know about the Alexanderson Alternators, I have never known much about the
arc rigs.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 02:49:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA15002
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:49:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA15381;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 02:39:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA13616 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from server9.wans.net (server9.wans.net [216.75.0.37]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA13609 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by server9.wans.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA29971;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:29:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from slip-32-101-233-239.nv.us.ibm.net(32.101.233.239), claiming to be "janeway"
 via SMTP by server9.wans.net, id smtpdAAAa007KG; Wed Jun 30 01:29:25 1999
From: "Scott Alfter" <salfter@delphi.com>
To: "Bill Henderson" <Bill_Henderson@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: RE: GB> Searching tube data
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 23:29:23 -0700
Message-ID: <NCBBKEMBADLHBJFHAAKIIEFPCHAA.salfter@delphi.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <msg285572.thr-67f2fa94.77359403@ocdsb.edu.on.ca>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>A BIG THANK YOU !!!
>This is exactly the type of information that I was looking for.
>Guess I'll have to check which edition of the G.E. Essential
>Characteristics manual that I have.

No problem...the 14th edition is available as a reprint from Antique
Electronic Supply.  I think it was originally published in the early 70s
(either '72 or '73).  I also have the 10th edition ('63), which has the
basing diagrams and tube data split apart so you can turn each to where you
need to go and have it all in front of you.  It's a neat feature, but it's
not as comprehensive as the 14th edition.

Scott Alfter
salfter@delphi.com


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 05:00:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA15129
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 05:00:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA21952;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 04:51:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id BAA14900 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id BAA14895 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 01:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373611(10)>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:39:17 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135676(7)>; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:38:44 -1000
Date: 	Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:38:40 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Ham Radio History E-list <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <19990629155142.62090.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906292207240.908-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


I wrote:
>Pop quiz: What was the date Class B emissions were finally prohibited?
>Jeff KH6O


Gee, no one came close! Let me quote from Peter Schroeder's excellent
book, Contact At Sea (a wonderful history of maritime radio comms):
(keep in mind he wrote this book in 1965 -- one year prior to spark
finally being prohibited): "... The latest attention to the question 
of spark in maritime communications is seen at the Geneva Conference 
of 1959. In the Geneva Radio Regulations there is reiterated the 
previous authorization that a mobile station in distress may attract
attention to its plight by any means available, which includes the
use of spark if available and necessary. A new proviso makes its
appearance at this point, where it is stated that `in exceptional
circumstances' a land station may aid a mobile station in distress
by `any means at its disposal.' That is to say, it could use spark,
or broaden its radiotelephone or modulated CW (A2) emissions beyond
the frequency tolerances specified and normally used.

"At long last it appears that the terminal date previously sought for
spark transmitters has been designated by the Geneva Regulations,
bringing to a solution a problem second in importance only to that 
of obligatory intercommunications. It is categorically stated that 
Class B emissions will be allowed for distress calls and distress
traffic only until January 1, 1966. By this time some thirty-nine
years will have passed during which attempts have been repeatedly
made to eliminate from maritime communications a mode of transmission
rapidly reaching obsolescence, increasingly inefficient in the light
of advancing technology, and a wasteful user of spectrum space. As
indicated, this long process has been marked by the slow attrition 
of frequency assignments to spark stations, by imposing stricter
technical requirements which spark could not meet, by the belated
awareness on the part of shipping concerns that their own interests
could  best be served by communications equipment of modern design,
and finally by outright prohibition."

Schroeder fully details that 39-year struggle, which occured in
conference after conference. I'll provide a summary of what transpired
during each of those conferences in regard to spark.

73, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 07:09:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA15192
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:09:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA15666;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:00:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id DAA16047 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA16042 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COMPUTER (ip124.winterpark.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.233.124])
	by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id DAA00048
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 03:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199906301051.DAA00048@snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <af4k@mail.earthlink.net>
From: "Brian Carling" <af4k@earthlink.net>
Organization: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~af4k
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:50:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: GB> GB on-the-air contest
Reply-to: af4k@earthlink.net
Priority: normal
References: <377596A3.EB48B77A@littonengr.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906272116460.9351-100000@shell14.ba.best.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Having cut my teeth on the 40m novice band during the 6 months before 
they allowed reciprocal licensing for UK radio amateurs residing in the 
USA, (and having to invent a new callsign each week to avoid 
detection!), I can tell you that I very much miss the proliferation of 
chirpy, drifty, sometimes T7 signals one used to hear back then.
Most were not TOO bad, and an occasional signal with outstandingly bad
characteristics might get an OO notice, but we EXPECTED a certain amount 
of yoop, drift and chirp back then, especially on the novice segment!

I really miss it. I am still amused when I hear an OT with a bug that is 
hard to decipher. However, when I hear an op who has a really good SWING 
to his fist and is still armchair copy, I am in heaven!!

73 de AF4K, Bry

On 27 Jun 99 at 21:27, Robert wrote: 

> Hi Folks,
> 
>     I've had similar experiences. I once had a QSO with a fellow on 80m
> who didn't live all that far away. After I told him I was running a
> DX-100, he gave me his phone number and asked me to call him (my nickel,
> of course). When I did, he reamed me out about my chirp! His rig? A
> TS-950SDX! Must be rig snobbery... As far as I'm concerned, if I can
> copy the fist, I'll work the station. Don't even get me starred on bug
> fists...
> 
> 73,
> Bob - W3CD
> 
> On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Conrad Warren wrote:
> 
> > 
> > In those days, one had to have a terrible signal before anyone complained.
> > Nobody ever told me my crystal controlled rig drifted objectionably until
> > about a year ago, or was it two.  Chirp?  Just about everybody had a little
> > chirp.  But, today, chirp is not to be tolerated.  I even had  a guy break
> > into a QSO, just to tell me that I had a little chirp. ...
> 
>   == SNIP ==
> 
> 
> 
> 
*************************************************
*** 73 from Radio AF4K/G3XLQ Orlando, Florida USA
**  E-mail to:  af4k@earthlink.net
*** ICQ 6124470  ***
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hall/8701/hamlynx.htm
***********************************************

From VoiceDirect_Customer_Support@emserve.com  Wed Jun 30 14:09:08 1999
Return-Path: <VoiceDirect_Customer_Support@emserve.com>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA15571
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:09:08 -0400
From: VoiceDirect_Customer_Support@emserve.com
Received: from email11.emserve.com (email11.emserve.net [209.64.13.11])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11491
	for <JSKI@WPI.EDU>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:47:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199906301347.JAA11491@smtp.WPI.EDU>
Received: from emserve.com (email20.emserve.net [209.64.13.20]) by email11.emserve.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3)
	id N9DZ1JG7; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:55:11 -0400
Date: 6/30/99 9:35:57 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Reply-To: VoiceDirect_Customer_Support@emserve.com
To: JSKI@WPI.EDU
Subject: Everybody's talking about VoiceDirect Continuous Gold! Save 60%!
Status: RO


Dear Joseph Krzeszewski ,

I didn't type this e-mail!  I dictated it using my voice and
my PC!

Today I'm able to write to you by saying these words
directly to my computer using my normal voice. I'm talking
at my normal rate and VoiceDirect Continuous Gold is
capturing my words and accurately typing it right onto my
computer screen.

Believe me when I say,  the latest speech recognition
technology is pretty amazing! And I want you to see for
yourself how VoiceDirect Continuous Gold can change the way
you work forever.

With this INCREDIBLE software, you can dictate text and
control your PC with your voice!

Voice-activated speech recognition software like VoiceDirect
Continuous Gold is on the cutting edge of making our PCs and
other software applications more user-friendly and
productive. You don't have to be tied to your keyboard
anymore. And you don't have to be stymied by your dislike
for typing. With VoiceDirect Continuous Gold, you can say
goodbye to typing and enjoy getting more done the HANDS-FREE
way!

To find out more about this exciting new technology and all
that it can do for you, click immediately on this SECRET
offer URL:
http://voicedirect.emserve.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?3590 
ORDER WITHIN THE NEXT 3 DAYS AND SAVE 60%

VoiceDirect Continuous Gold can be yours for only $39.95.
And by ordering now, you can get two FREE BONUSES and be
fully protected by IMSI's RISK-FREE GUARANTEE!

VoiceDirect Continuous Gold comes with an unconditional 90-
day money-back guarantee. That way, you don't have to be
afraid of trying the latest technology. You have 90 days to
use this software and see that it really works! If you're
not completely satisfied, you can return the product and
we'll promptly refund your purchase price (less shipping and
handling).

NEED 2 MORE REASONS TO ORDER?  HOW ABOUT 2 FREE GIFTS!

Take Voice Direct Continuous Gold for a test drive and we
will throw in a premium headset microphone and a trial
subscription to UpdateNOW! The FREE BONUS gifts are yours to
keep no matter what.  So what are you waiting on?  To place
an order simply point your browser to:
http://voicedirect.emserve.com/cgi-bin/mail.dll?3590 
ORDER FROM IMSI ANYTIME!

If you prefer to purchase VoiceDirect Continuous Gold by
phone, please call 1-800-833-8082 in the U.S. and Canada or
fax 1-800-833-0414.

Important Discount Information Follows! Read on...
To receive the Special Upgrade Offer, you must use promotion
code AVDCEA04 when ordering VoiceDirect Continuous Gold.
When ordering by phone, please tell the sales representative
that you are responding to an e-mail promotion and mention
the discount code shown here. If you order from our online
mall, type your code in the field provided to receive your
special discount. IMSI acccepts Visa, Mastercard, American
Express and Discover. All prices are in U.S. dollars (plus tax/GST
where applicable). Shipping and handling is $6.50 in the
U.S. and $9.50 in Canada.

For non-typists like myself or for those who thrive on
multi-tasking, VoiceDirect Continuous Gold is a must-have!
So do what I did. Say goodbye to tedious typing and say
hello to the latest continuous speech recognition software
today!

Sincerely,

Robert Mayer
Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales


P.S. This special promotion pricing is limited to one
product per person/company. For site license information or
multiple copy sales, please call IMSI's corporate sales
division at (888) 467-4223. You can e-mail the corporate
sales team at mailto:corporate@imsisoft.com. Comments and
suggestions about this and other IMSI products and services
can be e-mailed to mailto:websales@imsisoft.com.


If you'd rather not receive any future special promotion
notices and news from IMSI, please send an e-mail message to
mailto:unsubscribe_voicedirect@emserve.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject field. IMSI respects the privacy
of all individuals and companies.


(C) 1999 IMSI. All rights reserved. IMSI is a registered
trademark of IMSI. All other trademarks are acknowledged.
Information from this e-mail may not be redistributed
freely.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 14:09:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA15543
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:09:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20273;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA17833 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mailcity.com (fes-qout.whowhere.com [209.1.236.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA17828 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Unknown/Local ([?.?.?.?]) by mailcity.com; Wed Jun 30 07:31:34 1999
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 07:31:34 -0700
From: "andy eliason" <andye8@mailcity.com>
Message-ID: <LEGLMJJKAJGBAAAA@mailcity.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sent-Mail: off
X-Mailer: MailCity Service
Subject: GB> home built arc xmtr
X-Sender-Ip: 38.27.54.14
Organization: MailCity  (http://www.mailcity.lycos.com:80)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Take a look at www.lwca.org/library/articles/poulsen/poulsen1.html
if you want to see a modern arc transmitter someone built.  Scroll
down a ways to see the picture.

Andy


Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://my.lycos.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 14:29:13 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA15739
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:29:12 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16917;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:19:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA20270 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA20264 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.36]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990630175316.IYU4954@SandyBlaize>;
          Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:53:16 +0000
Message-ID: <000401bec321$1c4b8140$24ef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 10:15:02 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

    This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
telegraphy.  Some
*progressive* modernist will state that too many stations are
taking up space
(whether the sub-band is used or not) and will demand that the
mode not be given
a "sub-band" or be banned altogether, since we have "modern and
faster" digital
modes available.
    Note the already "shrinking" CW sub-bands now being shared
with digital AND
foreign SSB stations, many of which arrogantly dismiss any CW
activity in their
midst!  (I'm speaking of Region 2 activity which is
North/central/south America).
    We need to populate 80 meters more folks.  Remember the old
adage
"If you don't use it, you'll lose it"!  There's already Canadian
SSB down there now.
I don't know where the Canadian sub band stops.  3550 perhaps?
Anybody know?
73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 14:05:03 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA15507
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:05:03 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00011;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA18448 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail1.radix.net (mail1.radix.net [209.48.224.31]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA18443 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 08:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [209.48.224.40])
	by mail1.radix.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22957;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from gc@localhost)
	by saltmine.radix.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA19798;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:43:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:43:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Gary Chatters <gc@Radix.Net>
Message-Id: <199906301543.LAA19798@saltmine.radix.net>
To: andye8@mailcity.com, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> home built arc xmtr
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>
>Take a look at www.lwca.org/library/articles/poulsen/poulsen1.html
                                                                  ^
Drop the l.

gc

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 00:20:15 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA16356
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:20:14 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA13372;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA27684 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA27679 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from worldnet.att.net ([12.76.96.112])
          by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134)
          with ESMTP id <19990701035146.LMLK4954@worldnet.att.net>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:51:46 +0000
Message-ID: <377A3CDD.7D7ADB0F@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:50:53 +0600
From: Ralph Hartwell <ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net>
Reply-To: ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net
Organization: Spectrotek Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL  (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs mailing list <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> book review of interest to a newcomer
References: <377AB39F.17BDB101@ro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bill and Vicki Welch wrote:

> "Understanding Radio", by Watson, Welch, and Eby. McGraw-Hill 1951.
>
> "This book is written for students who have little or no background in
> electricity or science".

<snip>

And someone swiped my copy of it a few years back!  :((


--
Ralph   W5JGV

ICQ  8514638
ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net
http://home.att.net/~ralph.hartwell
Home of the Rife Biomedical Research Web Ring

voice - 504-733-9281
fax   - 504-733-9334 (also voice mail)


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 14:57:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA15783
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:57:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21421;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:48:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA21059 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from wallias.eda.com (wallias.eda.com [199.85.245.97]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA21048 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 11:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgriff.eda.com (bgriff.eda.com [199.85.245.188]) by wallias.eda.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA28492 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:27:26 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990630142737.008c66a0@mail.eda.com>
X-Sender: bgriff@mail.eda.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:27:37 -0400
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
From: Bill Griffith <bgriff@develcon.com>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <000401bec321$1c4b8140$24ef490c@SandyBlaize>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Sandy (and all);

At 10:15 99/06/30 -0500, you wrote:
>I don't know where the Canadian sub band stops.  3550 perhaps?
>Anybody know?

Here's the "official" 80m band plan from the Radio Amateurs of Canada
webpage at :
<http://www.rac.ca/hfband.htm>

80 Metre Band - Maximum bandwidth 6 kHz 

3.500 to 3.580 MHz - CW 
3.580 to 3.620 MHz - Digital Modes 
3.620 to 3.635 MHz - Packet/Digital Secondary 
3.635 to 3.725 MHz - CW 
3.725 to 3.790 MHz - SSB and other side band modes* 
3.790 to 3.800 MHz - SSB DX Window 
3.800 to 4.000 MHz - SSB and other wide band modes 

* 80 metres normally LSB, to stay within Band Plan SSB should not be lower
than 3.728 MHz. 

As example note US stations cannot operate below 3.753 MHz 

73,
Bill VE3WGX

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 15:43:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA15829
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:43:53 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA27868;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 15:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA22026 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA22021 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:15:36 -0700
Message-ID: <377A6D48.93CF5279@littonengr.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:19:14 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
CC: Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed
References: <000401bec321$1c4b8140$24ef490c@SandyBlaize>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Definitely a consider, Sandy, but I think your "selling" the wrong
folks on it. - Conrad

Sandy W5TVW wrote:

>     This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
> telegraphy.  Some
> *progressive* modernist will state that too many stations are
> taking up space
> (whether the sub-band is used or not) and will demand that the
> mode not be given
> a "sub-band" or be banned altogether, since we have "modern and
> faster" digital
> modes available.
>     Note the already "shrinking" CW sub-bands now being shared
> with digital AND
> foreign SSB stations, many of which arrogantly dismiss any CW
> activity in their
> midst!  (I'm speaking of Region 2 activity which is
> North/central/south America).
>     We need to populate 80 meters more folks.  Remember the old
> adage
> "If you don't use it, you'll lose it"!  There's already Canadian
> SSB down there now.
> I don't know where the Canadian sub band stops.  3550 perhaps?
> Anybody know?
> 73,
> Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 18:23:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA16084
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:23:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA17389;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:14:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA23597 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from www.durham.net (root@WWW.Durham.Net [198.73.212.119]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA23592 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Docusystems.durham.net (tserver1-13.durham.net [198.73.213.77])
	by www.durham.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA28763;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:52:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199906302152.RAA28763@www.durham.net>
From: "Edward Swynar VE3 CUI" <gswynar@durham.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Bill Griffith" <bgriff@develcon.com>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:51:14 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

As Bill so rightly points out, it's a "...band plan"only---NOT the law.
Legally, we here in Canada have had NO phone sub-bands, as such, for
several years now. We can---by letter of the law---call CQ on AM phone
right in the middle of the U.S. extra class CW sub-band, if we wish...

Fortunately, we ARE considerate Amateurs (bow), & I've yet to see anything
like that happen from north of the 49th...

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ



----------
> From: Bill Griffith <bgriff@develcon.com>
> To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
> Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
> Date: June 30, 1999 2:27 PM
> 
> Hi Sandy (and all);
> 
> At 10:15 99/06/30 -0500, you wrote:
> >I don't know where the Canadian sub band stops.  3550 perhaps?
> >Anybody know?
> 
> Here's the "official" 80m band plan from the Radio Amateurs of Canada
> webpage at :
> <http://www.rac.ca/hfband.htm>
> 
> 80 Metre Band - Maximum bandwidth 6 kHz 
> 
> 3.500 to 3.580 MHz - CW 
> 3.580 to 3.620 MHz - Digital Modes 
> 3.620 to 3.635 MHz - Packet/Digital Secondary 
> 3.635 to 3.725 MHz - CW 
> 3.725 to 3.790 MHz - SSB and other side band modes* 
> 3.790 to 3.800 MHz - SSB DX Window 
> 3.800 to 4.000 MHz - SSB and other wide band modes 
> 
> * 80 metres normally LSB, to stay within Band Plan SSB should not be
lower
> than 3.728 MHz. 
> 
> As example note US stations cannot operate below 3.753 MHz 
> 
> 73,
> Bill VE3WGX

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 20:36:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA16167
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:36:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA28981;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA25046 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ro.com (0@sh1.ro.com [205.216.92.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25034 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ro.com (pm3-3.ro.com [208.134.96.98])
	by ro.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RO-1.01) with ESMTP id TAA19388
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:16:21 -0500
Message-ID: <377AABE9.F55FAEFD@ro.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:44:42 -0500
From: Bill and Vicki Welch <bwelch@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs mailing list <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> A modest web site proposal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

As a newcomer to the "glowbugs" group, I have been very impressed about
the quality and quantity of projects, schematics, etc. in the archives.
I have spent many enjoyable evenings browsing and studying, and
tinkering with circuits at the bench.  However, I'd like to suggest an
idea:

Why not develop a series of small projects, and provide several "tracks"
simultaneously-- for example:

1. beautiful photos of vintage rigs, or copies of vintage rigs
2. construction information
3. circuit design information
4. results of on-air operations, hints-kinks, etc.
5. a "feedback" area, where folks can post their own views, experiences,
etc. related to a particular project.

For me, what I desire most, is to learn "why" every component was
included in the design.  Most articles in print don't go into the "why"
very much.  I miss that.  I am a newby, and I am more interested in
learning "why", than in just building a circuit and trying it out.  That
is fun too, but in my case my main goal is to learn how to design
circuits of my own, or how to modify an existing design.

With the "web site", we can actually provide all of the above, and let
the user browse around, and dig into which ever "tracks" they are most
interested in, and easily skip over what to them might be obvious or
boring. And post questions about issues that haven't been covered in
advance.

Here are some  examples of the sort of "design info" that I am looking
to learn about-- "bypass caps", "audio shaping", "interstage coupling",
"voltage regulation".  "rf amp" stage, "mixer" stage, etc.

By the way, I am aware that this sort of info is available in various
places, but wouldn't it be nice, to be able to click on an area of a
schematic, and have that portion of the design explained.  What I find
myself doing, is juggling several handbooks on my lap, nite after nite,
trying to figure it out.

thanks for your consideration,

  -bill AB4YD




From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 20:20:26 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA16145
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:20:26 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA27571;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA24773 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc07.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc07.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.42]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA24768 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.240.34]) by mtiwmhc07.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990630235719.GTDW3470@SandyBlaize>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:57:19 +0000
Message-ID: <003101bec353$ea2ef380$22f0490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Canadian etc. allocations
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:53:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


-----Original Message-----
From: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: Bill Griffith <bgriff@develcon.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 18:52
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed


>
>
>>Hi Sandy (and all);
>>
>>At 10:15 99/06/30 -0500, you wrote:
>>>I don't know where the Canadian sub band stops.  3550 perhaps?
>>>Anybody know?
>>
>>Here's the "official" 80m band plan from the Radio Amateurs of
>Canada
>>webpage at :
>><http://www.rac.ca/hfband.htm>
>
>Many thanks!  Interesting web site!
>
>I have been pressing for people to request that the 7.000-7.050
>part of the
>band remain CW exclusively, especially if the 7.2-7.3 Mhz
segment
>is given over
>to SWBC and a new 6.9-7.0 Mhz segment is authorized.  This will
>allow
>users of antique and older equipment to contibue to use these
>segments.
>I propose the uses of the 7.2-7.3 segment be transferred to
>6.9-7.0 Mhz.
>This will relieve greatly the congestion that is now in the
>present segment
>caused by SWBC stations.  If we press for this allocation, if
and
>when the
>new segment becomes a reality, both CW and SSB interests will be
>helped.
>I am also hoping that we can have (in the U.S.) a sub-band for
>digital
>so that digital and CW telegraphy will become less intermingled.
>
>Something to think about for the next WARC.
>
>73,
>Sandy W5TVW
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 20:35:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA16162
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:35:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA23609;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:26:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA25047 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ro.com (0@sh1.ro.com [205.216.92.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25040 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ro.com (pm3-3.ro.com [208.134.96.98])
	by ro.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RO-1.01) with ESMTP id TAA19393
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:16:23 -0500
Message-ID: <377AB39F.17BDB101@ro.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:17:35 -0500
From: Bill and Vicki Welch <bwelch@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs mailing list <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> book review of interest to a newcomer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

"Understanding Radio", by Watson, Welch, and Eby. McGraw-Hill 1951.

"This book is written for students who have little or no background in
electricity or science".

This book starts out its coverage of "glowbugs" by smashing one open and
examining the grid, plate, etc!

It then proceeds thru a series of circuits, starting with the crystal
set, vacuum tube diode detector, triode, etc. The 1H4G is used for many
of the early circuits. Each project has a "why-it-works" section. To
give you a feel for the level of detail, the discussion of the Hartley
oscillator takes 15 pages.  Here is a sample page:

http://millennium.fortunecity.com/treearbor/630/radio/hartley01.jpg

  -bill ab4yd



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 21:10:19 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA16188
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:10:19 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA31516;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:00:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA25547 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.inetport.com (inetport.com [204.96.100.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25542 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (as01-22.inetport.com [204.181.88.102])
	by admin.inetport.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15346
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:46:10 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199907010046.TAA15346@admin.inetport.com>
Reply-To: <talen@inetport.com>
From: "talen" <talen@inetport.com>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Need a 1710 IF transformer
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 19:33:51 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi folks,

Well I found one problem with a radio I'm working on. The primary winding 
is open in one of the J.W. Miller #1710 100Khz IF transformers. Took the 
transformer apart just to make sure it wasn't a lead that came loose inside 
the can where it attaches, it's not...looks like it opened up inside the coil. 
Does anyone have spare ?

73s  Kees K5BCQ 


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 22:14:22 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA16227
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:14:22 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA02231;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA26201 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA26196 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990701014209.MXWG1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:42:09 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Ham Radio History E-list" <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:42:19 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bec362$f4a1ac40$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906292207240.908-100000@uhunix5>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Jeffrey Herman wrote:

> Gee, no one came close! Let me quote from Peter Schroeder's excellent
> book, Contact At Sea (a wonderful history of maritime radio comms):
> (keep in mind he wrote this book in 1965 -- one year prior to spark
> finally being prohibited): "... The latest attention to the question
> of spark in maritime communications is seen at the Geneva Conference
> of 1959.

and so on.

What's interesting to me is how relatively early on radio amateurs cleaned
their houses of spark. In the United States, spark was expressly outlawed
only well after hams had alredy stopped using it; the beginning of the its
regulatory end occurred when, in 1924, US hamdom received new frequency
assignments--at 80, 40, 20, and 5 meters--in which spark was left out of the
list of authorized emissions.

Also of interest to me is this: Considering the arguably amateur-hostile
regulatory climate of the years immediately following World War I, we were
lucky to receive a great (and surely unintentional) gift from the US
authorities as we made the transition from spark to continuous wave: even
though continuous wave was, input watt for input watt, considerably more
efficient than spark, *the power limit for continuous wave operation
remained at the limit (1 kW input) already in place for spark.* Had the
regulators really had their wits about them, they might have lowered the
input power limit in the new, continuous-wave-only amateur allocations to
keep us on a commensurately shorter leash.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jun 30 22:15:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA16234
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:15:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA03675;
	Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:05:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA26386 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from pacs03.infoave.net (2610507E@pacs03.InfoAve.Net [165.166.0.13]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA26380 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pentagrid ("port 1032"@[207.144.106.166])
 by InfoAve.Net (PMDF V5.1-12 #23426)
 with SMTP id <01JD0YVKZUS6A9QIOX@InfoAve.Net> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:54:16 EDT
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:54:19 -0500
From: Conard Murray <ws4s@INFOAVE.NET>
Subject: GB> forwarded message
To: GlowBugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Message-id: <000701bec364$a2ec65a0$a66a90cf@pentagrid>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Priority: 3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Don't reply to me..... I am just forwarding this due to a mixup with the
list.
Conard


Hi,

I have two requests: first, I lost the URL to the list archive, can someone
tell me what it is? Second, most of the files there are in a format my MAC
can't seem to handle, even with its comprehensive translation capabilities.
What is this format, and are there MAC users here who can tell me how to
read
the files in the archive? Thanks.
--
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 04:56:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA16517
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 04:56:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA27239;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 04:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id BAA01142 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA01137 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 01:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA27318;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:21:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA23017;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:23:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:23:11 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: BA <boatanchors@sco.ThePorch.com>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> The Sutter Files!
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907010316220.22382-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   As I type this, I'm leafing through a trial-proof copy of "The Sutter
Files."  Everything of Fred's that appeared in print that I could find is
in it--34pp total.
   There's still work to be done; QST's very fine screen on photographs
makes decent xerographic reproduction *really* difficult and a couple of
the articles are going to have to be ecopied entire in an attempt to get
more-readable text.  But it's just about done.  Looks like the price will
be in the $10.00 range, less postage.
   I hope to have the project ready for the order-taking stage within a
month, barring any unforseen complications.

   73,
   -Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 07:17:07 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA16596
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 07:17:06 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA02171;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 07:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id DAA02308 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA02303 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 03:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEFER45A; Thu, 01 Jul 1999 06:26:46 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Boatanchors@theporch.com
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 05:23:16 -0500
Subject: GB> The case for take out
Message-ID: <19990701.052320.-95465.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,6-7,12-13,18-19,28-29,32-37
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

We are polite.

If someone says his Globe Scout is "running 70W," we don't ask if he
means Input (probably), or output power (surely not).  We never dream of
asking if Effective Radiated Power (ERP) is specified.  It doesn't
matter, anyway, if we can hear him, and ithe issue tends to lead to
arguments.

Twenty years ago the QRPers fought it out, decided wrongly, and persist
in the error.  Here are the words of one of the winners:  "[W]e have long
known that input power is no criteria for judging...what the circuit can
deliver to the antenna." Weiss, A. (K8EEG, then),  "Simple and Accurate
RF Power Meter," Ham Radio, Oct., 1973 p 26.

The answer to that was, sure, that's right, but Input power is easy for
the newcomer to meaure and, besides, it puts a premium on improving
circuits if you can run all you can get  at a given power input.  That
view was shared by the British low power fraternity, but the output power
folks here won a suspect election and the Brits changed over for comity.

Since then (1980 or so) the case for measuring what we take out of the
power supply, to the final usually, has not been made.  But it is worth
restating:  The fellow with the $7.95 Radio Shack  VOM can tell you what
he is feeding his final, but the price for even a low power kit Wattmeter
starts at about $100.  Moreover, if you are good at tinkering with
circuits to get more power to the load, you get to keep it in any Watt
Input system.  If you go by Watts out, a one-tube Hartley using an 813 is
the same as a push-push 40m signal from an 80M VFO as long as they bend
the bimetal the same distance.

So it is a good idea to be polite, still, but if someone asks how we
should measure power, tell 'em, "Input, of course, so it can be a hobby
for anyone."

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
Banned for life from QRP-L mailer for various truths.

From bob@atl.org  Thu Jul  1 14:32:12 1999
Return-Path: <bob@atl.org>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA17318
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:32:11 -0400
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28071
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:22:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id OAA09066
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:22:27 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <377B6941.5317@atl.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 14:12:33 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joseph M. Krzeszewski" <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> web site proposal
References: <199907011530.LAA16989@blargh.wpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO

Joe-
I would like a copy to fill
in some holes from the couple of tin=mes I got hacked and had to
shut the mail server down :-)
-bob

Joseph M. Krzeszewski wrote:
> 
> I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
> about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
> want a copy of it?
> 
> -- Joe
> 
> --
> Joseph M. Krzeszewski                Mechanical Engineering and stuff
> N5LHF                            Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
> jski@wpi.edu                    -= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 11:48:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA17013
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:48:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01632;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA04815 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 08:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from blargh.wpi.edu (jski@blargh.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.145]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA04810 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 08:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jski@localhost)
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA16989;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:30:57 -0400
From: "Joseph M. Krzeszewski" <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>
Message-Id: <199907011530.LAA16989@blargh.wpi.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> web site proposal
To: cmurray@tntech.edu (Conard Murray)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:30:56 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
In-Reply-To: <01c401bec498$a8ac74a0$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu> from "Conard Murray" at Jul 2, 99 09:39:15 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>From a musty, dusty corner of Conard Murray's mind came...
>
>Mornin' everyone,
>I think Bill has a good idea here. N6EV has been maintaining the 'Official Glowbugs Website'  at
>http://www.qsl.net/n6ev/Glowbug.html for a while. I couldn't find an archive of the list since we moved to
>piobaire....is anyone compiling one?
>73,
>Conard
>
>
>

I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
want a copy of it?

-- Joe

--
Joseph M. Krzeszewski		     Mechanical Engineering and stuff
N5LHF          			 Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
jski@wpi.edu    		-= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-

From alihernlem@hotmail.com  Thu Jul  1 12:10:39 1999
Return-Path: <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA17045
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:10:39 -0400
Received: from hotmail.com (f24.hotmail.com [207.82.250.234])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA06694
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:00:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 34576 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 1999 16:00:25 -0000
Message-ID: <19990701160025.34575.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:00:25 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: jski@blargh.wpi.edu
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB- web site proposal
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:00:25 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Status: RO


>From a musty, dusty corner of Conard Murray's mind came...
> >
> >Mornin' everyone,
> >I think Bill has a good idea here. N6EV has been maintaining the 
>'Official Glowbugs Website'  at
> >http://www.qsl.net/n6ev/Glowbug.html for a while. I couldn't find an 
>archive of the list since we moved to
> >piobaire....is anyone compiling one?
> >73,
> >Conard
> >
> >
> >
>
>I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
>about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
>want a copy of it?

I'd sure like a copy, or at least access to one. When I first subscribed to 
Glow Bugs it was after delving through the existing archives (which are full 
of great info). For me, creating my own archive involves a tremendous effort 
in time and cutting and pasting (drawback of hotmail).

Brad


>-- Joe
>
>--
>Joseph M. Krzeszewski		     Mechanical Engineering and stuff
>N5LHF          			 Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
>jski@wpi.edu    		-= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 12:34:10 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA17087
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:34:10 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09651;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:24:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA05389 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f24.hotmail.com [207.82.250.234]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA05384 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 34576 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 1999 16:00:25 -0000
Message-ID: <19990701160025.34575.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:00:25 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: jski@blargh.wpi.edu
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- web site proposal
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:00:25 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


>From a musty, dusty corner of Conard Murray's mind came...
> >
> >Mornin' everyone,
> >I think Bill has a good idea here. N6EV has been maintaining the 
>'Official Glowbugs Website'  at
> >http://www.qsl.net/n6ev/Glowbug.html for a while. I couldn't find an 
>archive of the list since we moved to
> >piobaire....is anyone compiling one?
> >73,
> >Conard
> >
> >
> >
>
>I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
>about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
>want a copy of it?

I'd sure like a copy, or at least access to one. When I first subscribed to 
Glow Bugs it was after delving through the existing archives (which are full 
of great info). For me, creating my own archive involves a tremendous effort 
in time and cutting and pasting (drawback of hotmail).

Brad


>-- Joe
>
>--
>Joseph M. Krzeszewski		     Mechanical Engineering and stuff
>N5LHF          			 Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
>jski@wpi.edu    		-= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 14:09:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA17276
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:09:18 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24242;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:59:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA06313 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f77.hotmail.com [207.82.250.183]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA06308 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 86574 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jul 1999 17:39:03 -0000
Message-ID: <19990701173903.86573.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:39:03 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Hi Voltage Caps
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 10:39:03 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Anyone know a source for 600 V filter caps, preferably modern, in the 10-47 
uF range (or thereabouts)?

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu  Thu Jul  1 14:00:28 1999
Return-Path: <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA17259
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:00:28 -0400
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22860
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:50:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA03183;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907011749.NAA03183@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> web site proposal
In-Reply-To: <199907011530.LAA16989@blargh.wpi.edu> from "Joseph M. Krzeszewski" at "Jul 1, 99 11:30:56 am"
To: jski@blargh.wpi.edu (Joseph M. Krzeszewski)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User NA4G Boatanchor Bob)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO

> I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
> about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
> want a copy of it?

Joe.... Ill take a hit of it, if you could ftp it to 152.1.207.52 and
drop it in the incoming/Misc/Glowbugs directory.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 14:38:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA17335
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:38:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA28770;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:28:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA06739 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ckpnt01.intergraph.com (ckpnt01.intergraph.com [205.139.151.254]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA06734 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b11.b11.ingr.com by ckpnt01.intergraph.com
          via smtpd (for piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252]) with SMTP; 1 Jul 1999 18:09:20 UT
Received: from ro.com (lilliput.ics.ingr.com) by b11.b11.ingr.com (5.65c/1.921207)
	id AA00294; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:09:16 -0500
Message-Id: <377BAED1.F018433E@ro.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 13:09:21 -0500
From: Dan Kerl <dlkerl@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Hi Voltage Caps
References: <19990701173903.86573.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Brad Hernlem wrote:
> 
> Anyone know a source for 600 V filter caps, preferably modern, in the 10-47
> uF range (or thereabouts)?

You can get AXON metallized-polypropylene caps 40 uF @ 630V from

Michael Percy (Connectors, MIT, Wonder Caps, Buf-03)
PO Box 526 
Inverness CA 94936 USA 
415-669-7181 Voice 
415-669-7558 FAX

These are axial leaded units.  They were around 13 bucks in 1995.

I'd also look at modern motor caps in 660 VAC ratings, such as those seen at
http://www.capacitorindustries.com/dal.htm  or
http://www.capacitorindustries.com/dao.htm

HTH
-- 
Dan Kerl
dlkerl@ro.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 16:07:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA17636
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:07:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA08365;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA07743 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sparticus.bright.net (sparticus.bright.net [205.212.123.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA07738 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bright.net (circ-ras3-4-cs-23.dial.bright.net [205.212.154.179])
	by sparticus.bright.net (8.9.3/8.9.3 ComNet Build) with SMTP id PAA29136;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:38:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <001701bec3f9$4d3451a0$b39ad4cd@Bright.net>
From: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
To: "Dan Kerl" <dlkerl@ro.com>, <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Cc: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Hi Voltage Caps
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:38:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Thanks for the URLs.  I've been looking for such a site.  Motor AC
caps are rated at RMS, and for DC, the rating would be RMS*(sqr2), or
660*1.414, (Peak voltage).  A 660 VAC cap would actually be the same
as a 933 VDC cap.  I've used motor starting and running caps for
filtering before and they work well.  Not the cheapest, but they are a
convenient source of HV caps.
73 de
Dick, WB8MHE
wb8mhe@bright.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Kerl <dlkerl@ro.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
<glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Thursday, July 01, 1999 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: GB> Hi Voltage Caps


>Brad Hernlem wrote:
>>
>> Anyone know a source for 600 V filter caps, preferably modern, in
the 10-47
>> uF range (or thereabouts)?
>
>You can get AXON metallized-polypropylene caps 40 uF @ 630V from
>
>Michael Percy (Connectors, MIT, Wonder Caps, Buf-03)
>PO Box 526
>Inverness CA 94936 USA
>415-669-7181 Voice
>415-669-7558 FAX
>
>These are axial leaded units.  They were around 13 bucks in 1995.
>
>I'd also look at modern motor caps in 660 VAC ratings, such as those
seen at
>http://www.capacitorindustries.com/dal.htm  or
>http://www.capacitorindustries.com/dao.htm
>
>HTH
>--
>Dan Kerl
>dlkerl@ro.com
>

From bwelch@ro.com  Thu Jul  1 19:51:52 1999
Return-Path: <bwelch@ro.com>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA17827
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:51:52 -0400
Received: from ro.com (IDENT:0@sh1.ro.com [205.216.92.5])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA32257
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:42:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ro.com (pm3-6.ro.com [208.134.96.101])
	by ro.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/RO-1.01) with ESMTP id SAA17235
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:42:02 -0500
Message-ID: <377BFC59.FD021328@ro.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 18:40:10 -0500
From: Bill and Vicki Welch <bwelch@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joseph M. Krzeszewski" <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> web site proposal
References: <199907011530.LAA16989@blargh.wpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO

Hi Joe,

Sure, I'd like a copy.  Do you by chance have access to an Iomega "zip" drive?  If so, I'll drop one to you in
the mail, if that is OK.  I have a PC, not a MAC.

thanks,

 -bill ab4yd

"Joseph M. Krzeszewski" wrote:

> >From a musty, dusty corner of Conard Murray's mind came...
> >
> >Mornin' everyone,
> >I think Bill has a good idea here. N6EV has been maintaining the 'Official Glowbugs Website'  at
> >http://www.qsl.net/n6ev/Glowbug.html for a while. I couldn't find an archive of the list since we moved to
> >piobaire....is anyone compiling one?
> >73,
> >Conard
> >
> >
> >
>
> I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
> about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
> want a copy of it?
>
> -- Joe
>
> --
> Joseph M. Krzeszewski                Mechanical Engineering and stuff
> N5LHF                            Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
> jski@wpi.edu                    -= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 22:56:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA17942
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:56:12 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA13617;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA11677 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA11672 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: ARC transmitters... (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990701192707.11574C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Some of you on this list may find this interesting. I have talked with Mr.
Quinlan a couple of times about his arc. Does anyone know the article he
mentions in this post?

Ken W7EKB

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 20:40:43 -0400
From: "David L. Quinlan" <poulsen@ns.hicom.net>
To: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: ARC transmitters...

Now that you mention it: There were some hams in the period around 1925 who were
working with arc
and operated entirely on harmonics. but they were working with an arc that ran
between tungsten electrodes.
They wrote a paper for QST in 1925. Allen Miller has a copy of that  article,
he sent me a copy a few years ago.
Alan is at the Wireless and Steam Museum in Massachusetts.
I will have a look for the article.
A teacher at City College New York named Lester Israel had a diagram published
that showed" how amateurs can operate on "short waves"with the the arc." I tried
his circuit a few times but was never able to get the advertised results. I will
have a look for the Israel paper. Regards David Quinlan

Ken Gordon wrote:

> > Hello Ken! Arc will not work on 160 at all. The highest frequency that arc
> > oscillates on is around 150Khz.
>
> Hmmmm...We are thinking that VERY careful, extensive,  shielding and
> careful tuning to the proper harmonic might do the trick for 1.8 MHz.
>
> > However there are Lowfwer hams who communicate on VLF regularly. If that is
> > of interest to you I will be happy to offer info. Please have a look at the
> > LWCA site: Longwave Club of America. There are now VLF allocations in that
> > range for amateur use.
>
> Or are going to be soon, but we are reluctant to "disturb" the users who
> have been there for years.
>
> > Also the LWCA site has a lot of info on arc in general under
> > "Historic\Poulsen
> > It's right at the bottom of the site.REgards David Quinlan
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Ken


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 23:07:14 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17952
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:07:14 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA14222;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:57:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA12010 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA12005 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990702025018.ZJMK1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:50:18 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Hi Voltage Caps
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:50:18 -0400
Message-ID: <000101bec435$9ea3d380$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <19990701173903.86573.qmail@hotmail.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Brad Herlem wrote:

> Anyone know a source for 600 V filter caps, preferably modern, in
> the 10-47
> uF range (or thereabouts)?

I recommend seriesing a couple of 450-volters with the help of equalizing
resistors.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 23:29:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17967
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:29:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16118;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:19:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA12108 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (mail.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA12100 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16669 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 1999 02:54:06 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 16639 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 1999 02:54:05 -0000
Received: from sdialup138.phnx.uswest.net (HELO asu.uswest.net) (209.181.102.138)
  by pop.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 02:54:05 -0000
Message-ID: <377C29D2.329828C2@asu.uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 19:54:26 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@asu.uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> The case for take out
References: <19990701.052320.-95465.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have had good luck with the Tec Tec 1202 Wattmeter kit, which works up
through 150MHz, for the whopping price of $49.95. Not a Bird, but pretty darn good.

mnhopkins@juno.com wrote:
 
> Since then (1980 or so) the case for measuring what we take out of the
> power supply, to the final usually, has not been made.  But it is worth
> restating:  The fellow with the $7.95 Radio Shack  VOM can tell you what
> he is feeding his final, but the price for even a low power kit Wattmeter
> starts at about $100.  

-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 23:49:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA18002
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:49:16 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA17216;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA12562 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp5.jps.net (smtp5.jps.net [209.63.224.55]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA12556 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compaq (209-239-204-126.oak.jps.net [209.239.204.126])
	by smtp5.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA18431;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <01e001bec43b$0f7cbc20$7eccefd1@compaq>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Hi Voltage Caps
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:29:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, this isn't what you asked for, but two 350V caps in series, with
equalizing resistors (~1mA through them) will be *much* cheaper.  The axial
ones are usually nicer to mount, but the radials are generally quite a bit
cheaper.

73,
Mike, KK6GM


>Anyone know a source for 600 V filter caps, preferably modern, in the 10-47
>uF range (or thereabouts)?
>
>Brad
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 01:38:58 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA18065
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:38:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA24689;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA13660 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA13651 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373688(6)>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:14:01 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135682(10)>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:13:28 -1000
Date: 	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 19:13:26 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
cc: Ham Radio History E-list <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: RE: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <000001bec362$f4a1ac40$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907011844480.17314-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, David Newkirk wrote:
> What's interesting to me is how relatively early on radio amateurs cleaned
> their houses of spark. In the United States, spark was expressly outlawed
> only well after hams had alredy stopped using it; the beginning of the its
> regulatory end occurred when, in 1924, US hamdom received new frequency
> assignments--at 80, 40, 20, and 5 meters--in which spark was left out of the
> list of authorized emissions.

Amateurs knew quite well that they had everything to lose if they didn't
embrace change (memories of trying to get back on the air after WWI
were fresh on their mind). OTOH, the maritime industry had never felt
the threat of losing frequencies (every international conference resulted
in favorable results for them); in many ways the industry had a rather
arrogant manner of thinking, believing wireless was created exclusively
for its use. In conference after conference, the industry argued that it
couldn't financially replace spark with CW -- the monetary figures to
upgrade the industry were presented at each meeting, and smaller maritime
nations said they'd be especially hit hard, monetarily. Remember, change
within the ITU came about only through ballot, while change within a
nation (The FRC and amateur radio) was swift and usually one-sided. Thus,
we see provisions for spark lingering within the maritime industry to
1966.

7.3W, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 01:39:01 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA18070
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:39:01 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA22896;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA13676 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (mail.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA13670 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 22:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25326 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 1999 05:14:18 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 25292 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 1999 05:14:17 -0000
Received: from dialupq136.phnx.uswest.net (HELO asu.uswest.net) (209.181.111.136)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 05:14:17 -0000
Message-ID: <377C4AAF.BD580D4E@asu.uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 22:14:46 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@asu.uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> duplicate messages
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Does anyone on the list know why I am getting two copies of *all* messages
sent to the list. I had thought at first that my subscription was set to
receive a copy of the messages *I* posted, as well as the normal copy
distributed to the list, but for the past several days I have been getting two
copies of *all* messages, even where GLOWBUGS-L is listed as the only
recipient. Is there a problem on hte list?
-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 02:33:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA18101
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 02:33:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA16824;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 02:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA15171 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA15164 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17691 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 1999 06:09:22 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 17670 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 1999 06:09:21 -0000
Received: from rdialup148.phnx.uswest.net (HELO asu.uswest.net) (209.181.101.148)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 06:09:21 -0000
Message-ID: <377C5795.4EB9D2AB@asu.uswest.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 23:09:51 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@asu.uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907011844480.17314-100000@uhunix5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics wrote:
> 
> OTOH, the maritime industry had never felt
> the threat of losing frequencies (every international conference resulted
> in favorable results for them); in many ways the industry had a rather
> arrogant manner of thinking, believing wireless was created exclusively
> for its use. In conference after conference, the industry argued that it
> couldn't financially replace spark with CW -- the monetary figures to
> upgrade the industry were presented at each meeting

Boy, this really is interesting! This is similar to the argument being made by
the wireless telephone industry lately for why they need Federal laws against
manufacture and sale of scanning receivers capable of receiving the cell
portions of 800 MHz. THey say it is too expensive for them to go to using an
encryption scheme! For shame! Why is it, in the Teens or Nineties, big
business invokes the catachism of Free Enterprise/Market {sic}, except where
the market operates in their disfavor: then they are only too happy to have
government regulation! At least this is happy proof that everything isn't
going to hell for hams just lately; it has been this way, stably so, almost forever.
-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 03:18:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18127
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:18:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA26608;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:07:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA15957 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA15952 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 23:56:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374053(4)>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:55:36 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135686(5)>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:55:02 -1000
Date: 	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 20:54:57 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
cc: Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <000401bec321$1c4b8140$24ef490c@SandyBlaize>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906301014540.24105-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sandy W5TVW wrote:
>     This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
> telegraphy.  Some  *progressive* modernist will state that too many
>stations are taking up space (whether the sub-band is used or not) and
>will demand that the mode not be given  a "sub-band" or be banned
>altogether, since we have "modern and faster" digital modes available.

I believe AM would be targetted before CW. 

If CW were ever banned, I think there would be more bootleggers
(utilizing that banned mode) on the ham bands than ever before...

The argument for keeping CW is that it's really the only mode in which
equipment can readily be built by the average ham, thus helping us to
abide, in part, by S97.1:

97.1 Basis and purpose.
The rules and regulations in this Part are designed to provide an amateur 
radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following 
principles:
(a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the 
public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with 
respect to providing emergency communications.
(b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute 
to the advancement of the radio art.
(c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which 
provide for advancing skills in both the communications and technical phases 
of the art.
(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of 
trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.
(e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance 
international goodwill.

If CW ever comes under threat, we could form a loose association with
FISTS and QRP-L -- that in itself would result in well over 2,000 hams
conducting a letter-writing campaign (of course, tens of thousands more
would be just as vocal).

I'm proud of the fact that we're now the only radio service capable of
utilizing this mode. That certainly makes us unique!

Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 03:55:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA18150
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:55:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA32302;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id AAA16430 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA16425 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19523 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 1999 07:37:26 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 19513 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 1999 07:37:24 -0000
Received: from rdialup148.phnx.uswest.net (HELO asu.uswest.net) (209.181.101.148)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 07:37:24 -0000
Message-ID: <377C6C39.E4D541A9@asu.uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:38:00 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@asu.uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906301014540.24105-100000@uhunix5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I agree with most of this. AM certainly is a likelier target of any attempt to
get rid of old modes. But I don't think any modes have yet been outlawed,
unless you consider spark a "mode." I doubt the FCC would take any requests to
outlaw CW, or even AM, seriously. For the most part, CW and AM operation is
transparent to SSB operators. AM is so rare, and there are many SSB ops who
couldn't tell a CW signal from a heterodyne anyway. Ham radio is nostalgia for
some, cutting edge experimentation for others. Emergency service is part of
the ARS too. There is room for everyone, except the few little piggies who
want it all to themselves. But the arguments, if anyone is making them, for
phasing out modes that are less than up-to-the-minute are specious as far as
the ARS is concerned. After all, we aren't talking about maritime, commercial,
and military radio operation, where ultra-modernity is vital to save lives and money.

Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sandy W5TVW wrote:
> >     This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
> > telegraphy.  Some  *progressive* modernist will state that too many
> >stations are taking up space (whether the sub-band is used or not) and
> >will demand that the mode not be given  a "sub-band" or be banned
> >altogether, since we have "modern and faster" digital modes available.
> 
> I believe AM would be targetted before CW.
> 
> If CW were ever banned, I think there would be more bootleggers
> (utilizing that banned mode) on the ham bands than ever before...

> 
> If CW ever comes under threat, we could form a loose association with
> FISTS and QRP-L -- that in itself would result in well over 2,000 hams
> conducting a letter-writing campaign (of course, tens of thousands more
> would be just as vocal).
> 
> I'm proud of the fact that we're now the only radio service capable of
> utilizing this mode. That certainly makes us unique!
> 
> Jeff KH6O

-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 04:03:10 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA18158
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 04:03:09 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA31064;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:53:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id AAA16480 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA16475 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 00:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20864 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 1999 07:40:05 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 20842 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jul 1999 07:40:04 -0000
Received: from rdialup148.phnx.uswest.net (HELO asu.uswest.net) (209.181.101.148)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 2 Jul 1999 07:40:04 -0000
Message-ID: <377C6CDA.247D23EC@asu.uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 00:40:40 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@asu.uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> duplicate messages
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Does anyone on the list know why I am getting two copies of *all* messages
sent to the list. I had thought at first that my subscription was set to
receive a copy of the messages *I* posted, as well as the normal copy
distributed to the list, but for the past several days I have been getting two
copies of *all* messages, even where GLOWBUGS-L is listed as the only
recipient. Is there a problem on the list?
-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 05:06:34 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA18205
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 05:06:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA02789;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 04:56:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id BAA17205 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id BAA17200 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Fri, 2 Jul 1999 01:44:53 -0700
Message-ID: <377C7C74.BB229364@littonengr.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 01:47:10 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
CC: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>,
        Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906301014540.24105-100000@uhunix5>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I don't know what anyone would gain from doing any of the things you guys
are talking about.  And, if they did, they would have to get it by the FCC,
who, incidentally, happens to be one of the best friends that Amateur Radio
has, today.  And, they would have to get the cooperation of the WARC, which
might not be so easy, in lieu of the fact that amateur radio is more popular
in other countries than it is here - judging from the efforts of the member
nations of such conventions and conferences.

I wish more hams would spend less time worrying about their spectrum
and more time using it.  Worry has never helped anyone do anything.  But,
action speaks louder than words.  Congress is moved by statistics.  Dead
bands always look statristically bad and all the words in the world won't
help.  And, it doesn't hurt to let your representatives know how you feel.
If you feel concerned, do somethng about - find a dead band and work it
back to life.

A routine spin across the spectrum, from 1600 KHZ, to 20 Mhz, reveals
great gobs of spectrum that is almost totally abandoned.  There are few
users, since many uses have transferred to satellite communications
systems (or something else, like fiber)  people want "reliable" communications
channels - not solar impacted noisy radio.  I am will to predict that if there
are any users left in the lower radio bands, at the end of the 21st century
it will be the last few hams using up the last of the surviving 6L6's.

I think that it is pretty obvious that the hams will loose everything above
100 Mhz, within 25 years, but with the mediocre uses they are making of
these higher bands - due to repeaters and channelization, so what?  It seems
apparent that the hams are going to get more spectrum shortly than they
have ever had, and I expect that trend to continue. and for one very simple
reason - for every kilo-hertz of spectrum there is below 100 mega-cycles,
there is ten mege-cycles of useful spectrum above 100 mega-hertz - actually,
much more than that.  In the next twenty years, advanced microwave
technology will push the frontiers of microwave to well above 70,000Mhz,
although much of this spectrum is what I call "blue sky spectrum."

Even in the Soviet Union, there were hams, who had CW and (as far as
I know) voice capability.  All through the "Cold War" years, they could
talk to us.  Isn't it a little strange that (theoretically) the most
suppressive
government and ideological social structure would allow hamming, and
that hams, who live in a "free" society should be worried about loosing
their amateur radio priviledges?  What's wrong with this picture?

Another last thought.

Even a casual glance at "Industry" will reveal that "the Capitans of Industry,"

have never been interested in anything unless it looked like a sure deal and
one that could be maneuvered into some form of water tight monopoly -
like wire communications, fiber - even microwave.  But, radio?  Hah!
Even J.P. Morgan realized that radio could never be owned and why?
Because the signals travel by themselves and nobody can control them,
once they are launched.  That was why he refused to support Tesla's
"atmospheric power distribution schemes."

Even the most serious attempts at "jamming" are never completely
successful.  And, I imagine that the US Governments hopes of being
able to control propogation via Haarp technology has failed sufficiently
to indicate to them that they need to spend more money in other ways.
Radio is the sociological mercury that has always slipped through
every body's fingers.  That is why there is a big push to grab the
"High" ground, so to say.(Notice that no one is trying to forbid
listening to short wave, like they are UHF and Microwave.)

The Amateur Hams and the Indians have always had two things in
common: they started out with the most furtile ground and ended up
with the least.  But,  "fertile" is a frame of mind, as was demonstrated
when oil was struck on the Indian Reservation in Oklahoma, after the
turn of the century.  Same old, same old.  But, the nice thing is, that
what makes the lower bands fun, challenging and interesting to work,
makes them a nightmare for the communications business man - the
guy who wants all communications to flow through his hands and he
wants in for 15% - forever!  This guy is the antricipated problem.  But,
another way to look at it, is, that shortwave is not reliable enough for
him, anymore.  He wants something better - and he's found it - UHF,
Micro-wave and Laser communications.

So, relax - if there was an urgent plot to take away ham radio, it would
simply happen - boom, done!  Just like tha ban on fireworks, cigarettes
guns and drugs, and we all know how really successful these programs
are!  Right?!

Conrad, W7WLM





"Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sandy W5TVW wrote:
> >     This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
> > telegraphy.  Some  *progressive* modernist will state that too many
> >stations are taking up space (whether the sub-band is used or not) and
> >will demand that the mode not be given  a "sub-band" or be banned
> >altogether, since we have "modern and faster" digital modes available.
>
> I believe AM would be targetted before CW.
>
> If CW were ever banned, I think there would be more bootleggers
> (utilizing that banned mode) on the ham bands than ever before...
>
> The argument for keeping CW is that it's really the only mode in which
> equipment can readily be built by the average ham, thus helping us to
> abide, in part, by S97.1:
>
> 97.1 Basis and purpose.
> The rules and regulations in this Part are designed to provide an amateur
> radio service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in the following
> principles:
> (a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the
> public as a voluntary noncommercial communication service, particularly with
> respect to providing emergency communications.
> (b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute
> to the advancement of the radio art.
> (c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which
> provide for advancing skills in both the communications and technical phases
> of the art.
> (d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of
> trained operators, technicians, and electronics experts.
> (e) Continuation and extension of the amateur's unique ability to enhance
> international goodwill.
>
> If CW ever comes under threat, we could form a loose association with
> FISTS and QRP-L -- that in itself would result in well over 2,000 hams
> conducting a letter-writing campaign (of course, tens of thousands more
> would be just as vocal).
>
> I'm proud of the fact that we're now the only radio service capable of
> utilizing this mode. That certainly makes us unique!
>
> Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 07:22:56 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA18273
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:22:55 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA08138;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id DAA18500 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA18495 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990702105406.BSYF1309.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Fri, 2 Jul 1999 03:54:06 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 06:54:07 -0400
Message-ID: <000001bec479$35567ce0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906301014540.24105-100000@uhunix5>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Jeff Herman wrote:

> The argument for keeping CW is that it's really the only mode in which
> equipment can readily be built by the average ham, thus helping us to
> abide, in part, by S97.1:

This is simply untrue. A bare-bones CW transmitter can have a lower parts
count than a bare-bones SSB transmitter, but if you're capable of reading a
schematic and soldering together parts, an SSB transmitter is just as
buildable, even without PC boards, as a CW rig. It will probably be *more
expensive* as a result of the necessary sideband filter and will take more
time to build, but it will not be *less buildable.* (As for what an "average
ham" is, I welcome trustworthy data.) And then there's AM, a bare-bones
transmitter for which can be just a CW transmitter augmented by an audio
power amplifier -- also eminently buildable by *anyone* capable of reading a
schematic and soldering together parts.

My late uncle had a saying: "You don't need a license to build things; your
FCC license is for *operating*." And he was right. Yes, the amateur radio
service is one of the few services, perhaps the only service, in which an
operator can operate with self-built equipment that isn't subject to type
acceptance. But at least in this country, *building, testing, and
troubleshooting* one's own ham equipment can be done *without a license* (a
dummy antenna is necessary for transmitter tests; antennas can be tested in
receive, or with low-power test equipment for which a license is not
required). To put it another way, nearly all of the "build radio gear
yourself and learn by doing" territory we traditionally and
self-propagandizingly claim for amateur radio demonstrably *isn't* really
our territory because it is demonstrably accessible to *anyone* interested
in radio, licensed or not. The only time an amateur radio license is legally
operative is when its holder is *operating* a transmitter that emits a
signal, at a frequency allocated for amateur radio use, that is sufficiently
strong to require identification by the callsign printed on the license.

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  1 11:04:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA16949
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:04:16 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28513;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:54:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA04265 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 07:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA04260 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JD1NEZQ5W48WXRFS@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:37:05 CDT
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 09:39:15 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: GB> web site proposal
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <01c401bec498$a8ac74a0$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Mornin' everyone,
I think Bill has a good idea here. N6EV has been maintaining the 'Official Glowbugs Website'  at
http://www.qsl.net/n6ev/Glowbug.html for a while. I couldn't find an archive of the list since we moved to
piobaire....is anyone compiling one?
73,
Conard



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 12:29:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA18588
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:29:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03328;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA21344 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 08:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sparticus.bright.net (sparticus.bright.net [205.212.123.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA21339 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 08:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bright.net (circ-ras2-1-cs-6.dial.bright.net [209.143.14.110])
	by sparticus.bright.net (8.9.3/8.9.3 ComNet Build) with SMTP id LAA01622;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:59:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000201bec4a3$cc39b580$6e0e8fd1@Bright.net>
From: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
To: <wcw@asu.uswest.net>,
        "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Cc: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:57:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I can't remember where a mode has been "outlawed" or banned.  True,
some technology has been banned, but not the mode.  One that comes to
mind is the mechanically scanned TV on the lower bands.  TV, (the
underlying mode), has not been banned, only that technology, and then
only as being wastful of band width.  So if a "mode" were to be banned
in the future, that raises an interesting question.  If AM is
targeted, would this include ALL forms of (A)plitude (M)odulation,
including AM, SSB, CW, Television, (A5), etc?  Some seem to try to
separate one mode from another, when, in the basics, they are one and
the same.
73 de
Dick, WB8MHE
wb8mhe@bright.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
To: Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Friday, July 02, 1999 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed


>I agree with most of this. AM certainly is a likelier target of any
attempt to
>get rid of old modes. But I don't think any modes have yet been
outlawed,
>unless you consider spark a "mode." I doubt the FCC would take any
requests to
>outlaw CW, or even AM, seriously. For the most part, CW and AM
operation is
>transparent to SSB operators. AM is so rare, and there are many SSB
ops who
>couldn't tell a CW signal from a heterodyne anyway. Ham radio is
nostalgia for
>some, cutting edge experimentation for others. Emergency service is
part of
>the ARS too. There is room for everyone, except the few little
piggies who
>want it all to themselves. But the arguments, if anyone is making
them, for
>phasing out modes that are less than up-to-the-minute are specious as
far as
>the ARS is concerned. After all, we aren't talking about maritime,
commercial,
>and military radio operation, where ultra-modernity is vital to save
lives and money.
>
>Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Sandy W5TVW wrote:
>> >     This is my "fear" of what might happen to manual CW
>> > telegraphy.  Some  *progressive* modernist will state that too
many
>> >stations are taking up space (whether the sub-band is used or not)
and
>> >will demand that the mode not be given  a "sub-band" or be banned
>> >altogether, since we have "modern and faster" digital modes
available.
>>
>> I believe AM would be targetted before CW.
>>
>> If CW were ever banned, I think there would be more bootleggers
>> (utilizing that banned mode) on the ham bands than ever before...
>
>>
>> If CW ever comes under threat, we could form a loose association
with
>> FISTS and QRP-L -- that in itself would result in well over 2,000
hams
>> conducting a letter-writing campaign (of course, tens of thousands
more
>> would be just as vocal).
>>
>> I'm proud of the fact that we're now the only radio service capable
of
>> utilizing this mode. That certainly makes us unique!
>>
>> Jeff KH6O
>
>--
>Will White, KD7BFX
>
>to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@asu.uswest.net
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 12:54:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA18610
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:54:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05527;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:44:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA21754 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA21744 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEJMY2VZ; Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:30:36 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
Message-ID: <19990702.123831.4535.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906301014540.24105-100000@uhunix5>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-11,13-14,16,18-20,22,24-26,28-37
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:30:36 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I don't think CW will ever be actually banned, but if it were, it
would probably cause a Morse Revival.  Everybody would want to get
in on the "banned mode".

[ snip ]

>>I'm proud of the fact that we're now the only radio service capable of
>>utilizing this mode. That certainly makes us unique!

Very good point, Jeff.

I think that if CW bit the dust tomorrow ( as a requirement ),  it would
result in an elevation of that mode.  In spite of all i read from the
no-code
people about how there's no need for it, CW has always held a mystique
all it's own, and not just with the communication folks.  I have had more

than a couple digi-maniacs tell me " . . .  well, morse code, well,
that's
more like a language . . .)

In my small mind there is no catagory to put CW into ; it is it's * own *

discipline and art.   It is that mystique that keeps it alive.  Some may
think
it will die out with technology, i think it has a life of it's own.

Besides, if it weren't for CW, how would the world be saved in "
Independence
Day " ?  :>D

*** Small bit of trivia:  How did T. A. Edison propose to Mina since her
       parents never gave them two seconds alone together ?  *****

vry 73
gary ( and Al)   wd4nka



___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 12:52:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA18605
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:52:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05966;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:42:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA21755 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA21746 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEJMY3MC; Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:30:37 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Terman> Poulsen Arc. 
Message-ID: <19990702.123832.4535.1.wd4nka@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-13,15-20,22-31
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 12:30:37 EDT
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, i feel dumb.

I said that i never came across any literature on the arc that
Archie  ( Mr Alberg to us kids ) told me about in his Miami Fruit
days.
I flipped open to page seven in my Termans book, and there it was big 
as life.  Took the whole page.  Duhh.

My only excuse is that i never looked for these modes ( or rotary, for
that matter ) in what i consider the more modern oriented books.
 . . .well, that's my story an' i'm stickin to it. < grin >

Terman seems to indicate that the Poulsen Arc will produce a fairly
good signal up to 2 megs. Of course, what is a " fairly good " signal
in 1937 ?  Archie described  the sound on his receiver ( probably
autodyne )
to be like the drawing of a bow across a violin string  to a cadence.
Perhaps the effect of the magnetic field at right angle to the arc ?
( it always sounded like an awsome description - a violin.  i guess
from there we went to chirp, buzz and rac.)   

By th' way, i was listening to 20 mtrs on the super gainer this morning
at
6:00 eastern, and there were a lot of DX from the Pacific.  Guess who
was heard consistently by all the Aussies and JA's ?

Yup, the W5 wid the chirp an' th' bug.  5-3-9 to boot.

Gimme a chirp an' i'll make a contact.

vry 73
gary wd4nka

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 13:24:04 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18629
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:24:03 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08700;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA22307 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 10:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA22302 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 10:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373527(2)>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 07:00:03 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135682(7)>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 06:59:28 -1000
Date: 	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 06:59:25 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <19990702.123831.4535.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907020657520.25916-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Gary G Johanson wrote:
> *** Small bit of trivia:  How did T. A. Edison propose to Mina since her
>        parents never gave them two seconds alone together ?  *****

I had read somewhere that he proposed "speaking" Morse code to her.

Everyone have a safe weekend!
Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 14:57:40 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA18679
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:57:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18552;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA23125 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA23110 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> ARC transmitters...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990702112200.23096A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

See QST June 1925, page 39, QST January 1925, page 39.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 15:32:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA18700
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 15:32:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16668;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 14:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA23166 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hawk.csrv.uidaho.edu (root@hawk.csrv.uidaho.edu [129.101.119.220]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA23161 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: keng@uidaho.edu
Received: from astratech1 (pppl065.moscow.com [199.245.242.65])
	by hawk.csrv.uidaho.edu (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/) with SMTP id LAA13404
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199907021827.LAA13404@hawk.csrv.uidaho.edu>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:27:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: GB> ARC transmitters...
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have an e-mail I received from Mr. Quinlan containing .GIF and 
.JPG files of the QST articles I mentioned in the previous post.

It is VERY large (509 kb) so I will only forward it on to those who 
ask specifically for it.

If I forwarded it to the list, it would probably overload some 
members' IP or e-mail reader.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  2 16:32:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA18814
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:32:47 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26794;
	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 16:22:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA24183 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA24178 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 12:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373533(9)>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:55:13 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135672(7)>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:54:38 -1000
Date: 	Fri, 2 Jul 1999 09:54:31 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: David Newkirk <dpnewkirk@home.com>
cc: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>,
        Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> Date spark finally outlawed 
In-Reply-To: <000001bec479$35567ce0$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907020935080.21613-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, David Newkirk wrote:
> Jeff Herman wrote:
 
> > The argument for keeping CW is that it's really the only mode in which
> > equipment can readily be built by the average ham, thus helping us to
> > abide, in part, by S97.1:
 
> This is simply untrue. A bare-bones CW transmitter can have a lower parts
> count than a bare-bones SSB transmitter, but if you're capable of reading a
> schematic and soldering together parts, an SSB transmitter is just as
> buildable, even without PC boards, as a CW rig. 

I believe you're giving that "average ham" a bit too much credit, and 
are also dismissing the parts count as something of little importance. I
think today's average ham will be more attracted to the 20-component
transmitter over a 200-component transmitter, especially when that average
ham has only an average junkbox and an average amount of time to search
for and order speciality components. Our average ham also only has an
average collection of test equipment, and an average knowledge of trouble-
shooting (every CW transmitter I've ever built worked the first time I
powered it up -- not so with the more complex gear I've struggled with).

Maybe we should look at what hams are building today. If kit manufacturers
are any indication, we see a huge number of CW kits being offered FS, but
hardly any phone kits. Considering that what's being offered by the  
manufacturers reflects upon what folks desire to build, it would seem
that phone kits are just not popular.

> (As for what an "average  ham" is, I welcome trustworthy data.) 

Whoever today's average ham is, I wonder if he even owns a soldering
iron?

Happy Independence Day!
Jeff

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 11:56:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19518
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:56:11 -0400
Received: from bigboote.WPI.EDU (root@bigboote.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.2])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06770;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:45:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by bigboote.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA09891;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:22:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA28281 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA28276 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> FD99...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990702210120.28110C-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

If you would like to see some of our FD99 pix, and my cycle-gen, go to:

http://users.moscow.com/scripters/fd-99/

The ugly old fart with the glasses and the broad-brimmed hat, tearing the
GN-58 apart and operating the green key is yours truly, in case you
couldn't tell.

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 11:55:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19513
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:55:46 -0400
Received: from bigboote.WPI.EDU (root@bigboote.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.2])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06535;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:45:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by bigboote.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA07768;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:25:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA28397 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA28386 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> CW-Crystals... SK...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990702210702.28110E-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

To the list...

Ken W7EKB

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 19:38:54 -0500
From: cwxtal <cwxtal@u-n-i.net>
To: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> CW-Crystals...


Ken, I'M not real good on this thing, but I am reporting a silent key.
John Morris of CW Crystals passed away at  11:52 p.m. on Monday,
June 28, 1999.  He came down sick on Sunday, May 16, 1999, had
surgery on Friday, June 11, 1999, and  two more emergency surgeries on the
20th and 27th of June.  It all started with a blockage in the small
intestine and cancer was found.
He is very much missed by his family and companion, Marilyn, of 9 years.  I
(Marilyn) will try to answer any questions, but it will be difficult.


on the follo Message-----
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
To: Brian Carling <af4k@earthlink.net>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Sunday, June 27, 1999 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: GB> CW-Crystals...


>> Hi Ken - did we find out anything about John???
>>
>> I hope that he is OK! We really should support and encourage his work
>> there!
>
>I have e-mailed him twice, and called him via telephone at least 3 times.
>The e-mail I sent did NOT bounce, but I received no answer from him,
>and could not raise him via telephone either.
>
>I have no idea what is going on with him, but would really like to know.
>
>That is John Morris of C-W Crystals, who lives in Nevada, Missouri, for
>those of you who are wondering who we are talking about.
>
>Ken W7EKB
>


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 11:55:20 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19508
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:55:19 -0400
Received: from bigboote.WPI.EDU (root@bigboote.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.2])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06289;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by bigboote.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA08712;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:49:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA28770 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA28765 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 21:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEKWXZKV; Sat, 03 Jul 1999 00:26:34 EDT
To: Boatanchors@theporch.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 1999 23:22:50 -0500
Subject: GB> FMLA: Echoes
Message-ID: <19990702.232303.-14123.2.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


"And now to Mr. Kent of Gotham's Daily Planet:"  "Tell me, Clark,
what's your take on that?"

   "Well, since a conventional wisdom has not developed, yet, for
me to parrot, I'll just fall back on Professor Pangloss and say
that the Administration must know what it is doing by invading the
Vatican."  "Human rights are foremost in the New World Order, and
time will tell."

   "What a fool!" Frank snapped as he pulled the plug on the
chassis of an ancient Admiral and shorted the filters with a clip
lead and a screwdriver.  "I remember when he was a promising young
reporter, but now he's banished to Sunday morning talk shows." 
"It's like he wanted to be overlooked."

   As Frank began to pull the 21 mc IF parts from the old black and
white, I settled back in repose on a rusting 388 case.  I pulled
a Ralph W. Emerson that morning by skipping church to avoid
Communion, and Frank tossed his off Saturday at Our Lady.  Frank,
an ex choirboy in addition to being leader of a Five Meter
Liberation Army to take back 56-60 mc, skips when out-of-town
troupes bring a non Latin Mass.

  My kids were being ecumenically shuffled on cross-faith visits
and Christie, Frank's chief bodyguard, attended All Apologies
Unitarian with her boyfriend, Press, so she could join the gun
control debate.  Only Frank and I were in the basement as the other
bodyguard, who I call the WARmon, was upstairs teaching Christies'
pet ferret to attack Texas' 10-gallon water bugs. 

   Frank's interest in TV is sporadic.  We don't have one and his
trailer, where he spends less time than in our basement workshop,
lacks even a broadcast band radio save the special coils for his
Super-Gainer RX.  But he pulls a lot of junkers down for parts and
especially likes the pre mid-1950s sets for their 21 mc
intermediate frequency.  He once had me build a VHF front end from
a Standard turret tuner, but now he re tunes the cans for 12 Meter
transmitters.

   When TV moves up from the bottom six channels, Frank reasons,
he can pull the TXs up to 28 mc and push-push to 5 meters with any
big twin triode.  Untill then he operates them on 25 mc and jumps
up to 6M.  You'd think someone would notice his 80-100 kc wide
modulated oscillations on the Magic Band, but he stays above 50.125
and no one catches him.  If he inches up into Channel 2 and puts
a herringbone on Sesame Street, the Feds drive down the street in
a Crown Victoria with an antenna.  "Barney's Brigade," the WARmon
calls them, and they have yet to find Frank's unshielded pair of
250 THs.

  "So Frank," I asked searchingly (just talking to my 1930esque pal
seems to bring out Tom Swifties), "How is today, at the end of the
century," different from the Depression Era?"  I expected the usual
recitation about character and adversity but, to my surprise, he
said: "Not at all."  I must have looked puzzled because he motioned
to a breadboard on the bench and said, "just listen."

  This was another of his regens, I could see.  He names them and
this one says "Bobbi" on its panel, which has silver foil on the
back to shield the 34 and pair of  19s from hand capacity.  It was
a 0-V-2 in the parlance of its day as it had no RF amp, a detector
and two stages of audio to a pair of Baldwin 'phones.  I cranked
down the bench supply to 2 volts and fed it 135 more from a Lambda
in a nearby rack.  I walked up the pointed black regen control and
searched with a Type B dial for signals.  An old voltmeter read 32
when the feedback went critical, without a 'pop,' and I could hear
signals.

  I was looking for another pair of 'phones when Frank said, "just
listen" again.

  What a mess.  I could hear AC on most of the signals when I could
keep them in the Blooper's passband.  With some difficulty I was
able to copy one of the errant ECOs at least enough to learn it
emanated from a Hartley.  There was no mention of the TX's tube
type and his RX was said to be a 1-V-2.  He wandered out of range
and a chirpy Colpits, or something, came by with the OT signing,
I think, "8GZ."  No one was giving a name but everyone reported
QTH.

  I did not listen long.  The funny keying was troublesome, like
when Frank uses his hacksaw blade sideswiper, and I have never
mastered the trick of copying one sig out of five without a direct
conversion RX to let me zero beat the worst offender.  Since it was
broad daylight, I assumed the coils were for 40M, but I suspected
a trick.  I cut the voltages and looked under the wooden base for
a tape recorder input, but found only some wing nuts and mismatched
fasteners of all sorts.  Frank calls Electric Radio magazine "a
pitiful pit of form-over-function priggism," and they would not
want to picture his home brew style, thank you.

  One does not ask an obvious question of Frank, so I continued to
consider the cacophony carefully after replacing the probably
perilous potentials prudently.  In seven monitored QSOs I heard one
commercial allusion.  Someone had a "Super Wasp."  I heard Frank's
favorite 210 tubes, literally, all over the band and I was glad
when the WARmon broke my concentration by setting down the red eyed
weasel.

  "She ate three and bloodied a Malamute in four attempts," he
said.  I wondered what Sgt. Preston was doing in Dallas.

  Then the tattooed skinhead turned to Frank and let the ferret,
as it were, out of the bag.

   "How is that ADA contest, Frank?", he asked revealingly.

    Of course he meant Antique Wireless Association, but maybe ADA
fit too.  

    All the OT sigs seemed to have marked disabilities.


de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58 Box
226841, Dallas, TX  75222  Copyright FMLA XLIII

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 11:49:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19494
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:49:17 -0400
Received: from bigboote.WPI.EDU (root@bigboote.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.2])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02820;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:38:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by bigboote.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA15046;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 02:37:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA01223 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 23:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA01218 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 2 Jul 1999 23:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.240.207]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990703062315.HSXW9368@SandyBlaize>;
          Sat, 3 Jul 1999 06:23:15 +0000
Message-ID: <007d01bec51c$358de380$4cef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Gary G Johanson" <wd4nka@juno.com>
Subject: GB> Re: Super Gainer and chirp
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 00:45:05 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


-
>By th' way, i was listening to 20 mtrs on the super gainer this
morning
>at
>6:00 eastern, and there were a lot of DX from the Pacific.
Guess who
>was heard consistently by all the Aussies and JA's ?
>
>Yup, the W5 wid the chirp an' th' bug.  5-3-9 to boot.
>
>Gimme a chirp an' i'll make a contact.
>
>vry 73
>gary wd4nka

    There is a nifty Super Gainer in the 1941 (9th Edn) Radio
Handbook
I just got.  (The E&E west coast one).  Uses a 6K8, 6SJ7 and 6V6
as mixer, regen. IF and AF amp. respectively.  Also a 1500 Khz
IF.
I'd like to try a 1410 Khz IF can from a BC-454 in it.  They are
made well
and one could play with it internally fairly easy if you had to
loosen the
coupling a bit.
    A "chirpy" signal DOES stand out in the crowd and is aan
attention
getter.  A lot of the Cubans are still that way!  Another way is
to use an
A2 tone modulated signal.  Ain't legal, but sure does sound
pretty!
Easily done by using a two-tone test oscillator on an SSB rig!
73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 10:23:58 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA19434
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 10:23:57 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01694;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 10:13:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA05068 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA05063 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 05:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id IAA12727
	for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 08:11:01 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <377DB545.51A9@atl.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 1999 08:01:25 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> The Signalman
References: <19990702.232303.-14123.2.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

THE SIGNALMAN

	(A chapter about Telegraphers from "Lorraine" Legendary
	 Battleground, a book about his life and adventures in 
	 Europe during World War One, by John Frederick, who is
	 a member of Atlanta Chapter, MTC, Exposition Press, New York.)


	A field Signal Battalion consists of three companies, each with special
communication services within a combat division. Company A is known as
the Radio Company, Company B as the Wire Company, and Company C as the
Outpost Company.

	Unlike so many combat line companies, the Outpost Company is not made
up of civilians from all walks of life. The majority of personnel
consists of telegraph operators, lineman, and telegraph and telephone
technicians. The rest are unbranded mavericks usually thrown in at the
last minute to bring the company to full complement.

	The telegraph operators come from the railroads, commercial telegraph
companies, and press news services. Among them are train dispatchers,
wire chiefs, experts, and third-rate artisans who go through life
classified as "lids". The experts were born this way, and the lids never
get any better. Telegraphers make a strange fraternity that borders on
the eccentric, consisting of a veritable army of nomads. In their
strabge and mysterious devotion there is an unyielding class distinction
which divides them from boomers, floaters, and home guards. A close
study of the specie reveals the best of them to be idealists dreaming of
greener pastures just over the hill. The bravest, and often the best,
are afflicted with a strange malady called "foot-itch", and drift along
with the tide bucking the extra board and keeping a few steps ahead of
their creditors. The boomers, consisting chiefly of lids, are the most
boisterous of the lot, and take great pride in admitting they have
"flagged" on every railroad in the company during their relentless
dodging of sheriffs and loan sharks.

	To work under an assumed name seems to impart a certain degree of
craftiness to their mental behavior. They know each other intimately
"over-the-wire", although they may be meeting physically for the first
time.

	I have oftem wondered if Samuel Morse realized when he invented
telegraphy what a strange breed of cats he was to turn loose on society.
Their every waking thought is of telegraphy and they live in a strange
world where the clicking of the sounder is like unto the trumpet of the
Angel Gabriel. To them telegraphy is the highest form of art, and like
musucuans, they belong to a class considered erratic outside their
selected realm. Of all the signalmen they are the most clannish, and
like to mix only among themselves. They can be seen promenading in
little groups or gathering in ginmills, all reminiscing at the same time
and speaking a jargon only they understand.

	Telegraphers are never crapshooters, the sport being too strenous or
below their dignity. They will often indulge in a friendly game of poker
among themselves for low stakes. Their playing of poker is often a sham,
merely a means of getitng together, and very little money changes hands
during the lull in their strange expressions.

	The linemen are are the rough an ready lot, or the boys that wear the
number 44 tunics and size 6 hats. Occasionally there is a great runt
among them, but he is usually looked upon as a kind of mascot, or the
recipient of their horseplay. Linemen are boys who refuse to grow up,
and are selected to their craft solely from the measurement across their
backs. these pole climbers usually stick together come hell or high
water, and it's a rare instance when military policy bring a group of
less than six of them at a time. They cling together like birds of a
feather, and their antisocial aspect is not of their own choice. There
worldly knowledge is centered on pole line work, and their total
conversation is related only  to that which has to do with cutting
phantoms, hanging loadcoils, and stringing wire. Telegraphers and
technicians shun them like the plague; they are too rough and full of
fun - no telegrapher or technician would dream of mixing with them
socially. Thet judge fellow linesmen by their speed and ability in
climbing poles, and some of them are rather fancy Dns. Thet gather in
the ginmills where they feel very much at home, and between elbow
bendings they set poles and string wire far into the night.

	I have heard that more miles of pole lines have been built in these
French bistros than any place on earth. Unlike the telegrapher who is
violently attached to his art of telegraphing, the lineman takes great
pride in demonstrating his physical prowess, whether it be the scuffling
of fellow-signalmen or the guzzling of great quantities of rum at one
time.

	Linesmen are all natural-born crapshooters, and to them "Ada from
Decatur" and "Nina from Dinah" are living symbols. Very few of them go
in for poker due to the mental hazards of the sport, or the fact that
they are easy prey for the professional slickers.

	The telephone and telegraph technicians are more of the studious type
and are looked upon as the boys with the single-track minds. Their every
waking thought is of telephone and telegraph circuitry. And
fellow-signalmen are inclined to consider them as necessary evils, or
the boys who have somehow managed to escape the butterfly nets. They
never agree among themselves, and each of them has devised a special
circuit that will eventually revolutionize the communications industry.
They gather in the ginmills not to partake of the essence of the vine,
but to argue over the merit of some new circuit. French bistro keepers
have learned to spot them from the wild look in their eyes, and once
they are seated there is a hurried removal of tablecloths before they
become criss-crossed with the heiroglyphics of their frenzied minds.

	These technicians are constantly drawing new circuits, or testing
instruments, or killing time in mental gymnastic that produce a phony
atmosphere. The lineman, whose work produces much sweat from the brow,
is prone to look upon this environment as a maleficent scheme of
gold-bricking. He syas nothing, but in the back part of his head he
knows he will have his day. The poles are set and there is wire to
string, and there is always a shortage of groundmen. Nothing pleases the
line sargent more than harnessing a technician to the stringinh reel/
These are gala days that bring forth almost a fiesta spirit, and over
the hills of old Lorraine is heard:

The Song of the Lineman:

		The sound of the saw, that mighty claw
		Opening the way for the sun to the soil.
		The digging of holes, the setting of poles
		Is the groundman's contribution to toil.

		But the greatest desire is the stringing of wire,
		And the lineman climbs and shouts for joy;
		Bucking the reel over stream and field\		
		Is the task that separates the man from the boy!

	The technicians are compelled to stick together for self-preservation
as the lineman are too rough and the telegraqphers look down their noses
at them. The unbranded mavericks, unable to classify in any of the
special crafts, become steady and reliabel groundmen. Those of slight
physique are assigned to the pigeon detail where they become entranced
with the love-life and habits of these noble birds.

	Our signal company has its share of knuckleheads, slickers, phonies and
goldbricks. A knucklehead is an honest and hard-working boy who is
placed in this classification by the others simply because he lacks the
skill of getitng out of work. HTey seldom grumble or complain, and this
demeanor has caused them to be classified as dumb. The slickers are the
ones that turn first sargant's hair grey and they appear in all the
groups.

	They are born with the instinct of a fox, taking short-cuts and
shifting the menial tasks to fellow-signalmen by every ruse and
strategem. The phonies are a slight bit off their rocker, and suffer
from hullicinations; they are usually little fellows wanting to be
mental giants and afraid they will be overlooked in the shuffle. No one,
with sincere apologies to the psychologists, has entirely figured the
goldbrick, and the common conception that he is lazy is certainly
misleading. He will perform more genuine labor getting out of work than
the actual task involved. He is a rebel at heart and. like the common
house cat, refuses to be bossed.

From CB711MACK@aol.com  Sat Jul  3 10:24:12 1999
Return-Path: <CB711MACK@aol.com>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA19439
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 10:24:12 -0400
From: CB711MACK@aol.com
Received: from imo25.mx.aol.com (imo25.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.69])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01749
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 10:13:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CB711MACK@aol.com
	by imo25.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id 7TJRa04556 (3936)
	 for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 04:40:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <2dce4de9.24af2647@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 04:39:35 EDT
Subject: Re: GB> web site proposal
To: jski@blargh.wpi.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10
Status: RO


I have just about every message since I subscribed to the list. Should be
about two years worth. I know it is about 9Mb worth of flat ascii. Anyone
want a copy of it?

-- Joe

--
Joseph M. Krzeszewski		     Mechanical Engineering and stuff
N5LHF          			 Jack of All Trades, Master of None... Yet
jski@wpi.edu    		-= CCC Shop Student Hardware Specialist =-

Joe, I'd like a copy of it, I can put it on CD-ROM for later retreival.... 
thanks 73's John

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul  3 11:49:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19499
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:49:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA02980;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA06743 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 08:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from yoda.fdt.net (root@yoda.fdt.net [209.212.128.32]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA06738 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 08:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kensimps (port-18-pm3a-oca.da.fdt.net [209.212.145.81]) by yoda.fdt.net with SMTP id LAA31677 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:35:43 -0400
Message-ID: <03b001bec569$39bbcec0$c9bafea9@kensimps>
From: "Ken Simpson" <W8EK@fdt.net>
To: "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> More Nostalgia type books FS
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 11:32:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

For sale - Ameco, Tab, Sams and other nostalgia books:

Allied Radio - Dictionary of Electronic Terms - 8th edition -
     January 1969 - like new condition     -    $ 15

Allied Radio Electronics Data Handbook - 5th edition - Oct 1968
     also in like new condition     $ 12

Amateur Radio - Theory and Practice by Shrader - 1982   $ 7


Ameco Amateur Radio Theory Course - 1974
comprehensive book, good for all class licenses    $ 6

Ameco Amateur Radio Novice Class Theory Course - 1977 - $ 5

Ameco Complete Technician Radio Amateur FCC Test Manual  1990  $ 4

Ameco Advanced Class Radio Amateur License Guide - 1981  -  $ 3


Tab - Oscar: The Ham Radio Satellites, by K4TWJ - first edition,
first printing, 1979        hardbound        $ 8

Tab - Amateur Radio General Class License Study - 2nd Edition - 1975
$ 4

Tab - Amateur Radio Advanced Class License Study - 2nd Edition - 1975
$ 4

Sams - General Class Amateur License Study Guide by W0XI
           1979 - first edition - first printing -   $ 5

Sams Handbook of Electronic Tables and Formulas - 3rd edition
     1968 - hardbound -  $ 15

W5YI Part 97 FCC rules and regulations - Jan 1993  $ 3

73 magazine General Class License Study Guide - 1978 -  $ 4

Sinclair Cambridge Program Library - Volumes 1-4
     General/Finance/Statistics
     Mathematics
     Physics & Engineering
     Electronics
           1977 =     $ 8

Prices do not include shipping from Florida.
All books are in good condition.

E-mail to W8EK@fdt.net

Thanks.

73,

Ken, W8EK


Ken Simpson
E-Mail to W8EK@fdt.net
Voice Phone  (352)  732-8400




From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul  4 10:33:45 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA20372
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 10:33:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18057;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 10:23:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA17979 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA17974 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1.indy.net [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA23654;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 09:03:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA26883;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 09:04:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 09:04:47 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: BA <boatanchors@sco.ThePorch.com>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Beam filter advice?
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907040858280.25650-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Picked up one of the WW II "Beam Filters" used in aircraft not toolong
ago, which if I remember right, is a switchable filter--sharp 1020 cps
bandpass, sharp 1020 notch, and (level-matched?) straight through.

   Can't seem to find the "CQ" art. that spoke of these; does anyone know
what sort of source and load Zs they were happiest with?  (I do remember a
non-invasive mod for variable bandwidth--a pot from input to output that
can be mounted externally and connections taked onto what's already there)

   Tryin' to come up with something to help out on the noise &
clutter--used to use a HB audio filter on the HW-16 that allowed a nice
wide (IF) bandwidth but kinda made the center of the passband stand out.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul  4 11:10:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA20395
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:10:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19163;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:00:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA18497 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA18492 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 07:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: GB> Terman> Poulsen Arc. (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990704075435.18468B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

More stuff from Mr. Quinlan about ARC transmitters.

Ken

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 04:27:16 -0400
From: "David L. Quinlan" <poulsen@ns.hicom.net>
To: keng@uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: (Fwd) Re: GB> Terman> Poulsen Arc.

Interesting that i have those references printed out somewhere.
Additions to the book list.
1( Wireless Telegraph construction for Amateurs,byAlfred  Powell Morgan , 1914
2(Experimental Wireless Stations  By Phillip E. Edelman. EE., 1920
3(Elements of Radio Communication by Ellery W. Stone, 1926, N.Y.
Prime reference on Arc.
4(Robison's Manual of Radio Telegraphy and Telephony, 1918

keng@uidaho.edu wrote:

> David:
>
> Here is what was sent to me.
>
> Ken Gordon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ken:
>
> The page actually discusses the topic of spark in general, and the
> Poulsen arc in specific in a large paragraph ( well, almost a page, anyway ) :
> there are no schematics or photos, therefore i will transcribe it thusly:
>
> "The Poulsen arc takes advantage of the negative-resistance
> characteristic of an electric arc to convert direct-current power into
> radio-frequency energy. The arc as ordinarily employed takes place
> between carbon and copper electrodes in an atmosphere of hydrocarbon
> vapor and with a magnetic field at right angles to the axis of the arc.
>
> Such an arrangement, when properly designed, will generate large
> quantities of radio-frequencies at a fair efficiency. The Poulsen arc
> operates most efficiently at frequencies below several hundred thousand
> cycles, but it will function after a fashion up to frequencies approaching
> 2000 kc.
>
> For the frequencies to which it is adapted the arc is a very simple and
> rugged generator of radio-frequency energy, and hundreds are still in regular
> use. It is, however, being rapidly replaced by the vacuum-tube oscillator
> because of the latter's flexibility, frequency stability, and freedom from
> harmonics.
>
> Footnote 3: For futher information regarding the Poulsen arc, the reader
> is referred to the following articles:
>
> Leonard F. Fuller, The Design of Poulsen Arc Converters for Radio
> Telegraphy, Proc. I.R.E., vol. 7, p.449, October, 1919;
>
> P.O.Pedersen, On the Poulsen Arc and Its Theory, Proc I.R.E., vol 5, p.
> 255 August, 1917; Some Improvements in the Poulsen Arc, Proc. I.R.E.,
> vol 9, p. 434, October 1921, and vol 11 p. 155, April, 1923. "
>
> This is page 7, ' Radio Engineering ' by F. E. Terman, Sc.D., Second
> Edition 1937.
>
> There is no futher reference to the Poulsen Arc...


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul  4 13:08:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA20454
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 13:08:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22871;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:57:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA19483 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 09:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA19478 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 09:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy2.indy.net (root@indy2.indy.net [199.3.65.7])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13223;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:52:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy2.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA29027;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:53:39 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:53:38 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy2
To: BA <boatanchors@sco.ThePorch.com>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Beam Filters, RCC
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907041120171.26544-100000@indy2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Thanks to everyone who responded about the beam filter.  Not sure what
version I have--seems to be ex-Navy (US) from the "U(anchor)S" stamp, has
two 1/4" output jacks, a flying-lead input plug (PL-55 marked "1136-1
UTC") and an angled front panel marked for either way up mounting
(horizontally or vertically, I presume).  No extra terminals on the
internal connection strip, so it is either 4K or 600R and the only way to
find out is to try it!  Panel is labelled "BEAM FILTER" at the top, "N. A.
F. 68304" and a serial number at the bottom.  Nice little case, modern
accessory filters should be so solid and clean.
   ...And for those who suggested an active filter, I have built and used
'em and find them not really well-suited to Morse work, or at least simple
ones aren't, especially plugged in to the output of a receiver.  Too prone
to do annoying things when overdriven and they call for knocking the level
down and than hanging an amp on the output, way too much stuff for a
simple job.  (Pat Hawker shows a neat one in the latest set of Technical
Topic reprints; but it's not suited to these lists without subbing a dozen
tubes for the original active devices; a tube comparator, you don't wanna
build!  Or maybe you do if you have a lot of free time).  (Yes, there are
plenty of ways to make an active filter act nice, both subtle things per
Deane Jensen and overtly simple ones like a clipper at the input and real
audio amp--6V6, LM380, something with some oomph--at the output, but
that's fancier than I'm looking for).
   My old set-up, which I may yet clone, started out with a nifty clipper
(three switchable steps--1N34s, 1N34s, 1N4007s) and then the filter,
nothing more than a 5mH RFC & condenser tuned to about 700cps with small
condensers to top-couple the signal in and out.  Worked well, despite a
likely-crummy Q.  The clippers whomped the noise bursts most severely and
the filter took away the clipping artifacts while making sigs near Fo
stand out.  Lost it one of the times I moved house.  If I can dope out the
beam filter, adding a stepped clipper will be easy.  (Advantage over the
continuously-variable ones?  No batteries!  ...Though a triode starved for
plate volts will do a very fine job here as well). 

   Next topic!  Does anyone know what happed to the "Rag Chewer's Club?"
Used to be the easiest wallpaper to get; received one under my first call
about a week after going on the air!  The '97 HB still talks about the
award but you don't see 'em on hamshack walls any more. :(  It would seem
a natural for tube-fan on-the-air gatherings, you can't hardly swap the
dope about your rigs, haze each other over keying & note and so on in much
less than the required half-hour.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul  4 16:09:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA20543
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 16:09:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA28465;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 15:58:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA20962 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from netcom11.netcom.com (tomrice@netcom11.netcom.com [192.100.81.121]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA20957 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tomrice@localhost)
	by netcom11.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.02)) id MAA06815;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tom R. Rice" <tomrice@netcom.com>
Message-Id: <199907041951.MAA06815@netcom11.netcom.com>
Subject: GB> 'nother friction-drive parts source?
To: boatanchors@sco.theporch.com (boatanchors list)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (free glowbugs)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

	A recent inquiry regarding friction-drive parts sources
	triggered the following response:

--------

	In answer to your query, I've just spotted an ad
	in the latest issue (Jun 99) of R & D Magazine:

	Ultra High Friction Parts
	Material ML6 Ups Productivity!
	Superior to rubber an urethane.
	We apply to steel, bronze, nylon, ceramics.
	etc., etc., etc.

	(picture of shafts, wheels, etc., with "rubber" 
	friction-drive elements)

	Meridian Laboratory
	2415 Evergreen Road
	PO Box 620156
	Middleton, WI  53562

	phone: 800 837 6010
	or:    608 836 7571
	fax:   608 831 0300
	

	It's not clear from the ad whether they do custom/prototype
	work, repair/replacement of worn elements or are hot for
	big OEM jobs.  In any case, it's probably worth giving them
	a call.  

	73 de WB6BYH   

	
-- 
"Start off every day with a smile and get it over with."  --W.C.Fields
Tom R. Rice  
tomrice@netcom.com     

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul  4 22:04:12 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA20734
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 22:04:11 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA05130;
	Sun, 4 Jul 1999 21:53:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA23782 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f234.hotmail.com [207.82.251.125]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA23777 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 18:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 84420 invoked by uid 0); 5 Jul 1999 01:46:40 -0000
Message-ID: <19990705014640.84419.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 207.214.218.134 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Sun, 04 Jul 1999 18:46:40 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [207.214.218.134]
From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Regulator Circuits
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 18:46:40 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

The ARRL Handbooks show regulated power supply circuits using 6L6 or 6Y6 
type tubes for the series regulator tubes. I have a number of used 6BQ6 and 
6DQ6 type sweep tubes. Would these be suitable for this application?

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 09:02:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA22026
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:01:58 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA32047;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 08:50:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA13297 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from x8.boston.juno.com (x8.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.24]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA13292 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 05:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wd4nka@juno.com)
 by x8.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEUH32RL; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 08:34:44 EDT
To: rbarmore@indy.net
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:07:52 -0400
Subject: Re: GB> Beam Filters, RCC
Message-ID: <19990706.090754.11510.0.wd4nka@juno.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907041120171.26544-100000@indy2>
X-Mailer: Juno 1.49
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-24
From: Gary G Johanson <wd4nka@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi, Bobbi:

Funny you should mention RCC.
I saw one on the wall in an older photograph in some
magazine and it made me wonder why i never got mine.

Way back in 1977 i "qualified " and was applied for 
( i think that's how it worked: the guy you talked to had
to have submitted a report of a QSO for over half hour,
which was easy for me because i can't let anyone go 
for at least an hour without a molecular breakdown of
my station.)

But i never got it.     Think i had to apply for membership
with ARRL or something;  but nobdy i knew then had RCC
either, and there was never any talk about it with the eriudite
stiffs on the club machines then, so i just let it go, like so
many other things.

It took so many years for the novelty to wear thin that i
didn't mind it, really.   Kinda wish now that i had it, as a momento
to my radio past.   C'est la vie.

vry 73
gary, wd4nka

___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 10:32:14 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA22293
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:32:14 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12769;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:21:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA14084 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 07:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA14079 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 07:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EEUPCPEN; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 10:06:51 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:02:45 -0500
Subject: GB> MEL, JEL, straight from...
Message-ID: <19990706.090249.-3183307.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,8-9,14-19
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

	
The '56 West Coast Handbook features the next to last Frank Jones Super
Gainer RX, but with a distinctly ARRL twist:  They specify a component
which, if available at all, costs more than the rest of the project.  It
must have been a sop to the advertisers who, naturally, resent an all
junkbox undertaking.  My pal in the basement, for instance, caluclated
the inductance of a spiral notebook retaining wire so he could cut off
how many partial Henry's he needs, but QST was not interested.  In bed
with Air Dux, he speculated.

  But as an example, the '56 rig calls for a 40 MEL plug in coil.  That
thing has an '807ish base.  My junk box contains a 40 JEL, which looks
about the same but the mounting is slightly different.  The JEL came from
a Gonset Commander, if memory serves.  So what is the difference and is
there a secret understanding about the runic notation?

de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222
One grid dip oscillator could cause a recession.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 10:26:50 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA22271
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:26:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA11772;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 10:15:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA14035 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 07:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from ckpnt01.intergraph.com (ckpnt01.intergraph.com [205.139.151.254]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id HAA14030 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 07:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b11.b11.ingr.com by ckpnt01.intergraph.com
          via smtpd (for piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252]) with SMTP; 6 Jul 1999 14:03:08 UT
Received: from ro.com (lilliput.ics.ingr.com) by b11.b11.ingr.com (5.65c/1.921207)
	id AA12789; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 09:03:02 -0500
Message-Id: <37820C98.A898E276@ro.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 09:03:04 -0500
From: Dan Kerl <dlkerl@ro.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Regulator Circuits
References: <19990705014640.84419.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Brad Hernlem wrote:
> 
> The ARRL Handbooks show regulated power supply circuits using 6L6 or 6Y6
> type tubes for the series regulator tubes. I have a number of used 6BQ6 and
> 6DQ6 type sweep tubes. Would these be suitable for this application?

Should be fine, as long as the cathode-screen ratings are observed.
Most sweep tubes have a fairly low screen voltage rating.

-- 
Dan Kerl
dlkerl@ro.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 14:56:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA22989
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 14:56:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18079;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 14:45:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA16407 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (imail@ha1.rdc1.nj.home.com [24.3.128.66]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA16401 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com ([24.5.103.17])
          by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111)
          with SMTP
          id <19990706181353.GDWE2725.mail.rdc1.nj.home.com@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>;
          Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:13:53 -0700
Reply-To: <dpnewkirk@home.com>
From: "David Newkirk" <dpnewkirk@home.com>
To: <mnhopkins@juno.com>, <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> MEL, JEL, straight from...
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 14:13:56 -0400
Message-ID: <000501bec7db$4fc61760$11670518@cc328679-a.vron1.nj.home.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
In-reply-to: <19990706.090249.-3183307.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Michael Hopkins:

> The '56 West Coast Handbook features the next to last Frank Jones Super
> Gainer RX, but with a distinctly ARRL twist:  They specify a component
> which, if available at all, costs more than the rest of the project.  It
> must have been a sop to the advertisers who, naturally, resent an all
> junkbox undertaking.  My pal in the basement, for instance, caluclated
> the inductance of a spiral notebook retaining wire so he could cut off
> how many partial Henry's he needs, but QST was not interested.  In bed
> with Air Dux, he speculated.

Of course! How else could evil ARRL raise the money to do fake surveys about
FM and buy overexpensive parts for surreptitious insertion in non-League
projects?

If I were in charge of QST's Hints and Kinks column--which I was, for
something about eight years--I, also, would reject a hint about using
spiral-binder wire for general-purpose inductances, for the reason that
because it's steel, the Q of inductors made with it is *terrible*. I admit
that it can work well if you're trying to quash an unwanted resonance, as in
a parasitic-oscillation suppressor for the low (say, 160 through 40 m)
bands--I've used it for that purpose myself. But even at those frequencies,
a few inches of that steel wire in a circulating-current path will introduce
measurable loss compared to copper wire of the same length.

>   But as an example, the '56 rig calls for a 40 MEL plug in coil.  That
> thing has an '807ish base.  My junk box contains a 40 JEL, which looks
> about the same but the mounting is slightly different.  The JEL came from
> a Gonset Commander, if memory serves.  So what is the difference and is
> there a secret understanding about the runic notation?

I believe I saw someone mention this nomenclature in passing in the
Boatanchors within the past couple of weeks, and some elements of it appear
to be elegantly simple: JEL mentions "Junior ("75 W") with end link"; JCL
means "Junior with (fixed) center link"; JVL means (uh-oh) "Junior with
variable center link." My 1959 Allied Radio catalog also mentions the "Baby"
series (no power/voltage ratings given), which I think B & W considered as
"mini" in naming its members: MC (center-tapped, no link), MEL (mini with
end link), and MCL (mini with center link).

73,

Dave Newkirk, W9VES
dpnewkirk@home.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 22:08:55 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA23636
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:08:55 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA30139;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 21:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA20832 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp6.jps.net (smtp6.jps.net [209.63.224.103]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA20824 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compaq (209-239-194-155.oak.jps.net [209.239.194.155])
	by smtp6.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA09135;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <01dd01bec81a$4dfec640$9bc2efd1@compaq>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Regulator Circuits
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 18:44:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I'd guess they should be fine.  On the subject, one thing that's kind of
hidden in the fine print regarding such circuits is the large voltage
difference that can exist between the heater and the cathode.  Normally I
doubt we give much thought to the heater-cathode rating of tubes, but in
this case you must pay attention to this rating.  This is why the heater
transformer for such circuits was usually referenced to a voltage other than
ground -- the top of the VR tube was a common spot.  This way the
heater-cathode voltage for the amplifier tube is zero, while the
heater-cathode voltage for the pass tube is reduced by Vref.  The 6AS7 dual
triode pass tube has a 300V rating, making it very useful for such service.
Most of the other tubes used as pass tubes seem to have a 180-200V rating,
but note that sometimes the early production tubes were only rated for 90V,
with this rating rising in later years.  For example, both the 6L6 and the
6Y6 in my 1946 Sylvania manual are only rated at 90V, though they're twice
that in later manuals.

73,
Mike, KK6GM


>The ARRL Handbooks show regulated power supply circuits using 6L6 or 6Y6
>type tubes for the series regulator tubes. I have a number of used 6BQ6 and
>6DQ6 type sweep tubes. Would these be suitable for this application?
>
>Brad


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul  6 22:33:54 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA23663
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:33:54 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA32057;
	Tue, 6 Jul 1999 22:22:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA21052 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 19:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m4.jersey.juno.com (m4.jersey.juno.com [209.67.34.61]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA21047 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 19:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mharla@juno.com)
 by m4.jersey.juno.com (queuemail) id EEVX3XD4; Tue, 06 Jul 1999 21:58:35 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 21:57:53 -0400
Subject: Re: GB> MEL, JEL, straight from...
Message-ID: <19990706.215756.-475267.1.mharla@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,6-7,10-11,13-14,18-19
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael J Harla <mharla@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hello all:

I have in front of me a '10 JCL,' a '10 JEL, a '40 JVL,' and a ' a '20
JVL.'   The JCL and JEL have their links wound over the tank coil, at the
center and end respectively.  The JVL puts the link in a gap of about 1/2
in. at the center of the tank, which consists of two series-connected
sections; thus the link's coupling can be varied to an extent.

In the case of the 20 JVL, there is a sixth terminal, from a tap two
turns from one end of the tank, to a pin mounted outboard from the
nearest mounting eye.  The 40 JVL lacks this tap.

I also have a few Bud coils that resemble the '40 JVL' construction. 
Their part labelling was apparently similar to B&W's, but began with "O."

My catalogs describe the "Junior" as 75W, 850 V, able to take the output
of an 807.  The Bud coils are also rated for 75W.  The "Baby" coils were
rated at 25W.  The 75W coils were to be offerred in my '42 Allied Radio
Catalog, all three styles by '53, only the B&W lines by '56.

Hope this helps, Mike, n2mho in SNJ.
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul  7 02:37:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA23810
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 02:37:16 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA14628;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 02:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA23341 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 23:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA23335 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 6 Jul 1999 23:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Tue, 6 Jul 1999 23:13:11 -0700
Message-ID: <3782F065.C3A1EDFB@littonengr.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 23:15:11 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael J Harla <mharla@juno.com>
CC: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> MEL, JEL, straight from...
References: <19990706.215756.-475267.1.mharla@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

There was also an HDVL series rated for a kilowatt, as I recall.
I have several  examples of these as well as a variety of those
previously mentioned.  If anyone is attempting to put together
complete sets of these coils, they might quiry me to see what
"holes" I might fill in their collection.  I also, have some of the
"Jack Bars" for those coils which do not employ tube sockets
for their retention.  --  Conrad, W7WLM

Michael J Harla wrote:

> Hello all:
>
> I have in front of me a '10 JCL,' a '10 JEL, a '40 JVL,' and a ' a '20
> JVL.'   The JCL and JEL have their links wound over the tank coil, at the
> center and end respectively.  The JVL puts the link in a gap of about 1/2
> in. at the center of the tank, which consists of two series-connected
> sections; thus the link's coupling can be varied to an extent.
>
> In the case of the 20 JVL, there is a sixth terminal, from a tap two
> turns from one end of the tank, to a pin mounted outboard from the
> nearest mounting eye.  The 40 JVL lacks this tap.
>
> I also have a few Bud coils that resemble the '40 JVL' construction.
> Their part labelling was apparently similar to B&W's, but began with "O."
>
> My catalogs describe the "Junior" as 75W, 850 V, able to take the output
> of an 807.  The Bud coils are also rated for 75W.  The "Baby" coils were
> rated at 25W.  The 75W coils were to be offerred in my '42 Allied Radio
> Catalog, all three styles by '53, only the B&W lines by '56.
>
> Hope this helps, Mike, n2mho in SNJ.
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Get the Internet just the way you want it.
> Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
> Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul  7 14:20:27 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA24568
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:20:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17163;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:08:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA29930 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA29925 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 10:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373697(2)>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:43:12 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135667(4)>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 07:43:06 -1000
Date: 	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 05:41:42 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        Ham Radio History E-list <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>
Subject: GB> Morse code transmitters and receivers will be shut down (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907070538380.11779-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, we knew it was going to happen... 

>"Globe Wireless, through it's station KFS, has been in
>marine communications since 1910 using Morse code. That
> era is about to come to an end at 2359 UTC on 12 July,
>1999 when the last KFS/KPH/WNU/WCC Morse code
>transmitters and receivers will be shut down. Ship, Ham
>and SWL operators may request QSL cards from Globe
> Wireless to commemorate this historic event. Please send
> your requests via Email to cw@globewireless.com, or by
>facsimile message to: +650-372-2656. Titanic RIP"
>
>                                            Peter Kierans,
>                                            Vice President,
>                                            Regulatory Affairs
>                                            Globe Wireless

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul  7 18:10:54 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA25171
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 18:10:54 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17325;
	Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA02213 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from maxtor.com ([134.6.32.3]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA02208 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 14:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Longmont64.Maxtor.COM (longmont64.mlm.maxtor.com [134.6.79.210])
	by maxtor.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA21887
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 7 Jul 1999 15:34:01 -0600 (MDT)
Received: by Longmont64.Maxtor.COM with VINES-ISMTP; Wed, 7 Jul 99 15:35:55 MDT
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 99 16:35:54 CDT
Message-ID: <vines.PP59+tUwUrA@Longmont64.Maxtor.COM>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
From: "Mark Dittmar" <Mark_Dittmar@Maxtor.COM>
Reply-To: <Mark_Dittmar@Maxtor.COM>
Subject: GB> Arc xmtr ?
X-Incognito-SN: 368
X-Incognito-Version: 4.11.23
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



	Following the recent spate of postings regarding the Poulsen Arc 
converter,  I stumbled on this page.

	Not really a "Poulsen" arc,  but he is generating RF with it at 
about 1 Mhz:

	http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/arcosc.htm.

	Enjoy.

	73,

	Mark, AB0CW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 09:19:56 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA26084
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:19:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA11833;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA10346 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 05:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from imo19.mx.aol.com (imo19.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.9]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA10341 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 05:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wd4nka@aol.com
Received: from Wd4nka@aol.com
	by imo19.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id wZNVa23678 (14427)
	 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 08:40:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <66e188d7.24b5f625@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 08:40:05 EDT
Subject: GB> Lighthouses
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi, Gang.

Just came back from visiting some of the old
stomping grounds around Daytona and Dunedin
( east and west coasts, respectively: i think Florida
is the only state in the lower 48 where you can
watch the sun rise and set over ocean ) and as i
checked out what was left of the lighthouses, i wondered
why no mention was made in the literature concerning
these structures abt the radios installed therin. 
These sentinels were largely closed up after the war,
and certainly maintained a radio presence at least from
the twenties through the late thirties.  I remember the
antenna masts in ruin as a kid.  I know there are indices
of operating lighthouses across the U.S.  but i wonder if
there is a roster of associated frequencies that were used?

Wouldn't it be cool to do a field day from one of these things??

******************************************************************************
*********
As for the trivia question, about Al and Mina ( the Thomas Edisons )
How did he propose to her under the constant scrutiny
of her folks? ( He was 25 yrs older than her, but they had
no problems with his money )

They held hands.  A lot.  He taught Mina to copy and send
Morse.  He tapped his betrothal request while they held hands.
She responded in kind.  

Now you tell me?  Could Packet and Amtor do THAT??
CW is still the best way to communicate in an **emergency** < grin >.
The defense rests.   ;>)

( Me, naw....., i had to ask Cindy's dad's permission. - - Southern style.)

vry best 73
gary, wd4nka

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 10:15:34 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA26142
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 10:15:34 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA19415;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 10:03:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id GAA10989 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA10984 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 06:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA02420;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:46:04 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907081346.JAA02420@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Closing if US HF CW Marine Stations.
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:46:03 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User NA4G Boatanchor Bob)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I just got off the phone with a local news reporter who got an email
from someone to the effect that Globe Wireless is closing all HF CW
Marine operations this coming monday.

If anyone knows anything about this, holler back to me or the list.
It might be the last time to catch a call tape droning on and on,
or a tfc list.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 10:35:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA26166
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 10:35:06 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22297;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 10:23:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA11110 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 07:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA11105 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 07:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA02447;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:58:06 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907081358.JAA02447@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Arc xmtr ?
In-Reply-To: <vines.PP59+tUwUrA@Longmont64.Maxtor.COM> from Mark Dittmar at "Jul 7, 99 04:35:54 pm"
To: Mark_Dittmar@Maxtor.COM
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 09:58:05 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> 	Following the recent spate of postings regarding the Poulsen Arc 
> converter,  I stumbled on this page.
> 
> 	Not really a "Poulsen" arc,  but he is generating RF with it at 
> about 1 Mhz:
> 
> 	http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/arcosc.htm.
> 
> 	Enjoy.
> 
> 	73,
> 
> 	Mark, AB0CW

Interesting, he is operating it more like a spark set than an arc set.
An arc is not a relaxation oscillator.  A spark sort of is.

Put the arc where C1 is, and put C1 in series with the secondary tank,
perhaps, would make it closer to an arc in operation.

When I saw him mention sawtooth waveform, that told me it was not
operating as an arc should.  An arc is supposed to generate sine waves.

You can replace the arc electrodes with a pair of points and it will
be an ordinary spark set.

I would sense that allowing the tank circuits to flywheel might smooth
out the sawtooth and make it more sinusoidal.  If so, that would mean
it might work on 160M.

But, it is a very interesting idea and approach to generating waves.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 15:22:00 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA26659
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 15:21:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00134;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 15:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA14135 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from home.gis.net (home.gis.net [208.218.130.20]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA14129 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 11:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blah (ppp28-250.gis.net [216.41.28.250]) by home.gis.net (8.8.8/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA15244 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:39:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <003301bec970$1ba87ea0$fa1c29d8@blah>
Reply-To: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
From: "Richard Brunner" <rbrunner@gis.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Arc Transmitter???
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:28:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Following the recent spate of postings regarding the Poulsen Arc
converter,  I stumbled on this page.

Not really a "Poulsen" arc,  but he is generating RF with it at
about 1 Mhz:

http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/arcosc.htm.

Enjoy.

73,

Mark, AB0CW
-------------------------------------------
Yes, the acid test is in listening with a receiver.  A spark transmitter
generates damped waves, and will sound like anything between keyed static to
a fairly musical note, without the BFO.  An arc transmitter generates
continuous waves and may have some arc hiss on it, but requires a BFO for
reception.

Richard Brunner, AA1P, rbrunner@gis.net


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 17:52:21 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA26929
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:52:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21154;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:40:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA15832 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA15827 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA03160;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:07:01 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907082107.RAA03160@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Re: The End Is Near... (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907081323511.10637-100000@shell14.ba.best.com> from "Robert P. Okas" at "Jul 8, 99 01:24:30 pm"
To: vintage@best.com (Robert P. Okas)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:07:00 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

FYI NOTE QRG'S AT BOTTOM.....

DE NA4G/Bob

> Hi Bob,
> 
>     Yet another post concerning the Globe Wireless shutdown. This one's
> from Boatanchors..
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 17:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Dick Dillman <ddillman@igc.apc.org>
> To: Old Tube Radios <boatanchors@theporch.com>
> Cc: kay@kwmr.org
> Subject: The End Is Near...
> 
> Careful readers of these pages may remember my post not a month ago stating
> that KFS was the last North American station still on the air with a Morse
> wheel soliciting traffic on HF.  While I was listening to the repeated CQ on
> 4Mc. a ship actually called with traffic.  And KFS had traffic for him.  How
> sweet it was to monitor the superb op at KFS handle the traffic with
> off-hand professionalism, giving not a hint that he was the last man
> standing in an honorable profession.
> 
> Now comes news that even this last stand of the art of Morse will soon be no
> more.  On Monday, 12 July, KFS will cease its Morse service.  I'm told there
> will be ceremonial messages sent.  I myself plan to be there to witness the
> event although it will certainly be a bitter-sweet day for me.  KFS was the
> first station I worked as Radio Officer aboard the M/V Rainbow Warrior/GSZY.
> 
> Those with interest in such things may wish to monitor KFS on that sad day.
> The frequencies for KFS are listed below.  Not all are likely to be in
> operation.  The ones marked with an asterisk are the ones I have actually
> heard KFS on recently.  *But* their recent traffic lists include mention of
> 500Kc. so listeners within range may want to monitor that historic channel
> as well.
> 
> After 12 July there will be only... silence.
> 
> QRG for KFS:
> 
> 500
> 4228
> 4274 *
> 6348
> 6365.5
> 8444.5 *
> 8558.4
> 12695.5
> 12844.5
> 17026
> 17184.8
> 22515
> 22581.5
> 
> Vy 73,
> 
> Dick/"RD"
> 

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 20:25:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA27068
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:25:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00947;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA17256 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from atnet.net (mail.atnet.net [205.199.7.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA17251 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atnet.net [12.7.30.149] by atnet.net with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-4.02) id AC8442A00116; Thu, 08 Jul 1999 17:04:20 -0700
Message-ID: <37853A98.A3B78920@atnet.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 16:56:09 -0700
From: Bob - W7AVK <rsrolfne@atnet.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Ham-Boatanchors@uscd.edu
Subject: GB> Plug Info or drawing?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Greetings All - This weekend I had an opportunity to quickly look at a
Viet Nam "Village Radio".  About the size of a BC-611 but a more modern
design.  Has a single "earphone" which is also used as its mic.  My
question has to do with the covered "external headset" jack on the top
of the unit.  It looks to be a 2 circuit phone jack but not 1/4 inch
standard -  maybe the next size smaller.  Any one know what plug it
takes?  Or wonders of wonders, anyone have a drawing of the radio?

Sorry, I didn't get any name plate information.

Of course all costs will be paid.

Thanks,

73's  Bob  W7AVK


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 21:02:19 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA27100
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:02:19 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA03123;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:50:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA17762 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA17757 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 17:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374047(6)>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:35:12 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135689(5)>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:35:03 -1000
Date: 	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 14:35:02 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Bob - W7AVK <rsrolfne@atnet.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Ham-Boatanchors@uscd.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Plug Info or drawing?
In-Reply-To: <37853A98.A3B78920@atnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907081433300.26822-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Bob - W7AVK wrote:
> Greetings All - This weekend I had an opportunity to quickly look at a
> Viet Nam "Village Radio".  About the size of a BC-611 but a more modern

Were the controls labeled in Vietnamese? I had a manual for one which
showed such labeling.

73, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 22:47:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA27169
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:47:57 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12515;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:35:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA18756 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 19:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA18751 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 19:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12141;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:15:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA13025;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:16:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:16:28 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Bob - W7AVK <rsrolfne@atnet.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Ham-Boatanchors@uscd.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Plug Info or drawing?
In-Reply-To: <37853A98.A3B78920@atnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907082112540.12389-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Almost certaiinly, what that set used was a "Collins/Drake mic plug,"
which I think is 0.205" in diameter.  There's a military-type version that
looks like a skinny edition of a three-circuit switchboard/patch cord
plug.  I have one in the basement, will see if it has a PL-ish number on
the barrel. Pretty sure the same thing was used for microphones on WW II &
later military airplanes and probably elsewhere.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 23:25:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA27200
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:25:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15807;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:13:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA19219 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA19214 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.193]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990709025915.TXYL9368@SandyBlaize>;
          Fri, 9 Jul 1999 02:59:15 +0000
Message-ID: <000601bec9b6$ad11ac40$c1ef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "User Na4g Boatanchor Bob" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: The End Is Near... (fwd)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 21:56:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Heard tonight after a brief scan:
Station    Freq.        Time (GMT)        Signal (RST)
GKB      4273.5       0205                    339
Portishead Radio England
GKB      8559           0210                    549   Portishead
Radio
KFS       8444           0211                    549   Bolinas
Radio
CLA        8573          0230                    589   Havana
Radio with TFC list
GKB       12835        0212                     569    Portishead
Radio
SPE        12939        0216                    569    Szczecin
Radio Poland
A7D        12966.5     0217                    569    ???
LPD        12988.5     0218                    439    Argentina
4XZ         17050        0220                    579    Israel
(Haifa Radio?)
LGX         17074       0222                    339   Rogaland
Radio Norway
KFS         17185       0225                    569    Bolinas
Radio

Frequencies are aprox.  Heard using my German Maritime receiver
(Siemens E-410).  This will give you some idea of what we get
here
at night in a few minutes.  Slim pickins' compared to a few years
ago!
500 Khz is completely dead here.  Some of us may liven it up this
winter with some "tests" on 500 Khz!
73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul  8 23:28:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA27207
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:28:47 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA16119;
	Thu, 8 Jul 1999 23:16:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA19291 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sssnet.com (mail.sssnet.com [209.117.156.3]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA19286 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 20:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Received: from orfyepek.sssnet.com (cable-16-206.sssnet.com [24.140.16.206]) by sssnet.com (8.8.5/SCA-6.6)  with SMTP
	id WAA19943 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:59:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990708230443.007b5ce0@mail.sssnet.com>
X-Sender: w8au@mail.sssnet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 23:04:43 -0400
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Plug Info or drawing?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

 


There is probably no nameplate as they were not to be identified by the
enemy.  By your description it it either the Hallicrafters HT2 or HT2A.
The 2 is for 30-40 mHz, and the 2A has an additional chassis added that
gives it 118-136 mHz for aircraft communications.  If you see a switch that
says "ground/ground and ground/air" then it is a 2A.

The external earphone jack is a common 1/8" miniature, not a shortened 1/4"
(PL-55) or a military style PL-68.

BTW, it is not a GB radio.  It's solid state.

Perry w8au




At 04:56 PM 7/8/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Greetings All - This weekend I had an opportunity to quickly look at a
>Viet Nam "Village Radio".  About the size of a BC-611 but a more modern
>design.  Has a single "earphone" which is also used as its mic.  My
>question has to do with the covered "external headset" jack on the top
>of the unit.  It looks to be a 2 circuit phone jack but not 1/4 inch
>standard -  maybe the next size smaller.  Any one know what plug it
>takes?  Or wonders of wonders, anyone have a drawing of the radio?
>
>Sorry, I didn't get any name plate information.
>
>Of course all costs will be paid.
>
>Thanks,
>
>73's  Bob  W7AVK
>
>
>
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 14:39:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA28160
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:39:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21796;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:39:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA28689 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA28684 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06537
	for glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:11:17 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907091811.OAA06537@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> This Weekend's 30/40/80/160M QRGs?????
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

OK Gang, the fingers they be a'itchin' fer some activity on the
ol' brass sendin' monkey, so what be the pleasure of the crewe
for particulars in QRG/QTR this weekend?

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 14:42:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA28173
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:42:43 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22261;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:42:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA28678 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp.amotusa.com ([206.169.137.4]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA28673 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM davidb-200.amotusa.com BY smtp.amotusa.com ; Fri Jul 09 11:11:35 1999
Message-ID: <00d001beca36$54680320$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Nickle a Watt
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:10:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi all,

Looking at the latest AES sales flyer I found what might be a sleeper.  It's
the 12GC6, which appears to be a 12DQ6-A with a different pinout.  The
6DQ6/12DQ6/etc family was a very commonly used sweep tube, and ended up in a
lot of transmitters as well (there were also lots of compactron and other
versions -- just look for sweep tubes with 17.5 or 18 Watt plates).  Anyway,
the good news is that AES is selling the 12GC6 for all of a buck fifty.
There are lots of other good buys on the flyer, but this is the one that
caught my eye.

BTW, the 12GC6 is even cheap when it's not on sale -- around $2.50 to $3.

73,
Mike, KK6GM


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 14:59:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA28207
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:59:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24567;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:59:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA29823 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA29798; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> This Weekend's 30/40/80/160M QRGs?????
In-Reply-To: <199907091811.OAA06537@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990709113645.29752A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> OK Gang, the fingers they be a'itchin' fer some activity on the
> ol' brass sendin' monkey, so what be the pleasure of the crewe
> for particulars in QRG/QTR this weekend?

Bob:

Why don't you suggest some frequencies?

Ken

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 15:47:13 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA28290
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:47:13 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA31535;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:47:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA00491 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:15:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.51]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA00486 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA06741
	for glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA06721;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907091911.PAA06721@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> This Weekend's 30/40/80/160M QRGs?????
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990709113645.29752A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu> from Ken Gordon at "Jul 9, 99 11:37:09 am"
To: keng@uidaho.edu (Ken Gordon)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:11:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu (User NA4G Boatanchor Bob)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> > OK Gang, the fingers they be a'itchin' fer some activity on the
> > ol' brass sendin' monkey, so what be the pleasure of the crewe
> > for particulars in QRG/QTR this weekend?
> 
> Bob:
> 
> Why don't you suggest some frequencies?
> 
> Ken

I always hang around 7025, 3525, and 3579, this time of year,
with emphasis on 7025.

Anyone know if a contest is on this weekend?  If so, that might
suggest we move to 7147 or 3579.

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 16:07:01 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA28319
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:07:00 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01510;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:06:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA00710 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA00703; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> This Weekend's 30/40/80/160M QRGs?????
In-Reply-To: <199907091911.PAA06721@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990709123628.669B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> > > OK Gang, the fingers they be a'itchin' fer some activity on the
> > > ol' brass sendin' monkey, so what be the pleasure of the crewe
> > > for particulars in QRG/QTR this weekend?
> > 
> > Bob:
> > 
> > Why don't you suggest some frequencies?
> > 
> > Ken
> 
> I always hang around 7025, 3525, and 3579, this time of year,
> with emphasis on 7025.
> 
> Anyone know if a contest is on this weekend?  If so, that might
> suggest we move to 7147 or 3579.

Yup! OK! Now, what about 160 meters and 30 meters? Got any suggestions for
either of those?

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 16:35:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA28360
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:35:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA05194;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:35:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA01292 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA01287 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA28863;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:18:26 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906290318.XAA28863@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> This weekend GB QRG....
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

OK, for the sake of simplicity, let us use 7025 at 0300Z
                                           7147 at 0400Z.

Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights.

Hope to see some of you folks aboard..... any takers?

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 16:44:00 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA28381
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:43:59 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06347;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:43:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA01394 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA01389 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA31272;
	Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:24:29 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199906290324.XAA31272@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Re: This weekend GB QRG....
In-Reply-To: <199906290318.XAA28863@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from Boatanchor Bob NA4G at "Jun 28, 1999 11:18:24 pm"
To: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 23:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

OK, for the sake of simplicity, let us use..... ammended

    10110 at 0200Z
     7026 at 0300Z
     7147 at 0400Z
     3579 at 0500Z.

Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights.

Hope to see some of you folks aboard..... any takers?

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 17:12:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA28435
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:12:08 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09076;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:12:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA01637 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA01632 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JDD69L0G4E8WYPAM@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:35:04 CDT
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 15:37:12 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: This weekend GB QRG....
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <066601beca4a$d2b4af80$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <199906290324.XAA31272@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

OK Bob ..... I will try to make it.
No promises though. The weather is a bit unstable here.
Conard



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 17:22:40 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA28455
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:22:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA09993;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:22:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA01999 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.net [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA01983 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:56:17 -0700
Message-ID: <37866260.EBC922C@littonengr.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 1999 13:58:40 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
CC: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> This Weekend's 30/40/80/160M QRGs?????
References: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990709123628.669B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

1830 and 1900 for 160 Meters...I got crystals for those freq.s
for 30 Meters, the band is so small why not work duplex,
then it doesn't matter - just tune around a bit, get a little excercise
on  the ol'e tuning wrist!  Where ever you are, call CQ and then
tune the band looking for a response.  Works like a charm -
Conrad, W7WLM

Ken Gordon wrote:

> > > > OK Gang, the fingers they be a'itchin' fer some activity on the
> > > > ol' brass sendin' monkey, so what be the pleasure of the crewe
> > > > for particulars in QRG/QTR this weekend?
> > >
> > > Bob:
> > >
> > > Why don't you suggest some frequencies?
> > >
> > > Ken
> >
> > I always hang around 7025, 3525, and 3579, this time of year,
> > with emphasis on 7025.
> >
> > Anyone know if a contest is on this weekend?  If so, that might
> > suggest we move to 7147 or 3579.
>
> Yup! OK! Now, what about 160 meters and 30 meters? Got any suggestions for
> either of those?
>
> Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 17:38:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA28471
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:38:43 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11443;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:38:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA02370 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA02364 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA13966;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:22:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA22574;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:23:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 16:23:34 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: This weekend GB QRG....
In-Reply-To: <199906290324.XAA31272@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907091622120.20668-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   I'll try--tonight might be iffy, there's a front moving through, but
Saturday (Indianapolis Hamfest!!!) is likely.  Who knows, might even have
some Wonderous Find to try out.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 17:43:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA28479
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:43:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA11856;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 17:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA02328 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from shell14.ba.best.com (vintage@shell14.ba.best.com [206.184.139.145]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA02323 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vintage@localhost)
	by shell14.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id OAA27024;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Robert P. Okas" <vintage@best.com>
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> This weekend GB QRG....
In-Reply-To: <199906290318.XAA28863@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9907091417450.20894-100000@shell14.ba.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Barring any last-minute, unforeseen requests of my presence, I'll activate
the West Coast at 0400Z.

73,
Bob - W3CD


On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:

> OK, for the sake of simplicity, let us use 7025 at 0300Z
>                                            7147 at 0400Z.
> 
> Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights.
> 
> Hope to see some of you folks aboard..... any takers?
> 
> Bob/NA4G
> 
> 

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 18:37:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA28528
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:37:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15779;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:37:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA03089 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA03084 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 15:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix1.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.6]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373812(1)>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:20:03 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix1.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135677(9)>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:20:08 -1000
Date: 	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 12:20:07 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix1
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: This weekend GB QRG....
In-Reply-To: <199906290324.XAA31272@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907091219090.29926-100000@uhunix1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:
>     10110 at 0200Z

What rig are you running on 30M, Bob?

Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 23:44:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA28755
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 23:44:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01239;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 23:44:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA05975 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 20:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA05970 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 20:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11102;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:32:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA13644;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:34:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:34:18 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Michael J Harla <mharla@juno.com>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
In-Reply-To: <19990709.210934.-508741.3.mharla@juno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907092217270.12221-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Oh, gee: The main makers were, as far as I know:
   Bud
   E. F. Johnson
   Decker
   Coto-Coil
   (All of the above are known to have made the small and/or medium ones
mounted horizontally on a ceramic or polystrene 5-pin tube base plug,
supported by polystrene or celluloid strips, "air," or ceramic.  Some of
the Coto-Coil ones used a ceramic form that is asterik-shaped in cross
section).
   Additionally, Millen and National (and B&W?) made plug-in transmitting
coils on pins-in-line or pins-slightly-offset long ceramic bases.
   Most of 'em made really *heavy* coils for higher-power stages.
Somebody (maybe Decker?) offered an edge-wound copper strip coil in
single-turn increments, with little clips to connect 'em.  Early 30s, and
I suspect it was kinda nonideal.

   Anybody know of others?

   Ready-wound receiving coils, the list would be waaaay long--National,
Hammarlund, Alden products ("Na-Ald"), Modern Radio Labs and lots more.
Some of the Hammarlund ones in particular are husky enough for low-power
oscillator tanks.

   73,
   --Bobbi

   (Never got on the air--storm came through and we had a whole new
unrelated plumbing problem here at Radio 0.1-Acre.  And a nice Code
violation in the existing drains, it'll be along time before I rent a
duplex again.  Shot the whole evening.  But no BAs were dampened, just
my kitchen).

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 00:35:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA28787
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 00:35:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA04040;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 00:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA06437 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hdo1.hdo.net (hdo1.hdo.net [209.76.66.193]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA06432 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from k6qq (pm-4-18.hdo.net [209.76.66.19])
	by hdo1.hdo.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA31452;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:18:28 -0700
Message-ID: <002101beca8b$7f538f00$13424cd1@k6qq>
From: "John Moriarity" <k6qq@hdo.net>
To: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>,
        "Michael J Harla" <mharla@juno.com>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907092217270.12221-100000@indy1>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:20:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>    Most of 'em made really *heavy* coils for higher-power
stages.
> Somebody (maybe Decker?) offered an edge-wound copper
strip coil in
> single-turn increments, with little clips to connect 'em.
Early 30s, and
> I suspect it was kinda nonideal.
>

E.F. Johnson also made edge-wound high power coils.  The
coil in
my Kilowatt Matchbox is edge wound.  Looks neat!  Doesn't
hardly
get warm at all with five watts through it ;-)

73,

John, K6QQ
Alturas, CA

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 02:00:08 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA28850
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 02:00:08 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA08045;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 01:59:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA07420 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA07411; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: This weekend GB QRG....
In-Reply-To: <199906290324.XAA31272@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990709223159.7382A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> OK, for the sake of simplicity, let us use..... ammended
> 
>     10110 at 0200Z
>      7026 at 0300Z
>      7147 at 0400Z
>      3579 at 0500Z.
> 
> Friday, Saturday, Sunday nights.
> 
> Hope to see some of you folks aboard..... any takers?

I will be on some of those on Saturday. Probably not on Sunday though: we
will be on our way back from Coeur d'Alene, which is about 100 miles
north.

Ken

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 07:50:49 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA29035
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:50:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA19616;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:50:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id EAA12121 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 04:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA12116 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 04:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EE6P7RJK; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:34:02 EDT
To: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, Boatanchors@theporch.com
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 22:25:41 -0500
Subject: GB> FMLA: Snuffy
Message-ID: <19990710.063020.-69697.0.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


We tend to think the younger guys don't know any history before
Jennifer Flowers, but the WARmon read Snuffy Smith somewhere.

   Old Snuffy, the comic hillbilly of "Barney Google and Snuffy
Smith" back when newspapers just had one color ink, liked to grab
the poker 'stakes after shooting out the light.  And his caplock
was but a short step from the WARmon's Tech 9 that darkened a room
as he backed out the door thru which his boss Christie pushed
Frank. The skinhead sprayed the ceiling again and the last fluros
fell among the 9mm cases in a Wagnerian darkness.  The only pieces
of unbroken glass were on Frank's breadboard.

   Frank, my pal who wants to take back 56-60 mc with a Five Meter
Liberation Army, meant well.  He really just wanted to encourage
the home construction and understanding of radio devices like he
did before 1938 on 5 Meters.  But the unrequested bodyguards who
attached themselves to him are, well, humorless when it looks like
anyone is going to harm their pal.  Frank does communications for
their WAR social club, for the Nation of Islam, and for anyone who
has an anti-government slant.  He never forgave the Feds for
outlawing modulated oscillators on 5M.

   But this time we were just taking in a suburban ham club
meeting.  Frank sets his browser to call him to his KayPro when the
term "homebrew," or "home brew" + "contest" appears on any amateur
radio mailer or website.  He saw a posting for a QRP transmitter
contest and thought he had a chance, even though his pair of 45s
on pine lost to a Pack Ratt board kit mounted in a wood box at the
HamCom regenerative RX contest. 

   So Frank went all out and we drove to Irving, Texas, which is
the home of the Dallas Cowboys who are not in jail at any given
time.

   The ham club over there has a nice meeting room in a cafeteria,
but we never really got to try the cuisine.  Truth is we did not
get past the registration table and it was not just because of the
bodyguards.  In fact, Christie is quite presentable.  She is 20
something and carries a baby bag that says "Nite, Nite, Baby." 
Don't ask what's in it.  You cannot see her tattoo, but her backup
is covered with them.  He has a shaved head, red muscle shirt,
suspenders and jackboots plus a ring with a skull on it and it does
not help a bit that he carries a huge dictionary sized book with
a craft paper cover that says, "Therman, last ed."  

   Still, we usually get in places as I look like any other worn
out 50-something guy with a white beard and Frank is positively
natty in double breasted brown suit with shoulder pads, Navy last
shoes and spats.  But the woman with the little sticky name tags
that say "Hello, my name is," took one look at Frank's offering and
called a KA5-something who asked, "What are those?"  He was
pointing at a 50L6 and 25-something.  It was not a good sign.

   Frank explained he had built up a MOPA with a full set of plug
in coils from 160 thru 5M.  Frank ignores non-harmonically related
bands and did not have time for a 12M/6M rig too.  He showed them
the coils in an Admiration Coffee can as an Old Timer wandered up
and pushed thru the crowd to get a better look.  Seeing the non
polarity line plug, he said,"No transformer," and the KA5-something
asked how it could work without one.

   When Frank said there was a fine transformer right outside on
a the pole, the OT laughed and explained that Frank had the
filaments in series with a dropping resistor and was using a
voltage tripler for about 400 volts of B+, no load, direct from the
line.  A couple of Neon bulbs operated as voltage regulators and
a 25W bulb so old it actually said "Mazda" on it took the initial
surge.  The OT cautioned about plugging in the cord the right way
and Frank showed him a pocket line tester.

   But after an animated side discussion, the folks decided Frank
could not enter because of insurance fears.  That led to a spirited
conversation in which, I fear, some things were said that many
might now regret.  And the menacing WARmon, as I call the
skinhead, made the registration woman nervous. She said "Officer?"
to a passing security guy so obese he could not throw Christie out,
or even the red-eyed white ferret who was peeping out of the baby
bag now. 

   But Christie did not even look around.  She does not like police
of any type so she shouted "Time's a'waistin'" and the WARmon
opened the book.

   The thing inside looked mildly like my Tom Corbet Space Cadet
raygun and flashlight, but it made a lot more noise.  I covered my
ears as he hosed down the ceiling.  We headed for the door but were
met by a pair of policemen.  One of them said, "Everybody back
inside."  "Were they're shots fired?"

   "Yes there were," said Christie, stepping up to the big cop. 
She showed him a picture ID saying she was a field rep for Handgun
Control Inc.  "We were illustrating the devastating effect of these
immoral firearms and now I've got to go to the car for more copies
of a Congressional Record speech by Senator Kennedy."  

   "Would you like one, too?" she asked as the cops pushed past us.
"Commie," I heard one say.

   The Irving Police are pretty good and might have caught us had
not Christie simply driven down the block in Frank's Frazer and
parked behind a Denny's.  We went in for Frank's favorite
"California Dreamin" sandwich and the WARmon joined us after
parking his Toyota Land Cruiser in a closed car lot next door and
affixing a pair of signs that said "One Owner" and "Nosotros
Financiamos."  

   As the ferret growled over the skin from the "all white" chicken
order the WARmon insisted on, Christie called her boyfriend to
bring her Lincoln, just in case.  We rode home with him after they
finally took the barricades off US 183.

   I opined, as we turned onto Loop 12, that I hoped this
experience at least taught us something.  There was a silence, but
finally Frank said, "Yes, I think you're right." 

   "There are some situations in which a transformerless power
supply might not be the best route."


de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58
Box 226841, Dallas, TX  75222  Copyright FMLA XLIV

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 08:06:43 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA29047
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:06:42 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19773;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA12405 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 05:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA12400 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 05:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA26016;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:02:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA25452;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:03:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:03:31 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: John Moriarity <k6qq@hdo.net>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
In-Reply-To: <002101beca8b$7f538f00$13424cd1@k6qq>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907100654320.25044-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Coils made of well-spaced, edge-wound continuous copper strip (||||...)
are very good for many MF & HF applications (flatwound ones (- - - ...)
are better as you get higher in freq but must be very well-supported).
   But the ones I was trying to describe had a discontinuity every turn
(and a little "jog")--each turn was held to the next by a little
sping-clip!  You could stack up however many you needed (fine notion) but
my intincts tell me the Q of such a setup probably wasn't very good--too
resistance in all those clips, especially after they'd been changed around
a few times.
   Still, it'd be interesting to find such a critter intact, unlikely
though that is.

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 11:03:54 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA29134
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:03:54 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26120;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:03:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA13978 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA13972 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COMPUTER (ip104.winterpark.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.233.104])
	by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA09694
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 07:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199907101453.HAA09694@falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <af4k@mail.earthlink.net>
From: "Brian Carling" <af4k@earthlink.net>
Organization: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~af4k
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:47:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
Reply-to: af4k@earthlink.net
Priority: normal
References: <19990709.210934.-508741.3.mharla@juno.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907092217270.12221-100000@indy1>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On  9 Jul 99 at 22:34, Roberta wrote: 

>    Anybody know of others?

DENCO - they are still making coils I understand!
In England
* Brian Carling in Orlando, Florida  USA
* http://come.to/AF4K
* ICQ:  6124470  /  AIM: happysurf9
***********************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 11:58:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA29165
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:58:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA28461;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:58:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA14572 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from pompano.pcola.gulf.net (root@gulf.net [198.69.72.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA14567 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from computer (seaotter18.pcola.gulf.net [205.160.71.129])
	by pompano.pcola.gulf.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA24084
	for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:51:29 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <009701becaea$f5b52500$8147a0cd@computer>
From: "rb" <rbigg@pcola.gulf.net>
To: <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Fw: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 10:43:25 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

There was also the Air-Dux line of coils that were frequently used.


-----Original Message-----
From: Roberta J. Barmore <rbarmore@indy.net>
To: John Moriarity <k6qq@hdo.net>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Saturday, July 10, 1999 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting


>
>Hi!
>
>   Coils made of well-spaced, edge-wound continuous copper strip (||||...)
>are very good for many MF & HF applications (flatwound ones (- - - ...)
>are better as you get higher in freq but must be very well-supported).
>   But the ones I was trying to describe had a discontinuity every turn
>(and a little "jog")--each turn was held to the next by a little
>sping-clip!  You could stack up however many you needed (fine notion) but
>my intincts tell me the Q of such a setup probably wasn't very good--too
>resistance in all those clips, especially after they'd been changed around
>a few times.
>   Still, it'd be interesting to find such a critter intact, unlikely
>though that is.
>
>   73,
>   --Bobbi
>
>KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
>      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
>   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 10 15:01:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA29256
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 15:01:33 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04205;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 15:01:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA16076 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.inetport.com (inetport.com [204.96.100.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA16071 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from default (as01-38.inetport.com [204.181.88.118])
	by admin.inetport.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA05165;
	Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:53:58 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199907101853.NAA05165@admin.inetport.com>
Reply-To: <talen@inetport.com>
From: "talen" <talen@inetport.com>
To: <baswaplist@qth.net>, <homebrew@qth.net>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> HBR Receivers
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 13:52:55 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

	
For those of you interested in the HBR Receivers presented in a series of 
construction articles in QST in the late 50s and 60s, we now have a functional 
HBR Receiver Web Site at     http://www.inetport.com/~talen/ 
......with operational links to a great HBR Receiver photo database (and growing).

73s  Kees K5BCQ

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 00:19:48 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA29585
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 00:19:47 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA26463;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 00:19:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA20275 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 21:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from imo23.mx.aol.com (imo23.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.67]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA20270 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 10 Jul 1999 21:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wd4nka@aol.com
Received: from Wd4nka@aol.com
	by imo23.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id wYWDa08290 (88)
	 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 00:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <72048d2a.24b970ca@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 00:00:10 EDT
Subject: Re: Fw: GB> Re: Coils, commercial, plug-in, transmitting
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


>>There was also the Air-Dux line of coils that were frequently used.<<

Wasn't Air-Dux made by Illumitronic?


Just in case anybody is interested, and tends to be captivated
by those magic eye tubes, i came across an old 6AL7GT in a junked
Hi-Fi i am about to disassemble for parts ( the cabinet is beyond
help, and i need the transformer ), and out of curiosity looked it
up in an AES catalogue :  $ 3.80 - - -  not a price i'm used to
seeing these days for a visual indicator.  The 6E5s are over 15.00
apiece, and don't even ask about the 6G5 / 6U5s  ( 30.00 es up !)

I use one for eye-appeal - - and sort of an audio- derived signal
strength indicator on the s'gainer.  The local kids that risk entering my 
shack 
think it's cool.

vry 73
gary, wd4nka

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 13:15:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA30031
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:15:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA18344;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:15:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA26686 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 09:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA26677 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 09:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> RCA Guide...
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990711094614.26596A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I have a partial copy of the "1942 RCA Guide..." and would like to obtain
copies of the pages which are missing from my copy.

I am missing pages 51 through 54, the cover, and any pages after 72.

This book has some interesting circuits and tube descriptions in it. Page
54 describes a neat little VFO transmitter which uses an 802 as the VFO
tube followed by an 807, on 160,80,40,20 and 10 meters. 

Page 57 starts the description of the RCA Economy Transmitter, which uses
a 6L6 Tri-Tet crystal oscillator followed by an 809. (This particular book
uses Tri-Tet crystal oscillators practically exclusively).

Page 59 starts a description of an RCA-815 UHF Transmitter, covering 2 1/2
through 20 meters, complete with modulator (another 815) and power-supply.

Page 64 describes the RCA SIngle-Control 360-Watt Transmitter: 6V6-G
driving an 813. The 6V6 gets its plate voltage from the screen of the
813. Neat idea.

Lastly is the RCA 5-Band Plate-Modulated 'Phone CW Transmitter.  450 watts
CW, 310 watts 'phone, 10-160 meters.  Push-pull 812s in the finals,
push-pull 811s as modulators.

Does anyone have a copy of this book from which they could copy my missing
pages?

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 13:38:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA30045
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:38:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA19107;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:37:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA27041 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 10:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA27036 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 10:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA49399
	for glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907010036.UAA49399@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> GB this weekend
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 20:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Well, we had a good round this weekend, with many fine signals heard
and worked.

30M was a bit of a bust, but might have potential if more folks can
make that QRG.

80M was a bit of a bust, but, three stations were heard, and I was 
heard, but down in the mud.

40M was good, as always.  7026 was quite good, except when the `TEST'
crowd was aboard.  7147 was good, except for the biggie heterodyne on
7150, later on in the evenings.

Transcons were FB on either 40M QRG, even with medium power.

All hands had a goodly time, and were about equally well heard.

Not a bad weekend, for just tossing out an ether carrot....(:+}}....


All hands try to catch the Globe Wireless signoff Sunday at 2359Z.
I was listening some, today, but nary a Globe call tape running.
Getting' pretty dry on the marcoms QRG's, so the end is finally here.
It may be catch as catch can, tonight.


73/ZUT
DE NA4G/Bob UP

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 14:52:37 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA30151
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:52:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22722;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA27635 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 11:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA27630 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 11:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA49496
	for glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:50:19 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907010150.VAA49496@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 21:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Found this on the net.....

Final round starts 2200Z tonight (sunday) --- all hands monitor.

WCC/WNU    500, 12826.5, 17117.6 kcs

KPH/KFS    500, 8444.5, 17184.8 kcs

BV WCC/WNU/KPH/KFS
DE NA4G VA

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 17:33:56 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA30303
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:33:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29889;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:33:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA28839 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.aurora.edu (admin.aurora.edu [192.203.224.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA28834 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 14:10:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (broehrig@localhost)
	by admin.aurora.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA29701;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:08:00 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:08:00 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> GB this weekend
In-Reply-To: <199907010036.UAA49399@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990711160720.22755A-100000@admin.aurora.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:

> All hands try to catch the Globe Wireless signoff Sunday at 2359Z.
> I was listening some, today, but nary a Globe call tape running.
> Getting' pretty dry on the marcoms QRG's, so the end is finally here.
> It may be catch as catch can, tonight.

Heard 'em all on this morning on all freqs Dick mentioned.

                    "Nostalgia is a thing of the past"
    E-mail: broehrig@admin.aurora.edu or k9eui@arrl.net   73 de Bob, K9EUI
            CIS: Data / Telecom   Aurora University, Aurora, IL
                      630-844-4898  Fax 630-844-4222

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 20:42:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA30477
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:42:12 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05423;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:41:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA00836 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.41]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA00826 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.167]) by mtiwmhc06.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990712002919.BXYK9368@SandyBlaize>;
          Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:29:19 +0000
Message-ID: <000701becbfd$37bc3c00$a7ef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Woody" <w5juc@juno.com>, "RJ KB9GKX" <rbarmore@indy.net>,
        "Mike K2UXE" <k2uxe@ibm.net>, "Mike" <ac5p@ionet.net>,
        "Ken Gordon" <keng@uidaho.edu>, "Jack W7QQQ" <jackmead@getnet.com>,
        "Dennis W5FRS" <dbrady@us.ibm.com>, "Darwin" <K5DOA@aol.com>,
        "Conard" <ws4s@INFOAVE.NET>, "Bob AC5AM" <ac5am1@juno.com>,
        "Art WA5OES" <artwinte@sprynet.com>,
        "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Boatanchor Bob NA4G" <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 19:25:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


-----Original Message-----
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
<glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Sunday, July 11, 1999 13:44
Subject: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs


>Found this on the net.....
>
>Final round starts 2200Z tonight (sunday) --- all hands monitor.
>
>WCC/WNU    500, 12826.5, 17117.6 kcs
>
>KPH/KFS    500, 8444.5, 17184.8 kcs
>
>BV WCC/WNU/KPH/KFS
>DE NA4G VA
>
>
This is all I copied.  On the hour on 17184 Mhz:

CQ CQ CQ DE KFS/KPH = CW HOURRS OF OPERATION MON-FRI 0900-0100
UTC, SAT SUN 1500-2300 UTC = NW HR TFC ON HAND AT 23:00 FOR:
A6NH A6NH D9   .......signal went off air.  A little later this
was sent:
RINAL RADIO TELEGRAPH MESSAGE SENT FROM THE LIBERTY SHIP SS
JEREMIAH OBRIEN IN SAN FRANCISCO AS A TOKEN OF THIS HISTORIC
EVENT STOP = BEST REGARDS
SS JEREMIAH OBRIEN/KXCH AR      ......nothing more received.

Looks like part of the traffic list and the message was
truncated?
I couldn't hear them on 8 mhz here nor on 12 Mhz.  Could hear
WCC/WNU
weakly on 17117.6 but nowhere else.  I guess I missed it somehow?
Did anyone hear anything on 500 Khz?   Too early to hear any 500
khz long haul and obviously WNU across the lake is QRT.

73,
Sandy W5TVW

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sun Jul 11 23:33:35 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA30561
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:33:35 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15111;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:32:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA02168 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA02163 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 20:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA16328;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 22:10:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA28650;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 22:12:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 22:12:05 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
cc: Woody <w5juc@juno.com>, Mike K2UXE <k2uxe@ibm.net>, Mike <ac5p@ionet.net>,
        Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>, Jack W7QQQ <jackmead@getnet.com>,
        Dennis W5FRS <dbrady@us.ibm.com>, Darwin <K5DOA@aol.com>,
        Conard <ws4s@INFOAVE.NET>, Bob AC5AM <ac5am1@juno.com>,
        Art WA5OES <artwinte@sprynet.com>,
        Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
In-Reply-To: <000701becbfd$37bc3c00$a7ef490c@SandyBlaize>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907112201380.27616-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Well, Sandy, you beat me--I got *nothing!*  Nil.  Found GKB and maybe CLA
still trollin' for tfc but nary a peep from the US stns.  Puzzling, even
called the USNO Master Clock to double-check the time.
   Clavio delenda est.  Morsum irae.  'Sanuf ta make ya cry in yer grog,
darn it.  Keep thinkin' I'm hearin' Morse in the static crashes--but why
would they spell out "MGY" and "CQD?"

   73,
   --Bobbi
   ZUT!

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 01:04:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA30608
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:04:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA19428;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:03:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA03232 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 21:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.aurora.edu (admin.aurora.edu [192.203.224.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA03226 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sun, 11 Jul 1999 21:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (broehrig@localhost)
	by admin.aurora.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA05600;
	Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:44:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 23:44:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
cc: Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
In-Reply-To: <000701becbfd$37bc3c00$a7ef490c@SandyBlaize>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990711233924.24088A-100000@admin.aurora.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, Sandy W5TVW wrote:

> This is all I copied.  On the hour on 17184 Mhz:
> 
> CQ CQ CQ DE KFS/KPH = CW HOURRS OF OPERATION MON-FRI 0900-0100
> UTC, SAT SUN 1500-2300 UTC = NW HR TFC ON HAND AT 23:00 FOR:
> A6NH A6NH D9   .......signal went off air.  A little later this
> was sent:
> RINAL RADIO TELEGRAPH MESSAGE SENT FROM THE LIBERTY SHIP SS
> JEREMIAH OBRIEN IN SAN FRANCISCO AS A TOKEN OF THIS HISTORIC
> EVENT STOP = BEST REGARDS
> SS JEREMIAH OBRIEN/KXCH AR      ......nothing more received.

That's what I got here too. The above was shortly after 2300Z, then
silence from both stations til after at least 0000. I just heard KFS back
on calling CQ on 8444.5, 17184.8, and 4274 at 0430 but they are off again.
Lets's hope they are back on tomorrow nite. Unfortunately I have an
extremely high noise level on 500 KC driving my poor RBL nuts.


                    "Nostalgia is a thing of the past"
    E-mail: broehrig@admin.aurora.edu or k9eui@arrl.net   73 de Bob, K9EUI
            CIS: Data / Telecom   Aurora University, Aurora, IL
                      630-844-4898  Fax 630-844-4222

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 11:05:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA31192
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:05:00 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29015;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:04:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA09096 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA09091 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JDH0ML1JOI8WZ4A1@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 09:36:59 CDT
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:39:07 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
To: Roberta J Barmore <rbarmore@indy.net>, Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: Woody <w5juc@juno.com>, Mike K2UXE <k2uxe@ibm.net>, Mike <ac5p@ionet.net>,
        Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>, Jack W7QQQ <jackmead@getnet.com>,
        Dennis W5FRS <dbrady@us.ibm.com>, Darwin <K5DOA@aol.com>,
        Bob AC5AM <ac5am1@juno.com>, Art WA5OES <artwinte@sprynet.com>,
        Glowbugs Reflector <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-id: <004201becd3d$774285a0$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907112201380.27616-100000@indy1>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Nothing heard in TN also. I did check the published freqs Friday afternoon and heard KFS on 8 and 12 Mc/s, but nothing
all day Sunday.
I wonder how long CLA will stay in operation?
73,
Conard

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 11:41:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA31272
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:41:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA01868;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA09631 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f241.hotmail.com [207.82.251.132]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA09626 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21198 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 1999 15:18:59 -0000
Message-ID: <19990712151859.21197.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:18:59 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Cc: cwarren@littonengr.com
Subject: GB> Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 08:18:59 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Could someone please write a little about glyptal varnish? Where to get it 
(make it?)? How to use it?

I have been thinking about building a small HV supply using RF oscillator 
design. The references I have suggest coating the HV windings with glyptal 
varnish and baking.

Conrad, do you have any info on this stuff?

Also, heard on NPR this morning that the "last commercial" station in the 
U.S. at Half Moon Bay will cease using Morse code at about 1700 PDT today 
(12 July 1999). No info on frequencies, etc.

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 13:53:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA31404
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:53:27 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA21654;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA11067 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11056 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buffnet9.buffnet.net (buffnet9.buffnet.net [205.246.19.19])
	by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA21947;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from bhowes@buffnet.net)
Received: from ufppp14.buffnet.net(208.28.191.26) by buffnet9.buffnet.net via smap (V2.0)
	id xma028098; Mon, 12 Jul 99 13:18:38 -0400
Reply-To: kg2ic@arrl.net
MMDF-Warning:  Parse error in original version of preceding line at buffnet9.buffnet.net
From: "Bruce J. Howes KG2IC" <bhowes@buffnet.net>
To: User Na4g Boatanchor Bob <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
MMDF-Warning:  Parse error in original version of preceding line at buffnet9.buffnet.net
Subject: RE: GB> Closing if US HF CW Marine Stations. -From their Web Site
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:05:26 -0400
Message-ID: <NDBBJFAKMLEDKBEFPNMIIEDGCFAA.bhowes@buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <199907081346.JAA02420@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Web Site at http://207.214.103.2//telegram.stm

Radio Telegram Service

Radio Telegrams (Cables) can be sent and received by ships at sea using the
Globe Wireless CW Super-Station®

Marine Morse Code Communications(Known to many as W/T, CW or Radio
Telegraphy)

February 1999 brought the full implementation of GMDSS and, with that, the
official end to morse code as a compulsory part of the SOLAS ship
communications requirements. Truly the end of an era. It's been a long and
honourble run since before the Titanic to the age of video telephones and
internet communications over HF radio (the same frequencies used for morse
code) with ships at sea. A proud history marked by proud Radio Officers
whose dedication to duty saved many a sailor's life.

Morse code is still used at the Globe Wireless HQ via MF (500 Khz) and HF
facilities at New Orleans (WNU) and San Francisco (KFS and KPH) to serve
some ships that still use CW. Some because they missed the GMDSS deadline
and some because their modern equipment has failed and the Radio Officer
(now often serving as an Electronics Officer) has fired up old equipment to
solve the immediate problem. It is surprising how often this happens. We, at
Globe Wireless, intend to offer a CW service via our US based stations for
as long as there is a real need.

We are very fortunate that we have wonderful and exciting new uses for the
HF frequencies that have served us so well for so many years.

We welcome comments from shipping companies, ships and all interested
parties. If you foresee a specific or general need for CW service, please
let us know.

The following frequencies are currently available.

KFS/KPH
500
4274.0       Call on channel 3/4 8444.5
12
16

WNU/WCC
  4               Call on channel 3/4 8
12
16

All of the regular services are still available. Amvers and OBS are still
free of charge.


Sincerely,

Bruce James Howes

****************************************************************
Bruce J. Howes KG2IC   email: kg2ic@arrl.net
East Amherst, NY 14051 web: www.buffnet.net/~bhowes
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." -Albert Einstein
****************************************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
[mailto:owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu]On Behalf Of User Na4g
Boatanchor Bob
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 1999 9:46 AM
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Cc: User NA4G Boatanchor Bob
Subject: GB> Closing if US HF CW Marine Stations.


I just got off the phone with a local news reporter who got an email
from someone to the effect that Globe Wireless is closing all HF CW
Marine operations this coming monday.

If anyone knows anything about this, holler back to me or the list.
It might be the last time to catch a call tape droning on and on,
or a tfc list.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 14:19:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA31436
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:19:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26129;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:18:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA11509 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA11503 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COMPUTER (ip103.winterpark.fl.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.233.103])
	by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA10185;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199907121753.KAA10185@falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <af4k@mail.earthlink.net>
From: "Brian Carling" <af4k@earthlink.net>
Organization: http://www.home.earthlink.net/~af4k
To: Bill and Vicki Welch <bwelch@ro.com>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:53:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: GB> A modest web site proposal
Reply-to: af4k@earthlink.net
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <377AABE9.F55FAEFD@ro.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54)
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Bill - this stuff sounds like a GREAT idea!

Why don't you go ahead and do it?!

(grin!) - seriously thought it would be a great service to the GB 
community out here.

On 30 Jun 99 at 18:44, Bill wrote: 

> As a newcomer to the "glowbugs" group, I have been very impressed about
> the quality and quantity of projects, schematics, etc. in the archives.
> I have spent many enjoyable evenings browsing and studying, and
> tinkering with circuits at the bench.  However, I'd like to suggest an
> idea:
> 
> Why not develop a series of small projects, and provide several "tracks"
> simultaneously-- for example:
> 
> 1. beautiful photos of vintage rigs, or copies of vintage rigs
> 2. construction information
> 3. circuit design information
> 4. results of on-air operations, hints-kinks, etc.
> 5. a "feedback" area, where folks can post their own views, experiences,
> etc. related to a particular project.
> 
> For me, what I desire most, is to learn "why" every component was
> included in the design.  Most articles in print don't go into the "why"
> very much.  I miss that.  I am a newby, and I am more interested in
> learning "why", than in just building a circuit and trying it out.  That
> is fun too, but in my case my main goal is to learn how to design
> circuits of my own, or how to modify an existing design.
> 
> With the "web site", we can actually provide all of the above, and let
> the user browse around, and dig into which ever "tracks" they are most
> interested in, and easily skip over what to them might be obvious or
> boring. And post questions about issues that haven't been covered in
> advance.
> 
> Here are some  examples of the sort of "design info" that I am looking
> to learn about-- "bypass caps", "audio shaping", "interstage coupling",
> "voltage regulation".  "rf amp" stage, "mixer" stage, etc.
> 
> By the way, I am aware that this sort of info is available in various
> places, but wouldn't it be nice, to be able to click on an area of a
> schematic, and have that portion of the design explained.  What I find
> myself doing, is juggling several handbooks on my lap, nite after nite,
> trying to figure it out.
> 
> thanks for your consideration,
> 
>   -bill AB4YD
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
* Brian Carling in Orlando, Florida  USA
* http://come.to/AF4K
* ICQ:  6124470  /  AIM: happysurf9
***********************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 14:49:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA31480
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:49:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA31322;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12148 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA12143 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA01718;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:30:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907121830.OAA01718@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
In-Reply-To: <19990712151859.21197.qmail@hotmail.com> from Brad Hernlem at "Jul 12, 1999 08:18:59 am"
To: alihernlem@hotmail.com (Brad Hernlem)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:30:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, cwarren@littonengr.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Could someone please write a little about glyptal varnish? Where to get it 
> (make it?)? How to use it?

I had the recipe to something like that a ways back.  It is not that
hard to make.   Memory suggests it was nothing more than a heavy varnish
of some sort, less the colorings and usual varnish frills.  Look in
an old recipe book for a spirit varnish and that would probably do.
Even shellac would probably do, if pure.

> I have been thinking about building a small HV supply using RF oscillator 
> design. The references I have suggest coating the HV windings with glyptal 
> varnish and baking.

All that does is hold the windings in place.  Anything from glue to
nail polish to a spirit varnish or a urethane dip of some sort will
probably work.  All it needs to be is non-RF conducting or absorbing
at the usual GB QRG's

> Conrad, do you have any info on this stuff?
> 
> Also, heard on NPR this morning that the "last commercial" station in the 
> U.S. at Half Moon Bay will cease using Morse code at about 1700 PDT today 
> (12 July 1999). No info on frequencies, etc.

Is this MONDAY EVENING and not sunday evening?  If so, I am off a raday,
and we may still have a chance to catch it!!!!!

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 14:54:01 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA31492
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:54:00 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA30943;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:52:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA11917 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA11912 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA01652;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:20:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907121820.OAA01652@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
In-Reply-To: <000701becbfd$37bc3c00$a7ef490c@SandyBlaize> from Sandy W5TVW at "Jul 11, 1999 07:25:56 pm"
To: ebjr@worldnet.att.net (Sandy W5TVW)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:20:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> >Final round starts 2200Z tonight (sunday) --- all hands monitor.
> >
> >WCC/WNU    500, 12826.5, 17117.6 kcs
> >
> >KPH/KFS    500, 8444.5, 17184.8 kcs
> >
> >BV WCC/WNU/KPH/KFS
> >DE NA4G VA
> >
> >
> This is all I copied.  On the hour on 17184 Mhz:
> 
> CQ CQ CQ DE KFS/KPH = CW HOURRS OF OPERATION MON-FRI 0900-0100
> UTC, SAT SUN 1500-2300 UTC = NW HR TFC ON HAND AT 23:00 FOR:
> A6NH A6NH D9   .......signal went off air.  A little later this
> was sent:
> RINAL RADIO TELEGRAPH MESSAGE SENT FROM THE LIBERTY SHIP SS
> JEREMIAH OBRIEN IN SAN FRANCISCO AS A TOKEN OF THIS HISTORIC
> EVENT STOP = BEST REGARDS
> SS JEREMIAH OBRIEN/KXCH AR      ......nothing more received.

That is exactly what I heard.  I had all the qrg's scanning
but nothing else turned up.

Let us make sure we have the right day?   I was thinking it was
the changeover from raday 11July99 to raday 12July99, and not
the next day, tonight.  Is that correct?   I would not want
to leave that possiblity open.

It sure was a sparse final whatzit, if that was all it was,
although I did not hear much on 500khz, I can (or have heard
KFS on 500 in the past).

> Looks like part of the traffic list and the message was
> truncated?
> I couldn't hear them on 8 mhz here nor on 12 Mhz.  Could hear
> WCC/WNU
> weakly on 17117.6 but nowhere else.  I guess I missed it somehow?
> Did anyone hear anything on 500 Khz?   Too early to hear any 500
> khz long haul and obviously WNU across the lake is QRT.

500 will be 2500 miles overland or across the water, nightpath.
If they were there, it probably would have been a long shot,
even from your QTH.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 14:57:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA31510
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:57:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00089;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:56:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12398 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f321.hotmail.com [207.82.250.246]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA12393 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 63079 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 1999 18:37:05 -0000
Message-ID: <19990712183705.63078.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:37:04 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:37:04 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


> > Also, heard on NPR this morning that the "last commercial" station in 
>the
> > U.S. at Half Moon Bay will cease using Morse code at about 1700 PDT 
>today
> > (12 July 1999). No info on frequencies, etc.
>
>Is this MONDAY EVENING and not sunday evening?  If so, I am off a raday,
>and we may still have a chance to catch it!!!!!
>
>Bob/NA4G
>

I heard the repeat clip after I wrote the above. It is definitely Monday 
(today). The news clip was very short and gave little details (Except that I 
got the time wrong .... should be 1659 PDT). Operations Chief was identified 
as Tim Gorman (sp?).

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 15:06:45 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA31519
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:06:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01701;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12345 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from cronus.oanet.com (root@cronus.oanet.com [204.209.13.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA12338 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ve6nap1 (dialin220.edm.oa.net [207.153.26.222])
	by cronus.oanet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17618;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:32:12 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199907121832.MAA17618@cronus.oanet.com>
From: "Gerald Caouette" <ve6nap@oanet.com>
To: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>,
        <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Cc: <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Subject: Re: GB> Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:40:07 -0700
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Glyptal is a trade name for a General Electric company insulating product
that can be 
purchased in arosol or liquid .. It was and possibly still is, in common
use by electric motor 
repair shops .. try one of these as your source for  the wire,  the varnish
and the insulating 
paper sheets. 

The form of glyptal that I am familiar with will air dry but baking will
decrease the required 
drying time.. Comes in natural - (almost clear) , RED , and GREY.

hope this helps

73de
ve6nap@oanet.com


   

----------
> From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
> To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
> Cc: cwarren@littonengr.com
> Subject: GB> Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
> Date: Monday, July 12, 1999 8:18 AM
> 
> Could someone please write a little about glyptal varnish? Where to get
it 
> (make it?)? How to use it?
> 
> I have been thinking about building a small HV supply using RF oscillator

> design. The references I have suggest coating the HV windings with
glyptal 
> varnish and baking.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 15:17:06 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA31542
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:17:05 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01652;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA12836 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA12828 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 11:55:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA01795;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907121902.PAA01795@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
In-Reply-To: <004201becd3d$774285a0$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu> from Conard Murray at "Jul 13, 1999 09:39:07 am"
To: cmurray@tntech.edu (Conard Murray)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Nothing heard in TN also. I did check the published freqs Friday
> afternoon and heard KFS on 8 and 12 Mc/s, but nothing all day Sunday.
> I wonder how long CLA will stay in operation?

I would expect CLA to be there for a while, since they run a lot
of third-world ships out of there.  As long as they don't make
port in a GMDSS country, or stay out of the USCG's way, they
probably will be keeping the CW for some time to come.  I would
expect some of the SA countries and African/Asian countries to
do likewise, for a while longer, in the backwaters.  Some of the
Cuban/SA ops will rattle an' bang like the breeze on their bugs
and keyers.... a nice round of code to hear, at speed.

Also, WLO is still running CW tfc lists and wx bcsts on the odd
hours (0100/0300/0500, etc) on 4343, plus others (http://wloradio.com)
and we might want to monitor what o' Mobile Marine Radio is doing.
I dunno if they are manning a CW position, still.  The wx is not the
full navtex like it used to be, but is still good cw copy.  It seems
to be just an automaton sending.

After 0000Z last night I did some serious scanning of the marine
bands, for call tapes, and heard about 25 or 30 call tapes going
on 4/6/8/12/16/22mhz.  Not too many there, though.  I will put
a list of QRA/QRG's out if I remember to bring it in.

So, all hands listen up tonight, too, just in case we had the
raday off by one......(:+{{.....

Bob/NA4G


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 15:34:07 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA31585
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:34:07 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06614;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:33:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA13132 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f107.hotmail.com [207.82.250.226]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA13127 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21336 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jul 1999 19:08:11 -0000
Message-ID: <19990712190811.21335.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:08:11 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: ve6nap@oanet.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu, cwarren@littonengr.com
Subject: GB> Re: GB- Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:08:11 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

After posting my question I found that Allied Electronics sells Red Glyptal 
varnish. Also found some links to a material using the same name which is 
allegedly GLycerin and PhThALic anhydride, also used for high vacuum seals. 
Is this the same stuff?

Is there any good reason NOT to just leave the windings uncoated?

I did some preliminary tinkering with this idea (the HV supply idea, not 
failure to use insulating varnish idea) by taking an old horizontal hold 
coil (the one with apparently several thousand turns of approx. #35 wire) 
and adding a hundred turns of #24 wire next to the fine windings (there was 
room on the form adjacent). Feeding the 100 turn winding with my Heathkit RF 
generator, I watched the output of the fine winding on my oscilloscope. 
There was a peak at about 180 kHz (about 20 V P-P out for less than 1 V in). 
I am assuming that this is the natural resonant frequency of the output 
winding with its distributed capacitance. The plan is to create another 
winding on the form so that the 100 turn winding will be part of the plate 
circuit of an oscillator (with caps to tune to 180 kHz) and using the final 
winding to feedback to the grid. Does this sound workable?

Brad

>Glyptal is a trade name for a General Electric company insulating product
>that can be
>purchased in arosol or liquid .. It was and possibly still is, in common
>use by electric motor
>repair shops .. try one of these as your source for  the wire,  the varnish
>and the insulating
>paper sheets.
>
>The form of glyptal that I am familiar with will air dry but baking will
>decrease the required
>drying time.. Comes in natural - (almost clear) , RED , and GREY.
>
>hope this helps
>
>73de
>ve6nap@oanet.com
>
>
>
>
>----------
> > From: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
> > To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
> > Cc: cwarren@littonengr.com
> > Subject: GB> Glyptal and more on less CW traffic
> > Date: Monday, July 12, 1999 8:18 AM
> >
> > Could someone please write a little about glyptal varnish? Where to get
>it
> > (make it?)? How to use it?
> >
> > I have been thinking about building a small HV supply using RF 
>oscillator
>
> > design. The references I have suggest coating the HV windings with
>glyptal
> > varnish and baking.
>


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 15:51:20 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA31602
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:51:20 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09264;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA13421 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.aurora.edu (admin.aurora.edu [192.203.224.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA13414 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (broehrig@localhost)
	by admin.aurora.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA23057;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:22:45 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:22:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: Sandy W5TVW <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> WCC/WNU/KFS/KPH final signoffs
In-Reply-To: <199907121820.OAA01652@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990712141940.26908G-100000@admin.aurora.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999, Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:

> > >Final round starts 2200Z tonight (sunday) --- all hands monitor.
> 
> Let us make sure we have the right day?   I was thinking it was
> the changeover from raday 11July99 to raday 12July99, and not
> the next day, tonight.  Is that correct?   I would not want
> to leave that possiblity open.

Yup - according to what Dick says, it is tonight (Monday). Below is
part of his message sent to the Boatanchors reflector:



From: Dick Dillman <ddillman@igc.apc.org>

In my posting a couple of weeks ago I mentioned that the Globe Wireless
stations, the last coast stations in North America to use Morse, would be
closing down their Morse operations on Monday, 12 July.

I now have the time and frequency information for that event that many
readers asked for.

The call signs involved are WCC/WNU which will be keyed from Lousiana and
KPH/KFS which will be keyed from Half Moon Bay, CA.  I use the term "call
signs" instead of "stations" because in the cases of WCC and KPH, formerly
the calls of the two great RCA stations on the east and west coasts, their
original transmitting plants were shut down years ago.  Still, it will be
your last chance to hear these calls on the air.

The official beginning of the event will be at 1600PDT (2300Z) with messages
from WCC/WNU followed by messages from KPH/KFS with the final sign-off at
2359Z.  However certain personal or organizational messages may be sent from
KPH/KFS beginning at 1500PDT (2200Z).  So my advice is to start your
listening watch a little before 2200Z to make sure you hear everything.

WCC/WNU

500 Kc.
12826.5 Kc.
17117.6 Kc.

KPH/KFS

500 Kc.
8444.5 Kc.
17184.8 Kc.



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 18:04:49 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA32277
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:04:48 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA25712;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 18:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA15349 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from basfzgw.basf-corp.com (basfzgw.basf-corp.com [144.29.126.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA15340 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 14:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from basfigw by basfzgw with SMTP (MMTA) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:32:52 -0400
Received: from intmaila.basf-corp.com  by basfigw (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP	id RAA00084 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com (actually host basf-corp-gw01.parsippa.basf-corp.com) 
          by intmaila; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:32:16 -0400
Received: by basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999))  
          id 852567AC.00760C28 ; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:29:23 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: BASF-CORP
From: Stanley A Mcintosh <mcintos@basf-corp.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-ID: <852567AC.00760A1C.00@basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:32:03 -0400
Subject: GB> Selectoroid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Anyone out there ever build McCoy's "Selectoroid" audio amp/filter?  This is
from a 1966 QST.  This is a 1-tube (12AU7 or 12AT7 or 12AX7) audio amp and audio
filter combination.  Between the two tube amplifier halves is an audio circuit
with two resonated LC circuits.  The resonators use those ubiquitous 88 mH
toroids, and a switch can lift one resonator connection out of the circuit, for
when the user wants less selectivity or less ringing.  There aren't too many
parts, and this looked like a simple place for me to start on my superhet.

Once this is done, then my intention is to work from the audio end backwards to
build a Mighty Midget Receiver.  Any recommendations for muting schemes would be
much appreciated.

Thanks and 72
sam


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 21:05:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA01517
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:05:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09269;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:04:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA17073 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from netcom9.netcom.com (tomrice@netcom9.netcom.com [192.100.81.119]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA17068 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from tomrice@localhost)
	by netcom9.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.02)) id RAA11718;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tom R. Rice" <tomrice@netcom.com>
Message-Id: <199907130043.RAA11718@netcom9.netcom.com>
Subject: GB> KPH/KFS: Vale!
To: boatanchors@sco.theporch.com (boatanchors list)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (free glowbugs)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


	Forgive me, folks, for this uncharacteristic, emotional
	post: in 36 years of marriage, my OL has never before
	seen me weep!  But the last messages from KPH & KFS did
	it to me, and I'm not an old-time op, never used a key 
	at sea, really have no right to feel so upset, but this
	was history with a vengeance!  "What hath God wrought",
	indeed.... never has an "SK" been so poignant....

	Thanks to Mr. Dillman for the timely alerts; the AR-88
	with its RCA 100A speaker heard it all clearly on the 
	8 mc band, it's on tape and now, all that remains is for 
	all you old-timers to get to work, writing, taping and
	preserving for posterity the lore of those wonderful 
	Morse years.  Don't fail us now!  

	73 de WB6BYH

 

-- 
"Start off every day with a smile and get it over with."  --W.C.Fields
Tom R. Rice  
tomrice@netcom.com     

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 21:06:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA01533
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:06:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA08714;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:05:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA17212 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from koto.qnet.com (koto.qnet.com [207.155.37.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA17207 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199907130052.RAA17207@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from [209.221.196.29] (56k-palm-00-14.dial.qnet.com)
          by koto.qnet.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c)
          ID# 0-54999U700L2S100V35) with SMTP id AAA9714
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:51:31 -0700
Subject: GB> A forwarded final copy
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 99 17:54:31 -0700
x-sender: jmc@pop3.av.qnet.com
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 1.1
From: JMcAulay <jmc@qnet.com>
To: "GlowBugs" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


I just received this from Phil Kane, now retired, who spent many years 
with the FCC District Office in San Francisco, finally as 
Engineer-In-Charge.   

I really do not suspect he would mind my forwarding it to the group.

[Now where's my hanky....]

Forwarded copy follows:


  I've spent the last hour or so playing radio intercept op,
  tuning KFS on MF and 4 MHz using a single receiver.  From the
  gaps on the HF VVV tape, it appeared that they were handling a
  bit of traffic, and repeating a number of bulletins.  Below is
  a sample:

   THE MARITIME RADIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY EXTENDS BEST WISHES TO
   PROFESSIONAL RADIO OPERATORS EVERYWHERE . WE ADMIRE YOUR
   COURAGE AND HOPE WE MET YOUR STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM. WE
   WISH YOU FAIR WINDS AND CALM SEAS . VY 73 DE MRHS - DE KPH/KFS

   SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME HISTORICAL PARK PROUDLY ANNOUNCES A NEW
   PERMANENT EXHIBIT ON COMMUNICATIONS AT SEA. SPARKS, WAVES AND
   WIZARDS OPENS THIS NOMBER. ON THIS HISTORIC DAY WE WISH KFS
   AND ALL RADIO MEN AND WOMEN A SAFE VOYAGE. DE KPH DE KFS RD K

   WE WOULD LIKE TO SAY FAREWELL AGAIN TO OUR CW FRIENDS AT SEA
   AND ASHORE. WE WISH YOU ALL FAIR WINDS AND SEAS ALWAYS = JACK
   MARTINI OPR AND MGR KPH 1960-1997  C SMITH SENIOR CW OPR =
   DICK WAHL CW OPR = STEVE BOWERS UTOR OPR  V DE KFS/KPH

  At 4:18pm I intercepeted the following on 468 kHz after a brief
  ACK on 500 kHz:

   KFS HALF MOON BAY CA = ATTN MR KEN JONES X THIS OCCASION OF
   THE END OF COMMERCIAL SHIP-TO-SHORE RADIOTELEGRAPH
   COMMUNICATION IN NORTH AMERICA THE CAPTAIN AND CREW OF THE SS
   JEREE IIJEREMIAH OBRIEN ALONG WITH THE OFFICERS MND STAFF OF
   THE NATIONAL LIBERTY SHIP MEMORIAL WISH TO EXPRESS OUR SINCERE
   THANKS FOR YOUR CONTINUING SUPPORT EFFORTS AND ESPECIALLY FOR
   YOUR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTION TO OUR SUCCESSFUL NORMANDY
   VOYAGE X WE WISH YOU AND GLOBE WIRELESS CONTINUED SUCCESS IN
   YOUR ENDEAVOR X BEST REGARDS = SS JEREMIAH OBRIEN/KXCH

  (The Jerry OBrien has always jad a special place in my heart,
  but I never did get the message to the Prez)

  And at 4:58 pm the following was intercepted on 4274 kHz:

    V  CQ  DE KPH KPH KPH   WE NOW CLOSE THE RADIOTELEGRAPH
    OPERATION OF STATION KPH. SINCE 1924, STATION KPH HAS
    DISTINGUISHED ITSELF AS ONE OF THE MOST WELL KNOWN AND
    RESPECTED CALL SIGNS IN THE W II THE WORLD, AND WILL CONTINUE
    TO DO SO AS PART OF THE GLOBAL RADIO NETWORK OF HF STATIONS =
    NW CL DE KPH

    DE KFS = THIS IS THE FINAL CW TRANSMISSION FROM STATION KFS -
    THE LAST COMMERCIAL RADIOTELEGRAPH STATION IN NORTH AMERICA.
    APPROPRIATELY, WE CLOSE CW AND EMBARK ON A NEW ERA OF
    COMMUNICATION WITH SAMUEL F.B. MORSE'S WORDS OF 155 YER ?
    YEARS AGO = NW CL 73 = WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT = DE KFS

   I am thankful that I hooked up and used the PK232 for machine
   copy backup, because it was awfully difficult to copy 20 wpm
   with tears in my eyes.

    73  de  Phil Kane - K2ASP


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 21:09:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA01572
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:09:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09818;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:08:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id RAA17199 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from admin.aurora.edu (admin.aurora.edu [192.203.224.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA17193 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (broehrig@localhost)
	by admin.aurora.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA32717;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 19:48:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 19:48:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bob Roehrig <broehrig@admin.aurora.edu>
To: Boatanchors <boatanchors@sco.theporch.com>,
        glowbugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> WNU/WCC/KFS/KPH CW QRT
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.96.990712194043.18139C-100000@admin.aurora.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Propagation was a lot different than yesterday. Today I could not tell if
WNU/WCC was even on the air. KFS was OK on 17184.8 though. Too bad they
didn't have a better op between 2300 and 2330 - whatever happened to
character and word spacing?

Anyway, the last transmissions were:

CQ CQ DE KPH KPH KPH -
WE NOW CLOSE THE RADIOTELEGRAPH OPERATION OF STATION KPH. SINCE 1904,
STATION KPH HAS DISTINGUISHED ITSELF AS ONE OF THE MOST WELL KNOWN
AND RESPECTED CALL SIGNS IN THE W II WORLD, AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO
AS PART OF THE GLOBAL RADIO NETWORK / HF STATIONS BT NW CL DE KPH SK

CQ DE KFS -
THIS IS THE FINAL CW TRANSMISSION FROM STATION KFS - THE LAST COMMERCIAL
RADIOTELEGRAPH STATION IN NORTH AMERICA. APPROPRIATELY, WE CLOSE CW AND
EMBARK ON A NEW ERA OF COMMUNICATION WITH SAMUEL F. B. MORSE'S WORDS
OF 155 YER ? YEARS AGO - NW CL 73 - WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT -
DE KFS SK

                    "Nostalgia is a thing of the past"
    E-mail: broehrig@admin.aurora.edu or k9eui@arrl.net   73 de Bob, K9EUI
            CIS: Data / Telecom   Aurora University, Aurora, IL
                      630-844-4898  Fax 630-844-4222

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Mon Jul 12 23:03:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA02955
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:03:45 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15375;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA18564 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 19:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA18559 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 19:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy1.indy.net (root@indy1 [199.3.65.5])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04510;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:43:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy1.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA18982;
	Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:45:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:45:14 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy1
To: "Tom R. Rice" <tomrice@netcom.com>
cc: Old Tube Radios <boatanchors@theporch.com>,
        free glowbugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Re: KPH/KFS: Vale!
In-Reply-To: <199907130043.RAA11718@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907122131330.17143-100000@indy1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Sure hope somebody got it on tape; I worked 'til 7:00 local, and missed
the whole thing.  Didn't even fire up the SX-28 (semi-official test gear,
it is--how else can we check cal of the freq counter?), was helping pack
up some TV production gear.
   (They're not getting me on a cruise ship now, not at any price, I can't
tread water for long enough.  Statistically, the new stuff may be
okay--didja ever hear the one about the statistician who drowned wading
a very wide river with an average depth of three feet...?)

   So--is GMDSS Y2K compliant?  ...Just a thought....  CLA may have more
work than they know what to do with, come New Year's Day!  (Somebody asked
how long CLA'd be on the air--I'd guess as long as Cuba consists of more
than one island!)

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 00:34:57 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03942
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:34:56 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA26896;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA19722 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA19717 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.131]) by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990713041010.BSCP4954@SandyBlaize>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Tue, 13 Jul 1999 04:10:10 +0000
Message-ID: <005101becce5$2d0916a0$0cef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Fw: KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU Last Gasp...
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:06:24 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



>Hello all,
>    Although I was monitoring both KPH/KFS and WCC/WNU, I got
>interrupted
>and missed a bit of the KFS/KPH text.....
>    This from 17184+ Khz:
>
>......and 73 de Peter Pascal Kierens  Pat ex
>VCTG/VGLN/VCWX/VFN/VFL6/VCK/VCB/VGLN/ELOC/5LIB/SWIE/GHVF/MAIT/
>to name a few AR =
>
>The age of sailing ships gave way to steam.  Now the age of
>rardiotelegraphy
>from ships yields to new communication technology, as the last
>commercial
>telegraph stations in the United States make their final
>transmissions.  When
>steam replaced sails, the men who manned the vessels remained
>professionals,
>only their specific roles changed.  The closing of
radiotelegraph
>parallels the change from sail to steam.  The men who manned the
>keys will remain professionals, only their role will change.  73
>and BV to all Paul Zerl Coastal station operator since 1963 at
>KFS/KTA/KOK/KLB/KPH/WCC/WNU AR = DE KFS/KPS =
>
>During my 24 year career, it has been an honor and a privilege
to
>work as a CW op.  I think I'll miss 500 Khz the most hi.  my vy
>best wishes to all CW ops.  Tim Gorman ex
NOX/NMC/KFS/WNU/WCC/KPH
>ZUT/BV/73  AR
>
>As rep of the Point Reyes/Bolinas KPH operation discontinued in
>1997, we would like to say farewell again to our CW friends at
>sea and ashore.  We wish you all fair winds
>and seas always.  Jack Martini opr and mgr KPH 1960-1997 AR  C
>Smith senior CW opr Rick Wahl CW opr  Steve Bowers a TOR opr AR
>de KFS/KPH = BV OM
>
>Then idling tape changed to:
>CQ CQ CQ DE WNU55 WNU55 WNU55 QSX 2 4 6 8 12 16 22 25 Mhz OBS?
>(Repeated)
>
>Then:  VVV VVV VVV DE WNU/WCC WNU/WCC
>CQ  DE WNU/WCC QSW 4310 6376 12826.5 16972 17117.6 KHZ AS
>(Repeated)  (My receiver retuned to 4310 Khz as the 17 Mhz
signal
>getting
>weak and cruddy.)
>
>CQ CQ DE WCC WCC= 12/2340 utc Jul 99=
>In 1901, callsign WCC was assigned to the South Wellfleet
>Massachusetts
>Wireless telegraph facility operated by Guglielmo Marconi. Morse
>code signals from
>WCC have been heard around the world ever since.  Today we
retire
>WCCfrom wireless telegraph operations.  WCC will continue to
>serve the maritime community
>in association with the global radio network operated by Globe
>Wireless AR
>de WCC WCC WCC SK
>
>(Repeated again later)
>Followed by a VVV tape via WNU.
>
>CQ CQ CQ DE WNU WNU= 12/2347 UTC JUL 99=
>Pearl River Radio/WNU now ceases radiotelegraph service after
>eighty-seven years of continous operation.  We will continue to
>serve the mariner  through our electronic mail service as part
of
>the global wireless network.  AR 73 DE WNU WNU W N U CL
>
>
>Sadly, that was it!  During some "dead air" time and an operator
>sending test and VVV on HF, I heard a carrier on 478 Khz. here.
>There was never any keying.  It went off
>before the WNU transmission (last one above).  When the last WNU
>transmission commenced, it came back on and stayed on thru the
>transmission on HF.
>(I copied them on 4310 Khz as they had faded on 17117!)  About
>4-5 minutes after the "CL" from WNU, the 478 carrier ceased.
478
>is WNU's working channel.  I suspect
>there was some trouble with the remote equipment at the WNU
>transmitter site.
>It is now unattended and everything is done from a central
>location via phone lines.
>A pity, as they would have been 599+ copy here!  Nothing EVER
>heard on 500 khz
>here at all!
>
>We have witnessed history.  I feel as though my 2nd Telegraph
>Operator's License
>is now just a piece of wallpaper.  I sometimes wish it was 1899
>and not 1999.
>This way I'd have all the "wireless" excitement to live over
>again!
>
>Hopefully, we as CW operators, will continue to carry the torch
>so that this
>part of "the radio art" will not become lost.
>
>73 and ZUT!
>
>Sandy Blaize W5TVW
>
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 01:15:51 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA04395
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:15:50 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA29088;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 01:14:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA20298 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp2.ihug.co.nz (tk2.ihug.co.nz [203.29.160.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA20291 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 21:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bjk.ihug.co.nz (p111-tnt2.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.109.245.111])
	by smtp2.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id QAA30025
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:52:49 +1200
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:52:49 +1200
Message-Id: <199907130452.QAA30025@smtp2.ihug.co.nz>
X-Sender: bjk@pop.ihug.co.nz
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
From: barry kirkwood <bjk@ihug.co.nz>
Subject: GB> Foreign Glowbugs?
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Greetings from ZL:
Was intrigued by Sandy W5TVW mentioning his Siemen's Maribne Rx.I have an
abiiding interest in hf technology of the vacuum tube era. Does anybody know
of websites in other than English speaking countries e.g. DL, that are
glowbug oriented?
Tnx es 73
Baz ZL1DD
end
Barry (Baz) Kirkwood PhD ZL1DD ex ZL1BN, ZL4OK etc
Signal Hill
66 Cory Road
Palm Beach
Waiheke Island 1240
NEW ZEALAND
www.waiheke.co.nz/signal.htm
Ph/Fax 64-9-372-5161

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 03:28:26 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA05827
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 03:28:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA03226;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 03:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA22334 for glowbugs-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from www.aimme.es (www.aimme.es [195.57.139.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA22329 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LAB_2.fermax.es [195.57.139.178] by www.aimme.es
  (SMTPD32-4.04) id A3D73150038; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:59:35 +0200
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990713085852.007fd100@192.168.0.1>
X-Sender: eb5agv#pop.ctv.es@192.168.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:58:52 +0200
To: "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
From: "JOSE V. GAVILA (EB5AGV/EC5AAU)" <eb5agv@ctv.es>
Subject: GB> mate to the mighty midget (FWD)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hello GB gang!

I am really busy with my new house building, so I can't work on my HB
projects :-( ... But I have got this e-mail from somebody who is lucky
enough to build a Mighty Midget receiver... Could you help him?. Thanks!

JOSE 

*** START OF FORWARDED MESSAGE ***

>Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 13:29:15 -0500
>From: Rick Haub <rhaub@midwestmicro-tek.com>
>To: eb5agv@amsat.org
>Subject: mate to the mighty midget
>
>I am building the MMM and I would like to add an S-meter to the design.
>I've found one S-meter that should be connected to the AGC but the MMM
>does not have automatic gain. Do you have any idea as to where the I
>could connect the S-meter?
>
>thanks
>
>73      Rick
>

*** END OF FORWARDED MESSAGE ***
------------------------------------------------------------
  73 EB5AGV / EC5AAU
     JOSE V. GAVILA
     Benetusser - VALENCIA (SPAIN)

** VISIT MY VINTAGE RADIO SITE - updated 11-July-1999 ***
  http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/6992/

  EuroBA eGroup: http://www.eGroups.com/list/euro_ba_swap

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 11:39:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11537
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:39:31 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12572;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA26696 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA26690 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from glowbug@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA03288;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:31:34 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from glowbug)
From: "Mr. Glowbug" <glowbug@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907131531.LAA03288@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> KPH/KFS: Vale!
In-Reply-To: <199907130043.RAA11718@netcom9.netcom.com> from "Tom R. Rice" at "Jul 12, 1999 05:43:39 pm"
To: tomrice@netcom.com (Tom R. Rice)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:31:34 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: boatanchors@sco.theporch.com (boatanchors list),
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (free glowbugs)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> 	Forgive me, folks, for this uncharacteristic, emotional
> 	post: in 36 years of marriage, my OL has never before
> 	seen me weep!  But the last messages from KPH & KFS did
> 	it to me, and I'm not an old-time op, never used a key 
> 	at sea, really have no right to feel so upset, but this
> 	was history with a vengeance!  "What hath God wrought",
> 	indeed.... never has an "SK" been so poignant....

You are not alone.... many of us had those watery eyes.....

ZUT

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 11:40:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11559
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:40:32 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12751;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA26661 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA26656 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from glowbug@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA03265;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:28:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from glowbug)
From: "Mr. Glowbug" <glowbug@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907131528.LAA03265@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Last remaining call tapes heard.....
In-Reply-To: <199907121902.PAA01795@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu> from Boatanchor Bob NA4G at "Jul 12, 1999 03:02:12 pm"
To: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:28:42 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> After 0000Z last night I did some serious scanning of the marine
> bands, for call tapes, and heard about 25 or 30 call tapes going
> on 4/6/8/12/16/22mhz.  Not too many there, though.  I will put
> a list of QRA/QRG's out if I remember to bring it in.
 
Here is the list I heard:


The last US tfc lists and wx --- 4343.0  WLO/WSL/KLB  odd hours+0
                                 6344.0
                                 8514.0
                                12886.5
                                17022.5
                                22487.0

This is worth copying, since it is the last remaining broadcast US CW.
KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU was the last operational traffic system on CW, though.


Call tapes ---  LGW    4240.2
                PPR    4243.2
                GKB    4273.3
                IAR    4319.3
                4XZ    4330.2

                SAA    6356.2
                4XZ    6378.2
                7TF    6414.2

                CLA    8495.5
                GKB    8559.0
                CLA    8572.3
                LGW    8573.2
                LMD    8645.2
                IAR    8645.2
                IRM    8684.3
                7TF    8697.2
                (?)    8699.0

                8BY   12074.0
                LGW   12726.7
                GKB   12834.6
                A7D   12965.7
                IAR   13014.8
                CLA   13061.2

                (?)   17030.6
                4XZ   17049.2
                LGW   17073.0
                GKB   17112.2
                CLA   17164.8
                IAR   17205.3
                (?)   17237.9


Calling/working frequencies heard:

                      4189.7   (35wpm CW tfc going there)
                      8365     call
                     12471.2   call/wrk(?)
                     16035.0   call


Although there are probably a few others, the pickins are getting
slim, folks.  If you value any of these signals, for posterity,
run off a cassette or two of the call tapes and wx, just for
a keepsake.

I have had the fortune to be able to record about 100 of the old
ARA Free Press broadcasts, now defunct, from WCC since about 1978
or so, and I managed to get one of the last real RCA Globecom
broadcasts with things like the baseball scores, the stocks,
and general news.  Also, I caught a real autoalarm from VCS,
back about 5 years, when the M/V Salvador Allende went down.
Someday, long after we are gone, someone might find such things
interesting, perhaps.....

What tapes do any of you folks have around?

Catch them while you can.....

RIP/VA WCC/KFS/KPH/WNU.......

DE NA4G/Bob

EE

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 13:56:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13289
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:56:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00455;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:54:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA28053 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA28047 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA03579;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907131726.NAA03579@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Final as-sent/as-received copy of KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:26:10 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Folks, for the sake of accuracy and the historical record, kindly
recheck all your tapes for proper copy and format on these historic
broadcasts.  Let us make sure we get the copy exact.  I know I am
picking at nits, but it would be good to get the formalized record
copy, as it would have been received, and not as automatons might
have received it.  If you look carefully at the copies, that are
posted, you will understand what I mean.  I noticed what might
be errors not by the sending operators, who did make some sending
errors due to the emotion of the time, but also on the receiving end.
Sandy, Jeff, Dick and others help out to make sure all is correct.

Someone has some of the bcsts online at http://hfradio.org/lastmorse.html
I hope he can put them all there for us to use and enjoy.
I don't have a wav player, so I cant run them on my NT machine, yet.

I will recheck carefully my tapes from last night to make sure I get
it exactly right, as a cw operator would have copied it and written
it down.

It may be good to have the as-sent copy, with errors, and the
record clean copy, etc.

Who actually has readable tapes of all the goings on?  Mine run
from about 2200 on, scanning the 5 given frequencies, but I sure
wish I had thought of 4310 like Sandy did.  WCC/WNU was only
QSA 1 here on 17117, and nil on 12886.  KFS/KPH was QSA5 on 17178
and nil elsewhere.  600M was nil.

Thanks all, and remember, this is history we have had the fortune
to hear.

ZUT DE NA4G/Bob UP


Afterthoughts......

(As Sandy put it... that 2nd telegraph is "wallpaper", even though mine
still has a year or a little less on it..... mebbie it and 10 bucks will
get us a cup o' coffee down by the docks or the union hall?...(:+}}...nah.
Will the FCC let us renew them?...nah...(:+{{..... Mine was on green
xerox paper cuz they didn't have any of the original blue-green blank
forms left...(:+{{.....crude!)

(Where do I plug the bug into that darn gmdss console.....(:+\\.....)

(Anyone got any extra RCA message blanks?  My mill is hungry....)

(Sandy was right.... back 100 years would have been fun for us.
                     Even 50 would have been wild....)

(All we have left are the memories, and the BA's which we can fire up
as long as we can keep them going...... may Big Bertha Radiomarine
ET-8019A long outlive me and keep a goodly ether wave emitted!
Hear! Hear!)

The CW is now in our hands..... practice it, and treasure it!
We are the last stand for brass pounders....

ZUT

ZUT

EE

EE

E

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 13:58:02 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13324
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:58:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00775;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:56:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA28288 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.38]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA28283 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 10:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from worldnet.att.net ([12.73.238.63])
          by mtiwmhc03.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134)
          with ESMTP id <19990713173533.LGHJ4954@worldnet.att.net>
          for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>;
          Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:35:33 +0000
Message-ID: <378ACFDD.AE38B410@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:34:21 +0600
From: Ralph Hartwell <ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net>
Reply-To: ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net
Organization: Spectrotek Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
References: <199907131726.NAA03579@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I scanned the newspaper article that appeared in this mornings local paper re
the closure of Global Wireless.  I'll be happy to email the zipped file (3 JPG
640 wide frames, incl. color photo of the operating position) to you if you
are interested.  The article is titled "Morse Code Buried At Sea As Ships Get
High-Tech Tools."

73,

--
Ralph   W5JGV

ICQ  8514638
ralph.hartwell@worldnet.att.net
http://home.att.net/~ralph.hartwell
Home of the Rife Biomedical Research Web Ring

voice - 504-733-9281
fax   - 504-733-9334 (also voice mail)


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 15:57:31 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA14919
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:57:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20726;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:56:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA29857 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA29850 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373492(9)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:43:12 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135686(7)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:43:08 -1000
Date: 	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:43:02 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Final as-sent/as-received copy of KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
In-Reply-To: <199907131726.NAA03579@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907130939160.17841-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

I sure wish all the GB traffic from the last couple of days had also
been sent to the History list (ham-radio-history@egroups.com). Please,
any further historical posts, Cc: that other list, okay? (You'll have
to be subscribed to that list, though: Send an email to:
ham-radio-history-request@egroups.com, and leave the text blank --
that will get you subscribed to that fine list.)

Jeff KH6O


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 16:18:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15166
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:18:28 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23810;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:17:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA00237 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from imo12.mx.aol.com (imo12.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA00232 for <Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wd4nka@aol.com
Received: from Wd4nka@aol.com
	by imo12.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id vLBEa28546 (14389);
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:55:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4048b3cf.24bcf3a5@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:55:17 EDT
Subject: Re: GB> Final as-sent/as-received copy of KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
To: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu
CC: Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi, Bob !

In a message dated 99-07-13 13:20:29 EDT, you write:

<< 
 The CW is now in our hands..... practice it, and treasure it!
 We are the last stand for brass pounders....
  >>

i can add no comment but amen and amen .

vry 73 -
gary- wd4nka

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 16:19:21 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15183
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:19:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24404;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA00226 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA00221 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 6544 invoked by alias); 13 Jul 1999 19:58:39 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 28769 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jul 1999 19:56:14 -0000
Received: from dialupq92.phnx.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.181.111.92)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 1999 19:56:14 -0000
Message-ID: <378B99E3.7A003451@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:56:20 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
References: <199907131726.NAA03579@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu> <378ACFDD.AE38B410@worldnet.att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Such a title begs the question (in my mind at least): have there been any
instances, in submarine disasters maybe, of morse code being sent *through*
the sea?

Ralph Hartwell wrote:
  The article is titled "Morse Code Buried At Sea As Ships Get
> High-Tech Tools."

-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 16:46:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15374
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:46:16 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26864;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:44:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA00834 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA00829 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA04173;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907132037.QAA04173@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
In-Reply-To: <378B99E3.7A003451@uswest.net> from Will White at "Jul 13, 1999 12:56:20 pm"
To: wcw@uswest.net
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:37:21 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> Such a title begs the question (in my mind at least): have there been any
> instances, in submarine disasters maybe, of morse code being sent *through*
> the sea?
> 
> Ralph Hartwell wrote:
>   The article is titled "Morse Code Buried At Sea As Ships Get
> > High-Tech Tools."
> 
> -- 
> Will White, KD7BFX

If memory serves me correctly, the submarine elf transmissions are
low enough in frequency that the seawater is largely transparent.
I dunno exactly how transparent, though.... a few hundred feet maybe.

You could use hydrophones to send morse.  I dunno what the DX would
be but it should be a few miles.  They can hear subs at several miles
or more.  Whales' songs can be heard at 100 miles or more.

It would probably take a lot of audio power and transducer power
to get DX, but it might be doable, and my expectation is that folks
have probably tried that kind of thing in the Silent Service.
Any pig boat folks around to add some insights?  I will check with
my neighbor, an old diesel fleet boat op (whose boat was the one
that was sunk at dockside in Buenos Aires durinig the Falklands
conflict - ex Sea Cat, I think).  He may have some insights from
the WWII-60's era.  Better yet, y'all get on 7026 and listen for
him in the evenings (N4HAF)... one of the best fists I have ever heard.

Hmmm.  What if, by chance, you were out off the coast, fishing,
and the bottom of your boat started humming.... CW.........
Freaky... nah.

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 18:13:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA16385
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:13:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04596;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:12:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id OAA01684 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from basfzgw.basf-corp.com (basfzgw.basf-corp.com [144.29.126.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA01679 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from basfigw by basfzgw with SMTP (MMTA) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:49:08 -0400
Received: from intmaila.basf-corp.com  by basfigw (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP	id RAA06089 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com (actually host basf-corp-gw01.parsippa.basf-corp.com) 
          by intmaila; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:48:30 -0400
Received: by basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999))  
          id 852567AD.00778976 ; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:45:39 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: BASF-CORP
From: Stanley A Mcintosh <mcintos@basf-corp.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-ID: <852567AD.007787AC.00@basf-corp-gw01.basf-corp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:48:23 -0400
Subject: GB> 'Nother Tube Question
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Last time, I screwed up the tube code, but this time I have the question right.
While looking for some junkbox 2C39's (which turned out to be 2C43's), I found a
couple of 6GK6's.  Is this my imagination, or do these have graphite anodes?
They sure look like graphite.  Could this be a qrp'ers 813?

72
sam
kd4bth


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 18:30:22 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA16579
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:30:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA06306;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 18:28:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id PAA01886 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA01880 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 15:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374209(9)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:07:24 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135686(3)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:07:17 -1000
Date: 	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 12:07:15 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        Ham Radio History E-list <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: GB> WNU/WCC/KFS/KPH CW QRT (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907131205080.24905-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Thought this might be of interest. Please note his signature line (former
owner of station WKM -- was that a maritime shore station?).
Jeff KH6O

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 13:28:17 -1000
From: dslosty <dslosty@pipeline.com>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> WNU/WCC/KFS/KPH CW QRT (fwd)

Jeff,
Thanks for all of the forwarded info.

A sad/memorial day.

I worry about the future of maritime communications.
We have most of our eggs in one basket: satellite communications
and the SITOR stations really don't have enough traffic to survive
financially,
in the long run, without government support. I don't really see
Globe Wireless (KPH/WCC/WNU) and Mobile Marine Radio (WLO/KLS) being
around 10 years from now.

On most of my voyages, even though deck officers have the new GMDSS
licenses and are now doing much of the communications work, they often
don't understand what they are doing.

The GMDSS false alarm rates still exceeds 95% due to transmission
errors,
improper forwarding of DSS transmissions, etc.  Either the deck officers
make the mistakes themselves or they get exasperated and turn the
equipment
off.  Thus the reliablility of the GMDSS system for ships that are truly
in distress is being compromised.

This has been a subject at internatinal conferences but no one wants to 
"rock the boat" and admit that the GMDSS system isn't perfect and that a
licensed
WELL TRAINED operator is still needed. Cost savings are the orders of
the day.

It will take a major maritime tragedy before this is truly addressed.

To answer your question:
Last year, when I got my GMDSS license, the FCC was still offering the
commercial radiotelegraphy licenses thru the volunteer examination
system.
It may have changed by now but I doubt it  - I've heard of no regulatory
changes
and the FCC is always slow to react.

73,

DougLas Losty/WA1TUT

(ex-maritime Radio-Electronics officer 
and ex-owner/operator of WKM/West Haven, CT
Radio).

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 19:30:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA17264
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:30:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11756;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id QAA02595 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mail2.svr.pol.co.uk (mail2.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.210]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA02590 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from modem-75.cornucopia.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.136.148.203] helo=burgermaster)
	by mail2.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 114BiE-0005Q8-00
	for glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:11:46 +0100
Message-ID: <004a01becd84$9b07a820$d100000a@burgermaster>
From: "Andrew Burge" <andrew@eightoseven.freeserve.co.uk>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> 'Nother Tube Question
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:08:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Sam,

we Europeans think of these as the EL509 (and their high voltage heater
cousins the PL509 or 40KG6 I think).

I've got some here and they are all steel anodes - maybe you folks have got
the better tubes !

To my mind they look much beefier than the 6KD6s (as fitted to the FTdx401s
and others) and I'm intending to rework my 401 to take the KGs rather than
the KDs which are now very pricey in the UK (circa 70 bucks *each* !!).

73/2

Andrew

M0BXT

-----Original Message-----
From: Stanley A Mcintosh <mcintos@basf-corp.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: 13 July 1999 23:19
Subject: GB> 'Nother Tube Question


Last time, I screwed up the tube code, but this time I have the question
right.
While looking for some junkbox 2C39's (which turned out to be 2C43's), I
found a
couple of 6GK6's.  Is this my imagination, or do these have graphite anodes?
They sure look like graphite.  Could this be a qrp'ers 813?

72
sam
kd4bth




From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 22:14:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA19025
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:14:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07940;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:12:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA04196 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.36]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA04191 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.240.77]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990714015851.MRFN2808@SandyBlaize>;
          Wed, 14 Jul 1999 01:58:51 +0000
Message-ID: <008901becd9c$0c0810c0$4df0490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Ham Radio History E-list" <ham-radio-history@egroups.com>
Subject: Re: GB> WNU/WCC/KFS/KPH CW QRT (fwd)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:54:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


>I worry about the future of maritime communications.
>We have most of our eggs in one basket: satellite communications
>and the SITOR stations really don't have enough traffic to
survive
>financially,
>in the long run, without government support. I don't really see
>Globe Wireless (KPH/WCC/WNU) and Mobile Marine Radio (WLO/KLS)
being
>around 10 years from now.
>

    I agree heartily!  The Masters and Mates usually take the
easy way out
which is the SATCOM terminal.  Most know NOTHING about HF
propagation
and don't care to learn.  Before I retired, most of the GMDSS
station installations
ignored the SSB/TELEX HF gear.  When one did an inspection, it
hardly EVER
was working!  So where is the GMDSS redundancy the gear is
supposed to provide
that's supposed to make up for the missing Radio Officer?

>On most of my voyages, even though deck officers have the new
GMDSS
>licenses and are now doing much of the communications work, they
often
>don't understand what they are doing.
>
>The GMDSS false alarm rates still exceeds 95% due to
transmission
>errors,
>improper forwarding of DSS transmissions, etc.  Either the deck
officers
>make the mistakes themselves or they get exasperated and turn
the
>equipment
>off.  Thus the reliablility of the GMDSS system for ships that
are truly
>in distress is being compromised.

   AMEN, AMEN, AMEN!  And I agree it will  take another Titanic
type
disaster at sea to even reconsider putting the R/O's back on!
The shipping
companies (mosst of them) don't give a damn about
safety....really!
They are concerned with the BOTTOM LINE of the ledger!

>This has been a subject at internatinal conferences but no one
wants to
>"rock the boat" and admit that the GMDSS system isn't perfect
and that a
>licensed
>WELL TRAINED operator is still needed. Cost savings are the
orders of
>the day.
>
>It will take a major maritime tragedy before this is truly
addressed.


   I addressed this above!

Sandy Blaize, W5TVW
ex- Shipboard  electronic maintenance engineer
worked for a division of Marconi Marine for 10 years
and then ITT-Mackay Radio for over 20 years.
Have held a 2nd Class Ship Radiotelegraph license for over 31
years.


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 22:47:41 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA19399
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:47:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA10867;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 22:46:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA04634 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp5.jps.net (smtp5.jps.net [209.63.224.55]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id TAA04629 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oemcomputer (216-119-14-228.o1.jps.net [216.119.14.228])
	by smtp5.jps.net (8.9.0/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA20156
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Kurt Arico" <karico@jps.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: RE: GB> KFS/KPH/WCC/WNU shutdown
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:38:41 -0700
Message-ID: <000301becda1$fc0d2060$e40e77d8@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <199907132037.QAA04173@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO



Please excuse the slightly off topic post. Being a West coaster who
has visted the Jeremiah OBrien several times, I was touched by the 
sign-off transmission. She is a restored Liberty ship crewed by
volunteers and on display in San Francisco. If you saw the movie
Titanic, you have seen the engine room of the Jeremiah OBrien.   

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Tue Jul 13 23:08:05 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA19617
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:08:04 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA12432;
	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id TAA04846 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from socrates.nmia.com (socrates.nmia.com [198.59.166.170]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id TAA04840 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 19:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plato.nmia.com(really [198.59.166.165]) by socrates.nmia.com
	via sendmail with smtp
	id <m114F5r-0033VRC@socrates.nmia.com>
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:48:23 -0600 (MDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Apr-19)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 20:48:24 -0600 (MDT)
From: <msix@nmia.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> The upside...
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990713203549.30080A-100000@plato.nmia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

For most of my ham life, we we're worried about HF band takeovers.

With S/S CW gone, only SWBC and Mil air and hams use HF.
Nobody else seems to care...all gone to SHF and up.

Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?

So...
Keep those TCS's warmed up!

Frank may even get 5M back...and I got my 1948 chalk box 
number 19 xcvr ready to go.

73 - John W7ZFB
1400 Catron SE   Albq, NM 87123
***********************************************************
* Homebrewer since 1947   CW   BoatAnchors    Norcal #930 *
* BA CW freqs - 3578, 7050, 7147, 14050, 21050, 28050     *
***********************************************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 00:23:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA20409
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:23:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA17611;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:21:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id VAA05554 for glowbugs-outgoing; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id VAA05549 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7067 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 1999 04:12:48 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 6882 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jul 1999 04:12:40 -0000
Received: from dialupp138.phnx.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.180.141.138)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 14 Jul 1999 04:12:39 -0000
Message-ID: <378C0E3F.FFEDEE0B@uswest.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:13:12 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> CW novels
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

My stepmother collects mystery novels, and though she doesn't own them or
remember the authors or titles, she tells me that there have been at least a
dozen or so mysteries written in the 30's, 40's, and/or 50's, that had
"mysterious" (no pun intended) CW wireless traffic figuring heavily in the
plots. Camilla is no ham, can barely operate a modern clock radio, but she
does know what a "fist" is, and remembers these books as having scenes where
though the code is uncopyable due to QSB, the "swing of the fist" identifies
the op to the narrator. I am certain these are *not* the ARRL/Cynthia Wall
books ("Night Signals," et al.). Any ideas of authors and titles?

Sorry if this isn't strictly on topic; I thought it would be OK given the
nostalgia "wave" (pun intended) the past few days on the list.
-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 03:36:54 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA22496
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:36:53 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA27310;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 03:35:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id AAA07994 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA07989 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374039(2)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:20:59 -1000
Received: by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu id <135682(3)>; Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:20:45 -1000
From: Jeffrey Herman <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
To: ham-radio-history@egroups, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: Last Dots and Dashes Issued (sadly)
Message-Id: <99Jul13.212045hwt.135682(3)@uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu>
Date: 	Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:20:42 -1000
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - It's finally taps for U.S. ship-to-shore
telegraph, drowned out by the high-speed chattering of satellite
communications, high frequency radios and e-mail.

Globe Wireless, an 89-year-old California communications
company, Monday sent out what it billed as the last commercial
maritime Morse Code message from North America, a terse sign-off
that repeated the first words transmitted by the telegraph's inventor,
Samuel F.B. Morse, 155 years ago: "What hath God wrought?"

{story}
http://news.excite.com/news/r/990713/18/tech-tech-telegraph


Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 10:48:19 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA27231
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:48:18 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27783;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA10955 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA10949 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from glowbug@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA05321;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from glowbug)
From: "Mr. Glowbug" <glowbug@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907141427.KAA05321@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> The upside... 200 Meters and UP!
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990713203549.30080A-100000@plato.nmia.com> from "msix@nmia.com" at "Jul 13, 1999 08:48:24 pm"
To: msix@nmia.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 10:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> For most of my ham life, we we're worried about HF band takeovers.

That is true, but maybe the picture will reverse to some extent.
 
> With S/S CW gone, only SWBC and Mil air and hams use HF.
> Nobody else seems to care...all gone to SHF and up.

Naturally.... give those folks 2 meters and down....(:+}}.....

> Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
> Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?

Just US!

> So...
> Keep those TCS's warmed up!

Yes.... and the SRT-14 covers 300khz-26000khz, so, provided I can
get the synthesizer going again, I am ready!

> Frank may even get 5M back...and I got my 1948 chalk box 
> number 19 xcvr ready to go.

Well, perhaps a 6SN7 version might be appropriate for 750M?

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 11:59:53 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA28095
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:59:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05559;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:58:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA11721 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f257.hotmail.com [207.82.251.148]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA11716 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 91382 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jul 1999 15:36:56 -0000
Message-ID: <19990714153656.91381.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:36:55 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: msix@nmia.com
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- The upside...
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 08:36:55 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

John W7ZFB writes:
>Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
>Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?

The New Scientist magazine carried a story a week or so ago about a project 
by the military to use HF for transmission of images. The idea was to break 
down the images into fragments and send them in different packets on 
different frequencies to eliminate noise or propagation problems. The 
imagelets were recombined on the receiving end.

Brad


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 12:36:03 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28522
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:36:03 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10279;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA12058 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA12053 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JDJW9JEW448WZLZB@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:04:17 CDT
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:06:23 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: GB> The end of Morse - A First Hand Report - forwarded
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <017301bece12$d2356380$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

This is forwarded from Dick Dillman by permission ....

The end came yesterday.  We knew it had to come.  But the end had been
predicted so many times for so many years while Morse soldiered on, paying
no attention, providing good, reliable service for decades after it was
declared dead... maybe some of thought the day would never come.  But when
KPH/KFS signed off the air for the last time yesterday it was the end of
commercial Morse in North America.

It was a sad day but one I knew I couldn't miss.

Tom Horsfall, WA6OPE and I were invited along with many others to be present
at the Half Moon Bay master station of Globe Wireless from which the final
messages would be sent.  I held in my hand two messages I hoped to have
transmitted.  They were messages of greeting and farewell from the Maritime
Radio Historical Society and the San Francisco Maritime Historical Park -
typed of course with a mill on historically correct Mackay Radio radiogram
blanks.  I secretly dared hope that I myself might be permitted to send
these messages.  I brought along my favorite straight key in its carrying
case and my radiotelegraph license just in case.

I have visited KFS many times over the years.  On my first visit the
operating room had nothing but Morse positions.  Over the years the number
of computers steadily advanced as the Morse positions retreated to the west
end of the building.  When we walked in yesterday both sides of the
operating room were lined with racks holding sleek black computers and
monitors.  And way down at the end was the one remaining Morse operating
position.

Tom spotted him first... Paul Zell, the morse operator on duty.  We knew him
by his green eyeshade.  All real radiotelegraph operators seem to wear green
eyeshades.  Pictures I have taken at KFS and KPH decades ago show men in
green eyeshades at the key or the Kleinschmidt.  Pictures taken at those
stations decades before that show the same thing.  I am convinced that there
is a secret ceremony of the green eyeshade in which the distinctive headgear
is carefully placed upon the head of the operator newly welcomed into the
fraternity.  This is of course a ceremony we have not been permitted to
witness, a ceremony that will never again take place.

I sat down next to Paul Zell as we listened to Russian and Cuban ships
calling their respective coast stations.  I realized that true to its
nature, Morse will carry on in other parts of the world even after the keyes
in North America are finally silent.  I had to ask Paul the question... "How
are you feeling about today?"  An impossible question to answer but he
answered it.  "CW was my life," he said and turned back to the receiver.

More people started to arrive, a surprising number of reporters among them.
But the real dignitaries in my eyes were the radio men and women who knew
they had to be there on this day.  Jack Martini, manager of KPH when it shut
down (he intentionally left the receivers on when he left).  Ray Smith, the
operator who sent the farewell message when KPH at Bolinas/Pt. Reyes shut
down.  John Brundage, manager of KFS in its golden age of Morse.  Denise,
the first female coast station operator on the west coast.  Rex Patterson,
chief engineer at KFS in its glory years.  And many more.  We swapped
stories and I showed them my photo album.  We ate from the delicious spread
of food provided by Peter Kierans of Globe Wireless.  But our eyes kept
glancing at the clock.  It was now less than two hours to the end.

I finally screwed my courage to the sticking place and asked Tim Gorman,
Director of Operations, if my messages might be sent and if, perhaps, I
might be permitted to send them.  Tim had met me only that day.  I might be
a fumble-fisted lid for all he knew.  And he was busy with the press and
with all the details of the ceremony.  "We'll see...", he said.  And that
was enough for me.

Now the final transmissions from WCC/WNU began.  We copied them off the air.
The room fell silent.  I noticed one man in particular.  He was probably the
oldest person there but had a presence that we used to call "spry".  He had
a quick laugh and twinkling eye.  I watched him now.  He stood leaning
forward, eyes closed, as the sound washed over him.... drinking in... the
Morse.  He was a pioneer operator, the genuine article, no doubt about it.
I wanted to meet him, to ask his name at least.  But of course I couldn't
possibly interrupt his reverie.

Paul Zell sent the first of the KFS/KPH sign off messages from the local
position.  Again we were all silent and when he finished... there was a
round of applause!  Applause for a radiotelegraph operator!  Well deserved
applause, deserved by every radiotelegraph operator everywhere, applause
unheard for 80 years.  Paul made a small, embarrassed nod of his head,
accepting the tribute for himself and for all the operators on all the ships
and at all the coast stations over the years.

Then he copied the last commercial message KFS would receive, from the
Liberty ship Jeremiah O'Brien/KXCH on 500kc.  The op on the O'Brien said he
would standby until 15 past the hour.  Zell replied "better make that 18
past, OM."  The operator on the O'Brien understood and said that yes, he
would observe the silent period - which of course is no longer required by
regulation but is absolutely required by tradition.  Then Paul said that
he'd standby "on 600".  The crowd got a big kick out of that - 600 meters
instead of 500kc.  Subtle, but all the more meaningful for that.

I saw Tim approaching me across the room.  "Get your key...", he said.  Get
your key!  Holy mackerel, they were going to let me do it!  So I got out the
key, gathered up my messages, and plugged in.  But then I realized: the best
Morse operators in the country... the best Morse operators in the world,
probably... would be listening to every dot and dash I sent!  They would be
too polite to say anything if I flubbed it of course... but they and I and
everyone else in the room and all the ships at sea would know!  My palms
started to sweat at that thought but there was no turning back now.  I took
Paul Zell's seat.  I sent a couple if Vs to see if there was side tone in
the 'phones.  The knob on the key was loose!  I tightened that up... and
began to send.

I sent the first message from the Maritime Radio Historical Society and all
went well.  Then I signed the station calls.. "de KPH/KFS".  Tom and a few
others noticed that I sent KPH first and understood why.  Then the second
message from the San Francisco Maritime Historical Park.  And the calls
again... followed by my "sine"... and K.  I had gotten through it!  And
there was a round of applause for me!  Thoroughly undeserved but very much
appreciated.  Someone even said, "Nice fist".  High praise indeed in that
crowd.

Then the final messages from KFS/KPH began.  Paul Zell sent the first ones.
Then Tim Gorman sat down and proved himself to be much more than just a
competent manager.  He sent the final message in meticulous Morse using the
chrome-plated Vibroplex, signed off with "What hath God wrought"... then
SK... and it was over.

There were wet eyes in that room, mine among them.  I heard more than one
tough-looking old timer mumble, "I didn't think it would get to me, but..."
and then turn away.

I had one further item on my agenda: to get my license endorsed showing me
as an operator at KFS/KPH on the last day of North American Morse.  Once
again Tim Gorman showed himself to be a gracious and understanding man as he
took pen in hand to write "satisfactory" in the blank provided for operator
evaluation on the back of the license and add his signature.

Finally it was time to go.  I gathered up my key and my photos and my papers
and shook hands once more with all the great men and women who were there.
And finally we were heading north on highway 1 with the beautiful Pacific
sunset on our left and the green coastal hills on the right.  "That was one
helluva day," Tom said.  "Yep," I agreed.

Vy 73,

Dick/"RD"


                           Dick Dillman, W6AWO
     Chief Operator at K6KPH of the Maritime Radio Historical Society
                        Collector Of Heavy Metal:
                 Harleys, Willys and Radios Over 100lbs.



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 12:38:11 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28554
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:38:11 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10613;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:36:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA12276 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from kostspelig.companet.net (root@kostspelig.companet.net [205.240.86.2]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA12271 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pm4-00-81.companet.net (pm4-00-81.companet.net [205.240.86.81])
	by kostspelig.companet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA27001;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:23:06 -0500
Message-ID: <378CB91F.68BE@companet.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:21:51 -0500
From: Mike <mmorrow@companet.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
CC: boatanchors@qth.net
Subject: GB> Maritime CW Stations QRT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hello list!

I left the US Navy 20 years ago as a ballistic missile submarine
officer.   A program had been started on board just as I was leaving to
upgrade the CW capability of the radiomen, who up to that time never
used CW and most of whom could not do 5 wpm.  It seems that someone, at
what level I never found out, had decided that if the missile boats ever
had to perform their function, it was unlikely that most of the exotic
communications systems, including satellites and land-based VLF
stations, would be in service afterwards.  Thus, maybe the old standby
of HF CW might be useful.

On my boat, an engineering officer was given the collateral duty of
providing the CW instruction, since he was a ham with better CW
proficiency than any of the radiomen or other officers on board at the
time.  I think they practised copying the NAVAREA and HYDROLANT
broadcasts from NAM/NMG/etc. on 8080 kHz.

Apparently this program was not universal, as I have spoken with
radiomen  on active duty elsewhere in the Navy at the time who report no
such additional emphasis being placed on CW by their commands.

It sure did seem to make sense to me then, and still does now.

Regards and 73,
                     Mike / KK5F

PS:  I never did use my 2nd Telegraph license, but I still fondly
remember copying WCC news/sports/stock bulletins every evening to get
ready to take the exam.  (But the exam's random code groups almost
killed me!)

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 14:43:35 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA30057
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:43:34 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA30228;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:41:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13507 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from smtp.amotusa.com ([206.169.137.4]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA13501 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM davidb-200.amotusa.com BY smtp.amotusa.com ; Wed Jul 14 11:22:06 1999
Message-ID: <01ba01bece26$ab94fe20$2c89a9ce@davidb-200.amotusa.com>
From: "Mike Silva" <mjsilva@jps.net>
To: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> 'Nother Tube Question
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:28:29 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Don't know much about the 6GK6 except that it was the ARRL's last oscillator
tube of choice (roughly: 6AG7 in the '50s, 12BY7 in the '60s, then the 6GK6
in the '70s).  Since it's a true pentode I guess you should say it's the
QRP'ers 803 instead, eh? (though you could get much more than 5W out of
it -- 15-20 depending on how hard you wanted to work the tube).

73,
Mike, KK6GM

>Last time, I screwed up the tube code, but this time I have the question
right.
>While looking for some junkbox 2C39's (which turned out to be 2C43's), I
found a
>couple of 6GK6's.  Is this my imagination, or do these have graphite
anodes?
>They sure look like graphite.  Could this be a qrp'ers 813?



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 14:55:38 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA30239
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:55:37 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA32196;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13549 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from socrates.nmia.com (socrates.nmia.com [198.59.166.170]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA13543 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plato.nmia.com(really [198.59.166.165]) by socrates.nmia.com
	via sendmail with smtp
	id <m114Tih-0033XrC@socrates.nmia.com>
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:25:27 -0600 (MDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Apr-19)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:25:27 -0600 (MDT)
From: <msix@nmia.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- The upside...
In-Reply-To: <19990714153656.91381.qmail@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990714122042.13296A-100000@plato.nmia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> John W7ZFB writes:
> >Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
> >Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?
> 
Brad Hernlem wrote:
> The New Scientist magazine carried a story a week or so ago about a project 
> by the military to use HF for transmission of images. The idea was to break 
> down the images into fragments and send them in different packets on 
> different frequencies to eliminate noise or propagation problems. The 
> imagelets were recombined on the receiving end.

Well...maybe, but this is the same gang of flakes that spent 250K
of your taxes on "The effects of jet noise on swine's ears" in the
70's!!!

73 - John W7ZFB
1400 Catron SE   Albq, NM 87123
***********************************************************
* Homebrewer since 1947   CW   BoatAnchors    Norcal #930 *
* BA CW freqs - 3578, 7050, 7147, 14050, 21050, 28050     *
***********************************************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 14:55:52 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA30248
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:55:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA32262;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA13723 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from socrates.nmia.com (socrates.nmia.com [198.59.166.170]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA13717 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 11:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plato.nmia.com(really [198.59.166.165]) by socrates.nmia.com
	via sendmail with smtp
	id <m114Tsk-0033XQC@socrates.nmia.com>
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:35:50 -0600 (MDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Apr-19)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:35:50 -0600 (MDT)
From: <msix@nmia.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> The upside...more
In-Reply-To: <872567AE.005C5492.00@d53mta04h.boulder.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990714122823.13296B-100000@plato.nmia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

WARC enraged me. Freqs should have been harmonically
related to 160/80 like all the other bands:
10.5, 17.5, 24.5

Now maybe you young guys can fix it for BAs/GBs/HBs 
if we can get the ricebox flakos out of the act...

73 - John W7ZFB
1400 Catron SE   Albq, NM 87123
***********************************************************
* Homebrewer since 1947   CW   BoatAnchors    Norcal #930 *
* BA CW freqs - 3578, 7050, 7147, 14050, 21050, 28050     *
***********************************************************



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 15:23:30 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA30589
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:23:30 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04106;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:21:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14149 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA14144 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:02:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA05838;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:09:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907141909.PAA05838@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> The upside...more
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990714122823.13296B-100000@plato.nmia.com> from "msix@nmia.com" at "Jul 14, 1999 12:35:50 pm"
To: msix@nmia.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> WARC enraged me. Freqs should have been harmonically
> related to 160/80 like all the other bands:
> 10.5, 17.5, 24.5
> 
> Now maybe you young guys can fix it for BAs/GBs/HBs 
> if we can get the ricebox flakos out of the act...
> 
> 73 - John W7ZFB

Well, it would be sweet tradition, perhaps to dial up the BA/GB
working QRG of 434 or 436, after calling on 600M.

Or, a slice of 4150-4200/8300-8400/etc....

Egads, what hath we wrought.....?

Just dreaming..... but, lets dream a little and run with it????

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 15:39:18 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA30791
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:39:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06488;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:37:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA14362 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA14357 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <374021(7)>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:15:19 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135685(3)>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:15:08 -1000
Date: 	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:15:04 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: msix@nmia.com
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> The upside...more
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990714122823.13296B-100000@plato.nmia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907140913050.19267-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On Wed, 14 Jul 1999 msix@nmia.com wrote:
> WARC enraged me. Freqs should have been harmonically

Wow, talk about "...looking a gift horse in the mouth..."!!!
In '79, HF users were as spectrum-thirst as ever before; I'm
still amazed the '79 WARC resulted in providing more HF freqs
for hams.

73, Jeff KH6O

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Wed Jul 14 16:41:13 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA31576
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:41:13 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16158;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:39:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA15377 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA15371 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from glowbug@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA05956;
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from glowbug)
From: "Mr. Glowbug" <glowbug@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907142022.QAA05956@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside...
In-Reply-To: <19990714153656.91381.qmail@hotmail.com> from Brad Hernlem at "Jul 14, 1999 08:36:55 am"
To: alihernlem@hotmail.com (Brad Hernlem)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 16:22:46 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> John W7ZFB writes:
> >Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
> >Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?
> 
> The New Scientist magazine carried a story a week or so ago about a project 
> by the military to use HF for transmission of images. The idea was to break 
> down the images into fragments and send them in different packets on 
> different frequencies to eliminate noise or propagation problems. The 
> imagelets were recombined on the receiving end.
> 
> Brad

That is good logic, but, the marine stations have been doing effectively
that for 75 years.  That is why they have/had multiple bands/calling/working
frequencies.  Pick whichever one was the strongest to move the traffic.
The shore stations monitored many bands and scanned calling frequencies
in each band listening for someone calling them, then came back at them
and moved to whichever frequency worked best.

The modern freqency hoppers would be doing effectively the same thing
in an automaton mode by packet rather than morse.  Packetizing it would
reduce the size of units (we might call them morse letters), and allow
transmission in bulk with requests for fills at the end, or singly until
received, or broadcast ratcheting across all bands sequentially or
en masse, or something like that......  There is probably a whole
potful of scenarios you could imagine that could be used.

I am curious as to why the military would use those kinds of schemes
for images, which could be quite large, where VHF or UHF satcoms might
be faster or less hassle.   Were they wanting to use it as an encryption
method by increasing the numbers of channels to catch all possible
packets?  The more frequency agile the system was, the less interception
of packets for reassembly by the enemy.  Also, the more complex it
becomes, which could introduce many unexpected problems.

Interesting.  The Enigma Channel Hopper Scheme.... ECHS encoding....

Nah.....

CW is more fun.

Bob/NA4G



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul 15 00:25:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03734
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:25:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA22980;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:23:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA19402 for glowbugs-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from imo28.mx.aol.com (imo28.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.72]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA19397 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tiuk@aol.com
Received: from Tiuk@aol.com
	by imo28.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id 7UUKa26611 (4113);
	Wed, 14 Jul 1999 23:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <baecdd5d.24beb5ed@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 23:56:29 EDT
Subject: Re: GB> Maritime CW Stations QRT
To: mmorrow@companet.net, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
CC: boatanchors@qth.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

In a message dated 99-07-14 12:24:17 EDT, mmorrow@companet.net writes:

<< Subj:	 GB> Maritime CW Stations QRT
 Date:	99-07-14 12:24:17 EDT
 From:	mmorrow@companet.net (Mike)
 Sender:	owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
 To:	glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
 CC:	boatanchors@qth.net
 
 Hello list!
 
 I left the US Navy 20 years ago as a ballistic missile submarine
 officer.   A program had been started on board just as I was leaving to
 upgrade the CW capability of the radiomen, who up to that time never
 used CW and most of whom could not do 5 wpm.  It seems that someone, at
 what level I never found out, had decided that if the missile boats ever
 had to perform their function, it was unlikely that most of the exotic
 communications systems, including satellites and land-based VLF
 stations, would be in service afterwards.  Thus, maybe the old standby
 of HF CW might be useful.
 
 On my boat, an engineering officer was given the collateral duty of
 providing the CW instruction, since he was a ham with better CW
 proficiency than any of the radiomen or other officers on board at the
 time.  I think they practised copying the NAVAREA and HYDROLANT
 broadcasts from NAM/NMG/etc. on 8080 kHz.
 
 Apparently this program was not universal, as I have spoken with
 radiomen  on active duty elsewhere in the Navy at the time who report no
 such additional emphasis being placed on CW by their commands.
 
 It sure did seem to make sense to me then, and still does now.
 
 Regards and 73,
                      Mike / KK5F
 
 PS:  I never did use my 2nd Telegraph license, but I still fondly
 remember copying WCC news/sports/stock bulletins every evening to get
 ready to take the exam.  (But the exam's random code groups almost
 killed me!) >>


Greetings

I also had the pleasure of serving Uncle Sam on a fast attack on the west 
coast & on a fleet ballistic missile sub on the east coast.  This was in the 
early '80's & it seemed that more emphasis on learning CW was placed on the 
missile sub.

The Navy had practically given up stressing the use of CW before I enlisted.
The old time radiomen were quite proficient but the new men coming out of 
Radio school were never taught CW. Only a few new radiomen were trained in CW 
in Radio school. There was one missile tech onboard who was an Advanced class 
ham who the CO allowed into the radio room so that he could help the other 
radiomen copy CW during radio drills. He & I  got blisters from rapidly 
changing frequencies on our R-1051B's.  We both loved CW but  the other 
non-ham radiomen were convinced we had some loose screws. Perhaps they were 
right.

The reason we were given for the increased emphasis on learning CW was 
because it was very easy to disrupt communications with EMP, jamming & a 
carefully aimed shotgun blast from an enemy satellite to one of our NavSats. 
The thought being that if any thing can be copied through that mess would be 
CW by a trained operator using the best filter ever devised: the human brain.

Being a ham & a radioman who could copy CW faster than 5 wpm I was given the 
order to train the other radiomen on board with daily CW practice. I had a 
blast. The command provided me with a Bencher paddle & an iambic keyer.

After a few days of practice of sending random 5 letter code groups the men 
got bored.  In order to pique thier interest I started sending selected 
passages from various Adult publications I had previously snuck aboard. 
Needless to say thier boredom disappeared & they were able to get thier code 
speed up to about 15wpm.

The submarine group that my boat was attached to also had monthly offcrew CW 
testing sessions. The object was to copy 5 letter code groups at 20 wpm with 
no errors.

The award for such a feat was known as the "Gold Key". It was a coveted prize 
among all submarine radiomen. It was a standard Japanese golden colored 
staight key mounted on a wooden plaque with your name, rate, date of solid 
copy & command.

My "Gold Key" was presented by the Admiral himself & I still have it 
displayed next to my DXCC, WAC & WAS.

Toward the end of my enlistment, CW was still being stressed as a desirable 
attribute of a submarine radioman. I just hope CW is still considered that by 
the submarine community.

Diesel Boats forever  &  CW  forever!

Roman Dementiuk,  N2CDD    ex:  RM2(ss)  (I made RM2 twice - but thats 
another story.)

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul  9 21:39:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA28674
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:39:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA26803;
	Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA04773 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m4.jersey.juno.com (m4.jersey.juno.com [209.67.34.61]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA04768 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 18:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mharla@juno.com)
 by m4.jersey.juno.com (queuemail) id EE5LHDA2; Fri, 09 Jul 1999 21:10:08 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 1999 21:05:25 -0400
Message-ID: <19990709.210934.-508741.3.mharla@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,4-5
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael J Harla <mharla@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

hello gang,

I see an ad in 'Radio' magazine (Nov 1937) for another maker of "75 Watt"
coils like those made by B&W and Bud.  It was Decker Mfg. Co. of So
Pasadena, CA.

Regards,  Mike, n2mho
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul 15 13:19:35 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12147
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:19:34 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24943;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:17:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA26276 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA26268 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 09:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07268;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:01:28 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907151701.NAA07268@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> NA4G's copy of KFS final (did I miss anything?)
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:01:27 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Here is my take on what I was able to hear in Raleigh, NC.
If anyone has any fills, I would appreciate them for the record,
so I can have the most accurate copy possible.  My WCC copy was nil.
My tin ears would not dig that deep into the mud....

Bob/NA4G



THIS IS THE AS-RECEIVED LOG OF THE FINAL TRANSMISSIONS OF THE
GLOBE WIRELESS COMMERCIAL MARINE CW COAST STATIONS, AS RECEIVED
BY ROBERT D. KEYS/NA4G ON 12 JULY, 1999, BEGINNING AT APPROXIMATELY
2200 UTC.  THE FOLLOWING FREQUENCIES WERE MONITORED, 500, 8444.5,
12886.5, 17117.6, AND 17184.8 KHZ.  MOST OF THE TRANSMISSIONS
WERE MONITORED ON 17184.8 KHZ, AT QSA 5, FROM KFS/KPH, WITH A
FEW TRANSMISSIONS MONITORED ON 17117.6 KHZ, AT QSA 1 TO QSA 2.



CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K


CQ DE KFS/GLOBE WIRELESS
BT
PLS NOTE:
THIS IS THE FINAL TRANSMISSION
OF THE ARA FREE PRESS
VIA CW.
GLOBE WIRELESS WILL CEASE CW
OPERATION OF KFS/KPH/WNU/WCC AT
122359 UTC JUL 99.
BT
ARA FREE PRESS -
JULY 11, 1999
TO ALL ARA MEMBERS AND INTERESTED SEAFARERS

RADIO OFFICERS UNION (ROU) FILED
A BANKRUPTCY PETITION JUNE 14.
THE REASONS FOR FILING REMAIN
UNCLEAR, BUT IT APPEA

(OPNOTE: TEXT STOPPED IN MIDWORD.)


CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K
CQ DE KFS KFS KFS QSX 4 8 12 16 MHZ K


VVV VVV
DE KFS KFS
AS


VVV VVV
DE KFS/KPH KFS/KPH
AS
AS


CQ CQ DE KFS/KPH KFS/KPH
BT
FOLLOWS SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
BT
BT
IT IS AN HONOUR AND
A PRIVILEGE TO HAVE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO SAY FAREWELL VIA
THIS LAST MORSE CODE MESSAGE
THOUGH THESE HISTORIC STATIONS KA
IT IS ALSO EXCITING TO
MARK THIS TRANSITION FROM THE
USE OF MORSE CODE IN
MARINE RADIO TO THE NEW
HIGH SPEED DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS MODES.
FAREWELL RO COLLEAGUES AND 73
DE PETER PASCAL KIERANS (PAT)
EX VCTG/VGLN/VCWX/VFN/VFL6/VCK/VCB/ELOC/5LIB/SWIE/GHVF/MAIT/GHVF
TO NAME A FEW
AR
BT
BT
THE AGE OF SAILING SHIPS
GAVE WAY TO STEAM.
NOW THE AGE OF RADIOTELEGNAPHY
FROM SHIPS YIELDS TO NEW COMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGY, AS THE LAST COMMERCIAL
TELEGRAPH STATIONS IN THE UNITED
STATES MAKE THEIR FINAL TRANSMISSIONS.
WHEN STEAM REPLACED SAILS, THE
MEN WHO MANNED THE VESSELS
REMAINED PROFESSIONALS, ONLY THEIR SPECIFIC
ROLES CHANGED.
THE CLOSING OF RADIOTELEGRAPH PARALLELS
THE CHANGE FROM SAIL TO
STEAM.
THE MEN WHO MANNED THE
KEYS WILL REMAIN PROFESSIONALS, ONLY
THEIR ROLE WILL CHANGE.
73 AND BV TO ALL.
PAUL ZELL COASTAL STATION OPERATOR
SINCE 1963 AT KFS/KTK/KOK/KLB/KPH/WCC/WNU
AR
BT
BT
DE KFS/KPH
BT
DURING MY 24 YR CAREER,
IT HAS BEEN AN HONOR
AND A PRIVILEGE TO WORK
AS A CW OP.
I THINK I'LL MISS 500
KHZ THE MOST HI.
MY VY BEST WISHES TO
ALL CW OPS.
TIM GORMAN EX NOX/NMC/KFS/WNU/WCC/KPH
ZUT/BV/73
AR
BT
BT
AS REP OF THE POINT
REYES/BOLINAS KPH OPERATION DISCONTINUED
IN 1997, WE WOULD LIKE
TO SAY FAREWELL AGAIN TO
OUR CW FRIENDS AT SEA
AND ASHORE.
WE WISH YOU ALL FAIR
WINDS AND SEAS ALWAYS
BT
JACK MARTINI OPR AND MGR KPH 1960-1997 AA
R C SMITH SENIOR CW OPR AA
RICK WAHL CW OPR AA
STEVE BOWERS ATOR OPR
AR
BT
DE KFS/KPH
BT
BV OM

(OPNOTE: KA SENT - "." PROBABLY MEANT)
(OPNOTE: RADIOTELEGNAPHY SENT - PROBABLY RADIOTELEGRAPHY MEANT)
(OPNOTE: ZUT IS AN OLD USCG CW OPS UNOFFICIAL SPECIAL SIGNAL
         MEANING ``CW FOREVER!'')

KXCH KXCH KXCH DE KFS/KPH KFS/KPH ANS 600

(OPNOTE: RCVR ON 600M DETECTED SIGNAL - NIL CPI)

(OPNOTE: MISSED TXT ABT TIME AND FCC LISTENING)


VE


VE
DE KPH/KFS
AS
AS
THE MARITIME RADIO HISTORICAL SOCIETY EXTENDS BEST WISHES TO
PROFESSIONAL RADIO OPERATORS EVERYWHERE.
WE ADMIRE YOUR COURAGE AND HOPE TO MEET YOUR STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONALISM.
WE WISH YOU FAIR WINDS AND CALM SEAS.
VY 73
DE MRHS - DE KPH/KFS
AS
AS
SAN FRANCISCO MARITIME HISTORICAL PARK PROUDLY ANNOUNCES
A NEW PERMANENT EXHIBIT ON COMMUNICATIONS AT SEA.
SPARKS, WAVES, AND WIZARDS OPENS THIS NOVEMBER.
ON THIS HISTORIC DAY WE WISH KFS AND ALL RADIO MEN AND
WOMEN A SAFE VYYAGE.
DE KPH
DE KFS
RD K

(OPNOTE: "VYYAGE" SENT - PROBABLY "VOYAGE" MEANT)
(OPNOTE:  DICK DILLMAN/RD ON KEY?)


ERJ9 DE KFS R QSL
BT
YES OM SRI TO SAY NEWS FOLKS HERE AT THIS MOMENT TO
RECORD CLOSING.
73 AND GUD LUCK
DE KFS K

R TALBUENO BUENASUERTE OM

R OK TKS 73 SU

EE


(OPNOTE: WCC 17117 KHZ QSA 1 POOR COPY)


CQ CQ DE WCC WCC BT
IN 1901,

ALL

IGN WCC

TO THE SOUTH WELLFLEET
MASSACHUSETTS WIRELESS      

IN

TO

OPERATED BY 

MARCONI.
MORSE CODE 

FROM WCC HAVE BEEN HEARD AROUND THE WORLD EVER SINCE.
TODAY WE  

WCC FROM WIRELESS 

OPERATIONS.
WCC WILL CONTINUE TO SERVE THE MARITIME COMMUNITY IN ASSOCIATION
WITH THE GLOBAL

NETWORK OPERATED BY GLOBE WIRELESS 
BT
AR
DE WCC WCC W C C 
VA

(OPNOTE:  SERIOUSLY MISSED MOST OF THAT AT QSA 1)


VVV VVV VVV VVV VVV DE WNU


VVV BT


(OPNOTE:  WCC/WNU STN COPY IMPROVING SOMEWHAT TO QSA 2)


CQ CQ CQ DE WNU WNU
BT
12/2346 UTC JUL 99
BT
PEARL RIVER RADIO/WNU NOW CLOSES RADIOTELEGRAPH SERVICE
AFTER EIGHTY-SEVEN YEARS OF CONTINUOUS OPERATION.
WE WILL CONTINUE TO SERVE THE MARINER THROUGH
OUR ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICE AS PART OF THE GLOBE WIRELESS
NETWORK.
BT
73
DE WNU WNU W N U
CL


VVV DE KFS/KPH
AS

T II
VVV VVV DE KPH KPH KPH
BT
CQ CQ CQ DE KPH KPH KPH
BT
WE NOW CLOSE THE RADIOTELEGRAPH OPERATION OF STATION KPH.
SINCE 1904, STATION KPH HAS DISTINGUISHED ITSELF AS ONE
OF THE MOST WELL KNOWN AND RESPECTED CALL SIGNS IN THE
W0 II THE WORLD, AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO AS PART OF
THE GLOBAL RADIO NETWORK OF HF STATIONS
BT 
NW CL
DE KPH
SK


(OPNOTE: SOME TESTING FOLLOWED, NIL COPY)


V


BT
CQ DE KFS
BT
THIS IS THE FINAL CW TRANSMISSION FROM STATION KFS - THE LAST
COMMERCIAL RADIOTELEGRAPH STATION IN NORTH AMERICA.
APPROPRIATELY, WE CLOSE CW AND EMBARK ON A NEW ERA OF
COMMUNICATION WITH SAMUEL F. B. MORSE'S WORDS OF 155
YER ? YEARS AGO
BT
NW CL 73
BT
WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT
BT
DE KFS
VA



(OPNOTE: ONLY SILENCE FOLLOWED.  THE END.  THE BATON IS NOW
         PASSING FROM THE COMMERCIAL RADIO SERVICE TO THE
         AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE AS THE LAST STAND FOR BRASS POUNDERS...
         BT
         ZUT/BV OM
         DE NA4G
         VA)


EE


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul 15 14:12:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA12818
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:12:43 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA31337;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 14:10:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id KAA26790 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from littontech.com (mail.littontech.com [209.77.76.11]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA26785 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from littonengr.com (207.215.90.145) by littontech.com with ESMTP
 (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:45:00 -0700
Message-ID: <378E1E8A.5DD06901@littonengr.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:47:58 -0700
From: Conrad Warren <cwarren@littonengr.com>
Reply-To: cwarren@littonengr.com
Organization: Litton Engineering
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
CC: msix@nmia.com, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside...
References: <19990714153656.91381.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

This is one of those ideas that "thinks: better than it probably
works.  In the shortwave spectrum, noise and path loss not
only vary with frequency  but also vary with time in ways
that are not predictable except in a general sort of way.  And,
one does not know how successfully a transmission has been
made until after it has occurred. Therefore, it is not so easy to
"characterize" a given transmission path as it is in the case of
transmission along a twisted pair, a modern modems do, since
the characteristics of a given propogation path from moment to
moment, on a given shortwave frequency vary in short term
unpredictable ways, due to fading and rapid fluctuations in the
reflective medium ( the ionosphere) and transmission attenuation
in the atmosphere due to turbulence and other factors.

The packet system only works because a given packet can be
re-transmitted until it is assumed to have been received correctly.
If the number of packets being sent is relatively small, and the
packets are relative simple (small),this re-transmission process
is acceptable and requires a relatively small additional amount of
time.  However, if the number of  packets becomes very large,
and the individual packets become more complex, re-transmission
times become much more significant, even to the point of throttling
the datra rate to such an extent that the process basically fails - the
needed data rate cannot be obtained.

Another factor is noise.  One can never get rid of noise.  The only
thing that can be done is to obtain and maintain an exceptable
signal to noise ration.  In the presence of the combined affect of
atmospheric, stellar, man made, antenna/transmission line and
receiver noise, variations of the signal strength can have a profound
affect on the quality of data arriving at the receiving end.  To date
no one has ever completely eliminated the affects of noise on data
and methodologies which "process" the data to reduce the affects
of noise require more time., which must be added to the time
required to send additional packets to ascertain the data got through.

It is not possible to "process" a signal, from which data is missing
are retrieve the missing data.  The best that one can hope to to is
to attempt to "characterize" the missing data, making assumptions
about what it might have been and replacing the missing data with
this assumed data, which actually becomes analogous to the inclusion
of artificial circuit/signal noise.  This also takes time.

There would be some advantage to sending the same packet of a
variety of channels and then combining the data streams at the
receiving end so that bits missing from one stream would be
added by another stream which had not lost that bit.  But, now
we are tying up gobs of spectrum to get the required data quality,
defeating the original purpose - unless the demand of the system for
spectrum is not a criteria and sufficient spectrum is available.

The great race to the higher frequencies has resulted from the fact
that any problems associated with propogation diminish almost
proportionally to the increase in complexity of the radio/antenna
part of the problem, but system vagueries  are more predictable
and controllable than propogation vagueries.  So, the idea of using
HF to send images would automatically work better at higher
frequencies - all other things being equal.

It is probably true, that barring low achieveable data rates, the
human operator can make better use of the shortwave spectrum
than a machine, unless very large antennas and great transmitter
power are available.  Even then, it boggles the mind to think of
writing software that would run in a computer, adequate to the
task of sorting out all the vagueries that a good morse operator
deals with routinely in the accomplishment of his/her work.

But, we have netered into a new age - one in which the human
operator has become the  imagined villian of higher states of
productivity and product quality.  Even a cursory look at the
history of the "Industrial Revolution," will reveal that the owners
of business have been trying to rid themselves of "manpower"
ever since the water wheel was invented as a source of power.
All the improvements in machine design and automation has been
with the expressed purpose or reducing man power requirements.
Now, the goal is to eliminate manpower requirements, as machines
increasingly demonstrate their ability to preform simple tasks which
can be structured in such a way that all vagueries have been eliminated
or reduced to inconsequential levels which are acceptable in terms of
final product.

Every area of modern eandeavor is being impacted by thisd attack on
human involvement is product production processes and it doesn't
seem to matter what the process is.  The FAA, as an example has
been studying automatic landing systems for years to get rid of the
need to have a pilot in the airplane.  Right now, unmanned vehicles
are plying a large oval track South East of Carson City, Nevada, for
the expressed purpose of developing unmanned over the road trucking
and transportation.  The car of the future will drive itself, using GPS
to get you from door to door.  Computers and robotics are beginning
to invade the operating room and doctors are no longer allowed to
prescribe drugs and treatments in Emergency - patient data is fed into
a computer and the computer makes a diagnosis and prescribes the
treatment - the insurance underwriters are pushing for this, because
apparently people make too many mistakes!

We live in a dollar driven world.  The dollar is the only thing that
counts.  Virtually everything in our culture gets pushed through
the "dollar" filter and either makes it through or doesn't.
Human values seem to play a very small role in modern commercial
thinking.  When I was a young engineer, companies had "personnel
department."  Now, they have "Human Resources" departments.  I
looked up the word "resource" in the dictionary and found that it means,
"something exploited for profit."  That is the best indicator of the
"modern" attitude of business people to everybody else - something
to be exploited for profit.  And, when a better resource comes along
which is easier to exploit for profit, the human "resource" is cast aside.

There is nothing new in this process...it has been going on for ten
thousand, only in those days, the weak slave was killed so that the
strong slave could be fed.  Simple mathematics.  Today, we are just
a little more compassionate about that - we let out weak slaves waunder
around the street, living under card board boxes.  It's not nice to
kill them, you see - it erodes the opinion other people have of us.

For many people, land and water and shinning mountains are just
real estate.  The Sky is just another form of real estate.  Wind and
radio waves are just real estate.  The Sea is real estate - something to be
controlled, consumed, bought, sold, fought over and then, like
everything else, thrown away - just like we do toilet paper and dixi cups.
Now, people have decided that the Shortwave bands are more trouble
than they are worth - just as they did vacuum tubes, steam , sails
and telegraph operators.  So, what else is new.  --  Conrad, W7WLM



Brad Hernlem wrote:

> John W7ZFB writes:
> >Before I'm gone I expect to see hams using most of HF...
> >Who else would want such a noisy, unpredictable place?
>
> The New Scientist magazine carried a story a week or so ago about a project
> by the military to use HF for transmission of images. The idea was to break
> down the images into fragments and send them in different packets on
> different frequencies to eliminate noise or propagation problems. The
> imagelets were recombined on the receiving end.
>
> Brad
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul 15 16:30:20 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA14557
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:30:20 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22770;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:28:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA28183 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA28178 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id QAA08447;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:06:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <378DF6DD.4C82@atl.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 15:57:33 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cwarren@littonengr.com
CC: Brad Hernlem <alihernlem@hotmail.com>, msix@nmia.com,
        glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE
References: <19990714153656.91381.qmail@hotmail.com> <378E1E8A.5DD06901@littonengr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

RAVEON!

Near real time path characterization is commonplace these days with the 
more sophisticated methods combining measurements based on the signal
and propagation models. With forward error correction 'tuning', based
on the dynamic characteristics of the path, it's pretty darned efficient
as well.

Don't get me wrong, I love morse and in my book there is nothing to
compare with digging that flashlight power, 40m, CW signal out of
noise or making a clean antipodal contact on 80 with only 30W to
the antenna. But, to blame enterprise for the demise of Morse when
it was enterprise that lead to it's development in the first place, 
... well, you can't have it both ways.

As for the almighty dollar, wake up and smell the roses. Take a look
at what is going on with open source and public license software.
If you'll visit my meagar web site http://www.debris.org you won't
see a lot but, the web server (Apache) is free, the PERL engine
that runs the scripts, is free, and the HTML generator (not editor)
PHP is free. I am using a commercial OS (Solaris) but could just as
well be running Linux or FreeBSD or ???? The Solaris was actually 
free as Sun is well aware of this 'free' software revolution.

If you want to watch this revolution in near real time,
http://www.freshmeat.net
is the place to go. In fact you'll find a linked article there, slamming
Amazon.com
for selling out :-)

Those guys and gals living in the cardboard boxes are nobodys slaves.
(I just snipped 60 lines, it could have been worse :-)

Check out the nature conservancy if you think all land is being
gobbled up by developers. Contribute some time, count some turtles,
blow up a beaver dam, catalog plants, solicit donations of land.

-bob

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Thu Jul 15 16:52:01 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA14798
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:52:00 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25483;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 16:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA28374 for glowbugs-outgoing; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hotmail.com (f33.hotmail.com [207.82.250.44]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA28369 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 60733 invoked by uid 0); 15 Jul 1999 20:26:16 -0000
Message-ID: <19990715202616.60732.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 147.49.1.75 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:26:16 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [147.49.1.75]
From: "Brad Hernlem" <alihernlem@hotmail.com>
To: bob@atl.org
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> Re: GB- Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 13:26:16 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

On the same subject, for almost 12 years now I have been using LaTeX or TeX 
for nearly all my word processing (and some graphics, circuit drawing, 
etc.). First it was on VMS, then Unix, and now I use it on NT. All free and 
rigorously de-bugged. It is just astounding the number of problems I have 
had with commercial software compared to never a problem with the LaTeX/TeX 
stuff. Some people (like us GBers, I suppose) do things for the love of the 
craft while others chase money. Guess which ones turn out the better 
product?

Currently I am writing up a research article. The publisher wants the lines 
numbered in the margins. What do I do? Search the CTAN (Comprehensive TeX 
Archive Network). Lo and behold! someone has already written a hack to do 
what I want. Costs nothing and it works and looks professional.

Brad

P.S. There is even support for generating pdf files. Woohoo! :-)

>RAVEON!
>
>Near real time path characterization is commonplace these days with the
>more sophisticated methods combining measurements based on the signal
>and propagation models. With forward error correction 'tuning', based
>on the dynamic characteristics of the path, it's pretty darned efficient
>as well.
>
>Don't get me wrong, I love morse and in my book there is nothing to
>compare with digging that flashlight power, 40m, CW signal out of
>noise or making a clean antipodal contact on 80 with only 30W to
>the antenna. But, to blame enterprise for the demise of Morse when
>it was enterprise that lead to it's development in the first place,
>... well, you can't have it both ways.
>
>As for the almighty dollar, wake up and smell the roses. Take a look
>at what is going on with open source and public license software.
>If you'll visit my meagar web site http://www.debris.org you won't
>see a lot but, the web server (Apache) is free, the PERL engine
>that runs the scripts, is free, and the HTML generator (not editor)
>PHP is free. I am using a commercial OS (Solaris) but could just as
>well be running Linux or FreeBSD or ???? The Solaris was actually
>free as Sun is well aware of this 'free' software revolution.
>
>If you want to watch this revolution in near real time,
>http://www.freshmeat.net
>is the place to go. In fact you'll find a linked article there, slamming
>Amazon.com
>for selling out :-)
>
>Those guys and gals living in the cardboard boxes are nobodys slaves.
>(I just snipped 60 lines, it could have been worse :-)
>
>Check out the nature conservancy if you think all land is being
>gobbled up by developers. Contribute some time, count some turtles,
>blow up a beaver dam, catalog plants, solicit donations of land.
>
>-bob


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 11:13:24 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA27347
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:13:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA11472;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:11:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA08265 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 07:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m4.jersey.juno.com (m4.jersey.juno.com [209.67.34.61]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA08259 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 07:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from mharla@juno.com)
 by m4.jersey.juno.com (queuemail) id EFNHR2SU; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:49:32 EDT
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Cc: wghauser@yahoo.com, ham-radio-history@egroups.com,
        boatanchors@theporch.com
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:49:08 -0400
Subject: GB> Other newspaper coverage
Message-ID: <19990716.104910.-437331.3.mharla@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,5-6
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael J Harla <mharla@juno.com>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

The Trenton (NJ) Times ran a Newhouse Service article about the Globe
Wireless closing on its business page of 15 July.  "Morse code taps out
at 87," was authored by Keith Darce.

I don't know offhand if Newhouse has a web site, but you can try for the
Trenton Times at:  www.nj.com

73, Mike, n2mho in SNJ
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 11:14:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA27366
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:14:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA10829;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id HAA08302 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 07:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA08297 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 07:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA76777;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:04:43 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907161504.LAA76777@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE (discussion)
In-Reply-To: <378DF6DD.4C82@atl.org> from BOB DUCKWORTH at "Jul 15, 1999 03:57:33 pm"
To: bob@atl.org
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:04:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> RAVEON!

Hey a little ranting and raving is good for discussion....(:+}}....

> Near real time path characterization is commonplace these days with the 
> more sophisticated methods combining measurements based on the signal
> and propagation models. With forward error correction 'tuning', based
> on the dynamic characteristics of the path, it's pretty darned efficient
> as well.

Yes, but they can be complex, and as relates to shipboard use, complexity
is the first step of disaster.  It is hard to fix out of port.

> Don't get me wrong, I love morse and in my book there is nothing to
> compare with digging that flashlight power, 40m, CW signal out of
> noise or making a clean antipodal contact on 80 with only 30W to
> the antenna. But, to blame enterprise for the demise of Morse when
> it was enterprise that lead to it's development in the first place, 
> ... well, you can't have it both ways.

We all like the CW, and I guess I am one of the biggie basketcases
with it (but hey, I do the latest internet/unix/web/etc stuf all day,
so it is refreshing to use CW and GB and BA to get the head back on
straight).

Enterprise is strictly to blame in the case of shipboard CW.
When the USCG dropped MF and HF CW, it was strictly a bottom
line bean counter thing, and not at all related to the new
technologies.  I have that directly from the fellow in
charge of making those decisions, back then (1992).  Alas,
I can't find those emails anymore, so my word will have to
be taken with a couple of grains of sea salt.  As to the
commercial marine CW traffic, that too, was a bean counter
thing, where replacing a 100K a year crew member with a one-time
50K investment in gear, was the way to go, by the ship owners.
For routine traffic, that is not necessarily a bad thing, but
for emergency traffic, it has lost the human touch, and we have
yet to see how well that really works, under fire.  My best
guess is that it will take about 10 years for the dust to
settle in the system, before all the bugs are out.

> As for the almighty dollar, wake up and smell the roses. Take a look
> at what is going on with open source and public license software.
> If you'll visit my meagar web site http://www.debris.org you won't
> see a lot but, the web server (Apache) is free, the PERL engine
> that runs the scripts, is free, and the HTML generator (not editor)
> PHP is free. I am using a commercial OS (Solaris) but could just as
> well be running Linux or FreeBSD or ???? The Solaris was actually 
> free as Sun is well aware of this 'free' software revolution.

Hey, I luv that open software.   It makes it possible to live with
and around the NT toyz around here.  I tend to be a BSD freak, but
that is my bent.

Interestingly, it is the internet, that has opened up marine telecoms
to the point where it is becoming an email operation.  That is probably
good in the long run, although might not be the best for emergency use.

> -bob

The other bob.... NA4G

We of the Amateur Radio Service are now, ``The Last Stand for Brass Pounders.''


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 12:09:44 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28087
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:09:43 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19533;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:07:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA08887 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 08:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id IAA08881 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 08:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA83069;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907161549.LAA83069@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:49:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (Boatanchor Bob NA4G)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Attention, all hands:

To help commemorate the last stand for brass pounders, commercially, this
week, we of the amateur radio service, now accept with honor and all due
respect the ``baton'' of CW operations, and will carry it on until then
end of our watch.

In order to practice, dilligently, the art and craft of the Brass
Pounder or CWist, on the air, and with like minded stations,
I propose we meet each Friday evening QTR 0300Z QRG 7147 KCS for
an informal roundtable and friendly discussion.

Call will be CQ BP CQ BP DE <yourcall> <yourcall> K.

The reason for 7147 is to allow those with lesser skill to join in
and for the novices to hear us and maybe tag along to ratchet up
their skills.  We need to try to mentor all hands along.
In winter, if it stays going, we can try an 80M novice QRG.

If you have a straight sending iron, use it.
If you have a bug, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
If you have an automatic key, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
If you have a keyboard, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
The point is to put it to use with your CW skills.

If you have Glowbug gear, use it.
If you have BoatAnchor gear, use it.
If you have modern gear, us it.
The point is to put it to use with your CW skills.

QRQ will be appropriate for the slowest operator.

Some short traffic/info may be appropriate.

Short discussions of CW, radio history, Glowbugging, or BoatAnchoring
are appropriate.

Short discussions of operating practices and skills are appropriate.

SEE U
73/ZUT
VA
DE NA4G/Bob

EE

(Someone QSP to the BA lists since I am not on those....)

(This is a little broader than our usual BA/GB get togethers, but
 maybe this will draw in some additional interest?)

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 12:13:11 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28132
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:13:11 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA20070;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:10:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id IAA09026 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 08:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id IAA09021 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8901 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 1999 15:50:09 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 3945 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jul 1999 15:47:24 -0000
Received: from jdialup242.phnx.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.180.135.242)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 16 Jul 1999 15:47:24 -0000
Message-ID: <378F5416.9BD5E6C3@uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 08:47:37 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE (discussion)
References: <199907161504.LAA76777@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:

  As to the
> commercial marine CW traffic, that too, was a bean counter
> thing, where replacing a 100K a year crew member with a one-time
> 50K investment in gear, was the way to go, by the ship owners.


Boy, was I born too late! That much for a commercial radio officer? And you
get to travel the world, sheesh!

> that is my bent.
> 
> Interestingly, it is the internet, that has opened up marine telecoms
> to the point where it is becoming an email operation.  That is probably
> good in the long run, although might not be the best for emergency use.

Yes it is. I have made a shore-to-ship telephone call once (from Aspen CO to a
Carnival ship near the Bering Strait), in 1984. It cost something like $25 for
10 minutes, and the noise and QSB were ferocious!


-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 12:43:29 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28642
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:43:29 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23792;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:41:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA09332 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from tntech.edu (SYSTEM@gemini.tntech.edu [149.149.11.7]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA09327 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tetrode ([149.149.42.10])
 by gemini.tntech.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #30682)
 with SMTP id <01JDMP42FOUS8WZZ23@gemini.tntech.edu> for
 glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:12:11 CDT
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:14:45 -0500
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Message-id: <0c9601becfa6$51cd91a0$0a2a9595@ece.tntech.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <199907161549.LAA83069@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Bob and the list,
Be there or be rectangular-shaped....
ZUT!
Conard


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 12:44:17 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28655
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:44:17 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23070;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:42:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA09522 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA09516 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA93985;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907161632.MAA93985@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE (discussion)
In-Reply-To: <378F5416.9BD5E6C3@uswest.net> from Will White at "Jul 16, 1999 08:47:37 am"
To: wcw@uswest.net
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

>   As to the
> > commercial marine CW traffic, that too, was a bean counter
> > thing, where replacing a 100K a year crew member with a one-time
> > 50K investment in gear, was the way to go, by the ship owners.
> 
> Boy, was I born too late! That much for a commercial radio officer? And you
> get to travel the world, sheesh!

Back when I first thought seriously of going out to sea, in the late
70's, the base was 20K and you effectively got as much overtime as
you could work so the total was 30-40K.  After Desert Storm, the
base, from what my friends told me, was double that plus, so 100K
was reasonable, with union contract vessels.  Alas, the ROU has
apparently filed for Chapter 11, and the era is over.....  Anyone
have the web site for the ARA or ROU or MEBA?  I wonder if my buddy
(ROU) who did go out from 1977 on, has a job or retirement, now.....
I always have wondered what would have happened had I gone out
starting in 1977, or earlier.  Yeah, we wuz born too late.
Old dreams and all..... oh, well, we do it ham style, now....

Bob/NA4G

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 14:30:22 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA29960
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:30:21 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06076;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:28:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA10625 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net (phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net [206.80.192.1]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA10620 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2005 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 1999 18:00:31 -0000
Delivered-To: fixup-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu@fixme
Received: (qmail 28853 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jul 1999 17:58:36 -0000
Received: from tdialup183.phnx.uswest.net (HELO uswest.net) (209.181.103.183)
  by phnxpop1.phnx.uswest.net with SMTP; 16 Jul 1999 17:58:36 -0000
Message-ID: <378F72D7.9546616A@uswest.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 10:58:55 -0700
From: Will White <wcw@uswest.net>
Reply-To: wcw@uswest.net
Organization: Hartley, Pierce, & Colpitts, Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
References: <199907161549.LAA83069@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

This is a truly wonderful idea. After a year and a half as a licensed
Procrastinator-class ham, I am finallyfinallyfinally QRV for 1(a-b-c). I dunno
what ticket I will come away with when I go in on August 7th (it would be
sooner, but no tests are scheduled around PHX till 8/7), but I am confident
almost to the point of being blasé about 13WPM. . .(heh, the number of
practice 3(b)'s I have taken, I think I may actually *have* memorized the
whole pool! 4(a) doesn't commit to memory so easily, and I haven't even looked
at 4(b) yet).

What is so great about this idea is that while I am brutally good at reading
my PC's code, and sending it with a practice keyer, I tremble at the idea of
calling or answering a CQ. Of course, I know I will foul up a bit at first,
and I know other CW-ops expect and accept this, but I am still *way* nervous.
I never really had mic-fright with repeaters and such, but I have key-fright!
So, a net dedicated to maintaining and improving the craft of the key is just
what the doctor ordered!

Vis-a-vis traffic, that reminded me that within 24HRS of my call going up on
QRZ, I got a Radiogram from a ham in  MS or AL. I wish I had at least copied
the info down and thanked via email (being a Tech). Really startled/pleased
me! Now, I'd like to return that favor in the future. Anyone still handle CW
traffic, including Radiograms?

Boatanchor Bob NA4G wrote:
> 
> Attention, all hands:
> 
> To help commemorate the last stand for brass pounders, commercially, this
> week, we of the amateur radio service, now accept with honor and all due
> respect the ``baton'' of CW operations, and will carry it on until then
> end of our watch.
> 
> In order to practice, dilligently, the art and craft of the Brass
> Pounder or CWist, on the air, and with like minded stations,
> I propose we meet each Friday evening QTR 0300Z QRG 7147 KCS for
> an informal roundtable and friendly discussion.
> 
> Call will be CQ BP CQ BP DE <yourcall> <yourcall> K.
> 
> The reason for 7147 is to allow those with lesser skill to join in
> and for the novices to hear us and maybe tag along to ratchet up
> their skills.  We need to try to mentor all hands along.
> In winter, if it stays going, we can try an 80M novice QRG.
> 
> If you have a straight sending iron, use it.
> If you have a bug, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
> If you have an automatic key, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
> If you have a keyboard, use it, but slow it down if appropriate.
> The point is to put it to use with your CW skills.
> 
> If you have Glowbug gear, use it.
> If you have BoatAnchor gear, use it.
> If you have modern gear, us it.
> The point is to put it to use with your CW skills.
> 
> QRQ will be appropriate for the slowest operator.
> 
> Some short traffic/info may be appropriate.
> 
> Short discussions of CW, radio history, Glowbugging, or BoatAnchoring
> are appropriate.
> 
> Short discussions of operating practices and skills are appropriate.

-- 
Will White, KD7BFX

to reply, please click this link mailto:wcw@uswest.net

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 14:53:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA30260
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:53:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA09881;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:50:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id LAA10821 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA10813; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 11:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: wcw@uswest.net, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Re: GB- The upside... respondent RAVE (discussion)
In-Reply-To: <199907161632.MAA93985@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990716111114.10585B-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> >   As to the
> > > commercial marine CW traffic, that too, was a bean counter
> > > thing, where replacing a 100K a year crew member with a one-time
> > > 50K investment in gear, was the way to go, by the ship owners.
> > 
> > Boy, was I born too late! That much for a commercial radio officer? And you
> > get to travel the world, sheesh!
> 
> Back when I first thought seriously of going out to sea, in the late
> 70's, the base was 20K and you effectively got as much overtime as
> you could work so the total was 30-40K.  After Desert Storm, the
> base, from what my friends told me, was double that plus, so 100K
> was reasonable, with union contract vessels.  Alas, the ROU has
> apparently filed for Chapter 11, and the era is over.....  Anyone
> have the web site for the ARA or ROU or MEBA?  I wonder if my buddy
> (ROU) who did go out from 1977 on, has a job or retirement, now.....
> I always have wondered what would have happened had I gone out
> starting in 1977, or earlier.  Yeah, we wuz born too late.
> Old dreams and all..... oh, well, we do it ham style, now....

I thought seriously of doing that back in the late '60s and early '70s. I
worked like heck to get my code speed up above 30 WPM by copying the Navy
VLF stations on my RAK-7 and simultaneously taught myself to type on an
old Remington portable my cousin gave me. The Navy had not yet changed
completely over to TTY at that point and was till sending 5 letter code
groups at a pretty fast clip. Sure got my code speed up in a hurry. I also
was NTS laison from RN7 to PAN and eventually became TCC.

I was a Conditional Class licensee then. I got an interim job with a local
TV station and had to have a 1st Class 'Phone, so one day I went over to
the FCC office in Seattle, which was about 400 miles from Missoula,
Montana where I was living, and spent the whole day taking tests: General,
Advanced and Extra, 1st Class 'Phone and 2nd Class Telegraph. I went in
there at about 8:00 AM and walked out at 5:00 PM with a splitting
headache...and passed all tests and got all three licenses.

I then tried to get in the ROU, but, due to my poor eyesight, had
difficulty getting past the Coast Guard requirements. I am legally blind
without my glasses.

The ROU even had a ship lined up for me...drat!

I wanted to travel. The pay was excellent, and if one stayed out of the
country for 18 months or longer, one didn't have to pay income taxes on
what one brought back in.

Perfect job for a single man.

Instead, I ended up staying in Missoula, working first for radio and TV
stations, then the University of Montana.

I sure wish I had been able to go to sea instead....

Oh, well. Man proposes...God disposes.

Ken W7EKB


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 15:26:39 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA30672
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:26:38 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14334;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:24:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA11339 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA11333 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA00314;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:10:41 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907161910.PAA00314@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
In-Reply-To: <378F72D7.9546616A@uswest.net> from Will White at "Jul 16, 1999 10:58:55 am"
To: wcw@uswest.net
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:10:41 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> This is a truly wonderful idea. After a year and a half as a licensed
> Procrastinator-class ham, I am finallyfinallyfinally QRV for 1(a-b-c). I dunno
> what ticket I will come away with when I go in on August 7th (it would be
> sooner, but no tests are scheduled around PHX till 8/7), but I am confident
> almost to the point of being blas_ about 13WPM. . .(heh, the number of
> practice 3(b)'s I have taken, I think I may actually *have* memorized the
> whole pool! 4(a) doesn't commit to memory so easily, and I haven't even looked
> at 4(b) yet).

For sure, go for it!

Take a deep breath before starting, clear the mind to become one with
the force, and run with it for the rest of your time on watch!


> What is so great about this idea is that while I am brutally good at reading
> my PC's code, and sending it with a practice keyer, I tremble at the idea of
> calling or answering a CQ. Of course, I know I will foul up a bit at first,
> and I know other CW-ops expect and accept this, but I am still *way* nervous.
> I never really had mic-fright with repeaters and such, but I have key-fright!
> So, a net dedicated to maintaining and improving the craft of the key is just
> what the doctor ordered!

Well, we all were a little gunshy at first dit.....

For heavens sake, this kid froze up solid into a block of mushy ice
on my first reply to my first CQ.  It so blew me away I totally lost
it.  My second CQ came back with a kind Canadian ham (DX no less!)
in the upper reaches of Quebec that came back to me on voice (15M)!
I am sure he understood my total fright, showing through on the key.
I still have that QSL up on the shack wall.  After the first nukem
attempt at a QSO, it kindof made my day.  Then, with the palms
still sweaty, I sent out a 3rd CQ, and the rest is history.....

I do think, now on the other end of the voyage, that it is a good
idea to mentor the newer hands, on the air, if possible, because
it is a totally different experience, there, compared to the
Instructograph tapes, cassettes, or computer programs.  Also, there
is a lot of the operating skill/proficiency end of the art and craft
that is best demonstrated.   We learn a little, about it every day,
or every QSO under our belt.  My net skills are a tad rusty, although
I used to pass a fair amount of mars traffic on CW, about 20 years
back.  But, now is the time to polish up all those kinds of things,
now that we, as the amateur radio service, are ``the last stand for
brass pounders.''  (By the way, can anyone tell me where that phrase
comes from?.... more later on it).

> Vis-a-vis traffic, that reminded me that within 24HRS of my call going up on
> QRZ, I got a Radiogram from a ham in  MS or AL. I wish I had at least copied
> the info down and thanked via email (being a Tech). Really startled/pleased
> me! Now, I'd like to return that favor in the future. Anyone still handle CW
> traffic, including Radiograms?

Tfc is handled every day, although it is mostly net reports and that
kind of thing.  There is some msg tfc that comes in on holidays and
the like.  Although, I did not intend to start a real net, it would
be good to occasionally pass some tfc, just to keep the fingers
honed, and introduce the new folks into the practice.  Even us olden
pfartes need the practice, now and then....

All hands.... how many folks aboard are regular      tfc handlers?
                                        occasional
                                        past

Mebbie we can coordinate some training examples for the group,
or such?  Or is it too old hat?

> > I propose we meet each Friday evening QTR 0300Z QRG 7147 KCS for
> > an informal roundtable and friendly discussion.
> > 
> > Call will be CQ BP CQ BP DE <yourcall> <yourcall> K.

Hope to see you there.....

ZUT DE NA4G/Bob UP

(p.s. the reference to ``The Last Stand for Brass Pounders'', comes
      from the title of an article on shipboard radio operating in
      the Merchant Marine, published in one of the popular electronics
      rags of the time (PE or Popular Mechanics, or Modern Electronics
      or something like that) from about 1965 or so.  That article
      always fired up my radio imagination, most heartily.  If anyone
      finds the citation to that sometime, do holler!  I would like
      to find a reprint of it.  TNX/NA4G/Bob.)





From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 15:51:40 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA30964
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:51:40 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18404;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:49:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA11789 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from sparticus.bright.net (sparticus.bright.net [205.212.123.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA11784 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Bright.net (circ-ras4-2-cs-13.dial.bright.net [205.212.154.219])
	by sparticus.bright.net (8.9.3/8.9.3 ComNet Build) with SMTP id PAA01969;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000e01bed008$8e7b17a0$db9ad4cd@Bright.net>
From: "Dick Blaney" <wb8mhe@bright.net>
To: "Conard Murray" <cmurray@tntech.edu>,
        "Boatanchor Bob NA4G" <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Cc: <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:57:55 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Would that be an equal sided quadrangle, Conrad?
73 de
Dick, WB8MHE
wb8mhe@bright.net

-----Original Message-----
From: Conard Murray <cmurray@tntech.edu>
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
<glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Date: Friday, July 16, 1999 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????


>Hi Bob and the list,
>Be there or be rectangular-shaped....
>ZUT!
>Conard
>
>

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 16:11:33 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA31183
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 16:11:32 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21020;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 16:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id MAA12044 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id MAA12037; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:55:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: wcw@uswest.net, glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
In-Reply-To: <199907161910.PAA00314@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990716124020.11770A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> All hands.... how many folks aboard are regular      tfc handlers?
>                                         occasional
>                                         past

I used to handle LOTS of traffic, both for MARS and for NTS. Mostly CW,
but also 'phone and RTTY. Several times, the Montana Section Manager tried
to see if he could overload NTS during the annual SET. I did the first one
totally CW and handled LOTS of traffic.  By the next year, I had the RTTY
set up and I we didn't have much trouble handling his load. I don't
exactly remember the number, but it was around 500 pieces over the 24
hours.

I even had an 80-to-20 meter RTTY repeater set up which worked
surprisingly well.

I used a TTL2 for the receiving converter, connected to a BC-779 to which 
I had added a triode product detector, and a modified
VF-1/DX-35/BC-610 for the transmitter. Had a complete model 15, 14 typing
reperf, 19, and a tape sender setup. My mother didn't like the noise much,
but I really enjoyed the rythmic clack-clack-clack. Thank heavens I was in
the basement!

The BC-779 was interesting: I could hear the signals on 20 drifting
slightly back and forth. Didn't seem to bother the TTL2 enough to prevent
copy though. But, boy, was that '779 sensitive with its two RF amp stages
and the product detector! And SO quiet! It was a real pleasure to use. I
used 1/2 of the 6N7 noise-limiter tube for the product detector.

You can probably tell that I am getting to be an Olden Pharte, what with
all the reminiscing...

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 17:04:03 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA31750
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:04:02 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26799;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 17:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id NAA12520 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu [152.1.207.52]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA12515 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 13:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from na4g@localhost)
	by weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA00488;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 16:41:29 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from na4g)
From: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199907162041.QAA00488@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990716124020.11770A-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu> from Ken Gordon at "Jul 16, 1999 12:55:18 pm"
To: keng@uidaho.edu (Ken Gordon)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 16:41:28 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

> > All hands.... how many folks aboard are regular      tfc handlers?
> >                                         occasional
> >                                         past
> 
> I used to handle LOTS of traffic, both for MARS and for NTS. Mostly CW,
> but also 'phone and RTTY. Several times, the Montana Section Manager tried
> to see if he could overload NTS during the annual SET. I did the first one
> totally CW and handled LOTS of traffic.  By the next year, I had the RTTY
> set up and I we didn't have much trouble handling his load. I don't
> exactly remember the number, but it was around 500 pieces over the 24
> hours.

That's a days worth.....(:+}}....

What I was getting to was that if there were a core group of say
half a dozen or so, to move things along, we might coordinate some
minor CWish training things for 7147, perhaps?

Sandy?  You have the loudenboomer signal in the middle reaches of
the land, and....

Darwin?  You also have a loudenboomer signal.

Ken?  Pump some ether into that antenna of yours so you can be heard
down east.

'Fess up folks and let's see if we can coordinate something for
helping the new folks aboard.  

We now must carry that baton along, ya know....


> I even had an 80-to-20 meter RTTY repeater set up which worked
> surprisingly well.

My rtty was strictly 80M, and used an AN/GRC-19 with a Model 19 system
and a HB terminal unit that may have been the old ST-6.  The alternate
rx was my infamous RAL, which did fairly well on a clear channel up
about 4050 or such, riding lightly on the RF gain.

> You can probably tell that I am getting to be an Olden Pharte, what with
> all the reminiscing...

Well, lots of us be getting a little grey around the crow's nest, etc.
Or somewhat broad across the armour belt....(:+{{.....

> Ken W7EKB

Something to think about, and there are plenty of well cwallified (:+}}
folks on the list.....  What say?

ZUT DE NA4G/Bob UP

EE

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 21:32:32 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA02064
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:32:32 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13553;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:30:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id SAA14963 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from relay4.hawaii.edu (relay4.hawaii.edu [128.171.94.12]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id SAA14958 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uhunix5.its.hawaii.edu ([128.171.44.55]) by relay4.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <373531(6)>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:10:52 -1000
Received: from localhost by uhunix5.its.Hawaii.Edu with SMTP id <135676(7)>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:10:48 -1000
Date: 	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 15:10:42 -1000
From: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
X-Sender: jeffreyh@uhunix5
To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: GB> Grammer/Keys' 160m Hartley xmtr
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9907161449380.13419-100000@uhunix5>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi Crew,
I was looking over a QST article that Bob has at his site ("A Low-Power
1715 kc CW Transmitter," March 1932, with Bob's modernized version for a
6/12SN7); Bob writes that just about any indirectly-heated tube can be
used. How about a 6146 (with all the screens tied together)? I just happen
to have one that's asking to be used for something. What value should R1
be changed to? I'd like to change the lightbulb output indicator to an
RF ammeter. What's the highest antenna current you'd expect to see?

Bob, have you tried wiring the rig for 40m? 160 and 80 are just too noisy
here in town (Metro Honolulu, designated by the EPA and FCC as having the
highest RF density in the nation -- some distinction...).

Enjoy the weekend!
Jeff KH6 Over



From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Fri Jul 16 23:27:25 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA03313
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:27:24 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA19803;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:25:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA15915 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 20:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from www.durham.net (root@WWW.Durham.Net [198.73.212.119]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA15910 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 20:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Docusystems.durham.net (tserver1-6.durham.net [198.73.213.70])
	by www.durham.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28946;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:08:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199907170308.XAA28946@www.durham.net>
From: "Edward Swynar VE3 CUI" <gswynar@durham.net>
To: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        "Glowbugs List" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Grammer/Keys' 160m Hartley xmtr
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:08:31 -0400
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Jeff & Co. ...

Hmmmm. How does this sound re. the amount of RF amps coming out of the
6146: assume it puts out 50-watts into a 50-ohm load, like a matched
antenna---the formula P = I (squared) x R would translate to power equals
current (squared) times resistive load (antenna impedance).

To secure current alone, power would have to be divided by resistance, and
then the square root of that would have to be taken.

In our 6146 example, power (50-watts) divided by resisive load (50-ohms)
equals one, the square root of which is one...thusly, one might expect one
ampere of RF current delivered to the load...

"...Correcto-mundo", or "...el-stinko baddo"? 

~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





----------
> From: Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>
> To: Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
> Subject: GB> Grammer/Keys' 160m Hartley xmtr
> Date: July 16, 1999 9:10 PM
> 
> Hi Crew,
> I was looking over a QST article that Bob has at his site ("A Low-Power
> 1715 kc CW Transmitter," March 1932, with Bob's modernized version for a
> 6/12SN7); Bob writes that just about any indirectly-heated tube can be
> used. How about a 6146 (with all the screens tied together)? I just
happen
> to have one that's asking to be used for something. What value should R1
> be changed to? I'd like to change the lightbulb output indicator to an
> RF ammeter. What's the highest antenna current you'd expect to see?
> 
> Bob, have you tried wiring the rig for 40m? 160 and 80 are just too noisy
> here in town (Metro Honolulu, designated by the EPA and FCC as having the
> highest RF density in the nation -- some distinction...).
> 
> Enjoy the weekend!
> Jeff KH6 Over
> 
> 
> 

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 00:12:54 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03800
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 00:12:52 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA21879;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 00:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id UAA16501 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 20:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from postal.indy.net (postal.indy.net [199.3.65.16]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA16496 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 20:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from indy3.indy.net (root@indy3 [199.3.65.14])
	by postal.indy.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01243;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:49:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (rbarmore@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by indy3.indy.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA28688;
	Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:51:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:51:11 -0500 (EST)
From: "Roberta J. Barmore" <rbarmore@indy.net>
X-Sender: rbarmore@indy3
To: Edward Swynar VE3 CUI <gswynar@durham.net>
cc: "Jeffrey Herman, KCC Mathematics" <jeffreyh@hawaii.edu>,
        Glowbugs List <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Subject: Re: GB> Grammer/Keys' 160m Hartley xmtr
In-Reply-To: <199907170308.XAA28946@www.durham.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.10.9907162239220.27190-100000@indy3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


Hi!

   Eddy, your math is correct--if P = I^2 * R (which it does), then I =
SQR(P/R).  The ability to permute equations is a remarkably useful skill;
on trickier ones I have to fuss and ponder to get the right units but it's
worth it.  (Used to be, High School Chemistry classes taught useful
shortcuts for this, using an interesting notation scheme).

   Basic 160m rigs, for another one see QST for August, 1933, pp 9-11:
Grammer, George; "A Simple 1750-Kc. Auxiliary Transmitter."  Simple it is,
pair of '45s in a P-P Hartley.  Kinda hoping to build one myself, just to
see it perc.  

   73,
   --Bobbi

KB9GKX "RJ"  rbarmore@indy.net   Roberta J. (Bobbi) Barmore
      FISTS #3388 * G-QRP #10001 * ARRL * RSGB * WIA 
   Appreciator Of Vacuum-Tube Ham Gear and Vintage Keys


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 01:50:42 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA04864
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 01:50:41 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA26174;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 01:48:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id WAA17982 for glowbugs-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (keng@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA17957; Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: keng owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ken Gordon <keng@uidaho.edu>
X-Sender: keng@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
To: Boatanchor Bob NA4G <na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
cc: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
In-Reply-To: <199907162041.QAA00488@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990716222930.17623D-100000@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Been getting my own, real, honest to goodness ham shack worked on.
Shortly, I can sit down to send rather than stand up.

Got plans for an operating bench, with shelves above it, and a rack full
of gear to the left.  Then a work bench around to the left.  Lots of
light. Warm enough in winter and cool in summer. Easy enough access to the
antennas and ground.

Will be on the 7147 QRG Saturday evening starting around 0300 or so. Have
to make the Idaho-Montana Net on 3647 at 0300. 

Ken W7EKB

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 06:34:28 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA06163
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 06:34:26 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA03668;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 06:32:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id DAA21299 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com (imo15.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.5]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA21294 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wd4nka@aol.com
Received: from Wd4nka@aol.com
	by imo15.mx.aol.com (IMOv20.21) id vEQZa05998 (14455);
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 06:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <660eb703.24c1b357@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 06:22:15 EDT
Subject: Re: GB> Anyone on the QRG this weekend????
To: na4g@weedcon2.cropsci.ncsu.edu
CC: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Hi, Gang:

Keep ur passbands wide open:
Those with Drake 2A's, stay in the 5kc
position: some of us only have 7145 xtals
( i will try the No. 2 pencil on the x-cut
   trick, though <grin>)

Hope i can get my vee up this weekend.

vy 73:
gary, wd4nka

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 07:22:26 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA06205
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:22:26 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA04973;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:20:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id EAA23002 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from m6.boston.juno.com (m6.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.197]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id EAA22997 for <Glowbugs@Piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: mnhopkins@juno.com
Received: (from mnhopkins@juno.com)
 by m6.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id EFQPKHYW; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:09:18 EDT
To: Boatanchors@theporch.com, Glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 22:03:59 -0500
Subject: GB> FMLA: The Moment
Message-ID: <19990717.060525.-3186477.4.MNHopkins@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
X-Juno-Att: 0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO


I had not known Frank to use tobacco.

   Oh, he would take a tributary toke on a cheap cigar to
commemorate a new baby, but he never took up smoking despite being
from an age when it was considered a badge of manliness.  I saw the
end of that age and succumbed for a while.  But my pal who plans
to take back 56-60 mc with a Five Meter Liberation Army knew a
simple truth.  The differential diagnosis between males and men was
made in bar ditches like this one, with the sun making little
apparititions on the macadam, the bugs regrouping, and time moving
more slowly, but more more completely, than it ever does indoors
where they sell Camels.

   He took some of it for himself and handed me the package of Bull
of the Woods.  It was an ancient but still moist sample.  I could
tell because the bull was still just that, not a steer like he, or
it, is now.  Frank has a lot of old fashioned things. 

   I took some tobacco and put it in my cheek.   We men, if we, or
I, qualify, have silent rituals and this was one of them.  It was
one of the easier ones, too.  You could tell what it asked and know
what to do about it.  The real tests come on you so fast you don't
have time to prepare --except for all of your life up to that
moment.

   Frank was well prepared.  I could see the stock was plain
hardwood without any fancy spacers or little porches for a fellow
to lay his cheek while he squints thru some little telescope. 
Frank told me once he enjoyed bullfights.  I thought that strange
then, but today, at the entrance of a ramp off I-20 in the
afternoon, I understood why.  No one would applaud if the Matador
took out the bull from the stands -- he has to face it.

   It was a Drilling, the way Europeans say it, but we, in our
feigned Proletarian parlance call it an "over and under."  The
bottom, the bigger one, had to be from the '60s because no one
makes them that way anymore.  It was for the 2.4 S Band and it was
adorned in the old way with an animal, a totem I suppose, along
with the legend "Bear Buster." 

   Above it sat the modern one.  It did X at 10.5; K at 24 and, in
the bargain, the Ku at 33 Gc.  It said, "Sharpshooter," and another
animal, a Cobra, coiled on  it.   Those devices were like Frank's
old super-regenerative receivers in that they put out as much
signal as they "detected."  They were wired together to a single
trigger and a line ran from there to a chest crossing bandoleer of
D cells that made Frank, in his bush jacket, look like a comically
miscast Pancho Villa.  The D cells said simply "Ray-O-Vac," but I
noticed Frank's shoe sole had a cat on it and the handy talkie he
answered now bore ducks -- several yellow ones and the legend
"Sleepy Time Sentinel."

   "I need at least 5 points," he told the WARmon, which is what
I call his assistant, on the recrystaled baby monitor.  We  looked
over the trench edge and a three pointer roared by.  It started up
the long, banked incline past us with it's Bug Catcher leaning back
in the wind.  I could not make out the other two antennas, and
Frank just spat some of the 'Bull and said, "an appliance operator,
yeah, but not an old one."

    It seemed we had been there forever, but then it all happened
quickly.  The WARmon called out a 6 pointer and, to Frank's
question, replied, "no tailgaters."  We waited.  I could not have
done it alone.  I thought he decided, for some reason, not to do
it but, at the last minute, he sprung up and, always the follower,
I did too.

   It was a Land Rover, and he told me later he was glad as they
are one of the simple, useful things that are now  "so feminized
as to be perfect fits in a woman's world, but useless in a man's." 
He watched it.  I guessed he might be counting the antennas and
calculating the store-bought appliance each represented.  He did
not say.  Not then.  Not later.  He had the weapon at his side and
in the near-frozen time I noticed it said "Law Enforcement Wideband
Impulse Simulator" in Duco letters on its butt plate.

   He never raised it.  He fired from the hip and stood his ground. 

   You never know what they will do when you hit them.  It might
have come right at us when the hash from 8 thru 30-something Ghz
radiation hit its bank of detectors.  Frank had eye contact, of
course, but he lost it as the guy, a fat guy who looked somehow
familiar, turned to look over his shoulder and, at the same time,
sat on the brakes.  The Rover passed us so close I could smell the
stench of the tires.  But it did not really make the bridge.  It
sideswiped the left side,  then the right, and finally righted
itself.   But a huge, center-loaded whip sheered off and fell to
the old, dry creek bed below.  I looked at Frank to see if we
should go after it.

   "I'm not a trophy hunter," he said, "Let's go."

    We moved quickly then, or as fast as we could go with my
various infirmities, but Fate missed me that day and took Frank. 
His Navy last Brogan slipped into a hole, spat and all.  He fell
and by the time I helped him get it out of the indention, he was
already swelling.  He regarded it cooly, like it was something, or
someone, else despite what must have been significant and growing
pain.

   "I can't go on," he said, "Leave me the LEWIS gun and go on
without me."

   As the WARmon, (who is an ex-Boy Scout if that is possible), and
I lifted Frank onto a stretcher made from sheer-away road sign
posts and the seat cover from the Frazer, I said, "The Spanish
Civil War was over 60 years ago, Frank."

   "Maybe so," he answered.  I saw he was not looking at me, or his
ankle, but at the setting sun.  

   "But tomorrow," he counseled,  "when you wake at first light and
hear the birds, remember that every day is a new war."


Ernest Hemingway, a friend of Frank's, was born in 1899.
 
de ab5L, michael in dallas, MNHopkins@JUNO.com
Student of Tecraft, ICM and Six Meters' Golden age: 1957-58 Box
226841, Dallas, TX  75222   Copyright FMLA XLV

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 07:59:16 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA06237
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:59:15 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA04831;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 07:56:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id EAA23331 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from socrates.nmia.com (socrates.nmia.com [198.59.166.170]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id EAA23326 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 04:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plato.nmia.com(really [198.59.166.165]) by socrates.nmia.com
	via sendmail with smtp
	id <m115Sxm-0033MtC@socrates.nmia.com>
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 05:49:06 -0600 (MDT)
	(Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Apr-19)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 05:49:06 -0600 (MDT)
From: <msix@nmia.com>
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: GB> 7147 Friday nite
In-Reply-To: <660eb703.24c1b357@aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990717053511.11652A-100000@plato.nmia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Great fun - never heard so many stns.
QRN here but all still R5.
Neet sigs. Many neet BAs.
Know it's been tough for some to get 7147 rocks
but a crud-free BA QRG is well worth it.
We couldn't have done it on 7050.
I try to lurk every nite with 2B and AF-67 QRO...

PS: Jack, W7QQQ - what happened to you?
PPS: Tnx to Bob, NA4G for putting a little extra
effort behind this QRG. 

73 - John W7ZFB
1400 Catron SE   Albq, NM 87123
***********************************************************
* Homebrewer since 1947   CW   BoatAnchors    Norcal #930 *
* BA CW freqs - 3578, 7050, 7147, 14050, 21050, 28050     *
***********************************************************


From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 08:45:05 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA06285
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:45:05 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA06744;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id FAA23743 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 05:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from hat-trick.atl.org (atl.org [199.184.215.14]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id FAA23738 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from office (office.atl.org [199.184.215.100])
	by hat-trick.atl.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id IAA11417
	for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:36:34 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <37903030.6FBF@atl.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 08:26:40 +0100
From: BOB DUCKWORTH <bob@atl.org>
Reply-To: bob@atl.org
Organization: Atlanta Technology Library and Museum
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Subject: Re: GB> 7147 Friday nite
References: <Pine.LNX.3.93.990717053511.11652A-100000@plato.nmia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

Square Bob here.

No ant up at the moment.
Dacron failure.
Perhaps next week.
Did hear a few on ground level feedline though.

-bob

From glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu  Sat Jul 17 12:28:46 1999
Return-Path: <glowbugs-owner@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>
Received: from smtp.WPI.EDU (root@smtp.WPI.EDU [130.215.24.62])
	by blargh.wpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA06525
	for <jski@blargh.wpi.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 12:28:44 -0400
Received: from piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (root@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu [129.101.8.252])
	by smtp.WPI.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16476;
	Sat, 17 Jul 1999 12:26:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from domo@localhost) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) id JAA25481 for glowbugs-outgoing; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu: domo set sender to owner-glowbugs using -f
Received: from mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.36]) by piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA25471 for <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>; Sat, 17 Jul 1999 09:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SandyBlaize ([12.73.239.166]) by mtiwmhc01.worldnet.att.net
          (InterMail v03.02.07.07 118-134) with SMTP
          id <19990717161746.OPP2808@SandyBlaize>;
          Sat, 17 Jul 1999 16:17:46 +0000
Message-ID: <000301bed06f$84eca0c0$a6ef490c@SandyBlaize>
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <ebjr@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Heath Reflector" <heath@listserv.tempe.gov>,
        "Glowbugs Reflector" <glowbugs@piobaire.mines.uidaho.edu>,
        "CW Reflector" <cw@qth.net>,
        "BA Reflector 2" <boatanchors@listserv.temp.gov>,
        "BA Reflector" <boatanchors@theporch.com>,
        "Bob, NA4G" <na4g@weedcon1.cropsci.ncsu.edu>,
        "Art WA5OES" <artwinte@sprynet.com>, "Bob AC5AM" <ac5am1@juno.com>,
        "Conard" <ws4s@INFOAVE.NET>, "Darwin" <K5DOA@aol.com>,
        "Dennis W5FRS" <dbrady@us.ibm.com>, "Jack W7QQQ" <jackmead@getnet.com>,
        "Ken Gordon" <keng@uidaho.edu>, "Mike" <ac5p@ionet.net>,
        "Mike K2UXE" <k2uxe@ibm.ne